Individual mobility

The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 561-576

  Ellemers, Naomi ^a   van Laar, Colette ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880039386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446200919.n34     Document Type: Chapter

References (105)

1. Allport, G. W.(1979). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley. Arbeidsmarktanalyse 2006, Raad voor Werk en Inkomen. ISBN 13: 9789059016781. Reed Business.
2. Baron, R. S. Burgess, M. L., &Kao, C. F. Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17,115-123. (1991).
3. Barreto, M., &Ellemers, N. The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,629-639. (2002).
4. Barreto, M., &Ellemers, N. The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35,633-642. (2005a).
5. Barreto, M., &Ellemers, N. The perils of political correctness: Men's and women's responses to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68,75-88. (2005b).
6. Barreto, M. Ellemers, N., &Banal, S. Working under cover: Performance-related self-confidence among members of contextually devalued groups who try to pass. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36,337-352. (2006).
7. Barreto, M. Ellemers, N., &Palacios, M. S. The backlash of token mobility: The impact of past group experiences on individual ambition and effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,1433-1445. (2004).
8. Bettencourt, B. A. Charlton, K. Dorr, N., &Hume, D.L. Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127,520-542. (2001).
9. Branscombe, N. R. Thinking about one's gender-group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37,167-184. (1998).
10. Branscombe, B., &Ellemers, N.(1998). Use of individualistic and group strategies in response to perceived group-based discrimination. In J.Swim & C.Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The Target's Perspective (243-266).New York:Academic Press.
11. Branscombe, N. R. Schmitt, M. T., &Harvey, R. D. Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,135-149. (1999).
12. Cadinu, M. Maass, A. Frigerio, S. Impagliazzo, L., &Latinotti, S. Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33,267-285. (2003).
13. Crocker, J., &Major, B. Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96,608-630. (1989).
14. Crocker, J., Major, B., &Steele, C.(1998). Social stigma. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske, & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504-553). Boston, MA: Mcgraw-Hill.
15. Crosby, F.J.(2004). Affirmative Action is Dead; Long Live Affirmative Action. New Haven, CN:Yale University Press.
16. Derks, B. van Laar, C., &Ellemers, N. Striving for success in outgroup settings: Effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members? Social identity and performance styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32,576-588. (2006).
17. Derks, B., van Laar, C., &Ellemers, N. (in press). Working for the self or working for the group: How self-vs. group-affirmation affect collective behavior in low status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
18. Derks, B. van Laar, C., &Ellemers, N. Social creativity strikes back: Improving low status group members' motivation and performance by valuing ingroup dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37,470-493. (2007).
19. Doosje, B. Ellemers, N., &Spears, R. Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31,410-436. (1995).
20. Doosje, B., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., &Koomen, W.(1999). Group variability in intergroup relations: The distinctive role of social identity. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 41-74).Chichester:John Wiley.
21. Dovidio, J.F. On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave. Journal of Social Issues, 57,829-849. (2001).
22. Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J. C., Johnson, B. T., &Gaertner, S. L.(1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In C. N.Macrae, C.Stangor & M.Hewstone (Eds.), Foundations of Stereotypes and Stereotyping (pp. 276-319).New York:Guilford.
23. Eagly, A. H. Makhijani, M. G., &Klonsky, B. G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111,3-22. (1992).
24. Ellemers, N. The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4,27-57. (1993).
25. Ellemers, N.(2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. In J. T.Jost, & B.Major (Eds.) The Psychology of Legitimacy; Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations (pp. 205-222).Cambridge University Press.
26. Ellemers, N., &Barreto, M.(2008). Maintaining the illusion of meritocracy. In S.Demoulin, J.-P.Leyens, & J. F.Dovidio (Eds.). Intergroup Misunderstandings: Impact of Divergent Social Realities (pp. 191-212).Hove, E. Sussex:Psychology Press.
27. Ellemers, N. Spears, R., &Doosje, B. Sticking together or falling apart: Group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,123-140. (1997).
28. Ellemers, N. Van den Heuvel, H. De Gilder, D. Maass, A., &Bonvini, A. The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43,315-338. (2004).
29. Ellemers, N. Wilke, H., &van Knippenberg, A. Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64,766-778. (1993).
30. Ethier, K.A., &Deaux, K. Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,243-251. (1994).
31. Faddegon, K., Scheepers, D., &Ellemers, N.(2006). If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as a group identity.
32. Federico, C. M., &Sidanius, J. Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: The antecedents and consequences of "principled objections" to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,488-502. (2002).
33. Garcia, D. M. Reser, A. H. Amo, R. B. Redersdorff, S., &Branscombe, N. R. Perceivers' responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,769-780. (2005).
34. Glick, P., &Fiske, S. T. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,491-512. (1996).
35. Glick, P., &Fiske, S. T.(2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115-188).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
36. Hafer, C. L., &Olson, J. M. Beliefs in a just world and reactions to personal deprivation. Journal of Personality, 57,799-823. (1989).
37. Hebl, M. R., &Dovidio, J. F. Promoting the "social" in the examination of social stigmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9,156-182. (2005).
38. Heilman, M. E., &Alcott, V. B. What I think you think of me: Women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,574-582. (2001).
39. Heilman, M. E., &Blader, S. L. Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,188-193. (2001).
40. Higgins, E. T. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52,1280-1300. (1997).
41. Highhouse, S. Stierwalt, S. L. Bachiochi, P. Elder, A. E., &Fisher, G. Effects of advertised human resource management practices on attraction of African American applicants. Personnel Psychology, 52,425-442. (1999).
42. Huo, Y. J., &Molina, L. E. Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9,359-376. (2006).
43. Inzlicht, M., &Ben Zeev, T. A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11,365-371. (2000).
44. Inzlicht, M. McKay, L., &Aronson, J. Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17,262-269. (2006).
45. Jackman, M. R.(1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
46. Jackson, L. A. Sullivan, L. A. Harnish, R., &Hodge, C.N. Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,241-254. (1996).
47. James, E. H. Brief, A. P. Dietz, J., &Cohen, R. R. Prejudice matters: Understanding the reactions of Whites to affirmative action programs targeted to benefit Blacks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,1120-1128. (2001).
48. Jost, J.T., &Banaji, M.R. The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33,1-27. (1994).
49. Kaiser, C. R.(2006). Dominant ideology threat and the interpersonal consequences of attributions to discrimination. In S.Levin & C.van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 45-64).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
50. Kaiser, C. R., &Miller, C. T. Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,254-263. (2001).
51. Kaiser, C. R., &Miller, C. T. Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6,227-237. (2003).
52. Keller, J., &Dauenheimer, D.(2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women's math performance.
53. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29,371-381.
54. Konrad, A. M., &Linnehan, F.(1999). Affirmative action: History, effects and attitudes. In G. N.Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 429-452).Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452231365 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231365.
55. Levin, S. van Laar, C., &Foote, W. Ethnic segregation and perceived discrimination in college: Mutual influences and effects on social and academic life. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36,1471-1501. (2006).
56. Levin, S. van Laar, C., &Sidanius, J. The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6,76-92. (2003).
57. Levine, J. M. Higgins, E. T., &Choi, H. S. Development of strategic norms in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82,88-101. (2000).
58. Macrae, C. N. Bodenhausen, G. V. Milne, A. B., &Jetten, J. Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,808-817. (1994).
59. Maio, G. R., &Esses, V. M. The social consequences of affirmative action: Deleterious effects on perceptions of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24,65-74. (1998).
60. Major, B.(1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-348.). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
61. Major, B., &Crocker, J.(1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. M.Mackie & D. L.Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception (pp. 345-370).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
62. Major, B. Gramzow, R. H. McCoy, S. K. Levin, S. Schmader, T., &Sidanius, J. Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,269-282. (2002).
63. Major, B., &O'Brien, L. T. The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56,393-421. (2005).
64. Major, B. Quinton, W. J., &Schmader, T. Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39,220-231. (2003).
65. Major, B., &Schmader, T.(1998). Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. In J. K.Swim & C.Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The Target's Perspective (pp. 219-241).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
66. Marx, D. M., &Roman, J. S. Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,1183-1193. (2002).
67. Mendoza Denton, R. Downey, G. Purdie, V. J. Davis, A., &Pietrzak, J. Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83,896-918. (2002).
68. Osborne, J. W. Academics, self-esteem, and race: A look at the underlying assumptions of the disidentification hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21,449-455. (1995).
69. Quinn, D. M.(2006). Concealable versus conspicuous stigmatized identities. In S.Levin & C.van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 88-103).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
70. Quinn, D. M. Kahng, S. K., &Crocker, J. Discreditable: Stigma effects of revealing a mental illness history on test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,803-815. (2004).
71. Riach, P., &Rich, J. Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. The Economic Journal, 112,480-518. (2002).
72. Richeson, J. A., &Shelton, J. N. When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14,287-290. (2003).
73. Rutte, C. G. Diekmann, K. A. Polzer, J. T. Crosby, F. J., &Messick, D. M. Organization of information and the detection of gender discrimination. Psychological Science, 5,226-231. (1994).
74. Sassenberg, K., &Hansen, N. The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37,421-444. (2007).
75. Sassenberg, K. Jonas, K. J., &Shah, J. Y., &Brazy, P. C. Why some groups just feel better: The regulatory fit of group power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92,249-267. (2007).
76. Scheepers, D., &Ellemers, N. When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental-Social Psychology, 41,192-200. (2005).
77. Schmader, T. Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38,194-201. (2002).
78. Schmitt, M. T., &Branscombe, N. R.(2000). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European Reviewof Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 166-199).Chichester:John Wiley.
79. Schmitt, M. T., &Branscombe, N. R. The internal and external causal loci of attributions to prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,484-492. (2002).
80. Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., &Branscombe, N. R.(2003). Perceiving and responding to sex discrimination at work. In S. A.Haslam, D.van Knippenberg, M. J.Platow, & N.Ellemers (Eds.), Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice (pp. 277-292).New York:Psychology Press.
81. Sechrist, G. B. Swim, J. K., &Stangor, C. When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self-presentation and need for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87,111-122. (2004).
82. Shah, J. Y. Brazy, P. B., &Higgins, E. T. Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and the nature of in-group bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,433-446. She figures 2006: Women and Science-Statistics and Indicators. European Commission-Community Research. ISSN 1018-5593.(2004).
83. Shelton, J. N. A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4,374-390. (2000).
84. Shelton, J. N. Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6,171-185. (2003).
85. Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., &Hill, D. M.(2006). Silence is not golden: The intrapersonal consequences of not confronting prejudice. In S.Levin & C.van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 65-81).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
86. Sinclair, S., &Huntsinger, J.(2006). The interpersonal basis of self-stereotyping. In S.Levin & C.van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. Spears, R. Doosje, B., &Ellemers, N. Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,538-553. (1997).
88. Stangor, C. Swim, J. K. Van Allen, K. L., &Sechrist, G. Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,69-74. (2002).
89. Steele, C. M., &Aronson, J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,797-811. (1995).
90. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., &Aronson, J.(2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
91. Swim, J. K.(2006). Responding to everyday discrimination: A synthesis of research on goal directed, self-regulatory coping behaviors. In S.Levin & C.van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 105-126).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
92. Swim, J. K. Aikin, K. J. Hall, W. S., &Hunter, B. A. Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,199-214. (1995).
93. Tajfel, H., &Turner, J. C.(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47).Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole.
94. Taylor, M. C. Impact of affirmative action on beneficiary groups: Evidence from the 1990 General Social Survey. Special issue: Social psychological perspectives on affirmative action. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 15,143-178. (1994).
95. Taylor, D.M., &McKirnan, D.J. A five stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23,291-300. (1984).
96. Tropp, L. R.(2006). Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups. In S.Levin & C.van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 171-191).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
97. Truax, K., Cordova, D. I., Wood, A., Wright, E., &Crosby, F.(1998). Undermined? Affirmative action from the target's point of view. In J. K.Swim & C.Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The Target's Perspective (pp. 171-188).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
98. Turner, M. E., &Pratkanis, A. R. Affirmative action as help: A review of recipient reactions to preferential selection and affirmative action. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 15,43-69. (1994).
99. van Laar, C. The paradox of low academic achievement but high self-esteem in African American students: An attributional account. Educational Psychology Review, 12,33-61. (2000).
100. van Laar, C., &Derks, B.(2003). Managing stigma: Disidentification from the academic domain. In F.Salili & R.Hoosain (Eds.), Learning and Motivation in a Multicultural Setting (pp. 345-393).Greenwich, CN:Information Age Publishing.
101. van Laar, C. Levin, S., andSinclair, S. Social identity and personal identity concerns in stereotypethreat: The case of affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 30295-310. (2008).
102. Verkuyten, M., &Thijs, J. Psychological disidentification with the academic domain among ethnic minority adolescents in The Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74,109-125. (2004).
103. Wheeler, S. C., &Petty, R. E. The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127,797-826. (2001).
104. Wright, S. C.(2000). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In: R.Brown & S.Gaertner (Eds.). Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processses (pp. 409-430).Oxford:Blackwell.
105. Wright, S. C. Taylor, D. M., &Moghaddam, F. M. Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,994-1003. (1990).