Convergence of sequences and series: Interactions between visual reasoning and the learner's beliefs about their own role

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-32

  Alcock, Lara ^a   Simpson, Adrian ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

advanced mathematical thinking; beliefs; convergence; definitions; grounded theory; proof; real analysis; representations; sequences; visualization

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644260889     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047051.07646.92     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alcock, L.J.: 2001, Categories, Definitions and Mathematics: Student Reasoning About Objects in Analysis, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Mathematics Education Research Centre, University of Warwick, UK.
2. Alcock, L.J. and Simpson, A.P.: 2001, 'The Warwick Analysis project: practice and theory', in D. Holton (ed.), The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 99-111.
3. Alcock, L.J. and Simpson, A.P.: 2002a, 'Two components in learning to reason using definitions', Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (at the Undergraduate Level), Hersonisoss, Greece, published at www.math.uoc.gr/~ictm2/.
4. Alcock, L.J. and Simpson, A.P.: 2002b, 'Definitions: dealing with categories mathematically', For the Learning of Mathematics 22(2), 28-34.
5. Arcavi, A.: (2003) 'The role of visual representatios in the learning of mathematics', Educational Studies in Mathematics 52, 215-24.
6. Bell, A.W.: 1976, 'A study of pupils' proof-explanations in mathematical situations', Educational Studies in Mathematics 7, 23-40.
7. Burn, R.P.: 1992, Numbers and Functions: Steps into Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Copes, L.: 1982, 'The Perry development scheme: A metaphor for learning and teaching mathematics', For the Learning of Mathematics 3(1), 38-44.
9. Cornu, B.: 1992, 'Limits', in D.O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 153-166.
10. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K. and Vidavovic, D.: 1996, 'Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme', Journal of Mathematical Behaviour 15, 167-192.
11. Davis, P.J.: 1993, 'Visual theorems', Educational Studies in Mathematics 24, 333-344.
12. Davis, R.B. and Vinner, S.: 1986, 'The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages', Journal of Mathematical Behaviour 5(3), 281-303.
13. Dreyfus, T.: 1991, 'On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education', in F. Furinghetti (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Assisi, Italy, pp. 33-48.
14. Dubinsky, E., Elterman, F. and Gong, C.: 1988, 'The student's construction of quantification', For the Learning of Mathematics 8(2), 44-51.
15. Fischbein, E.: 1982, 'Intuition and proof', For the Learning of Mathematics 3(2), 9-24.
16. Fischbein, E.: 1987, Intuition in Science and Mathematics: An Educational Approach, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
17. Gibson, D.: 1998, 'Students' use of diagrams to develop proofs in an introductory analysis course', in A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, and E. Dubinsky (eds.), CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education III, pp. 284-307.
18. Ginsburg, H.: 1981, 'The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: aims, rationales, techniques', For the Learning of Mathematics 1(3), 4-11.
19. Glaser, B.: 1992, Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
20. Harel, G. and Sowder, L.: 1998, 'Students' proof schemes: results from exploratory studies', in A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput and E. Dubinsky (eds.), CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education III, pp. 234-283.
21. Hughes-Hallet, D.: 1991, 'Visualisation and calculus reform', in W. Zimmermann and S. Cunningham (eds.), Visualisation in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, MAA Notes 19, pp. 121-126.
22. Johnson-Laird, P.N. and Byrne, R.M.J.: 1991, Deduction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, MI.
23. Kosslyn, S.M.: 1995, 'Mental imagery', in S.M. Kosslyn and D.N. Osherson (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd ed., Volume 2: Visual Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 267-296.
24. Krutetskii, VA.: 1976, 'Type, age and sex differences in the components of mathematical abilities', in V.A. Krutetskii (eds), The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 313-343.
25. Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. May, T.: 1997, Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process, Open University Press, Buckingham.
27. Mason, J.J.: 2002, 'Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing', Routledge Farmer, London.
28. Monaghan, J.: 1991, 'Problems with the language of limits', For the Learning of Mathematics 11(3), 20-24.
29. Moore, R.C.: 1994, 'Making the transition to formal proof', Educational Studies in Mathematics 27, 249-266.
30. Nelsen, R.B.: 1993, Proofs Without Words: Exercises in Visual Thinking, Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC.
31. Piaget, J.: 1975, The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures, The Viking Press, New York.
32. Pinto, M. and Tall, D.: 2002, 'Building formal mathematics on visual imagery: A case study and a theory', For the Learning of Mathematics 22(1), 2-10.
33. Presmeg, N.C.: 1986, 'Visualisation and mathematical giftedness', Educational Studies in Mathematics 17, 297-311.
34. Schoenfeld, A.H.: 1985, 'Making sense of "out loud" problem-solving protocols', Journal of Mathematical Behaviour 4, 171-191.
35. Schoenfeld, A.H.: 1992, 'Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics', in D.A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 334-370.
36. Sfard, A. and Linchevski, L.: 1994, 'The gains and pitfalls of reification - the case of algebra', Educational Studies in Mathematics 26, 191-228.
37. Sierpinska, A.: 1987, 'Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits', Educational Studies in Mathematics 18, 371-397.
38. Skemp, R.R.: 1976, 'Relational understanding and instrumental understanding', Mathematics Teaching 77, 20-26.
39. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J.: 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, London.
40. Tall, D.O.: 1991, 'Intuition and rigor: the role of visualization in the calculus', in W.S. Zimmemian and S. Cunningham (eds.), Visualization in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, MAA Notes No. 19, Mathematical Association of America. Washington DC, pp. 105-119.
41. Tall, D.O.: 1995, 'Cognitive development, representations and proof', Proceedings of Justifying and Proving in School Mathematics, Institute of Education, London, pp. 27-38.
42. Tall, D.O.: 1997, 'Functions and calculus', in A.J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and C. Laborde (eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 289-325.
43. Tall, D.O. and Vinner, S.: 1981, 'Concept image and concept definition with particular reference to limits and continuity', Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 151-169.
44. Thurston, W.P.: 1995, 'On proof and progress in mathematics', For the Learning of Mathematics 15(1), 29-37.
45. Vinner, S.: 1992, 'The role of definitions in teaching and learning mathematics', in D.O. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 65-81.
46. Watson, A. and Mason, J.: 2002, 'Student-generated examples in the learning of mathematics', Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 2(2), 237-249.
47. Williams, S.R.: 1991, 'Models of limit held by college calculus students', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22(3), 219-236.