Correction to Presumed Fair: Ironic Effects of Organizational Diversity Structures [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (2013), 104, 3, 504-519] DOI: 10.1037/a0030838;Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 504-519

  Kaiser, Cheryl R ^a   Major, Brenda ^b   Jurcevic, Ines ^c   Dover, Tessa L ^b   Brady, Laura M ^a   Shapiro, Jenessa R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Diversity; Multiculturalism; Procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879602460     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000055     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189
2. Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/ 1745691610393980
3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998).
4. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical environments impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045-1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
5. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
6. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
7. Cordova, D. I. (1992). Cognitive limitations and affirmative action: The effects of aggregate versus sequential data in the perception of discrimination. Social Justice Research, 5, 319-333. doi:10.1007/BF01048669
8. Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
9. Dobbin, F. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Eccleston, C. P., Kaiser, C. R., & Kraynak, L. R. (2010). Shifts in justice beliefs induced by Hurricane Katrina: The impact of claims of racism. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 571-584. doi:10.1177/ 1368430210362436
11. Edelman, L. B., Fuller, S. R., & Mara-Drita, I. (2001). Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1589-1641. doi:10.1086/321303
12. Edelman, L. B., Krieger, L. H., Eliason, S. R., Albiston, C. R., & Mellema, V. (2011). When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 888-954. doi:10.1086/661984
13. Edelman, L. B., Uggen, C., & Erlanger, H. S. (1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 406-454. doi:10.1086/210316
14. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998).
15. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/ process2012.pdf
16. Jost, J., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in systemjustification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
17. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305. doi:10.1177/ 0146167200265003
18. Kaiser, C. R., Dyrenforth, P., & Hagiwara, N. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system-and groupjustifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1423-1536. doi:10.1177/0146167206291475
19. Kaiser, C. R., Eccleston, C., & Hagiwara, N. (2008). Post-Hurricane Katrina racialized explanations as a system threat: Implications for Whites' and Blacks' racial attitudes. Social Justice Research, 21, 192-203. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0065-0
20. Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2006). A social psychological perspective on perceiving and reporting discrimination. Law and Social Inquiry, 31, 801-830. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00036.x
21. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263. doi:10.1177/0146167201272010
22. Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589-617. doi:10.1177/ 000312240607100404
23. Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management: Employer response to antidiscrimination law 1961 to 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 960 -984. doi:10.1177/ 0002764298041007008
24. Kulik, C. T., Perry, E. L., & Bourhis, A. C. (2000). Ironic evaluation processes: Effects of thought suppression on evaluations of older job applicants. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 689-711. doi: 10.1002/1099-1379(200009)21:6689::AID-JOB523.0.CO;2-W
25. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007).
26. Legault, L., Gutsell, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22, 1472-1477. doi: 10.1177/0956797611427918
27. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2
28. Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-2 S 181, 123 Stat. 5 (2009).
29. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Early, C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952
30. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
31. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.808
32. Major, B., & Schmader, T. (2001). Legitimacy and the construal of social disadvantage. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 176-204). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Monteith, M. J., Sherman, J. W., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Suppression as a stereotype control strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 63-82. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_4
34. Nielsen, L. B., & Nelson, R. L. (2008). Scaling the pyramid: A sociolegal model of employment discrimination litigation. In L. B. Nielsen & R. L. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of employment discrimination research: Rights and realities (pp. 3-34). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
35. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvisb, T., & Davidenkoc, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872. doi:10.1016/ j.jesp.2009.03.009
36. Paluck, E. L. (2006). Diversity training and intergroup contact: A call to action research. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 577-595. doi:10.1111/j .1540-4560.2006.00474.x
37. Paluck, E. L. (2011). Peer pressure against prejudice: A high school field experiment examining social network change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 350-358.
38. Plant, A. E., & Devine, P. G. (2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 486-501. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1478
39. Plaut, V. C. (2010). Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 77-99. doi:10.1080/ 10478401003676501
40. Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., & Goren, M. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities. Psychological Science, 20, 444-446. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x
41. Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Ditlmann, R., & Randall Crosby, J. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
42. Shelton, J. N., & Stewart, R. E. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215-223. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x
43. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Thomas, K. M. (2008). Diversity resistance in organizations. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
45. Triana, M. C., & Garcia, M. F. (2009). Valuing diversity: A group-value approach to understanding the importance of organizational efforts to support diversity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 941-962. doi:10.1002/job.598
46. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, A. E. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115-191). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X
47. Unzueta, M. M., & Binning, K. R. (2010). Which racial groups are associated with diversity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 443-446. doi:10.1037/a0019723
48. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. Retrieved from http:// www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.htm
49. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2010). Charge statistics: FY 1997 through FY 2011. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/ eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm
50. Vaidyanathan, R. (2011, March 9). The women accusing Walmart of sex discrimination. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ world-us-canada-12601177
51. Velez et al. v. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 04 Civ. 09194 (2010).
52. Wallace, J. C., Edwards, B. D., Mondore, S., & Finch, D. F. (2008). The interactive effects of litigation intentions and procedural justice climate on employee-employer litigation charges. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20, 313-326.
53. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 77-140). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
54. Wilson, D. (2010a, April 6). Novartis bias suit to begin. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/business/07gender.html?_r0
55. Wilson, D. (2010b, May 17). Women win a bias suit against Novartis. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/ business/18novartis.html
56. Wilson, T. D. (2011). Redirect: The surprising new science of psychological change. New York, NY: Little, Brown & Company.