Comparison of methods for generating sensory vocabulary with consumers: A case study with two types of satiating foods

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 44, Issue , 2015, Pages 111-118

  Fiszman, Susana ^a   Salgado, Natalia ^b   Orrego, Carlos E ^b   Ares, Gastón ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Descriptor generation; Open ended questions; Repertory grid; Satiating foods; Vocabulary

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929576717     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Antmann G., Ares G., Salvador A., Varela P., Fiszman S.M. Exploring and explaining creaminess perception: Consumers' underlying concepts. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:40-47.
2. Ares G., Giménez A., Barreiro C., Gámbaro A. Use of an openended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:286-294.
3. Lexicon for sensory evaluation: Aroma, flavor, texture, and appearance 2011, ASTM, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
4. Carr B.T., Craig-Petsinger D., Hadlich S. A case study in relating sensory descriptive data to product concept fit and consumer vocabulary. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:407-412.
5. Chambers L., McCrickerd K., Yeomans M.R. Optimising foods for satiety. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2015, 41:149-160.
6. Childs J.L., Yates M.D., Drake M.A. Sensory properties of meal replacement bars and beverages made from whey and soy proteins. Journal of Food Science 2007, 72:S425-S434.
7. Chollet S., Valentin D. Impact of training on beer flavor perception and description: Are trained and untrained subjects really different?. Journal of Sensory Studies 2001, 16:601-618.
8. Dairou V., Sieffermann J.-M. A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the flash profile. Journal of Food Science 2002, 67:826-834.
9. De Graaf C. Texture and satiation: The role of oro-sensory exposure time. Physiology & Behavior 2012, 107:496-501.
10. Drake M.A., Civille G.V. Flavor lexicons. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2003, 2:33-40.
11. Drake M.A., Jones V.S., Russell T., Harding R., Gerard P.D. Comparison of lexicons for descriptive analysis of whey and soy proteins in New Zealand and the U.S.A. Journal of Sensory Studies 2007, 22:433-452.
12. Gains N. The repertory grid approach. Measurement of food preferences 1994, 51-76. Blackie Academic & Professional, London. H.J.H. MacFie, D.M.H. Thomson (Eds.).
13. Galmarini M.V., Symoneaux R., Chollet S., Zamora M.C. Understanding apple consumers' expectations in terms of likes and dislikes. Use of comment analysis in a cross-cultural study. Appetite 2013, 62:27-36.
14. Guerrero L., Gou P., Arnau J. Descriptive analysis of toasted almonds: A comparison between expert and semi-trained assessors. Journal of Sensory Studies 1997, 12:39-54.
15. Hayakawa F., Kazami Y., Wakayama H., Oboshi R., Tanaka H., Maeda G., et al. Sensory lexicon of brewed coffee for Japanese consumers, untrained coffee professionals and trained coffee tasters. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:917-939.
16. Halford J.C.G., Harrold J.A. Satiety-enhancing products for appetite control: Science and regulation of functional foods for weight management. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2012, 71:350-362.
17. Heenan S.P., Hamid N., Dufour J.-P., Harvey W., Delahunty C.M. Consumer freshness perceptions of breads, biscuits and cakes. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:380-390.
18. Hersleth M., Berggren R., Westad F., Martens M. Perception of bread: A comparison of consumers and trained assessors. Journal of Food Science 2005, 70:S95-S101.
19. Hogenkamp P.S., Stafleu A., Mars M., Brunstrom J.M., de Graaf C. Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products. Appetite 2011, 57:635-641.
20. Jaeger S.R., Andani Z., Wakeling I.N., Macfie H.J.H. Consumer preference for fresh and aged apples: A cross cultural comparison. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:355-366.
21. Kelly G. The psychology of personal constructs 1955, Norton, New York, NY.
22. Lawless L.J.R., Civille G.V. Developing lexicons: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 2013, 28:270-281.
23. Lawless H., Vanne M., Tuorila H. Categorization of English and finnish texture terms among consumers and food professionals. Journal of Texture Studies 1997, 28:687-708.
24. Marcano J., Ares G., Fiszman S. Comparison of partial and global projective mapping with consumers: Case study with satiating cheese pies. Food Research International 2015, 67:323-330.
25. McCrickerd K., Chambers L., Brunstrom J.M., Yeomans M.R. Subtle changes in the flavour and texture of a drink enhance expectations of satiety. Flavour 2012, 1:20. .
26. Mcewan J.A., Colwill J.S., Thomson D.M.H. The application of two free choice profile methods to investigate the sensory characteristics of chocolate. Journal of Sensory Studies 1989, 3:271-286.
27. McNeill K.L., Sanders T.H., Civille G.V. Using focus groups to develop a quantitative consumer questionnaire for peanut butter. Journal of Sensory Studies 2000, 15:163-178.
28. Nuessli Guth, J., & Wagner, D. (2009). Sensory language from a linguistic perspective - New ways in better understanding taste communication. In In 8th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium. Florence, Italy.
29. Pagès J., Bertrand C., Ali R., Husson F., Lê S. Sensory analysis comparison of eight biscuits by French and Pakistani panels. Journal of Sensory Studies 2007, 22:665-686.
30. Piggott J.R., Sheen M.R., Apostolidou S.G. Consumer perceptions of alcoholic beverages. Food Quality and Preference 1991, 2:177-185.
31. Piggott J.R., Watson M.P. A comparison of free-choice profiling and the repertory grid method in the flavor profiling of cider. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 7:133-145.
32. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
33. Ryle A., Lunghi M. The dyad grid: A modification of the repertory grid technique. British Journal of Psychiatry 1970, 117:323-327.
34. Smith V., Møgelvang-Hansen P., Hyldigc G. Spin versus fair speak in food labelling: A matter of taste?. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:1016-1025.
35. Solomon G.E.A. Psychology of novice and expert wine talk. American Journal of Psychology 1990, 103:495-517.
36. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., van Trijp H.C.M. Attribute elicitation in marketing research: A comparison of three procedures. Marketing Letters 1997, 8:153-165.
37. Swahn J., Öström Å., Larsson U., Gustafsson I.-B. Sensory and semantic language model for red apples. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:591-615.
38. Symoneaux R., Galmarini M.V. Open-ended questions. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling 2014, 307-332. CRC Press, Boca Raton. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
39. Symoneaux R., Galmarini M.V., Mehinagic E. Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:59-66.
40. Szczesniak A.S. Texture is a sensory property. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:215-225.
41. Tarancón P., Fiszman S.M., Salvador A., Tárrega A. Formulating biscuits with healthier fats. Consumer profiling of textural and flavor sensations during consumption. Food Research International 2013, 53:134-140.
42. Tárrega A., Martínez M., Vélez-Ruiz J.F., Fiszman S. Hydrocolloids as a tool for modulating the expected satiety of milk-based snacks. Food Hydrocolloids 2014, 39:51-57.
43. Tárrega A., Tarancón P. Free-choice profile combined with repertory grid method. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling 2014, 157-174. CRC Press, Boca Raton. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
44. ten Kleij F., Musters P.A.D. Text analysis of open-ended survey responses: A complementary method to preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:43-52.
45. Thomson D.M., McEwan J.A. An application of the repertory grid method to investigate consumer perceptions of foods. Appetite 1988, 10:181-193.
46. Tournier C., Martin C., Guichard E., Issanchou S., Sulmont-Rosse C. Contribution to the understanding of consumers' creaminess concept. A sensory and a verbal approach. International Dairy Journal 2007, 17:555-564.
47. Veinand B., Godefroy, Adam C., Delarue J. Highlight of important product characteristics for consumers. Comparison of three sensory descriptive methods performed by consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:474-485.
48. Wansink B., Painter J. Descriptive menu labels effect on sales. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 2001, 42:68-72.
49. Williams A.A., Langron S.P. The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1984, 35:558-568.
50. Yeomans M.R., Chambers L. Satiety-relevant sensory qualities enhance the satiating effects of mixed carbohydrate-protein preloads. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011, 94:1410-1417.
51. Yeomans M.R., McCrickerd K., Brunstrom J.M., Chambers L. Effects of repeated consumption on sensory-enhanced satiety. British Journal of Nutrition 2014, 111:1137-1144.