A hybrid PCA-CART-MARS-based prognostic approach of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 7062-7083

  Lasheras, Fernando Sánchez ^a   Nieto, Paulino José García ^a   de Cos Juez, Francisco Javier ^a   Bayón, Ricardo Mayo ^a   Suárez, Victor Manuel González ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aircraft engine; Classification and regression trees (CART); Dendrogram; Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS); Principal component analysis (PCA); Prognostics; Remaining useful life

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; BENCHMARKING; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; ENGINES; FORECASTING; FORESTRY; HEALTH; INGESTION (ENGINES); NEURAL NETWORKS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPLINES; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREE; DENDROGRAMS; MULTIVARIATE ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES; PROGNOSTICS; REMAINING USEFUL LIVES;

AIRCRAFT ENGINES;

CLASSIFICATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREES;

EID: 84928693259     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s150307062     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Cheng, S.; Azarian, M.H.; Pecht, M.G. Sensor systems for prognostics and health management. Sensors 2010, 10, 5774–5797.
2. Pecht, M.; Jaai, R. A prognostics and health management roadmap for information and electronics-rich systems. Microelectron. Reliab. 2010, 50, 317–323.
3. Pecht, M. Prognostics and Health Management of Electronics; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
4. Vichare, N.; Pecht, M. Prognostics and Health Management of Electronics. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 2006, 29, 222–229.
5. Schwabacher, M.; Goebel, K. A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Prognostics. In Proceedings of the 2007 AAAI Fall Symposium: AI for Prognostics, Arlington, VA, USA, 8–11 November 2007; pp. 9–11.
6. Liu, J.; Djurdjanovic, D.; Marko, K.; Ni, J.A. Divide and Conquer Approach to Anomaly Detection, Localization and Diagnosis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2009, 23, 2488–2499.
7. Liu, J.; Wang, M.; Ma, F.; Yang, Y.B.; Yang, C.S. A data-model-fusion prognostic framework for dynamic system state forecasting. Eng. Appl. Artif. Int. 2012, 25, 814–823.
8. Bai, G.; Wang, P.; Hu, C.; Pecht, M. A generic model-free approach for lithium-ion battery health management. Appl. Energ. 2014, 135, 247–260.
9. Sánchez-Lasheras, F.; de Andrés, J.; Lorca, P.; de Cos Juez, F.J. A hybrid device for the solution of sampling bias problems in the forecasting of firms’ bankruptcy. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 8, 7512–7523.
10. García Nieto, P.J.; Alonso Fernández, J.R.; de Cos Juez, F.J.; Sánchez Lasheras, F.; Díaz Muñiz, C. Hybrid modelling based on support vector regression with genetic algorithms in forecasting the cyanotoxins presence in the Trasona reservoir (Northern Spain). Environ. Res. 2013, 122, 1–10.
11. Xi, Z.; Jing, R.; Wang, P.; Hu, C. A copula-based sampling method for data-driven prognostics. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 2014, 132, 72–82.
12. Si, X.-S.; Wang, W.; Hu, C.-H.; Zhou, D.-H. Remaining Useful Life Estimation—A Review on the Statistical Data Driven Approaches. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 213, 1–14.
13. Dean, F.; de Castro, J.; Litt, J. User’s Guide for the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (C-MAPSS), NASA/ARL; Technical Manual TM2007-215026; NASA Center for AeroSpace Information: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2007.
14. Wang, T.; Yu, J.; Siegel, D.; Lee, J. A similarity-based prognostics approach for remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (PMH 2008), Denver, CO, USA, 6–9 October 2008; pp. 1–6.
15. Sikorska, J.Z.; Hodkiewicz, M.; Ma, L. Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mech. Sys. Signal Process. 2011, 25, 1803–1836.
16. Jardine, A.K.S.; Lin, D.; Banjevic, D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2006, 20, 1483–1510.
17. Wu, C.H. Behavior-based spam detection using a hybrid method of rule-based techniques and neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 4321–4330.
18. Bi, Y.; Bell, D.; Wang, H.; Guo, G.; Greer K. Combining Multiple Classifiers Using Dempster’s Rule of Combination for Text Categorization. Lect. Notes Artif. Int. 2004, 3131, 127–138.
19. Cho, S.B.; Lee, J.H. Learning Neural Network Ensemble for Practical Text Classification. In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; Volume 2690, pp. 1032–1036.
20. Wong, W.K.; Guo, Z.X. A hybrid intelligent model for medium-term sales forecasting in fashion retail supply chains using extreme learning machine and harmony search algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2010, 128, 614–624.
21. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
22. Grice, J.W. Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychol. Methods 2001, 6, 430–450.
23. Orchard, M.; Tobar, F.; Vachtsevanos, G. Outer feedback correction loops in particle filtering-based prognostic algorithms: Statistical performance comparison. Stud. Inform. Control 2009, 18, 295–304.
24. Hu, Y.; Baraldi, P.; di Maio, F.; Zio, E. A particle filtering and kernel smoothing-based approach for new design component prognostics. Rel. Eng. Syst. Safe 2015, 134, 19–31.
25. Pearson, K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag. 1901, 2, 559–572.
26. Hotelling, H. Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components. J. Educ. Psychol. 1933, 24, 417–441 and 498–520.
27. Ismail, S.; Shabri, A. Stream Flow Forecasting using Principal Component Analysis and Least Square Support Vector Machine. J. Appl. Sci. Agric. 2014, 9, 170–180.
28. Guhathakurta, P.; Rajeevan, M.; Thapliyal, V. Forecasting Indian summer monsoon rainfall by a Principal Component Neural Network model. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 1999, 71, 255–266.
29. Hu, T.; Wu, F.; Zhang, X. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling using Principal Component Analysis and Neural Network. Nord. Hydrol. 2007, 38, 235–248.
30. Therneau, T.M.; Atkinson, B.; Ripley, B. Rpart: Recursive Partitioning; R package Version 4.1-1; 2013.
31. Friedman, J.H. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (with discussion). Ann. Stat. 1991, 19, 1–141.
32. Sekulic, S.S.; Kowalski, B.R. MARS: A Tutorial. J. Chemometr. 1992, 6, 199–216.
33. Friedman, J.H.; Roosen, C.B. An Introduction to Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1995, 4, 197–217.
34. García Nieto, P.J.; Alonso Fernández, J.R.; Sánchez Lasheras, F.; de Cos Juez, F.J.; Diaz Muñiz, C. A New improved study of cyanotoxins presence from experimental cyanobacteria concentrations in the Trasona reservoir (Northern Spain) using the MARS technique. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 430, 88–92.
35. García Nieto, P.J.; Sánchez Lasheras, F.; de Cos Juez, F.J.; Alonso Fernández, J.R. Study of Cyanotoxins Presence from Experimental Cyanobacteria Concentrations Using a New Data Mining Methodology Based on Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines in Trasona Reservoir (Northern Spain). J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 195, 414–421.
36. Ramasso, E.; Saxena, A. Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets. Int. J. Progn. Health Manag. 2014, 5, 1–15.
37. Coble, J.; Hines, J. Prognostic algorithm categorization with PHM challenge application. In Proceedings of International Conference on prognostics and health management, Denver, CO, USA, 6–9 October 2008; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
38. Siegel, D. Evaluation of Health Assessment Techniques for Rotating Machinery. Master’s Thesis, Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2009.
39. Ramasso, E. Contribution of belief functions to hidden Markov models with an application to fault diagnosis. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, Grenoble, France, 1–4 September 2009; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
40. Wang, T. Trajectory Similarity Based Prediction for Remaining Useful Life Estimation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2010.
41. Riad, A.; Elminir, H.; Elattar, H. Evaluation of neural networks in the subject of prognostics as compared to linear regression model. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2010, 10, 52–58.
42. Abbas, M. System Level Health Assessment Of Complex Engineered Processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.
43. Ramasso, E.; Gouriveau, R. Prognostics in switching systems: Evidential Markovian classification of real-time neuro-fuzzy predictions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, Macao, China, 12–14 January 2010; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
44. Chai, T.; Draxler, R.R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci. Model Dev. 2014, 7, 1247–1250.
45. Heimes, F. Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, Denver, CO, USA, 6–9 October 2008; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
46. Peel, L. Data driven prognostics using a Kalman filter ensemble of neural network models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, Denver, CO, USA, 6–9 October 2008; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
47. Yidana, S.M.; Ophori, D.; Banoeng-Yakubo, B. A multivariate statistical analysis of surface water chemistry data—Tha Ankobra Basin, Ghana. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 86, 80–87.
48. Lewis, P.D.; Parry, J.M. An exploratory analysis of multiple mutation spectra. Mutat. Res. 2002, 518, 163–180.
49. Sarkar, S.; Mukherjee, K.; Sarkar, S.; Ray, A. Symbolic Transient Time-series Analysis for Fault Detection in Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines. In Proceedings of the 2012 American Control Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 27–29 June 2012; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 5132–5137.
50. Liu, K.; Gebraeel, N.Z.; Shi, J. A Data-Level Fusion Model for Developing Composite health Indices for Degradation Modeling and Prognostic Analysis. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2013, 10, 652–664.
51. Zio, E.; di Maio, F. A Data-driven Fuzzy Approach for Predicting the Remaining Useful Life in Dynamic Failure Scenarios of a Nuclear System. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 2010, 95, 49–57.
52. Ahmadzadeh, F.; Lundberg, J. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Grinding Mill Liners Using an Artificial Neural Network. Miner. Eng. 2013, 53, 1–8.
53. Guzman, D.; de Cos Juez, F.J.; Myers, R.; Guesalaga, A.; Sánchez Lasheras, F. Modeling a MEMS deformable mirror using non-parametric estimation techniques. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 21356–21369.
54. García Nieto, P.J.; Martínez Torres, J.; de Cos Juez, F.J.; Sánchez Lasheras, F. Using multivariate adaptive regression splines and multilayer perceptron networks to evaluate paper manufactured using Eucalyptus globulus. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 219, 755–763.
55. Lee, J.; Ni, J.; Djurdjanovic, D.; Qiu, H.; Liao, H. Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance. Comput. Ind. 2006, 57, 476–489.