The digital divide in the playstation generation: Self-efficacy, locus of control and ICT adoption among adolescents

Poetics

Volumn 34, Issue 4-5, 2006, Pages 306-317

  Broos, Agnetha ^a   Roe, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746560289     PISSN: 0304422X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
2. Bandura A. Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology 25 5 (1989) 729-735
3. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1997), Freeman, New York
4. Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context. Applied Psychology and International Review 51 2 (2002) 269-290
5. Bannert M., and Arbinger P.R. Gender-related differences in exposure to and use of computers. European Journal of Psychology of Education 11 3 (1996) 269-282
6. Barbeite F.G., and Weiss E.M. Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior 20 (2004) 1-15
7. Beentjes H.J.W.J., d'Haenens L., Van der Voort T.H.A., and Koolstra C.M. Dutch and Flemish children and adolescents as users of interactive media. Communications: The European Journal of Communication 24 2 (1999) 145-166
8. Bondafelli H. Online communication: putting the knowledge gap theory into perspective. In: Schorr A., Campbell W., and Schenk M. (Eds). Communication Research and Media Science in Europe (2003), de Gruyter, Berlin 289-307
9. Broos A. Gender and ICT Anxiety: Male Self-assurance, Female Hesitation. CyberPsychology and Behavior 8 1 (2005) 21-31
10. Broos A., and Roe K. Marginality in the information age: is the gender gap really diminishing?. Communications: The European Journal of Communication 30 2 (2005) 251-260
11. Brosnan M.J. The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 14 (1998) 223-234
12. Bucy E.P. Social access to the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5 1 (2000) 50-61
13. Bussey K., and Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review 106 4 (1999) 676-713
14. Chak K., and Leung L. Shyness and locus of control as predictors of internet addiction and internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7 5 (2004) 559-570
15. Charlton J.P. Measuring perceptual and motivational facets of computer control: the development and validation of the computing control scale. Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 791-815
16. Compeau D., Higgins C.A., and Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study'. MIS Quarterly 23 2 (1999) 145-158
17. Connell J.P. A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. Child Development 56 (1985) 1018-1041
18. de Haan, J., Rijken, S. 2002. The digital divide in The Netherlands: the influence of material, cognitive and social resources on the possession and use of ICTs. The Electronic Journal of Communication. [online], 12(1 & 2). http://www.cios.org.
19. Durndell A., Haag Z., and Laithwaite H. Computer self-efficacy and gender: a cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania. Personality and Individual Differences 28 (2000) 1037-1044
20. Durndell A., and Haag Z. Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety. Attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet by gender. Computers in Human Behavior 18 (2002) 521-535
21. Eastin M.S., and LaRose R. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (2000). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html [online] 6(1).
22. Eastin M.S., and LaRose R. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (2000). http:/www.ascusc.Org/jcmc/vol16/issue1/eastin.html [online] 6(1).
23. Eastin M.S. Teen Internet use: relating social perceptions and cognitive models to behaviour. CyberPsychology and Behavior 8 1 (2005) 62-75
24. Eurostat. Community survey on ICT usage in households and by individuals. Statistics in Focus (2005) 38/2005
25. Facer K., and Furlong R. Beyond the Myth of the Cyberkid: young people at the margins of the information revolution. Journal of Youth Studies 4 4 (2001) 451-469
26. Flanagin A.J., and Metzger M.J. Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research 27 1 (2001) 153-181
27. Gunkel D.J. Second thoughts: toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media and Society 5 4 (2003) 499-522
28. Hasan B. The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003) 443-450
29. Hoffman D.L., Novak T.P., and Schlosser A.E. Locus of control, web use, and consumer attitudes toward Internet regulation. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 22 (2003) 41-57
30. ILO (International Labour Office). International Standard Classification of Occupations. ISCO-88 (1990), ILO, Geneva
31. LaRose R., Mastro D., and Eastin M.S. Understanding Internet usage: a social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review 19 (2001) 395-413
32. Lefcourt H.M. Locus of control. In: Robinson J.P., Shaver P.R., and Wrightsman L.S. (Eds). Measures of Personality and Social-Psychological Attitudes (1991), Academic Press, London
33. Lenhart A., and Horrigan J.B. Re-visualizing the digital divide as a digital spectrum. IT & Society 1 5 (2003) 23-39. [online]. http://www.ITandSociety.org
34. Liaw S.-S. Understanding user perceptions of world-wide web environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18 (2002) 137-148
35. Livingstone S., Bober M., and Helsper E. Inequalities and the digital divide in children and young people's Internet use (2005). [online]. http://www.children-go-online.net
36. Losh S.C. Gender, educational, and occupational digital gaps. Social Science Computer Review 22 2 (2004) 152-166
37. Merton R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure (1963), Free Press, Glencoe, NY
38. Murphy C., Coover D., and Owen S. Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 49 (1989) 893-899
39. NTIA. Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion (2000), National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttn00.pdf Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttn00.pdf
40. NTIA. Falling through the Net: defining the digital divide. In: Compaine B.M. (Ed). The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? (2001), MIT Press, London 17-46
41. Odell P.M., Korgen K.O., Schumacher P., and Delucchi M. Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3 5 (2000) 855-862
42. Potosky D., and Bobko P. A model for predicting computer experience from attitudes toward computers. Journal of Business and Psychology 15 3 (2001) 391-404
43. Roe K. Different sestinies-different melodies: school achievement, anticipated status and adolescents' tastes in music. European Journal of Communication 7 3 (1992) 335-357
44. Roe K. Boys will be boys and girls will be girls: changes in children's media use. Communications: The European Journal of Communication 23 1 (1998) 5-26
45. Roe K. Socio-economic status and children's television use. Communications: The European Journal of Communication 25 1 (2000) 3-18
46. Roe K., and Broos A. Marginality in the information age: the socio-demographics of computer disquietude. Communications: The European Journal of Communication 30 1 (2005) 91-96
47. In: Rosengren K.E., and Windahl S. (Eds). Media Matter: TV-use in Childhood and Adolescence (1989), Ablex, Norwood, NJ
48. Rotter, J.B., 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs. 80 1. Whole No. 609.
49. Schumacher P., and Morahan-Martin J. Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behaviour 17 (2001) 27-35
50. Selwyn N. Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society 6 3 (2004) 341-362
51. Servon L.J. Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community and Public Policy (2002), Blackwell, Oxford
52. Sherer M., Maddux J.E., Mercandante B., Prentice-Dunn S., Jacobs B., and Rogers R.W. The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports 51 (1982) 663-671
53. Sherman R.C., End C., Kraan E., Cole A., Campbell J., Birchmeier Z., and Klausner J. The Internet gender gap among college students: forgotten but not gone?. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3 5 (2000) 885-894
54. Todman J. Gender differences in computer anxiety among university entrants since 1992. Computers and Education 34 (2000) 27-35
55. Torkzadeh G., and Van Dyke T.P. Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer use attitudes. Computers in Human Behaviour 18 (2002) 479-494
56. Tsai C., Lin S.S.J., and Tsai M. Developing an Internet attitude scale for high school students. Computers and Education 37 (2001) 41-51
57. Van der Voort T.A.H., Beentjes J.W.J., Bovill M., Gaskell G., Koolstra C.M., Livingstone S., and Marseille N. Young people's ownership and uses of new and old forms of media in Britain and the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication 13 4 (1998) 457-477
58. Walsh E.O., Gazala M.E., and Ham C. The truth about the digital divide. In: Compaine B.M. (Ed). The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth (2001), MIT Press, London 279-284
59. Weiser E.B. Gender differences in Internet use patterns and internet application preferences. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3 2 (2000) 167-177
60. White C., and Scheb II J.M. Impact of media messages about the Internet: Internet anxiety as a factor in the adoption process in the USA. New Media & Society 2 2 (2000) 181-194
61. Zhang Y. Comparison of Internet attitudes between industrial employees and college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior 5 2 (2002) 143-149