Role of mechanical cues in cell differentiation and proliferation: A 3D numerical model

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Mousavi, Seyed Jamaleddin ^a,b   Hamdy Doweidar, Mohamed ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARTILAGE CELL; CELL ASSAY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPECIFICITY; CELLULAR, SUBCELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANOSENSING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NEUROBLAST; OSTEOBLAST; PHENOTYPE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ALGORITHM; APOPTOSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL COUNT; CHONDROCYTE; CYTOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL;

ALGORITHMS; APOPTOSIS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL COUNT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHONDROCYTES; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OSTEOBLASTS; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84929377407     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124529     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006; 126:677-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 PMID: 16923388
2. Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS, Shvartsman D, Ali OA, Bencherif SA, et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater. 2010; 9:518-26. doi: 10.1038/nmat2732 PMID: 20418863
3. Li D, Zhou J, Chowdhury F, Cheng J, Wang N, Wang F. Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells. Regen Med. 2011; 6(2):229-40. doi: 10.2217/rme.11.2 PMID: 21391856
4. Palomares KT, Gleason RE, Mason ZD, Cullinane DM, Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC, et al. Mechanical stimulation alters tissue differentiation and molecular expression during bone healing. J Orthop Res. 2009; 27(9):1123-32. doi: 10.1002/jor.20863 PMID: 19242967
5. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999; 284(5411):143-7. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143 PMID: 10102814
6. Maul TM, Chew DW, Nieponice A, Vorp DA. Mechanical stimuli differentially control stem cell behavior: morphology, proliferation, and differentiation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011;p. 939-53.
7. Subramony SD, Dargis BR, Castillo M, Azeloglu EU, Tracey MS, Su A, et al. The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation. Biomaterials. 2013; 34(8):1942-53. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.012 PMID: 23245926
8. Pierce JH, Marco ED, Cox GW, Lombardi D, Ruggiero M, Varesio L, et al. Macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1) induces proliferation, chemotaxis, and reversible monocytic differentiation in myeloid progenitor cells transfected with the human c-fms/CSF-1 receptor cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1990; 87(15):5613-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5613 PMID: 2165597
9. Lee DA, Knight MM, Campbell JJ, Bader DL. Stem cell mechanobiology. J Cell Biochem. 2011; 112(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22758 PMID: 20626029
10. Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KE, Sacco A, Leonardi NA, Kraft P, et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science. 2010; 329:1078-81. doi: 10.1126/science.1191035 PMID: 20647425
11. Pauwels F. A new theory concerning the influence of mechanical stimuli on the differentiation of the supporting tissues. Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus. 1980;p. 375-407.
12. Delaine-Smith RM, Gwendolen CR. Mesenchymal stem cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2012; 2(3):169-80. PMID: 23738294
13. Lee Y, Huang J, Wangc Y, Lin K. Three-dimensional fibroblast morphology on compliant substrates of controlled negative curvature. Integr Biol. 2013;p. 10.1039/C3IB40161H.
14. Carter DR, Blenman PR, Beaupré GS. Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1988; 7:398-407.
15. Claes LE, Heigele CA. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the coarse and type of fracture healing. Journal of Biomechanics. 1999; 32:255-66. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00153-5 PMID: 10093025
16. GERIS L, OOSTERWYCK HV, SLOTEN JV, DUYCK J, NAERT I. Assessment of Mechanobiological Models for the Numerical Simulation of Tissue Differentiation around Immediately Loaded Implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2003; 6:277-88. doi: 10.1080/10255840310001634412 PMID: 14675948
17. Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ. Mechano-regulation of stem cell differentiation and tissue regeneration in osteochondral defects. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005; 38(7):1413-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.06.026 PMID: 15922752
18. Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ. A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. Journal of Biomechanics. 2002; 35:1163-71. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00086-6 PMID: 12163306
19. Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ, Li G, Marsh D. Biomechanical model of simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: application to fracture healing. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 2002; 40:14-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02347690 PMID: 11954702
20. Kang KT, Park JH, Kim HJ, Lee HM, Lee KI, Jung HH, et al. Study on Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Mechanical Stimuli and an Algorithm for Bone Fracture Healing. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2011; 8(4):359-70.
21. Stops AJ, Heraty KB, Browne M, O'Brien FJ, McHugh PE. A prediction of cell differentiation and proliferation within a collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold subjected to mechanical strain and perfusive fluid flow. J Biomech. 2010; 43(4):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.037 PMID: 19939388
22. Mousavi SJ, Doblaré M, Doweidar MH. Computational modelling of multi-cell migration in a multi-signalling substrate. Physical Biology. 2014; 11(2):026002 (17pp). doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/11/2/026002 PMID: 24632566
23. Mousavi SJ, Doweidar MH, Doblaré M. 3D computational modelling of cell migration: A mechanochemo-thermo-electrotaxis approach. J Theor Biol. 2013; 329:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.03.021 PMID: 23571009
24. Mousavi SJ, Doweidar MH, Doblaré M. Computational modelling and analysis of mechanical conditions on cell locomotion and cell-cell interaction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014; 17(6):678-93. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2012.710841 PMID: 22871181
25. Mousavi S, Doweidar MH. Three-Dimensional Numerical Model of Cell Morphology during Migration in Multi-Signaling Substrates. Plos One. 2015;accepted paper. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 PMID: 25822332
26. Mousavi SJ, Doweidar MH, Doblaré M. Cell migration and cell-cell interaction in the presence of mechano-chemo-thermotaxis. Mol Cell Biomech. 2013; 10(1):1-25. PMID: 24010243
27. Allena R, Aubry D. Run-and-tumble or look-and-run? A mechanical model to explore the behavior of a migrating amoeboid cell. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2012; 306:15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.03.041 PMID: 22726805
28. Allena R. Cell migration with multiple pseudopodia: temporal and spatial sensing models. Bull Math Biol. 2013; 75(2):288-316. doi: 10.1007/s11538-012-9806-1 PMID: 23319383
29. Wehrle-Haller B, Imhof BA. Actin, microtubules and focal adhesion dynamics during cell migration. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2003; 35(1):39-50. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00071-7
30. Mousavi SJ, Doweidar MH. A Novel Mechanotactic 3D Modeling of Cell Morphology. J Phys Biol. 2014; 11(4):.
31. Zaman MH, Kamm RD, Matsudaira P, Lauffenburgery DA. Computational Model for Cell Migration in Three-Dimensional Matrices. Biophysical Journal. 2005; 89:1389-1397. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.060723 PMID: 15908579
32. James DW, Taylor JF. The stress developed by sheets of chick fibroblasts in vitro. Experimental Cell Research. 1969; 54:107-110. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90299-7 PMID: 5771088
33. Ramtani S. Mechanical modelling of cell/ECM and cell/cell interactions during the contraction of a fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere:theory and model simulation. Journal of Biomechanics. 2004; 37:1709-1718. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.01.028 PMID: 15388313
34. Palsson E. A three-dimensional model of cell movement in multicellular systems. Future Generation Computer System. 2001; 17:835-852. doi: 10.1016/S0167-739X(00)00062-5
35. Taylor DL, Heiple J, Wang YL, Luna EJ, Tanasugarn L, Brier J, et al. Cellular and molecular aspects of amoeboid movement. CSH Symp Quant Biol. 1982; 46:101-111. doi: 10.1101/SQB.1982.046.01.014
36. Brofland GW, Wiebe CJ. Mechanical effects of cell anisotropy on epithelia. Computer Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2004; 7(2):91-99. doi: 10.1080/1025584042000209369
37. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005; 310:1139-43. doi: 10.1126/science.1116995 PMID: 16293750
38. Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, Rozenberg GI, Gefen A, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005; 8:241-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010 PMID: 16169468
39. Gladman SJ, Ward RE, Michael-Titus AT, Knight MM, Priestley JV. The effect of mechanical strain or hypoxia on cell death in subpopulations of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro. Neuroscience. 2010; 171(2):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.009 PMID: 20674687
40. Harrison NC, del Corral RD, Vasiev B. Coordination of Cell Differentiation and Migration in Mathematical Models of Caudal Embryonic Axis Extension. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:e22700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022700 PMID: 21829483
41. Kearney EM, Prendergast PJ, Campbell VA. Mechanisms of strain-mediated mesenchymal stem cell apoptosis. J Biomech Eng. 2008; 130(6):061004. doi: 10.1115/1.2979870 PMID: 19045533
42. Ulrich TA, Pardo EMDJ, Kumar S. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Research. 2009; 69:4167-4174. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4859 PMID: 19435897
43. Kurpinski K, Chu J, Hashi C, Li S. Anisotropic mechanosensing by mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103:16095-100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604182103 PMID: 17060641
44. Wozniak MA, Chen CS. Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10:34-43. doi: 10.1038/nrm2592 PMID: 19197330
45. Prokharaua PA, Vermolena FJ, Garcia-Aznar JM. A mathematical model for cell differentiation, as an evolutionary and regulated process. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014; 17(10):1051-70. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2012.736503
46. Cullinane DM, Salisbury KT, Alkhiary Y, Eisenberg S. Effects of the local mechanical environment on vertebrate tissue differentiation during repair: does repair recapitulate development. J Exp Biol. 2003; 206:2459-71. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00453 PMID: 12796461
47. Wu QQ, Chen Q. Mechanoregulation of Chondrocyte Proliferation, Maturation, and Hypertrophy: Ion-Channel Dependent Transduction of Matrix Deformation Signals. Exp Cell Res. 2000; 256(2):383-91. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4847 PMID: 10772811
48. Fouliarda S, Benhamidaa S, Lenuzzab N, Xaviera F. Modeling and simulation of cell populations interaction. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2009; 49(11):2104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.07.003
49. Théry M, Bornens M. Cell shape and cell division. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2006; 18(6):648-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.10.001 PMID: 17046223
50. Brown G, Hughesa PJ, Michell RH. Cell differentiation and proliferation-simultaneous but independent? Exp Cell Res. 2003; 291:282-288.
51. Shi N, Chen SY. Mechanisms simultaneously regulate smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation. J Biomed Res. 2014; 28(1):40-6. doi: 10.7555/JBR.28.20130130 PMID: 24474962
52. Hibbit, Karlson, Sorensen. Abaqus-Theory manual; 2011.
53. Akiyama SK, Yamada KM. The interaction of plasma fibronectin with fibroblastic cells in suspension. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1985; 260(7):4492-4500. PMID: 3920218
54. Schafer A, Radmacher M. Influence of myosin II activity on stiffness of fibroblast cells. Acta Biomaterialia. 2005; 1:273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.02.004 PMID: 16701806
55. Oster GF, Murray JD, Harris AK. Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1983; 78:83-125. PMID: 6663234
56. Penelope CG, Janmey PA. Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. Journal Applied Physiology. 2005; 98:1547-1553. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01121.2004
57. Isaksson H, Wilson W, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, Ito K. Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing. J Biomech. 2006; 39(8):1507-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.037 PMID: 15972212
58. Solon J, Leventa I, Sengupta K, Georges PC, Janmey PA. Fibroblast Adaptation and Stiffness Matching to Soft Elastic Substrates. Biophys J. 2007; 93(12):4453-61. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.101386 PMID: 18045965
59. Evans ND, Minelli C, Gentleman E, LaPointe V, Patankar SN, Kallivretaki M, et al. Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. Eur Cell Mater. 2009; 18:1-14. PMID: 19768669
60. Fu J, Wang YK, Yang MT, Desai RA, Yu X, Liu Z, et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nature Methods. 2010; 7:733-736. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1487 PMID: 20676108
61. Buxboim A, Ivanovska IL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in? Journal of cell science. 2010; 123:297-308.
62. Zemel A, Rehfeldt F, Brown AE, Discher DE, Safran SA. Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. Nat Phys. 2010; 6:468-473. doi: 10.1038/nphys1613 PMID: 20563235
63. Burke DP, Kelly DJ. Substrate Stiffness and Oxygen as Regulators of Stem Cell Differentiation during Skeletal Tissue Regeneration: A Mechanobiological Model. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(7):e40737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040737 PMID: 22911707
64. Hera GJ, Wub HC, Chenc MH, Chene MY, Change SC, Wanga TW. Control of three-dimensional substrate stiffness to manipulate mesenchymal stem cell fate toward neuronal or glial lineages. Acta Biomaterialia. 2013; 9(2):5170-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.012
65. Friedland JC, Lee MH, Boettiger D. Mechanically activated integrin switch controls α5β1 function. Science. 2009; 323:642-44. doi: 10.1126/science.1168441 PMID: 19179533