Prosthesis alignment affects axial rotation motion after total knee replacement: A prospective in vivo study combining computed tomography and fluoroscopic evaluations

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Harman, Melinda K ^a,b   Banks, Scott A ^c   Kirschner, Stephan ^d   Lützner, Jörg ^d  

^a AMRL   (United States)

^b RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c University of Florida   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Axial rotation; Implant alignment; Knee arthroplasty; Knee biomechanics; Knee kinematics; Mobile bearing prosthesis; Surgical alignment; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867668984     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-206     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with conventional methods. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC, J Arthroplasty 2005 20 7 Suppl 3 132 138 16214014 (Pubitemid 41425797)
2. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 428 26 34 15534515 (Pubitemid 39506147)
3. Total knee arthroplasty with conventional or navigated technique: Comparison of the learning curves in a community hospital. Daubresse F, Vajeu C, Loquet J, Acta Orthop Belg 2005 71 6 710 713 16459862 (Pubitemid 43088381)
4. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 457 156 162 17195810 (Pubitemid 46573409)
5. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. Lotke PA, Ecker ML, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977 59 1 77 79 833180 (Pubitemid 8030304)
6. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: A randomised prospective trial. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004 86 3 372 377 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14643 15125124 (Pubitemid 38559489)
7. A computerized bioskills system for surgical skills training in total knee replacement. Conditt MA, Noble PC, Thompson MT, Ismaily SK, Moy GJ, Mathis KB, Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2007 221 1 61 69 17315769 (Pubitemid 46443964)
8. Malrotation associated with implant alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty. Eckhoff DG, Metzger RG, Vandewalle MV, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995 321 28 31 7497681
9. Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacement: A comparison of two techniques. Ikeuchi M, Yamanaka N, Okanoue Y, Ueta E, Tani T, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007 89 1 45 49 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1. 17728 17259415 (Pubitemid 46218411)
10. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Akasaki Y, Iwamoto Y, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 8 1025 1031 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20265 18669957
11. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: No difference in functional results at two years. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007 89 4 477 480 10.1302/0301-620X. 89B4.18094 17463115 (Pubitemid 46851126)
12. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 426 180 186 15346071 (Pubitemid 39167127)
13. Transepicondylar axis accuracy in computer assisted knee surgery: A comparison of the CT-based measured axis versus the CAS-determined axis. van der Linden HM, van der Zwaag HM, Valstar ER, van der Molen AJ, Nelissen RG, Comput Aided Surg 2008 13 4 200 206 10.3109/10929080802240134 18622794 (Pubitemid 351990202)
14. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 392 46 55 11716424 (Pubitemid 33054928)
15. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: A comparative prospective randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Günther KP, Kirschner S, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 8 1039 1044 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20553 18669959
16. A prospective randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 2 236 243 17272435 (Pubitemid 46214339)
17. The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Siston RA, Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ, Clin Orthop Rel Res 2006 452 65 69 (Pubitemid 44690644)
18. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 356 144 153 9917679 (Pubitemid 29019483)
19. Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Ohashi H, Yamano Y, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002 402 196 201 12218484 (Pubitemid 35006591)
20. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994 299 31 43 8119035 (Pubitemid 24051697)
21. Less anterior knee pain with mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Schafroth MU, Blankevoort L, Schaap GR, van Dijk CN, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008 466 1959 1965 10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 18523833
22. Determination of neutral tibial rotational alignment in rotating platform TKA. Huddleston JI, Scott RD, Wimberley DW, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005 440 101 106 10.1097/01.blo.0000185448.43622.77 16239791 (Pubitemid 41579200)
23. Medium-term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Kaper BP, Smith PN, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Robertson D, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999 367 201 209 10546616 (Pubitemid 29503696)
24. Motion of a mobile bearing knee allowing translation and rotation. Walker PS, Komistek RD, Barrett DS, Anderson D, Dennis DA, Sampson M, J Arthroplasty 2002 17 1 11 19 10.1054/arth.2002.28731 12068395 (Pubitemid 34098197)
25. Dynamic in-vivo tibio-femoral and bearing motions in mobile bearing knee arthroplasty. Fantozzi S, Leardini A, Banks SA, Marcacci M, Giannini S, Catani F, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004 12 2 144 151 10.1007/s00167-003- 0384-5 15024562 (Pubitemid 40883828)
26. In vivo kinematics of the Low Contract Stress rotating platform total knee. Haas BD, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Orthopedics 2002 25 2 Supplement 219 226
27. In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997 345 60 66 9418622 (Pubitemid 28007487)
28. Relative motion of a mobile bearing inlay after total knee arthroplasty: A dynamic in vitro study. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Wenger KH, Wirth CJ, Clin Biomech 2002 17 49 55 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00103-6 (Pubitemid 34098776)
29. A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. der Zwaag HMJ VdL-v, Bos J, van der Heide HJL, Nelissen RGHH, Int Orthop 2011 35 845 850 10.1007/s00264-010-1082-9 20623282
30. The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation. Jazrawi LM, Birdzell L, Kummer FJ, Di Cesare PE, J Arthrop 2000 15 6 761 766 10.1054/arth.2000.8193
31. The effect of femoral component rotation on the kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints after total knee arthroplasty. Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Iranpour F, Deehan DJ, Amis AA, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011 19 1479 1487 10.1007/s00167-011-1499-8 21484388
32. Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. Nicoll D, Rowley DI, J Bone Joint Surg 2010 92B 1238 1244
33. Biomechanical background and clinical observations of rotational malalignment in TKA: Literature review and consequences. Zihlmann MS, Stacoff A, Romero J, Quervain IK, Stüssi E, Clin Biomech 2005 20 661 668 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.03.014 (Pubitemid 40917234)
34. The effect of femoral component position on the kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Tullos HS, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993 286 122 129 8425333 (Pubitemid 23059477)
35. Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. Banks SA, Hodge WA, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996 43 638 649 10.1109/10.495283 8987268 (Pubitemid 26158677)
36. Mobile-bearing insert translational and rotational kinematics in a PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Chouteau J, Lerat JL, Testa R, Moyen B, Fessy MH, Banks SA, Ortho Traum Surg Res 2009 95 254 259 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03. 012
37. A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J, Bellemans J, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006 88 8 1016 1021 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17529 16877599
38. Does ligament balancing technique affect kinematics in rotating platform PCL retaining knee arthroplasties? A prospective randomized study. Gamada K, Jayasekera N, Kashif F, Fennema P, Schmotzer H, Banks SA, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008 16 2 160 166 10.1007/s00167-007-0447-0 18058086
39. Limited rotation of the mobile-bearing in a rotating platform total knee prosthesis. Garling EH, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RGHH, Valstar ER, J Biomech 2007 40 Suppl 1 25 S30 17433337
40. Extensor malalignment arising from femoral component malrotation in knee arthroplasty: Effect of rotating-bearing. Colwell CW, Chen PC, D'Lima D, Clin Biomech 2011 26 52 57 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.009
41. Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study. Lützner J, Günther KP, Kirschner S, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010 18 1339 1344 10.1007/s00167-010-1153-x 20442982