Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 519-535

  Derks, Belle ^a   Ellemers, Naomi ^a   van Laar, Colette ^a   de Groot, Kim ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PREJUDICE; SEX FACTORS; WOMEN, WORKING;

EID: 80052409280     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: 20448309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466610X525280     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(2), 103. doi.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA Sage.
3. Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., & Kao, C. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 115. doi.
4. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162. doi.
5. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford Blackwell.
6. Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 662. doi.
7. Buunk, B. P., & van der Laan, V. (2002). Do women need female role models? Subjective social status and the effects of same-sex and opposite sex comparisons. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 15(3), 129-155.
8. Catalyst (2002). Census of women corporate officers and top earners of the fortune 500. New York Author.
9. Cooper, V. W. (1997). Homophily or the Queen Bee syndrome: Female evaluation of female leadership. Small Group Research, 28(4), 483. doi.
10. Cowan, G., Neighbors, C., DeLaMoreaux, J., & Behnke, C. (1998). Women's hostility toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(2), 267. doi.
11. Davey, K. M. (2008). Women's accounts of organisational politics as a gendering process. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(6), 650. doi.
12. Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Working for the self or working for the group: How self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 183. doi.
13. Dobson, R., & Iredale, W. (2006, December 31). Office Queen Bees hold back women's careers. The Sunday Times. Retrieved from
14. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125-145. doi.
15. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3-22. doi.
16. Eccleston, C., & Major, B. (2006). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: The role of group identification and appraisals. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 147-162. doi.
17. Ellemers, N. (2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 205-222). New York Cambridge University Press.
18. Ellemers, N., Barreto, & Spears, R. (1999). Commitment and strategic responses to social context. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 127-146). Oxford, UK Blackwell Science.
19. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together of falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617-626. doi.
20. Ellemers, N., Van Den Heuvel, H., De Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the Queen Bee syndrome British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315-338. doi.
21. Ellemers, N., & Van Laar, C. (2010). Individual mobility: The opportunities and challenges members of devalued groups encounter when trying to avoid group-based discrimination. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 561-576). London Sage.
22. Ensher, E. A., & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 460-481. doi.
23. Eurostat (2009). Average gross annual earnings in industry and services, by gender. Retrieved from
24. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black student's school success: Coping with the 'burden of "acting White"'. Urban Review, 18, 176-204. doi.
25. Garcia-Retamero, R., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55(1), 51. doi.
26. Groot, L., & Breedveld, K. (2004). Time over the life course: Preferences, options and life course policy. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 20(3), 288-302.
27. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organisational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657. doi.
28. Jackson, L. M., Esses, V. M., & Burris, C. T. (2001). Contemporary sexism and discrimination: The importance of respect for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 48. doi.
29. Jaspers, E., Lubbers, M., & De Graaf, N. D. (2009). Measuring once twice: An evaluation of recalling attitudes in survey research. European Sociological Review, 25, 287-301. doi.
30. Kaiser, C. R., & Pratt-Hyatt, J. S. (2009). Distributing prejudice unequally: Do Whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 432-445. doi.
31. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York Basic Books.
32. Linehan, M., & Scullion, H. (2008). The development of female global managers: The role of mentoring and networking. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 29. doi.
33. Lockwood, P. (2006). 'Someone like me can be successful': Do college students need same-gender role models Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 36-46. doi.
34. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, T. (2003). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220-231. doi.
35. Mathison, D. L. (1986). Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(5), 599.
36. Mavin, S. (2008). Queen Bees, wannabees, and afraid to bees: No more 'best enemies' for women in management British Journal of Management, 19(1), S75-S84. doi.
37. Merens, A., & Hermans, B. (2009). Emancipatiemonitor 2008/Emancipation Monitor 2008. Den Haag Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
38. Parks-Stamm, E. J., Heilman, M. E., & Hearns, K. A. (2008). Motivated to penalize: Women's strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 237. doi.
39. Ragins, B. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(3), 321-339. doi.
40. Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2001). An investigation of the moderating effects of gender on the relationships between mentorship initiation and protégé perceptions of mentoring functions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 342-363. doi.
41. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675. doi.
42. Staines, G., Tavris, C., & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The Queen Bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7(8), 55.
43. Sutton, R. M., Elder, T. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 563. doi.
44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago Nelson-Hall.
45. Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(2), 150. doi.
46. Yoder, J. D. (2002). 2001 Division 35 presidential address: Context matters: Understanding tokenism processes and their impact on women's work. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 1. doi.
47. Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2008). Effects of role models from films on short-term ratings of intent, interest, and self-assessment of ability by high school youth: A study of gender-stereotyped academic subjects. Psychological Reports, 102(2), 509-531. doi.