Network topology and parameter estimation: From experimental design methods to gene regulatory network kinetics using a community based approach

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Meyer, Pablo ^a   Cokelaer, Thomas ^b   Chandran, Deepak ^c   Kim, Kyung H ^d   Loh, Po Ru ^e   Tucker, George ^e   Lipson, Mark ^e   Berger, Bonnie ^e   Kreutz, Clemens ^f   Raue, Andreas ^f,g   Steiert, Bernhard ^f   Timmer, Jens ^f   Bilal, Erhan ^a   Sauro, Herbert M ^d   Stolovitzky, Gustavo ^a   Saez Rodriguez, Julio ^b  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c AUTODESK RESEARCH   (United States)

^d University of Washington   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^g MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; KINETICS; PROCEDURES; TIME;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; KINETICS; MODELS, GENETIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84893710009     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-13     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. De Smet R, Marchal K. Advantages and limitations of current network inference methods. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010, 8(10):717-29.
2. Marbach D, et al. Revealing strengths and weaknesses of methods for gene network inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107(14):6286-91. 10.1073/pnas.0913357107, 2851985, 20308593.
3. Prill RJ, et al. Crowdsourcing network inference: the DREAM predictive signaling network challenge. Sci Signal 2011, 4(189):mr7. 3465072, 21900204.
4. Banga JR. Optimization in computational systems biology. BMC Syst Biol 2008, 2:47. 10.1186/1752-0509-2-47, 2435524, 18507829.
5. Fernandez Slezak D, et al. When the optimal is not the best: parameter estimation in complex biological models. PLoS One 2010, 5(10):e13283. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013283, 2963600, 21049094.
6. Sun J, Garibaldi JM, Hodgman C. Parameter Estimation Using Meta-Heuristics in Systems Biology: A Comprehensive Review 2011, IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform.
7. Ashyraliyev M, Jaeger J, Blom JG. Parameter estimation and determinability analysis applied to Drosophila gap gene circuits. BMC Syst Biol 2008, 2:83. 10.1186/1752-0509-2-83, 2586632, 18817540.
8. van Riel NA. Dynamic modelling and analysis of biochemical networks: mechanism-based models and model-based experiments. Brief Bioinform 2006, 7(4):364-74. 10.1093/bib/bbl040, 17107967.
9. Kreutz C, Timmer J. Systems biology: experimental design. FEBS J 2009, 276(4):923-42. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06843.x, 19215298.
10. Kun Deng YZ, Chris B, Stephen S, Julie M. New algorithms for budgeted learning. Mach Learn 2013, 90:59-90.
11. Danino T, et al. A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks. Nature 2010, 463(7279):326-30. 10.1038/nature08753, 2838179, 20090747.
12. Elowitz MB, et al. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 2002, 297(5584):1183-6. 10.1126/science.1070919, 12183631.
13. Locke JC, et al. Stochastic pulse regulation in bacterial stress response. Science 2011, 334(6054):366-9. 10.1126/science.1208144, 21979936.
14. Meyer P, Dworkin J. Applications of fluorescence microscopy to single bacterial cells. Res Microbiol 2007, 158(3):187-94. 10.1016/j.resmic.2006.12.008, 17349779.
15. Moon TS, et al. Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells. Nature 2012, 491(7423):249-53. 10.1038/nature11516, 3904217, 23041931.
16. Muzzey D, van Oudenaarden A. Quantitative time-lapse fluorescence microscopy in single cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2009, 25:301-27. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113408, 3137897, 19575655.
17. Suel G. Use of fluorescence microscopy to analyze genetic circuit dynamics. Methods Enzymol 2011, 497:275-93.
18. Suel GM, et al. An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation. Nature 2006, 440(7083):545-50. 10.1038/nature04588, 16554821.
19. Sabido E, Selevsek N, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for systems biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012, 23(4):591-7. 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.014, 22169889.
20. Eydgahi H, et al. Properties of cell death models calibrated and compared using Bayesian approaches. Mol Syst Biol 2013, 9:644. 3588908, 23385484.
21. Liepe J, et al. Maximizing the information content of experiments in systems biology. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9(1):e1002888. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002888, 3561087, 23382663.
22. Chandran D, Bergmann FT, Sauro HM. TinkerCell: modular CAD tool for synthetic biology. J Biol Eng 2009, 3:19. 10.1186/1754-1611-3-19, 2776589, 19874625.
23. Sauro HS, Rohwer J, Snoep M, Hofmeyr JL. JARNAC: a system for interactive metabolic analysis. Animating the Cellular Map In Proceedings of the 9th International BioThermoKinetics Meeting 2000, 221-228. Stellenbosch University Press.
24. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence. Evolution 2008, 134(2):341-352.
25. Marbach D, et al. Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference. Nat Methods 2012, 9(8):796-804. 10.1038/nmeth.2016, 3512113, 22796662.
26. Prill RJ, et al. Towards a rigorous assessment of systems biology models: the DREAM3 challenges. PLoS One 2010, 5(2):e9202. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009202, 2826397, 20186320.
27. Hindmarsh AC, et al. SUNDIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Trans Math Softw 2005, 31:363-396.
28. Lohmann TBH, Schlöder J. Numerical methods for parameter estimation and optimal experimental design in chemical reaction system. Ind Eng Chem Res 1992, 31:54-57.
29. Press WFB, Saul S, Vetterling W. Numerical recipes 1992, Cambridge University Press.
30. McKay MD, Beckman RJC. W. J., A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer CodeTechnometrics. Am Stat Assoc Am Soc Qual 1979, 21:239-245.
31. Raue A, Becker V, Klingmüller UT. Identifiability and observability analysis for experimental design in Non-linear dynamical models. Chaos 2010, 20(4):45105.
32. Steiert B, et al. Experimental design for parameter estimation of gene regulatory networks. PLoS One 2012, 7(7):e40052. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040052, 3397990, 22815723.
33. Karr JR, et al. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 2012, 150(2):389-401. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044, 3413483, 22817898.