Single-cell transcriptional analysis to uncover regulatory circuits driving cell fate decisions in early mouse development

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1060-1066

  Chen, Haifen ^a   Guo, Jing ^a   Mishra, Shital K ^a   Robson, Paul ^b   Niranjan, Mahesan ^c   Zheng, Jie ^a,b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b GENOME INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMALIA;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROCEDURES; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MICE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84929143160     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu777     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andrecut, M. et al. (2011). A general model for binary cell fate decision gene circuits with degeneracy: indeterminacy and switch behavior in the absence of cooperativity. PLoS One, 6, e19358.
2. Bonzanni, N. et al. (2013). Hard-wired heterogeneity in blood stem cells revealed using a dynamic regulatory network model. Bioinformatics, 29, i80-i88.
3. Calzone, L. et al. (2010). Mathematical modelling of cell-fate decision in response to death receptor engagement. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000702.
4. Chazaud, C.et al. (2006). Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Develop. Cell, 10, 615-624.
5. Chickering, D.M. (2002). The WinMine Toolkit. Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
6. De Jong, H. (2002). Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J. Comput. Biol., 9, 67-103.
7. De Jong, K. (1988). Learning with genetic algorithms: an overview. Mach Learn, 3, 121-138.
8. Ding, C. and Peng, H. (2005). Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 3, 185-205.
9. Feiglin, A. et al. (2012). Static network structure can be used to model the phenotypic effects of perturbations in regulatory networks. Bioinformatics, 28, 2811-2818.
10. Frankenberg, S. et al. (2011). Primitive endoderm differentiates via a three-step mechanism involving Nanog and RTK signaling. Develop. Cell, 21, 1005-1013.
11. Fujita, A. et al. (2007). Modeling gene expression regulatory networks with the sparse vector autoregressive model. BMC Syst. Biol., 1, 39.
12. Guo, G. et al. (2010). Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Develop. Cell, 18, 675-685.
13. Hashimoto, T. et al. (2012). Lineage-based identification of cellular states and expression programs. Bioinformatics, 28, i250-i257.
14. Hecker, M. et al. (2009). Gene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models-a review. Biosystems, 96, 86-103.
15. Holland, J.H. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Sci. Am., 267, 66-72.
16. Hoppe, P.S. et al. (2014). Single-cell technologies sharpen up mammalian stem cell research. Nat. Cell Biol., 16, 919-927.
17. Huang, S. (2010). Cell lineage determination in state space: a systems view brings flexibility to dogmatic canonical rules. PLoS Biol., 8, e1000380.
18. Huang, S. and Kauffman, S.A. (2012). Complex gene regulatory networks-from structure to biological observables: cell fate determination. In: R.A., Meyers (ed.) Computational Complexity: Theory, Techniques, and Applications, Springer, New York, pp. 527-560.
19. Huang, S. et al. (2009). Cancer attractors: a systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. Semin. Cell Develop. Biol., 20(7), 869-876.
20. Irrthum, A. et al. (2010). Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PLoS One, 5, e12776.
21. Kauffman, S. (1969). Homeostasis and differentiation in random genetic control networks. Nature, 224, 177-178.
22. Kimura, S. et al. (2005). Inference of s-system models of genetic networks using a cooperative coevolutionary algorithm. Bioinformatics, 21, 1154-1163.
23. Li, C. and Wang, J. (2013). Quantifying cell fate decisions for differentiation and reprogramming of a human stem cell network: landscape and biological paths. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, e1003165.
24. Li, F. et al. (2004). The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 101, 4781-4786.
25. Li, J. et al. (2010). Negative correlations in collaboration: concepts and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM New York, pp. 463-472.
26. Macarthur, B.D. et al. (2009). Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 10, 672-681.
27. Maduranga, D. et al. (2013). Inferring gene regulatory networks from time-series expressions using Random Forests ensemble. In: Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 13-22.
28. Meyer, P. et al. (2014). Network topology and parameter estimation: from experimental design methods to gene regulatory network kinetics using a community based approach. BMC Syst. Biol., 8, 13.
29. Müssel, C. et al. (2010). BoolNet-An R package for generation, reconstruction and analysis of Boolean networks. Bioinformatics, 26, 1378-1380.
30. Nishioka, N. et al. (2009). The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Develop. Cell, 16, 398-410.
31. Oliveri, P. and Davidson, E.H. (2004). Gene regulatory network controlling embryonic specification in the sea urchin. Curr. Opin. Genet. Develop., 14, 351-360.
32. Oron, E. and Ivanova, N. (2012). Cell fate regulation in early mammalian development. Phys. Biol., 9, 045002.
33. Pal, R. et al. (2005). Generating boolean networks with a prescribed attractor structure. Bioinformatics, 21, 4021-4025.
34. Parikh, A.P. et al. (2011). TREEGL: reverse engineering tree-evolving gene networks underlying developing biological lineages. Bioinformatics, 27, i196-i204.
35. Qian, X. et al. (2010). State reduction for network intervention in probabilistic boolean networks. Bioinformatics, 26, 3098-3104.
36. Rajapakse, J.C. and Mundra, P.A. (2011). Stability of building gene regulatory networks with sparse autoregressive models. BMC Bioinformatics, 12(Suppl. 13), S17.
37. Rossant, J. and Tam, P.P. (2009). Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse. Development, 136, 701-713.
38. Samaga, R. et al. (2009). The logic of EGFR/ErbB signaling: theoretical properties and analysis of high-throughput data. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000438.
39. Samsonova, A.A. et al. (2007). Prediction of gene expression in embryonic structures of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e144.
40. Schlitt, T. and Brazma, A. (2007). Current approaches to gene regulatory network modelling. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(Suppl. 6), S9.
41. Takaoka, K. and Hamada, H. (2012). Cell fate decisions and axis determination in the early mouse embryo. Development, 139, 3-14.
42. Tang, F. et al. (2011). Development and applications of single-cell transcriptome analysis. Nat. Methods, 8, S6-S11.
43. Tournier, L. and Chaves, M. (2009). Uncovering operational interactions in genetic networks using asynchronous Boolean dynamics. J. Theor. Biol., 260, 196-209.
44. Wu, M. et al. (2013). Engineering of regulated stochastic cell fate determination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 110, 10610-10615.
45. Xu, H. et al. (2014). Construction and validation of a regulatory network for pluripotency and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003777.
46. Yamanaka, Y. and Ralston, A. (2010). Early embryonic cell fate decisions in the mouse. In: The Cell Biology of Stem Cells: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Springer US, 695, pp. 1-13.
47. Yamanaka, Y. et al. (2010). FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst. Development, 137, 715-724.