Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Buttazzo, Dario ^a,b   Degrassi, Giuseppe ^c   Giardino, Pier Paolo ^a,b   Giudice, Gian F ^a   Sala, Filippo ^b,d   Salvio, Alberto ^b,e   Strumia, Alessandro ^b  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b INFN SEZIONE DI PISA   (Italy)

^c ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^d LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Higgs physics; Renormalization group; Standard model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895558434     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2013)089     Document Type: Review

References (145)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. CMS collaboration, Updated measurements of the Higgs boson at 125 GeV in the two photon decay channel, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-001, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
4. -1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-012, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
5. CMS collaboration, Properties of the Higgs-like boson in the decay H → ZZ → 4ℓ in pp collisions at √s = 7 and 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-002, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
6. -1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-013, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
7. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, I. Masina, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, The universal Higgs fit, arXiv:1303.3570 [INSPIRE].
8. G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO, JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1205.6497] [INSPIRE].
9. I. Krive and A.D. Linde, On the vacuum stability problem in gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 117 (1976) 265 [INSPIRE].
10. N. Krasnikov, Restriction of the fermion mass in gauge theories of weak and electromagnetic interactions, Yad. Fiz. 28 (1978) 549 [INSPIRE].
11. L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Bounds on the number and masses of quarks and leptons, Nucl. Phys. B 136 (1978) 115 [INSPIRE].
12. H.D. Politzer and S. Wolfram, Bounds on particle masses in the Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Lett. B 82 (1979) 242 [Erratum ibid. B 83 (1979) 421] [INSPIRE].
13. P.Q. Hung, Vacuum instability and new constraints on fermion masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 873 [INSPIRE].
14. N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Bounds on the fermions and Higgs boson masses in grand unified theories, Nucl. Phys. B 158 (1979) 295 [INSPIRE].
15. A.D. Linde, Vacuum instability, cosmology and constraints on particle masses in the Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Lett. B 92 (1980) 119 [INSPIRE].
16. M. Lindner, Implications of triviality for the Standard Model, Z. Phys. C 31 (1986) 295 [INSPIRE].
17. M. Lindner, M. Sher and H.W. Zaglauer, Probing vacuum stability bounds at the Fermilab collider, Phys. Lett. B 228 (1989) 139 [INSPIRE].
18. M. Sher, Electroweak Higgs potentials and vacuum stability, Phys. Rept. 179 (1989) 273 [INSPIRE].
19. P.B. Arnold, Can the electroweak vacuum be unstable?, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 613 [INSPIRE].
20. t, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 3620 [INSPIRE].
21. M. Sher, Precise vacuum stability bound in the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 317 (1993) 159 [Addendum ibid. B 331 (1994) 448] [hep-ph/9307342] [INSPIRE].
22. G. Altarelli and G. Isidori, Lower limit on the Higgs mass in the Standard Model: an update, Phys. Lett. B 337 (1994) 141 [INSPIRE].
23. J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Improved Higgs mass stability bound in the Standard Model and implications for supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 342 (1995) 171 [hep-ph/9409458] [INSPIRE].
24. J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Improved metastability bounds on the Standard Model Higgs mass, Phys. Lett. B 353 (1995) 257 [hep-ph/9504241] [INSPIRE].
25. J. Casas, J. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Standard Model stability bounds for new physics within LHC reach, Phys. Lett. B 382 (1996) 374 [hep-ph/9603227] [INSPIRE].
26. B. Schrempp and M. Wimmer, Top quark and Higgs boson masses: interplay between infrared and ultraviolet physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 (1996) 1 [hep-ph/9606386] [INSPIRE].
27. T. Hambye and K. Riesselmann, Matching conditions and Higgs mass upper bounds revisited, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7255 [hep-ph/9610272] [INSPIRE].
28. G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi and A. Strumia, On the metastability of the Standard Model vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B 609 (2001) 387 [hep-ph/0104016] [INSPIRE].
29. J. Espinosa, G. Giudice and A. Riotto, Cosmological implications of the Higgs mass measurement, JCAP 05 (2008) 002 [arXiv:0710.2484] [INSPIRE].
30. J. Ellis, J. Espinosa, G. Giudice, A. Hoecker and A. Riotto, The probable fate of the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 369 [arXiv:0906.0954] [INSPIRE].
31. B. Feldstein, L.J. Hall and T. Watari, Landscape prediction for the Higgs boson and top quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 095011 [hep-ph/0608121] [INSPIRE].
32. M. Holthausen, K.S. Lim and M. Lindner, Planck scale boundary conditions and the Higgs mass, JHEP 02 (2012) 037 [arXiv:1112.2415] [INSPIRE].
33. J. Elias-Miro et al., Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 222 [arXiv:1112.3022] [INSPIRE].
34. C.-S. Chen and Y. Tang, Vacuum stability, neutrinos and dark matter, JHEP 04 (2012) 019 [arXiv:1202.5717] [INSPIRE].
35. O. Lebedev, On stability of the electroweak vacuum and the Higgs portal, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2058 [arXiv:1203.0156] [INSPIRE].
36. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect, JHEP 06 (2012) 031 [arXiv:1203.0237] [INSPIRE].
37. W. Rodejohann and H. Zhang, Impact of massive neutrinos on the Higgs self-coupling and electroweak vacuum stability, JHEP 06 (2012) 022 [arXiv:1203.3825] [INSPIRE].
38. F. Bezrukov, M.Y. Kalmykov, B.A. Kniehl and M. Shaposhnikov, Higgs boson mass and new physics, JHEP 10 (2012) 140 [arXiv:1205.2893] [INSPIRE].
39. A. Datta and S. Raychaudhuri, Vacuum stability constraints and LHC searches for a model with a universal extra dimension, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035018 [arXiv:1207.0476] [INSPIRE].
40. S. Alekhin, A. Djouadi and S. Moch, The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 214 [arXiv:1207.0980] [INSPIRE].
41. J. Chakrabortty, M. Das and S. Mohanty, Constraints on TeV scale Majorana neutrino phenomenology from the vacuum stability of the Higgs, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013) 1350032 [arXiv:1207.2027] [INSPIRE].
42. ++, JHEP 02 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1208.2821] [INSPIRE].
43. I. Masina, Higgs boson and top quark masses as tests of electroweak vacuum stability, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 053001 [arXiv:1209.0393] [INSPIRE].
44. E.J. Chun, H.M. Lee and P. Sharma, Vacuum stability, perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in type II seesaw models, JHEP 11 (2012) 106 [arXiv:1209.1303] [INSPIRE].
45. D.J. Chung, A.J. Long and L.-T. Wang, The 125 GeV Higgs and electroweak phase transition model classes, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 023509 [arXiv:1209.1819] [INSPIRE].
46. W. Chao, M. Gonderinger and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Higgs vacuum stability, neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113017 [arXiv:1210.0491] [INSPIRE].
47. P. Bhupal Dev, D.K. Ghosh, N. Okada and I. Saha, 125 GeV Higgs boson and the type-II seesaw model, JHEP 03 (2013) 150 [Erratum ibid. 05 (2013) 049] [arXiv:1301.3453] [INSPIRE].
48. O. Lebedev and A. Westphal, Metastable electroweak vacuum: implications for inflation, Phys. Lett. B 719 (2013) 415 [arXiv:1210.6987] [INSPIRE].
49. H.B. Nielsen, PREdicted the Higgs mass, arXiv:1212.5716 [INSPIRE].
50. A. Kobakhidze and A. Spencer-Smith, Electroweak vacuum (in)stability in an inflationary universe, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 130 [arXiv:1301.2846] [INSPIRE].
51. Y. Tang, Vacuum stability in the Standard Model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013) 1330002 [arXiv:1301.5812] [INSPIRE].
52. F. Klinkhamer, Standard Model Higgs field and energy scale of gravity, JETP Lett. 97 (2013) 297 [arXiv:1302.1496] [INSPIRE].
53. X.-G. He, H. Phoon, Y. Tang and G. Valencia, Unitarity and vacuum stability constraints on the couplings of color octet scalars, JHEP 05 (2013) 026 [arXiv:1303.4848] [INSPIRE].
54. E.J. Chun, S. Jung and H.M. Lee, Radiative generation of the Higgs potential, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 158 [arXiv:1304.5815] [INSPIRE].
55. F. Jegerlehner, The Standard Model as a low-energy effective theory: what is triggering the Higgs mechanism?, arXiv:1304.7813 [INSPIRE].
56. O. Antipin, M. Gillioz, J. Krog, E. Mølgaard and F. Sannino, Standard Model vacuum stability and Weyl consistency conditions, JHEP 08 (2013) 034 [arXiv:1306.3234] [INSPIRE].
57. V. Branchina and E. Messina, Stability, Higgs boson mass and new physics, arXiv:1307.5193 [INSPIRE].
58. D.J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet behavior of non-Abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1343 [INSPIRE].
59. H.D. Politzer, Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346 [INSPIRE].
60. W.E. Caswell, Asymptotic behavior of non-Abelian gauge theories to two loop order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 244 [INSPIRE].
61. D. Jones, Two loop diagrams in Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 75 (1974) 531 [INSPIRE].
62. O. Tarasov, A. Vladimirov and A.Y. Zharkov, The Gell-Mann-Low function of QCD in the three loop approximation, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 429 [INSPIRE].
63. S. Larin and J. Vermaseren, The three loop QCD β-function and anomalous dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 303 (1993) 334 [hep-ph/9302208] [INSPIRE].
64. T. van Ritbergen, J. Vermaseren and S. Larin, The four loop β-function in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 379 [hep-ph/9701390] [INSPIRE].
65. M. Czakon, The four-loop QCD β-function and anomalous dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 710 (2005) 485 [hep-ph/0411261] [INSPIRE].
66. 2 gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 581 [INSPIRE].
67. 2), Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 054005 [hep-ph/9809507] [INSPIRE].
68. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 1. Wave function renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 83 [INSPIRE].
69. L.N. Mihaila, J. Salomon and M. Steinhauser, Gauge coupling β-functions in the Standard Model to three loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 151602 [arXiv:1201.5868] [INSPIRE].
70. L.N. Mihaila, J. Salomon and M. Steinhauser, Renormalization constants and β-functions for the gauge couplings of the Standard Model to three-loop order, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 096008 [arXiv:1208.3357] [INSPIRE].
71. T. Cheng, E. Eichten and L.-F. Li, Higgs phenomena in asymptotically free gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 2259 [INSPIRE].
72. M. Fischler and J. Oliensis, Two loop corrections to the evolution of the Higgs-Yukawa coupling constant, Phys. Lett. B 119 (1982) 385 [INSPIRE].
73. K. Chetyrkin and M. Zoller, Three-loop β-functions for top-Yukawa and the Higgs self-interaction in the Standard Model, JHEP 06 (2012) 033 [arXiv:1205.2892] [ INSPIRE].
74. A. Bednyakov, A. Pikelner and V. Velizhanin, Yukawa coupling β-functions in the Standard Model at three loops, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 336 [arXiv:1212.6829] [INSPIRE].
75. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 2. Yukawa couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 221 [INSPIRE].
76. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 3. Scalar quartic couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 70 [INSPIRE].
77. M.-X. Luo and Y. Xiao, Two loop renormalization group equations in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 011601 [hep-ph/0207271] [INSPIRE].
78. K. Chetyrkin and M. Zoller, β-function for the Higgs self-interaction in the Standard Model at three-loop level, JHEP 04 (2013) 091 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2013) 155] [arXiv:1303.2890] [INSPIRE].
79. A. Bednyakov, A. Pikelner and V. Velizhanin, Higgs self-coupling β-function in the Standard Model at three loops, Nucl. Phys. B 875 (2013) 552 [arXiv:1303.4364] [INSPIRE].
80. L x U(1) theory: a simple renormalization framework, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 971 [INSPIRE].
81. L x U(1) theory, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2695 [Erratum ibid. D 31 (1985) 213] [INSPIRE].
82. R. Tarrach, The pole mass in perturbative QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 183 (1981) 384 [INSPIRE].
83. 3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4001 [hep-ph/9907509] [INSPIRE].
84. 3, Nucl. Phys. B 573 (2000) 617 [hep-ph/9911434] [INSPIRE].
85. K. Melnikov and T.v. Ritbergen, The three loop relation between the MS-bar and the pole quark masses, Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000) 99 [hep-ph/9912391] [INSPIRE].
86. R. Hempfling and B.A. Kniehl, On the relation between the fermion pole mass and MS Yukawa coupling in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1386 [hep-ph/9408313] [INSPIRE].
87. A. Sirlin and R. Zucchini, Dependence of the quartic coupling Hm on MH and the possible onset of new physics in the Higgs sector of the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 266 (1986) 389 [INSPIRE].
88. W.E. Caswell and F. Wilczek, On the gauge dependence of renormalization group parameters, Phys. Lett. B 49 (1974) 291 [INSPIRE].
89. T. Muta, Foundations of quantum chromodynamics, World Scientific, Singapore (2010), pg. 192.
90. D. Atkinson and M. Fry, Should one truncate the electron selfenergy?, Nucl. Phys. B 156 (1979) 301 [INSPIRE].
91. J. Breckenridge, M. Lavelle and T.G. Steele, The Nielsen identities for the two point functions of QED and QCD, Z. Phys. C 65 (1995) 155 [hep-th/9407028] [INSPIRE].
92. A.S. Kronfeld, The perturbative pole mass in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 051501 [hep-ph/9805215] [INSPIRE].
93. TEVATRON ELECTROWEAK WORKING GROUP, CDF and D0 collaborations, 2012 update of the combination of CDF and D0 results for the mass of the W boson, FERMILAB-TM-2532-E, Fermilab, Batavia U.S.A. (2012) [arXiv:1204.0042] [INSPIRE].
94. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP ELECTROWEAK WORKING GROUPcollaborations, A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the Standard Model, 2006, CERN-PH-EP-2006-042, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2006) [hep-ex/0612034] [INSPIRE].
95. 2012 Particle Data Group average, http://pdg.lbl.gov/.
96. -1 of data, arXiv:1107.5255 [INSPIRE].
97. CMS collaboration, CMS top physics website, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/ bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsTOP.
98. CMS collaboration, talks at the Moriond 2013 conference, La Thuile Italy March 9-16 2013.
99. ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS top physics website, https://twiki.cern.ch/ twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/TopPublicResults.
100. MULAN collaboration, V. Tishchenko et al., Detailed report of the MuLan measurement of the positive muon lifetime and determination of the Fermi constant, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 052003 [arXiv:1211.0960] [INSPIRE].
101. s (2012), Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 234 (2013) 229 [arXiv:1210.0325] [INSPIRE].
102. T. Kinoshita and A. Sirlin, Radiative corrections to Fermi interactions, Phys. Rev. 113 (1959) 1652 [INSPIRE].
103. T. van Ritbergen and R.G. Stuart, On the precise determination of the Fermi coupling constant from the muon lifetime, Nucl. Phys. B 564 (2000) 343 [hep-ph/9904240] [INSPIRE].
104. T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
105. R. Mertig and R. Scharf, TARCER: a Mathematica program for the reduction of two loop propagator integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 111 (1998) 265 [hep-ph/9801383] [INSPIRE].
106. O. Tarasov, Generalized recurrence relations for two loop propagator integrals with arbitrary masses, Nucl. Phys. B 502 (1997) 455 [hep-ph/9703319] [INSPIRE].
107. R. Mertig, M. Böhm and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345 [INSPIRE].
108. M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Onishchenko and O. Veretin, Bosonic corrections to Δr at the two loop level, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 053004 [hep-ph/0209084] [INSPIRE].
109. S.P. Martin, Evaluation of two loop selfenergy basis integrals using differential equations, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 075002 [hep-ph/0307101] [INSPIRE].
110. S.P. Martin and D.G. Robertson, TSIL: a program for the calculation of two-loop self-energy integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 133 [hep-ph/0501132] [INSPIRE].
111. B.A. Kniehl and A. Sirlin, Pole mass, width and propagators of unstable Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 116012 [arXiv:0801.0669] [INSPIRE].
112. F. Jegerlehner, M.Y. Kalmykov and B.A. Kniehl, On the difference between the pole and the MS-bar masses of the top quark at the electroweak scale, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 123 [arXiv:1212.4319] [INSPIRE].
113. S.P. Martin, Three-loop Standard Model effective potential at leading order in strong and top Yukawa couplings, arXiv:1310.7553 [INSPIRE].
114. PARTICLE DATA GROUP collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].
115. LEP Electroweak Working Group webpage, http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/.
116. C. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Standard Model criticality prediction: top mass 173 ± 5 GeV and Higgs mass 135 ± 9 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 368 (1996) 96 [hep-ph/9511371] [INSPIRE].
117. C. Froggatt, H.B. Nielsen and Y. Takanishi, Standard Model Higgs boson mass from borderline metastability of the vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 113014 [hep-ph/0104161] [INSPIRE].
118. C. Burgess, V. Di Clemente and J. Espinosa, Effective operators and vacuum instability as heralds of new physics, JHEP 01 (2002) 041 [hep-ph/0201160] [INSPIRE].
119. G. Isidori, V.S. Rychkov, A. Strumia and N. Tetradis, Gravitational corrections to Standard Model vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 025034 [arXiv:0712.0242] [INSPIRE].
120. F. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation: two loop analysis, JHEP 07 (2009) 089 [arXiv:0904.1537] [INSPIRE].
121. M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich, Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Lett. B 683 (2010) 196 [arXiv:0912.0208] [INSPIRE].
122. C. Ford, I. Jack and D. Jones, The Standard Model effective potential at two loops, Nucl. Phys. B 387 (1992) 373 [Erratum ibid. B 504 (1997) 551] [hep-ph/0111190] [INSPIRE].
123. L.J. Hall and Y. Nomura, A finely-predicted Higgs boson mass from a finely-tuned weak scale, JHEP 03 (2010) 076 [arXiv:0910.2235] [INSPIRE].
124. G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Probing high-scale and split supersymmetry with Higgs mass measurements, Nucl. Phys. B 858 (2012) 63 [arXiv:1108.6077] [INSPIRE].
125. M. Cabrera, J. Casas and A. Delgado, Upper bounds on superpartner masses from upper bounds on the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 021802 [arXiv:1108.3867] [INSPIRE].
126. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].
127. L.E. Ibánez and I. Valenzuela, The Higgs mass as a signature of heavy SUSY, JHEP 05 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1301.5167] [INSPIRE].
128. A. Hebecker, A.K. Knochel and T. Weigand, The Higgs mass from a string-theoretic perspective, Nucl. Phys. B 874 (2013) 1 [arXiv:1304.2767] [INSPIRE].
129. P.J. Fox, A.E. Nelson and N. Weiner, Dirac gaugino masses and supersoft supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 08 (2002) 035 [hep-ph/0206096] [INSPIRE].
130. K. Benakli, M.D. Goodsell and F. Staub, Dirac gauginos and the 125 GeV Higgs, JHEP 06 (2013) 073 [arXiv:1211.0552] [INSPIRE].
131. A. Hebecker, A.K. Knochel and T. Weigand, A shift symmetry in the Higgs sector: experimental hints and stringy realizations, JHEP 06 (2012) 093 [arXiv:1204.2551] [INSPIRE].
132. M. Redi and A. Strumia, Axion-Higgs unification, JHEP 11 (2012) 103 [arXiv:1208.6013] [INSPIRE].
133. G. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Living dangerously with low-energy supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 757 (2006) 19 [hep-ph/0606105] [INSPIRE].
134. P. Bak, C. Tang and K. Wiesenfeld, Self-organized criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 381 [INSPIRE].
135. S. Weinberg, Anthropic bound on the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 2607 [INSPIRE].
136. J.F. Donoghue, K. Dutta and A. Ross, Quark and lepton masses and mixing in the landscape, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 113002 [hep-ph/0511219] [INSPIRE].
137. L.J. Hall, M.P. Salem and T. Watari, Quark and lepton masses from Gaussian landscapes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 141801 [arXiv:0707.3444] [INSPIRE].
138. G.W. Gibbons, S. Gielen, C. Pope and N. Turok, Measures on mixing angles, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 013009 [arXiv:0810.4813] [INSPIRE].
139. G.F. Giudice, G. Perez and Y. Soreq, Flavor beyond the standard universe, arXiv:1207.4861 [INSPIRE].
140. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and S. Kachru, Predictive landscapes and new physics at a TeV, hep-th/0501082 [INSPIRE].
141. V. Agrawal, S.M. Barr, J.F. Donoghue and D. Seckel, The anthropic principle and the mass scale of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5480 [hep-ph/9707380] [INSPIRE].
142. I.Y. Kobzarev, L. Okun and M. Voloshin, Bubbles in metastable vacuum, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20 (1975) 644 [Yad. Fiz. 20 (1974) 1229] [INSPIRE].
143. S.R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 1. Semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 [Erratum ibid. D 16 (1977) 1248] [INSPIRE].
144. C.G. Callan Jr. and S.R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 2. First quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1762 [INSPIRE].
145. S.R. Coleman and F. De Luccia, Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 3305 [INSPIRE].