Cell migration and cell-cell interaction in the presence of mechano-chemo-thermotaxis

MCB Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-25

  Mousavi, S J ^a,b   Doweidar, M H ^a,b   Doblare M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cell migration; Cell cell interaction; Chemotaxis; Finite element method; Mechanotaxis; Numerical simulation; Thermotaxis

Indexed keywords

CELL MIGRATION; CELL-CELL INTERACTION; CHEMOTAXIS; MECHANOTAXIS; THERMOTAXIS;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CELLS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; TRACTION (FRICTION);

CYTOLOGY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL MOTION; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOCAL ADHESION; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL MOVEMENT; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOCAL ADHESIONS; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84881292612     PISSN: 15565297     EISSN: 15565300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. H. Behesti and S. Marino. Cerebellar granule cells: Insights into proliferation, differentiation, and role in medulloblastoma pathogenesis. Journal Applied Physiology 41:435-445, 2009.
2. B.A. Dalton, X.F.Walboomers, M. Dziegielewski, M.D.M. Evans, S. Taylor, J.A. Jansen, and J.G. Steele. Modulation of epithelial tissue and cell migra tion by microgrooves. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 56:195-207, 2001.
3. T. Pompe, S. Glorius, T. Bischoff, I. Uhlmann, M. Kaufmann, S. Brenner, and C. Werner. Dissecting the impact of matrix anchorage and elasticity in cell adhesion. Biophysical Journal, 97:2154-2163, 2009.
4. S. Suresh. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomaterialia 3:413-438, 2007.
5. M. Zhao. Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 20:674-82, 2009.
6. R. Allena and D. Aubry "run-And-Tumble" or "look-And- run"? a mechanical model to explore the behavior of a migrating amoeboid cell. Journal of Theoretical Biology 306:15-31, 2012.
7. B.K. Chirag, R.P Shelly and J.P Andrew. Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic mc3t3-e1 cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290:C1640-C1650, 2006.
8. R.J. Pelham, Jr., and Y.L. Wang. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility PNAS 94:13661-13665, 1997.
9. L. Bosgraaf and P.J.M. Van Haastert. Navigation of chemotactic cells by parallel signaling to pseudopod persistence and orientation. PLoS ONE 4:e6842, 2009.
10. O. Hoeller and R.R. Kay Chemotaxis in the absence of pip3 gradients. Current Biology 17:813-817, 2007.
11. M.P Neilson, D.M. Veltman1, P.J.M. van Haastert, S.D.Webb, J.A. Mackenzie, and R.H. Insall. Chemotaxis: A feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour. PLoS Biol 9:e1000618, 2011.
12. B.H. Choo, R.F. Donna, and L.P Kenneth. Thermotaxis of dictyostelium discoideum amoebae and its possible role in pseudoplasmodial thermotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:5646-5649, 1983.
13. A.A. Higazi, D. Kniss, J. Manuppelloand E.S. Barnathan, and D.B.Cines. Thermotaxis of human trophoblastic cells. Placenta 17:683-7, 1996.
14. Y.T. Maeda, J. Inose, M.Y. Matsuo, S. Iwaya, and M. Sano. Ordered patterns of cell shape and orientational correlation during spontaneous cell migration. PLoS ONE 3:e3734, 2008.
15. E. Hadjipanayi, V. Mudera, and R.A. Brown. Guiding cell migration in 3d: A collagen matrix with graded directional stiffness. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 66:435-445, 2009.
16. C.M. Lo H.B. Wang, M. Dembo, and Y.L. Wang. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophysical Journal 79:144-152, 2000.
17. T.A. Ulrich, E.M. De Juan Pardo, and S. Kumar. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Research 69:4167-4174, 2009.
18. D.E. Ingber and I. Tensegrity Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology Journal Cell Science 116:1157-1173, 2003.
19. P Moreo, J.M. Garcia-Aznar, and M. Doblaré. Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells. Acta Biomaterialia 4:613-621, 2008.
20. S.J. Mousavi, M.H. Doweidar, and M. Doblaré. Computational modelling and analysis of mechanical conditions on cell locomotion and cell-cell interaction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. page DOI: 10.1080/102558422012.710841, 2012.
21. C.G. Penelope and P.A. Janmey Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. Journal Applied Physiology 98:1547-1553, 2005.
22. P.J.M. Van Haastert. Chemotaxis: insights from the extending pseudopod. J Cell Sci. 123:3031-37, 2010.
23. K.F. Swaney C.H. Huang, and P.N. Devreotes. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility directional sensing, and polarity Annu Rev Biophys 39:265-289, 2010.
24. S. Zhang, P.G. Charest, and R.A. Firtel. Spatiotemporal regulation of ras activity provides directional sensing. Curr. Biol 18:1587-93, 2008.
25. M.P Neilson, J.A. Mackenzie, S.D. Webb, and R.H. Insall. Modeling cell movement and chemotaxis using pseudopod-based feedback. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 33:1035-1057, 2011.
26. M. Eisenbach A. Bahat. Sperm thermotaxis. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 252:115-119, 2006.
27. G.B. Young. Thermography CRC Critical Reviews of Radiological Science 1:593-638, 1970.
28. C.B. Hong, D.R. Fontanat, and K.L. Pofft. Thermotaxis of dictyostelium discoideum amoebae and its possible role in pseudoplasmodial thermotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 80:5646-49, 1983.
29. M.H. Zaman, R.D. Kamm, P Matsudaira, and D.A. Lauffenburgery Computational model for cell migration in three-dimensional matrices. Biophysical Journal 89:1389-1397, 2005.
30. D.W. James and J.F. Taylor. The stress developed by sheets of chick fibroblasts in vitro. Experimental Cell Research 54:107-110, 1969.
31. S. Ramtani. Mechanical modelling of cell/ecm and cell/cell interactions during the contraction of a fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere:theory and model simulation. Journal of Biomechanics 37:1709-1718, 2004.
32. R.C. Gao, X.D. Zhang, Y.H. Sun, Y. Kamimura, A. Mogilner, P.N. Devreotes, and M. Zhao. Different roles of membrane potentials in electrotaxis and chemotaxis of dictyostelium cells. Eukaryotic Cell 10:doi: 10.1128/EC.05066-11, 2011.
33. E. Palsson. A three-dimensional model of cell movement in multicellular systems. Future Generation Computer System 17:835-852, 2001.
34. G.W. Brofland and C.J. Wiebe. Mechanical effects of cell anisotropy on epithelia. Computer Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 7:91-99, 2004.
35. D.L. Taylor, J. Heiple, Y.L. Wang, E.J. Luna, L. Tanasugarn, J. Brier, J. Swanson, M. Fechheimer, P Amato, M. Rockwel, and G. Daley Cellular and molecular aspects of amoeboid movement. CSH Symp. Quant. Biol. 46:101-111, 1982.
36. Hibbit, Karlson, and Sorensen. Abaqus-Theory manual 6.3 edition edition.
37. S.K. Akiyama and K.M. Yamada. The interaction of plasma fibronectin with fibroblastic cells in suspension. Journal of Biological Chemistry 260:4492-4500, 1985.
38. A. Buxboim, I.L. Ivanovska, and D.E. Discher. Matrix elasticity cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in? Journal of cell science 123:297-308, 2010.
39. A. Schäfer and M. Radmacher. Influence of myosin ii activity on stiffness of fibroblast cells. Acta Biomaterialia 1:273-280, 2005.
40. G.F. Oster, J.D. Murray and A.K. Harris. Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis. journal Embryol Exp Morph 78:83-125, 1983.
41. M. Ehrbar, A. sala, P Lienemann, A. Ranga, K. Mosiewicz, A. Bittermann, S. C. Rizzi, and F. E. Weber. Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3d ceell migration and remodeling. Biophysical Journal 100:284-293, 2011.
42. N. Andrew and R.H. Insall. Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of ptdlns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nature Cell Biology 9:193-200, 2007.
43. D.K. Schlüter, I.R.C., and M.A.J. Chaplain. Computational modeling of single-cell migration: The leading role of extracellular matrix fibers. Biophysical Journal 103:1141-51, 2012.