Modern discrimination: How perpetrators and targets interactively perpetuate social disadvantage

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 142-146

  Ellemers, Naomi ^a   Barreto, Manuela ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; OFFENDER; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION; STEREOTYPING; STEREOTYPY; WELLBEING;

EID: 84928795311     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23521546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.001     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Stroebe K.E., Dovidio J.F., Barreto M., Ellemers N., John M.-S. Is the world a just place? Countering the negative consequences of pervasive discrimination by affirming the world as just. Br J Social Psychol 2010, 50:484-500.
2. Catalyst Pyramid: US Women in Business 2014, Catalyst, New York, http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/us-women-business-0.
3. Hoyt C.L. Women, men, and leadership: exploring the gender gap at the top. Social Personal Psychol Compass 2010, 4:484-498.
4. Kulich C., Trojanowski G., Ryan M.K., Haslam S.A., Renneboog L.D.R. Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration. Strategic Manage J 2011, 32:301-321.
5. Crosby F.J., Sabattini L., Aizawa M. Affirmative action and gender equality. The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Psychology 2013, 484-499. Sage Publications, London. M.K. Ryan, N.R. Branscombe (Eds.).
6. Hyde J.S. Gender similarities and differences. Annu Rev Psychol 2014, 65:373-398.
7. Barreto M. Experiencing and coping with social stigma. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 2: Group Processes 2014, 473-506. American Psychological Association. 10.1037/14342-018. M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, J.F. Dovidio, J.A. Simpson (Eds.).
8. DiTomaso N. The American Non-dilemma: Racial Inequality Without Racism 2013, Russell Sage Foundation.
9. Greenwald A.G., Pettigrew T.F. With malice toward none and charity for some. Am Psychol 2014, 69:669-684.
10. Koch S.C., Konigorski S., Sieverding M. Sexist behavior undermines women's performance in a job application situation. Sex Roles 2014, 70:79-87.
11. Van Laar C., Derks B., Ellemers N. Motivation for education and work in young Muslim women: the importance of value for ingroup domains. Basic Appl Psychol 2013, 35:64-74.
12. Ellemers N., Van Laar C. Individual mobility: the opportunities and challenges members of devalued groups encounter when trying to avoid group-based discrimination. Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination 2010, 561-576. Sage, London. J.F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, V. Esses (Eds.).
13. Van Nunspeet F., Ellemers N., Derks B., Nieuwenhuis S. Moral concerns increase attention and response monitoring during IAT performance: ERP evidence. Social Cogn Affect Neurosci 2014, 9:141-149.
14. Greenwald A.G., Poehlman T.A., Uhlmann E.L., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Personal Social Psychol 2009, 97:17-41.
15. Leslie S.J., Cimpian A., Meyer M., Freeland E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 2015, 347:262-265.
16. Folbre N. Should women care less? Intrinsic motivation and gender inequality. Br J Ind Relat 2012, 50:597-619.
17. Ellemers N. Women at work: how organizational features impact career development. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci 2014, 1:46-54.
18. Schmader T., Hall H., Croft A. Stereotype threat in intergroup relations. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 2: Group Processes 2014, 447-471. American Psychological Association. M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, J.F. Dovidio, J.A. Simpson (Eds.).
19. Ståhl T., Van Laar C., Ellemers N. How stereotype threat affects cognitive performance under a prevention focus: initial cognitive mobilization is followed by depletion. J Personal Social Psychol 2012, 102:1239-1251.
20. Miller D.I., Eagly A.H., Linn M.C. Women's representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: evidence from 66 nations. J Educ Psychol 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005.
21. Schmitt M.T., Branscombe N.R., Postmes T., Garcia A. The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological wellbeing: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 2014, 140:921-948.
22. Jones K.P., Peddie C.I., Gilrane V.L., King E.B., Gray A.L. Not so subtle: a meta-analytic investigation of the correlates of subtle and overt discrimination. J Manage 2013, 10.1177/0149206313506466.
23. Barreto M., Ellemers N. Sexism in contemporary societies: how it is expressed, perceived, confirmed, and resisted. The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Psychology (Chapter 18) 2013, 288-305. SAGE Pubs. 10.4135/9781446269930. M. Ryan, N. Branscombe (Eds.).
24. Heilman M.E. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res Organizational Behav 2012, 32:113-135.
25. Stephens N.M., Levine C.S. Opting out or denying discrimination? How the framework of free choice in American society influences perceptions of gender inequality. Psychol Sci 2011, 22:1231-1236.
26. Gonsalkorale K., Sherman J.W., Allen T.J., Klauer K.C., Amodio D.M. Accounting for successful control of implicit racial bias: the roles of association activation, response monitoring, and overcoming bias. Personal Social Psychol Bull 2011, 37:1534-1545.
27. Ceci S.J., Ginther D.K., Kahn S., Williams W.M. Women in academic science: a changing landscape. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2014, 15:75-141.
28. Jetten J., Iyer A., Branscombe N.R., Zhang A. How the disadvantaged appraise group-based exclusion: the path from legitimacy to illegitimacy. Eur Rev Social Psychol 2013, 24:194-224.
29. Moss-Racusin C.A., Dovidio J.F., Brescoll V.L., Graham M.J., Handelsman J. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012, 109:16474-16479.
30. Barreto M., Ellemers N: Detecting and Experiencing Prejudice: New Answers to Old Questions 2015, 52.
31. Kaiser C.R., Major B., Jurcevic I., Dover T.L., Brady L.M., Shapiro J.R. Presumed fair: ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. J Personal Social Psychol 2013, 104:504-519.
32. Castilla E.J., Benard S. The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Admin Sci Quart 2010, 55:543-576.
33. Lyness K.S., Judiesch M.K. Gender egalitarianism and work-life balance for managers: a multisource perspective in 36 countries. Appl Psychol Int Rev 2014, 63:96-129.
34. Kahn J.R., García-Manglano J., Bianchi S.M. The motherhood penalty at midlife: long-term effects of children on women's careers. J Marriage Family 2014, 76:56-72.
35. Shih M., Young M.J., Bucher A. Working to reduce the effects of discrimination: identity management strategies in organizations. Am Psychol 2013, 68:145-157.
36. Ellemers N., Rink F., Derks B., Ryan M. Women in high places: when and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Res Organizational Behav 2012, 32:163-187.
37. Derks B., Van Laar C., Ellemers N., De Groot K. Gender bias primes elicit Queen Bee responses among senior police women. Psychol Sci 2011, 22:1243-1249.
38. Newheiser A.-K., Barreto M. Hidden costs of hiding stigma: ironic interpersonal consequences of concealing a stigmatized identity in social interactions. J Exp Social Psychol 2014, 52:58-70.
39. Van Laar C., Bleeker D., Ellemers N., Meijer E. Ingroup and outgroup support for upward mobility: divergent responses to ingroup identification in low status groups. Eur J Social Psychol 2014, 44:563-577.
40. Jones K.P., King E.B. Managing concealable stigmas at work: a review and multilevel model. J Manage 2014, 40:1466-1494.
41. Sedlovskaya A., Purdie-Vaughns V., Eibach R.P., LaFrance M., Romero-Canyas R., Camp N.P. Internalizing the closet: concealment heightens the cognitive distinction between public and private selves. J Personal Social Psychol 2013, 104:695-715.
42. Derks B., Ellemers N., Van Laar C., De Groot K. Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?. Br J Social Psychol 2011, 50:519-535.
43. Cihangir S., Barreto M., Ellemers N. Men as allies against sexism: the positive effects of a suggestion of sexism by male (vs. female) sources. Sage Open 2014, April-June:1-12.
44. Kahn KB, Barreto M, Kaiser CK, Rego MS: When do high and low status group members support confrontation? The role of perceived pervasiveness of prejudice. Br J Social Psychol, in press.
45. Swim J.K., Eyssell K.M., Quinlivan E., Ferguson M.J. Self-silencing to sexism. J Social Issues 2010, 63:493-507.
46. Mallett R.K., Melchiori K.J. Goal preference shapes confrontations of sexism. Personal Social Psychol Bull 2014, 40:646-656.
47. Rasinski H.M., Geers A.L., Czopp A.M. "I guess what he said wasn't that bad": dissonance in nonconfronting targets of prejudice. Personal Social Psychol Bull 2013, 39:856-869.
48. Rasinski H.M., Czopp A.M. The effect of target status on witnesses' reactions to confrontations of bias. Basic Appl Social Psychol 2010, 32:8-16.
49. Garcia D.M., Schmitt M.T., Branscombe N.R., Ellemers N. Women's reactions to ingroup members who protest discriminatory treatment: the importance of beliefs about inequality and response appropriateness. Eur J Social Psychol 2010, 40:733-745.
50. Moss-Racusin C.A., Van der Toorn J., Dovidio J.F., Brescoll V.L., Graham M.J., Handelsman J. Scientific diversity interventions. Science 2014, 343:615-616.