Implant positioning in TKA: Comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation

Orthopedics

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2015, Pages e271-e280

  Ferrara, Ferdinando ^a   Cipriani, Antonio ^a   Magarelli, Nicola ^a   Rapisarda, Santi ^a   De Santis, Vincenzo ^a   Burrofato, Aaron ^a   Leone, Antonio ^a   Bonomo, Lorenzo ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RESECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT PLANNING; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VERY ELDERLY; DEVICES; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; SURGERY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84929612745     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: 19382367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150402-54     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dawson J, Linsell L, Zondervan K et al. Epidemiology of hip and knee pain and its impact on overall health status in older adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43:497-504.
2. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Hong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1487-1497.
3. Rasanen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:108-115.
4. Iorio R, Robb WJ, Healy WL, et al. Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1598-1605.
5. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1328-1335.
6. Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X. Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1307-1322.
7. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, et al. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144-153.
8. Incavo SJ, Wild JJ, Coughlin KM, Beynnon BD. Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:131-136.
9. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, et al. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:570-578.
10. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:99-107.
11. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236-243.
12. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:889-894.
13. Iorio R, Bolle G, Conteduca F, et al. Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2296-3000.
14. Jenny JY, Miehlke RK, Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement: a multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee. 2008;15:80-84.
15. Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, et al. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;15:12-16.
16. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF. Initial experience with customfit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1571-1575.
17. Noble JW Jr, Moore CA, Liu N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:153-155.
18. Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, Ollivier M, Le Corroller T, Argenson JN. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2213-2219.
19. Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM, Ford AD, Foreman K, Nunley RM. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:95-99.
20. Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008;31:857-863.
21. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y. Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14:152-156.
22. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:40-47.
23. Hitt K, Shurman JR II, Greene K, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:115-122.
24. Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Ferretti A. Patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014;38:259-265.
25. Roh YW, Kim TW, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3988-3995.
26. MacDessi SJ, Jang B, Harris IA, Wheatley E, Bryant C, Chen DB. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2013;21:406-409.
27. Zihlmann MS, Stacoff A, Romero J, Quervain IK, Stüssi E. Biomechanical background and clinical observations of rotational malalignment in TKA: literature review and consequences. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:661-668.
28. Harman MK, Banks SA, Kirschner S, Lützner J. Prosthesis alignment affects axial rotation motion after total knee replacement: a prospective in vivo study combining computed tomography and fluoroscopic evaluations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:206.
29. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Günther KP, Kirschner S. Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty is better at the medial third of tibial tuberosity than at the medial border. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:57.
30. Brooks P. Seven cuts to the perfect total knee. Orthopedics. 2009;32(9).
31. Waelchli B, Romero J. Dislocation of the polyethylene inlay due to anterior tibial slope in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:296-298.
32. Holme TJ, Henckel J, Cobb J, Hart AJ. Quantification of the difference between 3D CT and plain radiograph for measurement of the position of medial unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee. 2011;18:300-305.
33. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:13-22.
34. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:49-64.
35. Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1149-1154.
36. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143-2149.
37. Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL. Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:169-174.
38. Yaffe MA, Patel A, McCoy BW, et al. Component sizing in total knee arthroplasty: patient-specific guides vs computer-assisted navigation. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2012;57:277-282.
39. Chen JY, Yeo SJ, Yew AK, et al. The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:630-635.
40. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:184-192.