3D computational modelling of cell migration: A mechano-chemo-thermo-electrotaxis approach

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 329, Issue , 2013, Pages 64-73

  Mousavi, Seyed Jamaleddin ^a,b   Doweidar, Mohamed Hamdy ^a,b   Doblaré, Manuel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chemotaxis; Electrotaxis; Mechanotaxis; Single cell migration; Thermotaxis

Indexed keywords

CELL ORGANELLE; CHEMOTAXIS; MOTILITY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

ARTICLE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROTAXIS; MECHANOTAXIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMOTAXIS;

ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL SHAPE; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HOT TEMPERATURE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84877091201     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Akiyama S.K., Yamada K.M. The interaction of plasma fibronectin with fibroblastic cells in suspension. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260:4492-4500.
2. Allena R., Aubry D. Run-and-tumble or look-and-run? A mechanical model to explore the behavior of a migrating amoeboid cell. J. Theor. Biol. 2012, 306:15-31.
3. Andrew N., Insall R.H. Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of ptdlns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:193-200.
4. Barker A.T., Jaffe L.F., Vanable J.W. The glabrous epidermis of cavies contains a powerful battery. Am. J. Physiol. 1982, 242:R358-R366.
5. Behesti H., Marino S. Cerebellar granule cells. insights into proliferation, differentiation, and role in medulloblastoma pathogenesis. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 41:435-445.
6. Bosgraaf L., Van Haastert P.J.M. Navigation of chemotactic cells by parallel signaling to pseudopod persistence and orientation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6842.
7. Buxboim A., Ivanovska I.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus. how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in?. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:297-308.
8. Chang P.C.T., Soong H.G., Sulik G.L., Parkinson W.C. Galvanotropic and galvanotactic responses of corneal endothelial cells. Formos. Med. Assoc. J. 1996, 95:623-627.
9. Chiang M., Robinson K.R., Vanable J.W. Electrical fields in the vicinity of epithelial wounds in the isolated bovine eye. Exp. Eye Res. 1992, 54:999-1003.
10. Chirag B.K., Shelly R.P., Andrew J.P. Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic mc3t3-e1 cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2006, 290:C1640-C1650.
11. Choo B.H., Donna R.F., Kenneth L.P. Thermotaxis of dictyostelium discoideum amoebae and its possible role in pseudoplasmodial thermotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80:5646-5649.
12. Cooper M.S., Shliwa M. Motility of cultured fish epidermal cells in the presence and absence of direct current electric fields. J. Cell Biol. 1986, 102:1384-1399.
13. Dalton B.A., Walboomers X.F., Dziegielewski M., Evans M.D.M., Taylor S., Jansen J.A., Steele J.G. Modulation of epithelial tissue and cell migration by microgrooves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 2001, 56:195-207.
14. + channel activity. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114:2697-2705.
15. Eisenbach M., Bahat A. Sperm thermotaxis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2006, 252:115-119.
16. Elliott Ch.M., Stinner B., Venkataraman Ch. Modelling cell motility and chemotaxis with evolving surface finite elements. J. R. Soc. Interface 2012, 9(76):3027-3044.
17. Etienne-Manneville S. Polarity proteins in migration and invasion. Oncogene 2008, 27:6970-6980.
18. Fraser S.P., Diss J.K.J., Mycielska M.E., Coombes R.C., Djamgoz M.B.A. Voltage-gated sodium channel expression in human breast cancer: possible functional role in metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2002, 76:S142.
19. Gao R.C., Zhang X.D., Sun Y.H., Kamimura Y., Mogilner A., Devreotes P.N., Zhao M. Different roles of membrane potentials in electrotaxis and chemotaxis of dictyostelium cells. Eukaryotic Cell 2011, 10. 10.1128/EC.05066-11.
20. Grahn J.C., Reilly D.A., Nuccitelli R.L., Isseroff R.R. Melanocytes do not migrate directionally in physiological dc electric fields. Wound Repair Regen. 2003, 11:64-70.
21. Van Haastert P.J.M. Chemotaxis: insights from the extending pseudopod. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:3031-3037.
22. Hibbit, Karlson, Sorensen, 2011. Abaqus-Theory Manual, 6.11-3 edition.
23. Higazi A.A., Kniss D., Manuppelloand J., Barnathan E.S., Cines D.B. Thermotaxis of human trophoblastic cells. Placenta 1996, 17:683-687.
24. Hoeller O., Kay R.R. Chemotaxis in the absence of pip3 gradients. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:813-817.
25. Huang Yao-X., Zheng X.J., Kang L.L., Chen X.Y., Liu W.J., Wu Zh.-J., Huang B.T. Quantum dots as a sensor for quantitative visualization of surface charges on single living cells with nano-scale resolution. Biosensors Bioelectronics 2011, 26:2114-2118.
26. Illingworth C.M., Barker A.T. Measurement of electrical currents emerging during the regeneration of amputated finger tips in children. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 1980, 1:87.
27. Ingber D.E., Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116:1157-1173.
28. Jaffe L.F., Vanable J.W. Electric fields and wound healing. Clin. Dermatol. 1984, 2:34-44.
29. James D.W., Taylor J.F. The stress developed by sheets of chick fibroblasts in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 1969, 54:107-110.
30. Maeda Y.T., Inose J., Matsuo M.Y., Iwaya S., Sano M. Ordered patterns of cell shape and orientational correlation during spontaneous cell migration. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3734.
31. Maria E.M., Djamgoz M.B.A. Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:1631-1639.
32. McCaig C.D., Rajnicek A.M., Song B., Zhao M. Has electrical growth cone guidance found its potential?. Trends Neurosci. 2002, 25:354-359.
33. Moreo P., Garcia-Aznar J.M., Doblaré M. Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells. Acta Biomaterialia 2008, 4:613-621.
34. Mousavi, S.J., Doweidar, M.H., Doblaré, M., 2012. Computational modelling and analysis of mechanical conditions on cell locomotion and cell-cell interaction. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. page doi:10.1080/10255842.2012.710841.
35. Mycielska M.E., Djamgoz M.B. Cellular mechanisms of directcurrent electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:1631-1639.
36. Neilson M.P., Veltman1 D.M., van Haastert P.J.M., Webb S.D., Mackenzie J.A., Insall R.H. Chemotaxis. a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000618.
37. Nishimura K.Y., Isseroff R.R., Nuccitelli R. Human keratinocytes migrate to the negative pole in direct current electric fields comparable to those measured in mammalian wounds. J. Cell Sci. 1996, 109:199-207.
38. Nuccitelli R. A role for endogenous electric fields in wound healing. Curr. Top Dev. Biol. 2003, 58:1-26.
39. Onuma E.K., Hui S.W. A calcium requirement for electric field-induced cell shape changes and preferential orientation. Cell Calcium 1985, 6:281-292.
40. Onuma E.K., Hui S.W. Electric field-directed cell shape changes, displacement, and cytoskeletal reorganization are calcium dependent. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 106:2067-2075.
41. Oster G.F., Murray J.D., Harris A.K. Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 1983, 78:83-125.
42. Pelham R.J., Wang Y.L. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1997, 94:13661-13665.
43. Penelope C.G., Janmey P.A. Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 98:1547-1553.
44. Pompe T., Glorius S., Bischoff T., Uhlmann I., Kaufmann M., Brenner S., Werner C. Dissecting the impact of matrix anchorage and elasticity in cell adhesion. Biophys. J. 2009, 97:2154-2163.
45. Ramtani S. Mechanical modelling of cell/ECM and cell/cell interactions during the contraction of a fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere: theory and model simulation. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1709-1718.
46. Rapp B., Boisfleury-Chevance A., Gruler H. Galvanotaxis of human granulocytes dose-response curve. Eur. Biophys. J. 1988, 16:313-319.
47. Schäfer A., Radmacher M. Influence of myosin II activity on stiffness of fibroblast cells. Acta Biomaterialia 2005, 1:273-280.
48. Schlüter, D.K.I.R.C., Chaplain, M.A.J., 2012. Computational modeling of single-cell migration: the leading role of extracellular matrix fibers. Biophys. J. 103, 1141-1151.
49. Sheridan D.M., Isseroff R.R., Nuccitelli R. Imposition of a physiologic dc electric field alters the migratory response of human keratinocytes on extracellular matrix molecules. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1996, 106:642-646.
50. Sulik G.L., Soong H.K., Chang P.C., Parkinson W.C., Elner S.G., Elner V.M. Effects of steady electric fields on human retinal pigment epithelial cell orientation and migration in culture. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.) 1992, 70:115-122.
51. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomaterialia 2007, 3:413-438.
52. Swaney K.F., Huang C.H., Devreotes P.N. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2010, 39:265-289.
53. Tanos B., Rodriguez-Boulan E. The epithelial polarity program: machineries involved and their hijacking by cancer. Oncogene 2008, 27:6939-6957.
54. Ulrich T.A., De Juan Pardo E.M., Kumar S. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69:4167-4174.
55. Young G.B. Thermography. CRC Crit. Rev. Radiol. Sci. 1970, 1:593-638.
56. Zaman M.H., Kamm R.D., Matsudaira P., Lauffenburgery D.A. Computational model for cell migration in three-dimensional matrices. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:1389-1397.
57. Zhang S., Charest P.G., Firtel R.A. Spatiotemporal regulation of Ras activity provides directional sensing. Curr. Biol 2008, 18:1587-1593.
58. Zhao M. Electrical fields in wound healing-an overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 20:674-682.