Isospin-violating dark matter with colored mediators

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Hamaguchi, Koichi ^a   Liew, Seng Pei ^a   Moroi, Takeo ^a   Yamamoto, Yasuhiro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Hadronic Colliders; Phenomenological Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924189207     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2014)086     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. [1] Planck collaboration. P.A.R. Ade et al.. Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters. arXiv:1303.5076 [INSPIRE].
2. [2] G. Bertone. D. Hooper and J. Silk. Particle dark matter: evidence. candidates and constraints. Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
3. [3] DAMA and LIBRA collaborations. R. Bernabei et al.. New results from DAMA/LIBRA. Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 39 [arXiv:1002.1028] [INSPIRE].
4. [4] CoGeNT collaboration. C.E. Aalseth et al.. Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a P-type point contact germanium detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131301 [arXiv:1002.4703] [INSPIRE].
5. [5] C.E. Aalseth et al.. Search for an annual modulation in a P-type point contact germanium dark matter detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 141301 [arXiv:1106.0650] [INSPIRE].
6. [6] CoGeNT collaboration. C.E. Aalseth et al.. Search for an annual modulation in three years of CoGeNT dark matter detector data. arXiv:1401.3295 [INSPIRE].
7. [7] G. Angloher et al.. Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II dark matter search. Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1971 [arXiv:1109.0702] [INSPIRE].
8. [8] CDMS collaboration. R. Agnese et al.. Silicon detector dark matter results from the final exposure of CDMS II. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 251301 [arXiv:1304.4279] [INSPIRE].
9. [9] XENON10 collaboration. J. Angle et al.. A search for light dark matter in XENON10 data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 051301 [Erratum. 110 (2013) 249901] [arXiv:1104.3088] [INSPIRE].
10. [10] XENON100 collaboration. E. Aprile et al.. Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
11. [11] LUX collaboration. D.S. Akerib et al.. First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
12. [12] M. Felizardo et al.. Final analysis and results of the phase II SIMPLE dark matter search. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 201302 [arXiv:1106.3014] [INSPIRE].
13. [13] CDMS collaboration. D.S. Akerib et al.. A low-threshold analysis of CDMS shallow-site data. Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 122004 [arXiv:1010.4290] [INSPIRE].
14. [14] CDMS-II collaboration. Z. Ahmed et al.. Results from a low-energy analysis of the CDMS II germanium data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1011.2482] [INSPIRE].
15. [15] Super CDMSSoudan collaboration. R. Agnese et al.. CDMSlite: a search for low-mass WIMPs using voltage-assisted calorimetric ionization detection in the SuperCDMS experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041302 [arXiv:1309.3259] [INSPIRE].
16. [16] SuperCDMS collaboration. R. Agnese et al.. Search for low-mass WIMPs with SuperCDMS. arXiv:1402.7137 [INSPIRE].
17. [17] M.I. Gresham and K.M. Zurek. Light dark matter anomalies after LUX. Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 016017 [arXiv:1311.2082] [INSPIRE].
18. [18] E. Del Nobile. G.B. Gelmini. P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh. Update on light WIMP limits: LUX. lite and light. JCAP 03 (2014) 014 [arXiv:1311.4247] [INSPIRE].
19. [19] P.J. Fox. G. Jung. P. Sorensen and N. Weiner. Dark matter in light of LUX. arXiv:1401.0216 [INSPIRE].
20. [20] A. Kurylov and M. Kamionkowski. Generalized analysis of weakly interacting massive particle searches. Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 063503 [hep-ph/0307185] [INSPIRE].
21. [21] F. Giuliani. Are direct search experiments sensitive to all spin-independent WIMP candidates?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 101301 [hep-ph/0504157] [INSPIRE].
22. [22] S. Chang. J. Liu. A. Pierce. N. Weiner and I. Yavin. CoGeNT interpretations. JCAP 08 (2010) 018 [arXiv:1004.0697] [INSPIRE].
23. [23] Z. Kang. T. Li. T. Liu. C. Tong and J.M. Yang. Light dark matter from the U(1)X sector inthe NMSSM with gauge mediation. JCAP 01 (2011) 028 [arXiv:1008.5243] [INSPIRE].
24. [24] J.L. Feng. J. Kumar. D. Marfatia and D. Sanford. Isospin-violating dark matter. Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 124 [arXiv:1102.4331] [INSPIRE].
25. [25] M.T. Frandsen. F. Kahlhoefer. C. McCabe. S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg. The unbearable lightness of being: CDMS versus XENON. JCAP 07 (2013) 023 [arXiv:1304.6066] [INSPIRE].
26. [26] J.L. Feng. J. Kumar and D. Sanford. Xenophobic dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015021 [arXiv:1306.2315] [INSPIRE].
27. [27] V. Cirigliano. M.L. Graesser. G. Ovanesyan and I.M. Shoemaker. Shining LUX on isospin-violating dark matter beyond leading order. arXiv:1311.5886 [INSPIRE].
28. [28] S. Chang. R. Edezhath. J. Hutchinson and M. Luty. Effective WIMPs. Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1307.8120] [INSPIRE].
29. [29] H. An. L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang. Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction. arXiv:1308.0592 [INSPIRE].
30. [30] Y. Bai and J. Berger. Fermion portal dark matter. JHEP 11 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1308.0612] [INSPIRE].
31. [31] A. DiFranzo. K.I. Nagao. A. Rajaraman and T.M.P. Tait. Simplified models for dark matter interacting with quarks. JHEP 11 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1308.2679] [INSPIRE].
32. [32] M. Papucci. A. Vichi and K.M. Zurek. Monojet versus rest of the world I: t-channel models. arXiv:1402.2285 [INSPIRE].
33. [33] M.R. Buckley and W.H. Lippincott. A spin-dependent interpretation for possible signals of light dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 056003 [arXiv:1306.2349] [INSPIRE].
34. [34] J.R. Ellis. K.A. Olive and C. Savage. Hadronic uncertainties in the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 065026 [arXiv:0801.3656] [INSPIRE].
35. [35] Particle Data Group collaboration. J. Beringer et al.. Review of particle physics (RPP). Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
36. [36] A. Birkedal. K. Matchev and M. Perelstein. Dark matter at colliders: a model independent approach. Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 077701 [hep-ph/0403004] [INSPIRE].
37. [37] M. Beltrán. D. Hooper. E.W. Kolb. Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait. Maverick dark matter at colliders. JHEP 09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
38. [38] J. Goodman et al.. Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders. Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
39. [39] J. Goodman et al.. Constraints on dark matter from colliders. Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
40. [40] Y. Bai. P.J. Fox and R. Harnik. The Tevatron at the frontier of dark matter direct detection. JHEP 12 (2010) 048 [arXiv:1005.3797] [INSPIRE].
41. [41] P.J. Fox. R. Harnik. J. Kopp and Y. Tsai. LEP shines light on dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 014028 [arXiv:1103.0240] [INSPIRE].
42. [42] P.J. Fox. R. Harnik. J. Kopp and Y. Tsai. Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [INSPIRE].
43. [43] Y. Bai and T.M.P. Tait. Searches with mono-leptons. Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 384 [arXiv:1208.4361] [INSPIRE].
44. [44] CMS collaboration. Search for dark matter and large extra dimensions in monojet events in pp collisions at √s = 7TeV. JHEP 09 (2012) 094 [arXiv:1206.5663] [INSPIRE].
45. [45] CMS collaboration. Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions at √s = 8TeV. CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048. CERN. Geneva Switzerland (2012).
46. [46] CMS collaboration. Search for dark matter and large extra dimensions in pp collisions yielding a photon and missing transverse energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 261803 [arXiv:1204.0821] [INSPIRE].
47. [47] CMS collaboration. Search for dark matter in the mono-lepton channel with pp collision events at center-of-mass energy of 8TeV. CMS-PAS-EXO-13-004. CERN. Geneva Switzerland (2013).
48. [48] ATLAS collaboration. Search for dark matter candidates and large extra dimensions in events with a jet and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector. JHEP 04 (2013) 075 [arXiv:1210.4491] [INSPIRE].
49. [49] ATLAS collaboration. Search for new phenomena in monojet plus missing transverse momentum final states using 10 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. ATLAS-CONF-2012-147. CERN. Geneva Switzerland (2012).
50. [50] ATLAS collaboration. Search for dark matter in events with a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041802 [arXiv:1309.4017] [INSPIRE].
51. [51] J. Alwall. M. Herquet. F. Maltoni. O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer. MadGraph 5: going beyond. JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
52. [52] J. Kumar. D. Sanford and L.E. Strigari. New constraints on isospin-violating dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 081301 [arXiv:1112.4849] [INSPIRE].
53. [53] A. Friedland. M.L. Graesser. I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi. Probing nonstandard Standard Model backgrounds with LHC monojets. Phys. Lett. B 714 (2012) 267 [arXiv:1111.5331] [INSPIRE].
54. 54][ I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi. Unitarity and monojet bounds on models for DAMA. CoGeNT and CRESST-II. Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015023 [arXiv:1112.5457] [INSPIRE].
55. [55] G. Busoni. A. De Simone. E. Morgante and A. Riotto. On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 412 [arXiv:1307.2253] [INSPIRE].
56. [56] O. Buchmueller. M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe. Beyond effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. JHEP 01 (2014) 025 [arXiv:1308.6799] [INSPIRE].
57. [57] Fermi-LAT collaboration. M. Ackermann et al.. Constraining dark matter models from a combined analysis of milky way satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241302 [arXiv:1108.3546] [INSPIRE].
58. [58] A. Geringer-Sameth and S.M. Koushiappas. Exclusion of canonical WIMPs by the joint analysis of milky way dwarfs with Fermi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241303 [arXiv:1108.2914] [INSPIRE].
59. [59] Fermi-LAT collaboration. M. Ackermann et al.. Dark matter constraints from observationsof 25 milky way satellite galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 042001 [arXiv:1310.0828] [INSPIRE].
60. [60] X.-G. He and J. Tandean. Low-mass dark-matter hint from CDMS II. Higgs boson at the LHC and darkon models. Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 013020 [arXiv:1304.6058] [INSPIRE].
61. [61] N. Okada and O. Seto. Isospin violating dark matter being asymmetric. Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 063506 [arXiv:1304.6791] [INSPIRE].
62. [62] G. Bélanger. A. Goudelis. J.-C. Park and A. Pukhov. Isospin-violating dark matter from a double portal. JCAP 02 (2014) 020 [arXiv:1311.0022] [INSPIRE].
63. [63] ATLAS collaboration. Search for squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS detector in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum and 20.3 fb−1 of √s = 8TeV proton-proton collision data. ATLAS-CONF-2013-047. CERN. Geneva Switzerland (2013).
64. [64] T. Cohen et al.. SUSY simplified models at 14. 33 and 100TeV proton colliders. arXiv:1311.6480 [INSPIRE].
65. [65] J. Hisano. J.Y. Lee. N. Nagata and Y. Shimizu. Reevaluation of neutron electric dipole moment with QCD sum rules. Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 114044 [arXiv:1204.2653] [INSPIRE].
66. [66] A.J. Buras. S. Jager and J. Urban. Master formulae for ΔF = 2 NLO QCD factors in the Standard Model and beyond. Nucl. Phys. B 605 (2001) 600 [hep-ph/0102316] [INSPIRE].
67. [67] J. Brod and M. Gorbahn. Next-to-next-to-leading-order charm-quark contribution to the CP-violation parameter ΔK and ΔMK. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 121801 [arXiv:1108.2036] [INSPIRE].