Connecting dark matter UV complete models to direct detection rates via effective field theory

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  D’Eramo, Francesco ^a,b   Procura, Massimiliano ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Effective field theories; Renormalization Group

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928159203     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)054     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept.267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
2. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
3. J.L. Feng, Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48 (2010) 495 [arXiv:1003.0904] [INSPIRE].
4. B.W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological lower bound on heavy neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett.39 (1977) 165 [INSPIRE].
5. R.J. Scherrer and M.S. Turner, On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev.D 33 (1986) 1585 [Erratum.D 34 (1986) 3263] [INSPIRE].
6. M. Srednicki, R. Watkins and K.A. Olive, Calculations of relic densities in the early universe, Nucl. Phys.B 310 (1988) 693 [INSPIRE].
7. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: improved analysis, Nucl. Phys.B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
8. H. Goldberg, Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.50 (1983) 1419 [Erratum.103 (2009) 099905] [INSPIRE].
9. J.R. Ellis, J.S. Hagelin, D.V. Nanopoulos, K.A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric relics from the big bang, Nucl. Phys.B 238 (1984) 453 [INSPIRE].
10. T. Falk, K.A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Heavy sneutrinos as dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 339 (1994) 248 [hep-ph/9409270] [INSPIRE].
11. G. Servant and T.M.P. Tait, Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys.B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071] [INSPIRE].
12. H.-C. Cheng, J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev, Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125] [INSPIRE].
13. A. Birkedal, A. Noble, M. Perelstein and A. Spray, Little Higgs dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 035002 [hep-ph/0603077] [INSPIRE].
14. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP11 (2010) 042 [arXiv:1008.1591] [INSPIRE].
15. A.L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers and Y. Xu, The effective field theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP02 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1203.3542] [INSPIRE].
16. A.L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers and Y. Xu, Model independent direct detection analyses, arXiv:1211.2818 [INSPIRE].
17. N. Anand, A.L. Fitzpatrick and W.C. Haxton, Weakly interacting massive particle-nucleus elastic scattering response, Phys. Rev.C 89 (2014) 065501 [arXiv:1308.6288] [INSPIRE].
18. M.I. Gresham and K.M. Zurek, Effect of nuclear response functions in dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 123521 [arXiv:1401.3739] [INSPIRE].
19. A. Alves, S. Profumo, F.S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, Effective field theory approach to the galactic center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 115003 [arXiv:1403.5027] [INSPIRE].
20. N. Anand, A.L. Fitzpatrick and W.C. Haxton, Model-independent analyses of dark-matter particle interactions, arXiv:1405.6690 [INSPIRE].
21. R. Catena, Prospects for direct detection of dark matter in an effective theory approach, JCAP07 (2014) 055 [arXiv:1406.0524] [INSPIRE].
22. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Standard model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection. II. QCD analysis and hadronic matrix elements, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 043505 [arXiv:1409.8290] [INSPIRE].
23. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
24. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders, Phys. Lett.B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
25. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on dark matter from colliders, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
26. A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC bounds on interactions of dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 095013 [arXiv:1108.1196] [INSPIRE].
27. Y. Bai, P.J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the frontier of dark matter direct detection, JHEP12 (2010) 048 [arXiv:1005.3797] [INSPIRE].
28. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, LEP shines light on dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 014028 [arXiv:1103.0240] [INSPIRE].
29. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [INSPIRE].
30. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.-C. Yuan, Global constraints on effective dark matter interactions: relic density, direct detection, indirect detection and collider, JCAP05 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1201.3402] [INSPIRE].
31. Y. Bai and T.M.P. Tait, Searches with mono-leptons, Phys. Lett.B 723 (2013) 384 [arXiv:1208.4361] [INSPIRE].
32. M.R. Buckley, Using effective operators to understand CoGeNT and CDMS-Si signals, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055028 [arXiv:1308.4146] [INSPIRE].
33. L. Vecchi, WIMPs and un-naturalness, arXiv:1312.5695 [INSPIRE].
34. M.A. Fedderke, J.-Y. Chen, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, The fermionic dark matter Higgs portal: an effective field theory approach, JHEP08 (2014) 122 [arXiv:1404.2283] [INSPIRE].
35. S. Matsumoto, S. Mukhopadhyay and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter: a comprehensive analysis in effective field theory, JHEP10 (2014) 155 [arXiv:1407.1859] [INSPIRE].
36. I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Unitarity and monojet bounds on models for DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 015023 [arXiv:1112.5457] [INSPIRE].
37. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 728 (2014) 412 [arXiv:1307.2253] [INSPIRE].
38. S. Profumo, W. Shepherd and T. Tait, Pitfalls of dark matter crossing symmetries, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 056018 [arXiv:1307.6277] [INSPIRE].
39. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, part II: complete analysis for the s-channel, JCAP06 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1402.1275] [INSPIRE].
40. M. Endo and Y. Yamamoto, Unitarity bounds on dark matter effective interactions at LHC, JHEP06 (2014) 126 [arXiv:1403.6610] [INSPIRE].
41. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, T. Jacques, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, part III: analysis for the t-channel, JCAP09 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1405.3101] [INSPIRE].
42. D. Racco, A. Wulzer and F. Zwirner, Robust collider limits on heavy-mediator dark matter, arXiv:1502.04701 [INSPIRE].
43. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1307.8120] [INSPIRE].
44. H. An, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang, Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115014 [arXiv:1308.0592] [INSPIRE].
45. A. DiFranzo, K.I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman and T.M.P. Tait, Simplified models for dark matter interacting with quarks, JHEP11 (2013) 014 [Erratum.01 (2014) 162] [arXiv:1308.2679] [INSPIRE].
46. O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Beyond effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP01 (2014) 025 [arXiv:1308.6799] [INSPIRE].
47. M. Papucci, A. Vichi and K.M. Zurek, Monojet versus the rest of the world I: t-channel models, JHEP11 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1402.2285] [INSPIRE].
48. A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP06 (2014) 081 [arXiv:1402.6287] [INSPIRE].
49. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Lepton portal dark matter, JHEP08 (2014) 153 [arXiv:1402.6696] [INSPIRE].
50. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Leptophilic effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1402.7358] [INSPIRE].
51. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko and C.B. Verhaaren, Leptophilic dark matter and the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, JHEP08 (2014) 147 [arXiv:1402.7369] [INSPIRE].
52. K. Hamaguchi, S.P. Liew, T. Moroi and Y. Yamamoto, Isospin-violating dark matter with colored mediators, JHEP05 (2014) 086 [arXiv:1403.0324] [INSPIRE].
53. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, S. Rydbeck and S. Vogl, Majorana dark matter with a coloured mediator: collider vs direct and indirect searches, JHEP06 (2014) 169 [arXiv:1403.4634] [INSPIRE].
54. A. Askew, S. Chauhan, B. Penning, W. Shepherd and M. Tripathi, Searching for dark matter at hadron colliders, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 29 (2014) 1430041 [arXiv:1406.5662] [INSPIRE].
55. O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan, S.A. Malik and C. McCabe, Characterising dark matter searches at colliders and direct detection experiments: vector mediators, JHEP01 (2015) 037 [arXiv:1407.8257] [INSPIRE].
56. S. Malik et al., Interplay and characterization of dark matter searches at colliders and in direct detection experiments, arXiv:1409.4075 [INSPIRE].
57. J. Abdallah et al., Simplified models for dark matter and missing energy searches at the LHC, arXiv:1409.2893 [INSPIRE].
58. M.R. Buckley, D. Feld and D. Goncalves, Scalar simplified models for dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 015017 [arXiv:1410.6497] [INSPIRE].
59. P. Harris, V.V. Khoze, M. Spannowsky and C. Williams, Constraining dark sectors at colliders: beyond the effective theory approach, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 055009 [arXiv:1411.0535] [INSPIRE].
60. J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 083502 [arXiv:0907.3159] [INSPIRE].
61. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Universal behavior in the scattering of heavy, weakly interacting dark matter on nuclear targets, Phys. Lett.B 707 (2012) 539 [arXiv:1111.0016] [INSPIRE].
62. M.T. Frandsen, U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer, P. Mertsch and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Loop-induced dark matter direct detection signals from gamma-ray lines, JCAP10 (2012) 033 [arXiv:1207.3971] [INSPIRE].
63. U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer and J. Unwin, The impact of heavy-quark loops on LHC dark matter searches, JHEP07 (2013) 125 [arXiv:1208.4605] [INSPIRE].
64. U. Haisch and F. Kahlhoefer, On the importance of loop-induced spin-independent interactions for dark matter direct detection, JCAP04 (2013) 050 [arXiv:1302.4454] [INSPIRE].
65. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, WIMP-nucleon scattering with heavy WIMP effective theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 211602 [arXiv:1309.4092] [INSPIRE].
66. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Standard model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection. I. Weak-scale matching, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 043504 [arXiv:1401.3339] [INSPIRE].
67. J. Kopp, L. Michaels and J. Smirnov, Loopy constraints on leptophilic dark matter and internal bremsstrahlung, JCAP04 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1401.6457] [INSPIRE].
68. A. Crivellin, F. D’Eramo and M. Procura, New constraints on dark matter effective theories from standard model loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 191304 [arXiv:1402.1173] [INSPIRE].
69. A. Crivellin and U. Haisch, Dark matter direct detection constraints from gauge bosons loops, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 115011 [arXiv:1408.5046] [INSPIRE].
70. P. Gondolo et al., DarkSUSY: computing supersymmetric dark matter properties numerically, JCAP07 (2004) 008 [astro-ph/0406204] [INSPIRE].
71. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and M. Procura, Accurate evaluation of hadronic uncertainties in spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering: disentangling two- and three-flavor effects, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 054021 [arXiv:1312.4951] [INSPIRE].
72. M.W. Goodman and E. Witten, Detectability of certain dark matter candidates, Phys. Rev.D 31 (1985) 3059 [INSPIRE].
73. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
74. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
75. P. Cushman et al., Snowmass CF1 summary: WIMP dark matter direct detection, arXiv:1310.8327 [INSPIRE].
76. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
77. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
78. V. Barger, W.-Y. Keung and D. Marfatia, Electromagnetic properties of dark matter: dipole moments and charge form factor, Phys. Lett.B 696 (2011) 74 [arXiv:1007.4345] [INSPIRE].
79. T. Banks, J.-F. Fortin and S. Thomas, Direct detection of dark matter electromagnetic dipole moments, arXiv:1007.5515 [INSPIRE].
80. J.-F. Fortin and T.M.P. Tait, Collider constraints on dipole-interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 063506 [arXiv:1103.3289] [INSPIRE].
81. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Remarks on Higgs boson interactions with nucleons, Phys. Lett.B 78 (1978) 443 [INSPIRE].
82. Y.G. Kim and K.Y. Lee, The minimal model of fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 115012 [hep-ph/0611069] [INSPIRE].
83. Y.G. Kim, K.Y. Lee and S. Shin, Singlet fermionic dark matter, JHEP05 (2008) 100 [arXiv:0803.2932] [INSPIRE].
84. J. March-Russell, S.M. West, D. Cumberbatch and D. Hooper, Heavy dark matter through the Higgs portal, JHEP07 (2008) 058 [arXiv:0801.3440] [INSPIRE].
85. S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and N. Okada, Can WIMP dark matter overcome the nightmare scenario?, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 055026 [arXiv:1005.5651] [INSPIRE].
86. L. Lopez-Honorez, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter and a standard model like Higgs at 125 GeV, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 179 [arXiv:1203.2064] [INSPIRE].
87. A.A. Petrov and W. Shepherd, Searching for dark matter at LHC with mono-Higgs production, Phys. Lett.B 730 (2014) 178 [arXiv:1311.1511] [INSPIRE].
88. L. Carpenter et al., Mono-Higgs-boson: a new collider probe of dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 075017 [arXiv:1312.2592] [INSPIRE].
89. A. Berlin, T. Lin and L.-T. Wang, Mono-Higgs detection of dark matter at the LHC, JHEP06 (2014) 078 [arXiv:1402.7074] [INSPIRE].
90. F. D’Eramo, Dark matter and Higgs boson physics, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 083522 [arXiv:0705.4493] [INSPIRE].
91. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Higgs decays to dark matter: beyond the minimal model, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 113001 [arXiv:1109.4872] [INSPIRE].
92. Y. Bai, P. Draper and J. Shelton, Measuring the invisible Higgs width at the 7 and 8 TeV LHC, JHEP07 (2012) 192 [arXiv:1112.4496] [INSPIRE].
93. A. Greljo, J. Julio, J.F. Kamenik, C. Smith and J. Zupan, Constraining Higgs mediated dark matter interactions, JHEP11 (2013) 190 [arXiv:1309.3561] [INSPIRE].
94. C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett.B 342 (1995) 189 [hep-ph/9304230] [INSPIRE].
95. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 64 (2001) 043502 [hep-ph/0101138] [INSPIRE].
96. D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
97. Z.-z. Xing, H. Zhang and S. Zhou, Impacts of the Higgs mass on vacuum stability, running fermion masses and two-body Higgs decays, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 013013 [arXiv:1112.3112] [INSPIRE].
98. J. March-Russell, J. Unwin and S.M. West, Closing in on asymmetric dark matter I: model independent limits for interactions with quarks, JHEP08 (2012) 029 [arXiv:1203.4854] [INSPIRE].
99. M. Freytsis and Z. Ligeti, On dark matter models with uniquely spin-dependent detection possibilities, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 115009 [arXiv:1012.5317] [INSPIRE].
100. G.F. Giudice, E.W. Kolb and A. Riotto, Largest temperature of the radiation era and its cosmological implications, Phys. Rev.D 64 (2001) 023508 [hep-ph/0005123] [INSPIRE].
101. F. D’Eramo, L. Fei and J. Thaler, Dark matter assimilation into the baryon asymmetry, JCAP03 (2012) 010 [arXiv:1111.5615] [INSPIRE].
102. C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys.B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
103. A. Alves, S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, The dark Z′portal: direct, indirect and collider searches, JHEP04 (2014) 063 [arXiv:1312.5281] [INSPIRE].
104. G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini, M.H.G. Tytgat and B. Zaldivar, Invisible Z′and dark matter: LHC vs LUX constraints, JHEP03 (2014) 134 [arXiv:1401.0221] [INSPIRE].
105. O. Lebedev and Y. Mambrini, Axial dark matter: the case for an invisible Z′, Phys. Lett.B 734 (2014) 350 [arXiv:1403.4837] [INSPIRE].
106. A. Alves, A. Berlin, S. Profumo and F. S. Queiroz, Dark matter complementarity and the Z′portal,arXiv:1501.03490[INSPIRE].
107. M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading U.S.A. (1995) [INSPIRE].
108. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. I. Wave function renormalization, Nucl. Phys.B 222 (1983) 83 [INSPIRE].
109. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. II. Yukawa couplings, Nucl. Phys.B 236 (1984) 221 [INSPIRE].
110. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. III. Scalar quartic couplings, Nucl. Phys.B 249 (1985) 70 [INSPIRE].