Motivational and metacognitive feedback in SQL-Tutor*

Computer Science Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 238-256

  Hull, Alison ^a   du Boulay, Benedict ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

feedback; intelligent tutoring systems; metacognition; motivation; past experiences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929516090     PISSN: 08993408     EISSN: 17445175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1033143     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. S.Alexander,, A.Sarrafzadeh,, & S.Hill, (2006). Easy with eve: A functional affective tutoring system. In G.Rebolledo-Mendez & E.Martinez-Miron (Eds.), Workshop on motivational and affective issues in ITS, 8th international conference on ITS 2006 (pp. 38–45). Jhongli, Taiwan.
2. C.Ames, (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
3. I.Arroyo,, B.Woolf,, W.Burelson,, K.Muldner,, D.Rai,, & M.Tai, (2014). A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 387–426.10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y
4. A.Bandura, (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5. D.Barrow,, A.Mitrovic,, S.Ohlsson,, & M.Grimley, (2008). Assessing the impact of positive feedback in constraint-based tutors. In B.P.Woolf, E.Aïmeur, R.Nkambou, & S.Lajoie (Eds.), 9th international conference of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS2008) (pp. 250–259). Montreal, Canada.
6. C.R.Beal,, & H.Lee, (2005). Creating a pedagogical model that uses student self reports of motivation and mood to adapt ITS instruction. Workshop on motivation and affect in educational software. 12th international conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 39–46). Amsterdam, Netherlands.
7. M.Ben-Ari, (2001). Constructivism in computer science education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20, 45–73.
8. N.C.Boreham, (1987). Learning from experience in diagnostic problem solving. In J.T.E.Richardson, M.W.Eysenck, & D.W.Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 89–97). Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
9. C.Conati,, & H.Maclaren, (2005). Data-driven refinement of a probabilistic model of user affect. Proceedings of 10th international conference UM’05 (pp. 40–49). Edinburgh: Springer-Verlag.
10. B.du Boulay,, K.Avramides,, R.Luckin,, E.Martínez-Mirón,, G.Rebolledo-Mendez,, & A.Carr, (2010). Towards systems that care: A conceptual framework based on motivation, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20 (3), 197–229.
11. S.K.D’Mello,, S.D.Craig,, A.Witherspoon,, B.McDaniel,, & A.Graesser, (2008). Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18, 45–80.10.1007/s11257-007-9037-6
12. T.Del Soldato,, & B.du Boulay, (1995). Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6, 337–378.
13. A.de Vicente,, & H.Pain, (2003). Validating the detection of a student’s motivational state. In A.Mendez Vilas, J.A.Mesa Gonzalez, & J.Mesa Gonzalez (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference on multimedia information & communication technologies in education (m-ICTE2003), (2004–2008). Merida: Junta de Extramadura.
14. A.Graesser,, P.Chipman,, B.King,, B.McDaniel,, & S.D’Mello, (2007). Emotions and Learning with AutoTutor. Proceedings of artificial intelligence in education: Building technology rich learning contexts, AIED 2007 (pp. 569–571). Los Angeles, CA.
15. A.C.Graesser,, G.T.Jackson,, & B.McDaniel, (2007). AutoTutor holds conversations with learners that are responsive to their cognitive and emotional states. Educational Technology, 47, 19–22.
16. A.C.Graesser,, N.K.Person,, D.Harter,, & TRG. (2001). Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 257–279.
17. Y.Hernández,, & L.E.Sucar, (2007). User study to evaluate an affective behavior model in an educational game. 13th international conference on artificial intelligence in education, AIED 2007, Workshop on modeling and scaffolding affective experiences to impact learning (pp. 57–66). Marina del Rey, CA.
18. C.B.Hodges, (2004). Designing to motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate in e-learning experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 1–7.
19. G.S.Howard, (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 399–404.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
20. A.Hull, (2014). Motivational and metacognitive feedback in an ITS: Linking past states and experiences to current problems (Doctor of Philosophy). Brighton: University of Sussex.
21. B.Kort,, R.Reilly,, & R.W.Picard, (2001). External representation of learning process and domain knowledge: Affective state as a determinate of its structure and function. AI-ED 2001, Workshop: External representations in AIED: Mutliple forms and multiple roles. San Antonio, TX.
22. R.Luckin,, & B.du Boulay, (1999). Ecolab: The development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 198–220.
23. R.Luckin,, & L.Hammerton, (2002). Getting to know me: Helping learners understand their own learning needs through metacognitive scaffolding. Proceedings of the sixth conference on intelligent tutoring systems, Biarritz, France (pp. 759–771). Berlin: Springer.
24. W.Ma,, O.O.Adesope,, J.C.Nesbit,, & Q.Liu, (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0037123
25. M.A.Mark,, & J.E.Greer, (1995). The VCR tutor: Effective instruction for device operation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 209–246.10.1207/s15327809jls0402_3
26. M.Mathews, (2012). A framework for multiple adaptable pedagogical strategies in intelligent tutoring systems (Doctor of Philosophy). University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
27. R.E.Mayer, (2003). Memory and information processes. In W.M.Reynolds, G.E.Miller, & I.B.E.I.C.Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 47–57). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0703
28. A.Mitrovic, (2007). SQL-Tutor: An ITS for SQL programming. Retrieved August 21, 2014, from http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/tanja.mitrovic/sql-tutor.html
29. A.Mitrovic, (2012). Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: What we have achieved and where we are going. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22, 39–72.10.1007/s11257-011-9105-9
30. A.Mitrovic,, & ICTG Team. (2006). Large-scale deployment of three intelligent web-based database tutors. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 14, 275–281 Reprinted from V. Luzar & V. Hljuz-Dobric (Eds.), (2006, June 19–22). Proc. ITI 2006 (pp. 135–140). Cavtat, Croatia.
31. A.Mitrovic,, & S.Ohlsson, (1999). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238–256.
32. A.Najar,, A.Mitrovic,, & K.Neshatian, (2014). Utilizing eye tracking to improve learning from examples. In C.Stephanidis & M.Antona (Eds.), Universal access in human–computer interaction. Universal access to information and knowledge (pp. 410–418). Switzerland: Springer.
33. S.Ohlsson, (1994). Constraint-based student modeling. In J.Greer & G.Mccalla (Eds.), Student modelling: The key to individualized knowledge-based instruction (pp. 167–189). Berlin: Springer.
34. F.Pajares, (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M.Maehr & P.R.Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
35. S.G.Paris,, & P.Winograd, (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B.F.Jones & L.Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction: Implications for educational reform (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. P.R.Pintrich, (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
37. K.Porayska-Pomsta,, M.Mavrikis,, S.D’Mello,, C.Conati,, & R.Baker, (2012). Contemporary methods for learner affect modelling. In B.du Boulay, R.Luckin, K.Porayska-Pomsta, & I.Arroyo (Eds.), In the mood for learning (Cogsci Research Paper number: 603, pp. 2–26). Brighton: Department of Informatics, Sussex University.
38. K.Porayska-Pomsta,, M.Mavrikis,, S.D’Mello,, C.Conati,, & R.Baker,. (2013). Knowledge elicitation methods for affect modelling in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22, 107–140.
39. S.I.Robertson, (2001). Problem solving. Hove: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203457955
40. A.Sarrafzadeh,, S.Alexander,, F.Dadgostar,, C.Fan,, & A.Bigdeli, (2008). “How do you know that I don’t understand?” A look at the future of intelligent tutoring systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1342–1363.10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.008
41. D.H.Schunk,, P.R.Pintrich,, & J.L.Meece, (2007). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
42. D.Thomson,, & A.Mitrovic, (2010). Preliminary evaluation of a negotiable student model in a constraint-based ITS. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5, 19–33.10.1142/S1793206810000797
43. K.VanLehn, (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46, 197–221.10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
44. G.Weber, (1996a). Episodic learner modeling. Cognitive Science, 20, 195–236.10.1207/s15516709cog2002_2
45. G.Weber, (1996b). Individual selection of examples in an intelligent learning environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7, 3–31.
46. G.Weber,, & P.Brusilovsky, (2001). ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 351–384.
47. G.M.Weinberg, (1971). The psychology of computer programming. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.