Characterising dark matter searches at colliders and direct detection experiments: vector mediators

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Buchmueller, Oliver ^a   Dolan, Matthew J ^b   Malik, Sarah A ^a   McCabe, Christopher ^c,d  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Exotics; Hadron Hadron Scattering; Particle and resonance production

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921996100     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2015)037     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Search for dark matter candidates and large extra dimensions in events with a jet and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector, JHEP04 (2013) 075 [arXiv:1210.4491] [INSPIRE].
2. ATLAS collaboration, Search for new phenomena in monojet plus missing transverse momentum final states using 10 fb−1of pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-147 (2012).
3. CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter and large extra dimensions in monojet events in pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 7 TeV, JHEP09 (2012) 094 [arXiv:1206.5663] [INSPIRE].
4. CMS Collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048 (2012).
5. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C.S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective dark matter model: relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC, JHEP08 (2011) 018 [arXiv:0912.4511] [INSPIRE].
6. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
7. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders, Phys. Lett.B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
8. Y. Bai, P.J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the frontier of dark matter direct detection, JHEP12 (2010) 048 [arXiv:1005.3797] [INSPIRE].
9. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on dark matter from colliders, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
10. A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC bounds on interactions of dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 095013 [arXiv:1108.1196] [INSPIRE].
11. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [INSPIRE].
12. O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Beyond effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP01 (2014) 025 [arXiv:1308.6799] [INSPIRE].
13. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, LEP shines light on dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 014028 [arXiv:1103.0240] [INSPIRE].
14. P.J. Fox and C. Williams, Next-to-leading order predictions for dark matter production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 054030 [arXiv:1211.6390] [INSPIRE].
15. J. Goodman and W. Shepherd, LHC bounds on UV-complete models of dark matter, arXiv:1111.2359 [INSPIRE].
16. I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Unitarity and monojet bounds on models for DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 015023 [arXiv:1112.5457] [INSPIRE].
17. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 728 (2014) 412 [arXiv:1307.2253] [INSPIRE].
18. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. Part II: complete analysis for the s-channel, JCAP06 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1402.1275] [INSPIRE].
19. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, T. Jacques, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. Part III: analysis for the t-channel, arXiv:1405.3101 [INSPIRE].
20. Y. Bai and T.M.P. Tait, Searches with mono-leptons, Phys. Lett.B 723 (2013) 384 [arXiv:1208.4361] [INSPIRE].
21. L. Carpenter et al., Mono-Higgs-boson: a new collider probe of dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 075017 [arXiv:1312.2592] [INSPIRE].
22. A.A. Petrov and W. Shepherd, Searching for dark matter at LHC with Mono-Higgs production, Phys. Lett.B 730 (2014) 178 [arXiv:1311.1511] [INSPIRE].
23. LHC New Physics Working Group collaboration, D. Alves et al., Simplified models for LHC new physics searches, J. Phys.G 39 (2012) 105005 [arXiv:1105.2838] [INSPIRE].
24. A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP06 (2014) 081 [arXiv:1402.6287] [INSPIRE].
25. ATLAS collaboration, Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV proton-proton collisions using the ATLAS experiment, JHEP10 (2013) 130 [Erratum ibid.1401 (2014) 109] [arXiv:1308.1841] [INSPIRE].
26. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in the multijet and missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, JHEP06 (2014) 055 [arXiv:1402.4770] [INSPIRE].
27. O. Buchmueller and J. Marrouche, Universal mass limits on gluino and third-generation squarks in the context of natural-like SUSY spectra, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 29 (2014) 1450032 [arXiv:1304.2185] [INSPIRE].
28. J. Barnard and B. Farmer, A simple technique for combining simplified models and its application to direct stop production, JHEP06 (2014) 132 [arXiv:1402.3298] [INSPIRE].
29. M. Papucci, K. Sakurai, A. Weiler and L. Zeune, Fastlim: a fast LHC limit calculator, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3163 [arXiv:1402.0492] [INSPIRE].
30. S. Kraml et al., SModelS: a tool for interpreting simplified-model results from the LHC and its application to supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2868 [arXiv:1312.4175] [INSPIRE].
31. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, R. Primulando and C.-T. Yu, Taking a razor to dark matter parameter space at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 015010 [arXiv:1203.1662] [INSPIRE].
32. H. An, X. Ji and L.-T. Wang, Light dark matter and Z′dark force at colliders, JHEP07 (2012) 182 [arXiv:1202.2894] [INSPIRE].
33. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Search for gamma-ray spectral lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and dark matter implications, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 082002 [arXiv:1305.5597] [INSPIRE].
34. U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer and J. Unwin, The impact of heavy-quark loops on LHC dark matter searches, JHEP07 (2013) 125 [arXiv:1208.4605] [INSPIRE].
35. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1307.8120] [INSPIRE].
36. H. An, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang, Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115014 [arXiv:1308.0592] [INSPIRE].
37. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion portal dark matter, JHEP11 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1308.0612] [INSPIRE].
38. A. DiFranzo, K.I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman and T.M.P. Tait, Simplified models for dark matter interacting with quarks, JHEP11 (2013) 014 [Erratum ibid.1401 (2014) 162] [arXiv:1308.2679] [INSPIRE].
39. M. Papucci, A. Vichi and K.M. Zurek, Monojet versus the rest of the world I: t-channel models, JHEP11 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1402.2285] [INSPIRE].
40. K. Hamaguchi, S.P. Liew, T. Moroi and Y. Yamamoto, Isospin-violating dark matter with colored mediators, JHEP05 (2014) 086 [arXiv:1403.0324] [INSPIRE].
41. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, S. Rydbeck and S. Vogl, Majorana dark matter with a coloured mediator: collider vs. direct and indirect searches, JHEP06 (2014) 169 [arXiv:1403.4634] [INSPIRE].
42. P.J. Fox and E. Poppitz, Leptophilic dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 79 (2009) 083528 [arXiv:0811.0399] [INSPIRE].
43. S. Cassel, D.M. Ghilencea and G.G. Ross, Electroweak and dark matter constraints on a Z′in models with a hidden valley, Nucl. Phys.B 827 (2010) 256 [arXiv:0903.1118] [INSPIRE].
44. P.J. Fox, J. Liu, D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, An effective Z′, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 115006 [arXiv:1104.4127] [INSPIRE].
45. Y. Mambrini, The ZZ′kinetic mixing in the light of the recent direct and indirect dark matter searches, JCAP07 (2011) 009 [arXiv:1104.4799] [INSPIRE].
46. P. Gondolo, P. Ko and Y. Omura, Light dark matter in leptophobic Z′models, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 035022 [arXiv:1106.0885] [INSPIRE].
47. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Direct detection of dark matter in models with a light Z′, JHEP09 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1107.2118] [INSPIRE].
48. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, A. Preston, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, LHC and tevatron bounds on the dark matter direct detection cross-section for vector mediators, JHEP07 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1204.3839] [INSPIRE].
49. H. An, R. Huo and L.-T. Wang, Searching for low mass dark portal at the LHC, Phys. Dark Univ.2 (2013) 50 [arXiv:1212.2221] [INSPIRE].
50. A. Alves, S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, The dark Z′portal: direct, indirect and collider searches, JHEP04 (2014) 063 [arXiv:1312.5281] [INSPIRE].
51. G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini, M.H.G. Tytgat and B. Zaldivar, Invisible Z′and dark matter: LHC vs LUX constraints, JHEP03 (2014) 134 [arXiv:1401.0221] [INSPIRE].
52. O. Lebedev and Y. Mambrini, Axial dark matter: the case for an invisible Z′, Phys. Lett.B 734 (2014) 350 [arXiv:1403.4837] [INSPIRE].
53. S. Davidson, Including the Z in an effective field theory for dark matter at the LHC, JHEP1410 (2014) 84 [arXiv:1403.5161] [INSPIRE].
54. M. Fairbairn and J. Heal, On the complementarity of dark matter searches at resonance, arXiv:1406.3288 [INSPIRE].
55. D.E. Soper, M. Spannowsky, C.J. Wallace and T.M.P. Tait, Scattering of dark particles with light mediators, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 115005 [arXiv:1407.2623] [INSPIRE].
56. J. Kumar and D. Marfatia, Matrix element analyses of dark matter scattering and annihilation, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 014035 [arXiv:1305.1611] [INSPIRE].
57. A. Crivellin, F. D’Eramo and M. Procura, New constraints on dark matter effective theories from standard model loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 191304 [arXiv:1402.1173] [INSPIRE].
58. J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 083502 [arXiv:0907.3159] [INSPIRE].
59. N.F. Bell, Y. Cai, R.K. Leane and A.D. Medina, Leptophilic dark matter with Z′interactions, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 035027 [arXiv:1407.3001] [INSPIRE].
60. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
61. M.R. Buckley, D. Hooper, J. Kopp and E. Neil, Light Z′bosons at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 115013 [arXiv:1103.6035] [INSPIRE].
62. M.R. Buckley, D. Hooper and J.L. Rosner, A leptophobic Z′and dark matter from grand unification, Phys. Lett.B 703 (2011) 343 [arXiv:1106.3583] [INSPIRE].
63. M. Duerr, P. Fileviez Perez and M.B. Wise, Gauge theory for baryon and lepton numbers with leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 231801 [arXiv:1304.0576] [INSPIRE].
64. M. Duerr and P. Fileviez Perez, Baryonic dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 732 (2014) 101 [arXiv:1309.3970] [INSPIRE].
65. U. Haisch, F. Kahlhoefer and E. Re, QCD effects in mono-jet searches for dark matter, JHEP12 (2013) 007 [arXiv:1310.4491] [INSPIRE].
66. P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146] [INSPIRE].
67. S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].
68. S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].
69. J. Pumplin et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis, JHEP07 (2002) 012 [hep-ph/0201195] [INSPIRE].
70. A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 63 (2009) 189 [arXiv:0901.0002] [INSPIRE].
71. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE].
72. S. Ovyn, X. Rouby and V. Lemaitre, DELPHES, a framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, arXiv:0903.2225 [INSPIRE].
73. DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
74. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-ktjet clustering algorithm, JHEP04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
75. UK Dark Matter collaboration, G.J. Alner et al., First limits on nuclear recoil events from the ZEPLIN I galactic dark matter detector, Astropart. Phys.23 (2005) 444 [INSPIRE].
76. G.J. Alner et al., First limits on WIMP nuclear recoil signals in ZEPLIN-II: A two phase xenon detector for dark matter detection, Astropart. Phys.28 (2007) 287 [astro-ph/0701858] [INSPIRE].
77. D.Y. Akimov et al., WIMP-nucleon cross-section results from the second science run of ZEPLIN-III, Phys. Lett.B 709 (2012) 14 [arXiv:1110.4769] [INSPIRE].
78. XENON collaboration, J. Angle et al., First results from the XENON10 dark matter experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 021303 [arXiv:0706.0039] [INSPIRE].
79. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
80. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 021301 [arXiv:1301.6620] [INSPIRE].
81. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
82. J.H. Davis, C. Boehm, N. Oppermann, T. Ensslin and T. Lacroix, The XENON100 exclusion limit without considering Leff as a nuisance parameter, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 015027 [arXiv:1203.6823] [INSPIRE].
83. J.H. Davis, T. Ensslin and C. Boehm, New method for analyzing dark matter direct detection data, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 043505 [arXiv:1208.1850] [INSPIRE].
84. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 704 (2013) 111 [arXiv:1211.3788] [INSPIRE].
85. M. Szydagis, A. Fyhrie, D. Thorngren and M. Tripathi, Enhancement of NEST capabilities for simulating low-energy recoils in liquid Xenon, 2013 JINST8 C10003 [arXiv:1307.6601] [INSPIRE].
86. J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys.6 (1996) 87 [INSPIRE].
87. S.K. Lee, M. Lisanti and B.R. Safdi, Dark-matter harmonics beyond annual modulation, JCAP11 (2013) 033 [arXiv:1307.5323] [INSPIRE].
88. C. McCabe, The Earth’s velocity for direct detection experiments, JCAP02 (2014) 027 [arXiv:1312.1355] [INSPIRE].
89. C. McCabe, The astrophysical uncertainties of dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 023530 [arXiv:1005.0579] [INSPIRE].
90. M. Fairbairn, T. Douce and J. Swift, Quantifying astrophysical uncertainties on dark matter direct detection results, Astropart. Phys.47 (2013) 45 [arXiv:1206.2693] [INSPIRE].
91. J. Billard, L. Strigari and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 023524 [arXiv:1307.5458] [INSPIRE].
92. G. Duda, A. Kemper and P. Gondolo, Model independent form factors for spin independent neutralino-nucleon scattering from elastic electron scattering data, JCAP04 (2007) 012 [hep-ph/0608035] [INSPIRE].
93. P. Klos, J. Menéndez, D. Gazit and A. Schwenk, Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 083516 [arXiv:1304.7684] [INSPIRE].
94. S. Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of unknown background, Phys. Rev.D 66 (2002) 032005 [physics/0203002] [INSPIRE].
95. SuperCDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., Search for low-mass weakly interacting massive particles with SuperCDMS, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 241302 [arXiv:1402.7137] [INSPIRE].
96. D.C. Malling et al., After LUX: the LZ program, arXiv:1110.0103 [INSPIRE].
97. P. Grothaus, M. Fairbairn and J. Monroe, Directional dark matter detection beyond the neutrino bound, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 055018 [arXiv:1406.5047] [INSPIRE].
98. F. Ruppin, J. Billard, E. Figueroa-Feliciano and L. Strigari, Complementarity of dark matter detectors in light of the neutrino background, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 083510 [arXiv:1408.3581] [INSPIRE].
99. H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting scalar and pseudoscalar couplings with nucleons, JHEP07 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1202.1292] [INSPIRE].
100. J.R. Ellis, A. Ferstl and K.A. Olive, Reevaluation of the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 481 (2000) 304 [hep-ph/0001005] [INSPIRE].
101. P. Gondolo et al., DarkSUSY: computing supersymmetric dark matter properties numerically, JCAP07 (2004) 008 [astro-ph/0406204] [INSPIRE].
102. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].
103. K. Petraki and R.R. Volkas, Review of asymmetric dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 28 (2013) 1330028 [arXiv:1305.4939] [INSPIRE].
104. CoGeNT collaboration, C.E. Aalseth et al., Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a p-type point contact germanium detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 131301 [arXiv:1002.4703] [INSPIRE].
105. C.E. Aalseth et al., Search for an annual modulation in a p-type point contact germanium dark matter detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 141301 [arXiv:1106.0650] [INSPIRE].
106. CoGeNT collaboration, C.E. Aalseth et al., CoGeNT: a search for low-mass dark matter using p-type point contact germanium detectors, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 012002 [arXiv:1208.5737] [INSPIRE].
107. CoGeNT collaboration, C.E. Aalseth et al., Search for an annual modulation in three years of CoGeNT dark matter detector data, arXiv:1401.3295 [INSPIRE].
108. G. Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II dark matter search, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 1971 [arXiv:1109.0702] [INSPIRE].
109. CDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., Silicon detector dark matter results from the final exposure of CDMS II, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 251301 [arXiv:1304.4279] [INSPIRE].
110. R. Bernabei et al., Final model independent result of DAMA/LIBRA-phase1, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2648 [arXiv:1308.5109] [INSPIRE].
111. J.H. Davis, C. McCabe and C. Boehm, Quantifying the evidence for dark matter in CoGeNT data, JCAP08 (2014) 014 [arXiv:1405.0495] [INSPIRE].
112. A. Brown, S. Henry, H. Kraus and C. McCabe, Extending the CRESST-II commissioning run limits to lower masses, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 021301 [arXiv:1109.2589] [INSPIRE].
113. M. Kuzniak, M.G. Boulay and T. Pollmann, Surface roughness interpretation of 730 kg days CRESST-II results, Astropart. Phys.36 (2012) 77 [arXiv:1203.1576] [INSPIRE].
114. CRESST-II collaboration, G. Angloher et al., Results on low mass WIMPs using an upgraded CRESST-II detector, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3184 [arXiv:1407.3146] [INSPIRE].
115. K. Blum, DAMA vs. the annually modulated muon background, arXiv:1110.0857 [INSPIRE].
116. J. Pradler, B. Singh and I. Yavin, On an unverified nuclear decay and its role in the DAMA experiment, Phys. Lett.B 720 (2013) 399 [arXiv:1210.5501] [INSPIRE].
117. J.H. Davis, Fitting the annual modulation in DAMA with neutrons from muons and neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 081302 [arXiv:1407.1052] [INSPIRE].
118. J. March-Russell, J. Unwin and S.M. West, Closing in on asymmetric dark matter I: model independent limits for interactions with quarks, JHEP08 (2012) 029 [arXiv:1203.4854] [INSPIRE].
119. CMS collaboration, Projected performance of an upgraded CMS detector at the LHC and HL-LHC: contribution to the Snowmass process, arXiv:1307.7135 [INSPIRE].
120. CMS collaboration, tudy of the discovery reach in searches for supersymmetry at CMS with 3000/fb, CMS-PAS-FTR-13-014 (2013).
121. ATLAS collaboration, Search for Supersymmetry at the high luminosity LHC with the ATLAS experiment, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-010 (2014).
122. ATLAS collaboration, Sensitivity to WIMP dark matter in the final states containing jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector at 14 TeV LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-007 (2014).
123. G. Salam and A. Weiler, Collider reach, http://collider-reach.web.cern.ch/.
124. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile, The XENON1T dark matter search experiment, Springer Proc. Phys.C12-02-22 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1206.6288] [INSPIRE].
125. S.S. AbdusSalam, B.C. Allanach, M.J. Dolan, F. Feroz and M.P. Hobson, Selecting a model of supersymmetry breaking mediation, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 035017 [arXiv:0906.0957] [INSPIRE].
126. B.C. Allanach and M.J. Dolan, Supersymmetry with prejudice: fitting the wrong model to LHC data, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 055022 [arXiv:1107.2856] [INSPIRE].
127. O. Buchmueller et al., The CMSSM and NUHM1 after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2922 [arXiv:1312.5250] [INSPIRE].