Women's reactions to ingroup members who protest discriminatory treatment: The importance of beliefs about inequality and response appropriateness

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 733-745

  Garcia, Donna M ^a   Schmitt, Michael T ^b   Branscombe, Nyla R ^c   Ellemers, Naomi ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957229970     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.644     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Steele, C. M. (2006). The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 602-615.
2. Branscombe, N. R., & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 243-266). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Branscombe, N. R.,Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G.,&Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388.
4. Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (2004). Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Cohen, J., Cohen, P.,West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavior sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Dixon, K. A., Storen, D., & Horn, C. E. V. (2002). A workplace divided: How Americans view discrimination and race on the job, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey: John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development.
7. Dodd, E. H., Giuliano, T. A., Boutell, J. M., & Moran, B. E. (2001). Respected or rejected: Perceptions of women who confront sexist remarks. Sex Roles, 45, 567-577.
8. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. InW. Stroebe&M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-58). New York: Wiley.
9. Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172.
10. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
11. Feagin, J. R., & Sikes, M. P. (1994). Living with racism: The Black middle-class experience. Boston, MA: Beacon.
12. Garcia, D. M., Horstman Reser, A., Amo, R., Redersdorff, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Perceivers' responses to in-group and outgroup members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769-780.
13. Gupta, V. K., & Bhawe, N. M. (2007). The influence of proactive personality and stereotype threat on women's entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 73-85.
14. Hornsey,M. J., Blackwood, L., Louis,W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., et al. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1701-1722.
15. Kaiser, C. R., Dyrenforth, P. S., & Hagiwara, N. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system and group justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523-1536.
16. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop Complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263.
17. Kobrynowicz, D., & Branscombe, N. R. (1997). Who considers themselves victims of discrimination? Individual difference predictors of perceived gender discrimination in women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 347-363.
18. Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179-196.
19. Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421.
20. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The "black sheep effect": Extremity of judgments towards in-group members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
21. Morgan-Lopez, A. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2006). Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 77-87.
22. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is meditated and when mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
23. Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). Influence of long term racial environmental composition on subjective well being in African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 735-751.
24. Postmes, T., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Young, H. (1999). Comparative processes in personal and group judgments: Resolving the discrepancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 320-338.
25. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
26. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., &Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
27. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 167-199.
28. Simon, B., Hastedt, C., & Aufderheide, B. (1997). When self-categorization makes sense: The role of meaningful social categorization in minority and majority members' self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 310-320.
29. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Van Allen, K. L., & Sechrist, G. B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 69-74.
31. Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me-what did you say? Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.
32. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
33. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed. pp. 7-24). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
34. Wright, S. C. (2001). Restricting intergroup boundaries: Tokenism, ambiguity, and the tolerance of injustice. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 223-256). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.