Effects of learner–instructor relationship-building strategies in online video instruction

Distance Education

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 100-114

  Kim, Yanghee ^a   Thayne, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

blended learning; e learning; learner affect; learner instructor relationship; video based lessons

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928414187     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1019965     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/publications/survey/going_distance_2011
2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
3. Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2013). Communication and social presence: The impact on adult learners’ emotions in distance learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16, 102–114. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/
4. Arghode, V. (2012). Role of empathy in instruction. Global Education Journal, 128–143. Retrieved from http://franklinpublishing.net/globaleducation.html
5. Artino Jr., A. R., & Jones II, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 170–175. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
7. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents: A volume in adolescence and education (pp. 307–337). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
8. Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32, 421–439. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.610293
9. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
10. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25. Retrieved from http://www.rpajournal.com/
11. Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82–90. doi:10.1080/03634529809379112
12. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/
13. Daniels, L. M., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2012). Not that different in theory: Discussing the control-value theory of emotions in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 222–226. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.04.002
14. Gibbons, J. F., Kincheloe, W. R., & Down, K. S. (1977). Tutored videotape instruction: A new use of electronics media in education. Science, 195, 1139–1146. doi:10.1126/science.195.4283.1102
15. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40–53. doi:10.1080/03634528809378702
16. Holder, B. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 245–260. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.002
17. Kay, J., Remann, P., Diebold, E., & Kummerfeld, B. (2013). MOOCs: So many learners, so much potential … IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28, 10–77. doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.66
18. Khan, S. (2012). The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. New York, NY: Twelve.
19. Kim, C. (2012). The role of affective and motivational factors in designing personalized learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 563–584. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9253-6
20. Komarraju, M., Musulkin, S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2010). Role of student–faculty interactions in developing college students’ academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 332–342. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9515-7
21. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Education Technology and Research Development, 59, 593–618. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
22. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.004
23. Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 150–160. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.001
24. Marchant, M., & Anderson, D. H. (2012). Improving social and academic outcomes for all learners through the use of teacher praise. Beyond Behavior, 21, 22–28. Retrieved from http://www.ccbd.net/Publications/BeyondBehavior
25. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
26. Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2012). Connecting to the professor: Impact of the student–faculty relationship in a highly challenging course. College Teaching, 60, 41–47. doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.627576
27. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26, 29–48. doi:10.1080/01587910500081269
28. Murphy, L. M., Shelley, M. A., White, C. J., & Baumann, U. (2011). Tutor and student perceptions of what makes an effective distance language teacher. Distance Education, 32, 397–419. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.610290
29. Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
30. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
31. Petty, R. E., DeSteno, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2001). The role of affect in attitude change. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 212–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101–109. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
33. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793
34. Sakiz, G. (2012). Perceived instructor affective support in relation to academic emotions and motivation in college. Educational Psychology, 32, 63–79. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.625611
35. Schwarz, N. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom in feelings. In L. F. Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), The wisdom in feelings (pp. 145–166). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36. Sipusic, M. J., Pannoni, R. L., Smith, R. B., Dutra, J., Gibbons, J. F., & Sutherland, W. (1999). Virtual collaborative learning: A comparison between face-to-face tutored video instruction (TVI) and distributed Tutored Video Instruction (DTVI) (Final Report). Palo Alto, CA: Sun Microsystems.
37. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22, 306–331. doi:10.1080/0158791010220208
38. Tello, S. F. (2007). An analysis of student persistence in online education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3, 47–62. doi:10.4018/jicte.2007070105
39. Teven, J. J. (2007). Teacher caring and classroom behavior: Relationships with student affect and perceptions of teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 55, 433–450. doi:10.1080/01463370701658077
40. Thompson, C. (2011, July 15). How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Magazine, p. 126.
41. Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 131–150. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
42. Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & Osguthorpe, R. (2013). Caring in a technology-mediated online high school context. Distance Education, 34, 97–118. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770435
43. Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 302–323. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
44. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451
45. Xiao, J. (2012). Tutors’ influence on distance language students’ learning motivation: Voices from learners and tutors. Distance Education, 33, 365–380. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.723167
46. Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20, 65–77.10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2