Predictors of digital competence in 7th grade: A multilevel analysis

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 220-231

  Hatlevik, O E ^a   Ottestad, G ^a   Throndsen, I ^b  

^a Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Culture for professional development; Digital competence; Family background; Mastery orientation; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928214309     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12065     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Luxembourg: European Union.
2. Avidov-Ungar, O., & Eshet-Alkakay, Y. (2011). Teachers in a World of Change: Teachers' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards the Implementation of Innovative Technologies in Schools, 7.
3. Aviram, R., & Eshet-Alkalay, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: Three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Aharon_Aviram.htm.
4. Balanskat, A., & Gerthsch, C. A. (2010). Digital Skills Working Group. Review of National Curricula and Assessing Digital Competence for Students and Teachers: Findings from 7 Countries, Brussels.
5. Berge, O., Hatlevik, O. E., Kløvstad, V., Ottestad, G., & Skaug, J. H. (2009). ITU monitor. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.
6. Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 28-42.
7. Broos, A., & Roe, K. (2006). The digital divide in the PlayStation generation: Self-efficacy, locus of control and ICT adoption among adolescents. Poetics, 34, 306-317.
8. Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers and Education, 58, 797-807.
9. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation & Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (CERI/OECD). (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA. Paris, France: CERI/OECD. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/inspired-by-technology-driven-by-pedagogy_9789264094437-en
10. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st Century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers and Education, 59(3), 1042-1053. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004
11. Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 557-573.
12. Dexter, S. (2008). Leadership for IT in schools. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (Vol. 2, pp. 543-554). New York: Springer.
13. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
14. Erstad, O. (2010). Educating the digital generation. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 5(1), 56-71. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2010/01/art05
15. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe, Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=6359
16. Frønes, T. S., & Narvhus, E. K. (2011). Students on the Internet: Digital Reading in PISA 2009. (Elever på nett - Digital lesing i PISA 2009), Oslo.
17. Gabrielsen, E., & Lagerstrøm, B. O. (2007). Med annen bakgrunn. Lese- og regneferdigheter blant voksne innvandrere, Stavanger.
18. Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of internet literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media and Society, 13(6), 963-980.
19. Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432-448. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x
20. Hatlevik, O. E. (2009). How to identify and understand digital literacy among 9th grade Norwegian students: Examining the influences from school and home on students digital literacy. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 03/04, 159-173.
21. Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers and Education, 63, 240-247.
22. Hatlevik, O. E., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2013). An emerging digital divide in urban school children's information literacy: Challenging equity in the Norwegian school system. First Monday, 18(4). doi:10.5210/fm.v18i4.4232
23. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
24. Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt.
25. Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre Utbilding, 1, 39-51.
26. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2009). Developing Web literacy in collaborative inquiry activities. Computers and Education, 52, 668-680.
27. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Dordrecht: Springer.
28. Litt, E. (2013). Measuring users' Internet skills: A review of past assessment and a look toward the future. New Media and Society, 15(4), 612-630. doi:10.1177/1461444813475424
29. Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3-14. doi:10.1080/10714420490280152
30. MCEECDYA. (2010). National Assessment Program: ICT Literacy Years 6 & 10 Report 2008.
31. Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first- and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 409-433. doi:10.1037/a0033890
32. Moores, T. T., & Chang, J. C.-J. (2009). Self-efficacy, overconfidence, and the negative effect on subsequent performance: A field study. Information and Management, 46(2), 69-76. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.11.006
33. NOU. (2010). NOU 2010:7. Mangfold og mestring. Flerspråklige barn, unge og voksne i opplæringssystemet, Oslo.
34. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35. OECD. (2004). Messages from PISA 2000, 79. OECD, Paris.
36. OECD. (2006). Are Students Ready for a Technology-Rich World? What PISA Studies Tell Us, OECD, Paris.
37. OECD. (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/talis/firstresults
38. Ottestad, G. (2008a). Visjoner og realiteter. Bruk av IKT i matematikk og naturfag på åttende trinn. IEA SITES 2006. Norsk rapport [Translated: Visions and Realities: The Use of ICT in Mathematics and Science at 8th Grade. IEA SITES 2006 Norwegian Report]. Oslo: Forsknings- og kompetansenettverk for IT i utdanning.
39. Ottestad, G. (2008b). Schools as digital competent organisations: Developing organisational traits to strengthen the implementation of digital founded pedagogy. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 4(4), 149-158.
40. Ottestad, G. (2010). Innovative pedagogical practice with ICT in three Nordic countries: Differences and similarities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 478-491. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00376.x
41. Ottestad, G. (2013). School leadership for ICT as predictor for teachers' use of digital tools. A case study of Norwegian principals' and teachers' views and use of ICT in school. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(1-2), 107-125. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2013/01-02/school_leadership_for_ict_and_teachers_use_of_digital_tools?highlight=#highlight
42. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
43. Solhaug, T. (2009). Two configurations for accessing classroom computers: Differential impact on students' critical reflections and their empowerment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 411-422.
44. Spiezia, G. (2010). Does computer use increase educational achievements? Student-level Evidence from PISA, OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/eco/labour/49849896.pdf
45. Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192-204. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
46. Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 53, 1000-1009.
47. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2008). Knowledge Promotion. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training, Oslo.
48. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework For Basic Skills, Oslo.
49. Tømte, C. (2011). Challenging our views on ICT, gender and education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(Special issue), 309-324. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2011/special_issue/art06
50. Tømte, C., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2011). Gender-differences in self-efficacy ICT related to various ICT-user profiles in Finland and Norway. How do self-efficacy, gender and ICT-user profiles relate to findings from PISA 2006. Computers and Education, 57, 1416-1424.
51. Tømte, C., Kårstein, A., & Olsen, D. (2013). IKT i lærerutdanningen. Oslo, Norway: NIFU.
52. Van Deursen, A. (2012). Internet skill-related problems in accessing online health information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(1), 61-72.
53. Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2009). Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 333-340.
54. Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2010). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 893-911. doi:10.1177/1461444810386774
55. Van Deursen, A., Van Dijk, J., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills. The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39, 125-144.
56. Van Deursen, A., Van Dijk, J., & Peters, O. (2012). Proposing a survey instrument for measuring operational, formal, information and strategic Internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(12), 827-837.
57. Wan, Z., Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2008). Why people benefit from e-learning differently: The effects of psychological processes on e-learning outcomes. Information and Management, 45(8), 513-521. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.08.003
58. Yang, H.-L., & Cheng, H.-H. (2009). Creative self-efficacy and its factors: An empirical study of information system analysts and programmers. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 429-438. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.005
59. Zhang, G., Wang, Q., & Kolodinsky, J. (2010). The digital divide in Internet information searching: A double-hurdle model analysis of household data from Vermont. First Monday, 15(11-1). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2836/2582
60. Zhong, Z.-J. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers and Education, 56, 736-746.