The dark Zportal: Direct, indirect and collider searches

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Alves, Alexandre ^a   Profumo, Stefano ^b   Queiroz, Farinaldo S ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898962140     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)063     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. A.L. Fitzpatrick, D. Hooper and K.M. Zurek, Implications of CoGeNT and DAMA for Light WIMP Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 115005 [ arXiv:1003.0014 ] [ INSPIRE ].
2. M.R. Buckley, Using Effective Operators to Understand CoGeNT and CDMS-Silicon, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055028 [ arXiv:1308.4146 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. J.L. Feng, J. Kumar and D. Sanford, Xenophobic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015021 [ arXiv:1306.2315 ] [ INSPIRE ].
4. C. de S. Pires, F. Queiroz and P. Rodrigues da Silva, Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter, DAMA, CoGeNT and CDMS-II, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 105014 [ arXiv:1002.4601 ] [ INSPIRE ].
5. C. Kelso, P. Sandick and C. Savage, Lowering the Threshold in the DAMA Dark Matter Search, JCAP 09 (2013) 022 [ arXiv:1306.1858 ] [ INSPIRE ].
6. C. Kelso, D. Hooper and M.R. Buckley, Toward A Consistent Picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 043515 [ arXiv:1110.5338 ] [ INSPIRE ].
7. C. Kelso, D. Hooper and M.R. Buckley, Toward A Consistent Picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 043515 [ arXiv:1110.5338 ] [ INSPIRE ].
8. D. Hooper and C. Kelso, Implications of CoGeNT's New Results For Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 083001 [ arXiv:1106.1066 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. C. Kelso and D. Hooper, Prospects For Identifying Dark Matter With CoGeNT, JCAP 02 (2011) 002 [ arXiv:1011.3076 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. D. Hooper, J. Collar, J. Hall, D. McKinsey and C. Kelso, A Consistent Dark Matter Interpretation For CoGeNT and DAMA/LIBRA, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 123509 [ arXiv:1007.1005 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. DAMA Collaboration, LIBRA collaboration, R. Bernabei et al., New results from DAMA/LIBRA, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 39 [ arXiv:1002.1028 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. CoGeNT collaboration, C. Aalseth et al., CoGeNT: A Search for Low-Mass Dark Matter using p-type Point Contact Germanium Detectors, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 012002 [ arXiv:1208.5737 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. CoGeNT collaboration, C. Aalseth et al., Results from a Search for Light-Mass Dark Matter with a P-type Point Contact Germanium Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131301 [ arXiv:1002.4703 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. G. Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter Search, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1971 [ arXiv:1109.0702 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. CDMS collaboration, Silicon Detector Dark Matter Results from the Final Exposure of CDMS II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 251301 [ arXiv:1304.4279 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. CDMS collaboration, Silicon detector results from the first five-tower run of CDMS II, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 031104 [ arXiv:1304.3706 ] [ INSPIRE ].
17. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [ arXiv:1207.5988 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. LUX collaboration, D. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, arXiv:1310.8214 [ INSPIRE ].
19. J.L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia and D. Sanford, Isospin-Violating Dark Matter Benchmarks for Snowmass 2013, arXiv:1307.1758 [ INSPIRE ].
20. J.L. Feng, J. Kumar and D. Sanford, Xenophobic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015021 [ arXiv:1306.2315 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. D. Hooper and T. Linden, On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 123005 [ arXiv:1110.0006 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope, Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 412 [ arXiv:1010.2752 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. K.N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Detection of a Gamma-Ray Source in the Galactic Center Consistent with Extended Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation and Concentrated Astrophysical Emission, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083511 [ arXiv:1207.6047 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. D. Hooper, I. Cholis, T. Linden, J. Siegal-Gaskins and T. Slatyer, Millisecond pulsars Cannot Account for the Inner Galaxy's GeV Excess, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083009 [ arXiv:1305.0830 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. D. Hooper and T.R. Slatyer, Two Emission Mechanisms in the Fermi Bubbles: A Possible Signal of Annihilating Dark Matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 118 [ arXiv:1302.6589 ] [ INSPIRE ].
26. C. Gordon and O. Macias, Dark Matter and Pulsar Model Constraints from Galactic Center Fermi-LAT Gamma Ray Observations, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083521 [ arXiv:1306.5725 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. L. Bergstrom, T. Bringmann, I. Cholis, D. Hooper and C. Weniger, New limits on dark matter annihilation from AMS cosmic ray positron data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171101 [ arXiv:1306.3983 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. D. Hooper, C. Kelso and F.S. Queiroz, Stringent and Robust Constraints on the Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section From the Region of the Galactic Center, Astropart. Phys. 46 (2013) 55 [ arXiv:1209.3015 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Dark Matter Constraints from Observations of 25 Milky Way Satellite Galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 042001 [ arXiv:1310.0828 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. AMS collaboration, M. Aguilar et al., First Result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: Precision Measurement of the Positron Fraction in Primary Cosmic Rays of 0.5350 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 141102 [ INSPIRE ].
31. T. Linden and S. Profumo, Probing the Pulsar Origin of the Anomalous Positron Fraction with AMS-02 and Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes, Astrophys. J. 772 (2013) 18 [ arXiv:1304.1791 ] [ INSPIRE ].
32. C. Weniger, A Tentative Gamma-Ray Line from Dark Matter Annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope, JCAP 08 (2012) 007 [ arXiv:1204.2797 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl and C. Weniger, Fermi LAT Search for Internal Bremsstrahlung Signatures from Dark Matter Annihilation, JCAP 07 (2012) 054 [ arXiv:1203.1312 ] [ INSPIRE ].
34. D.P. Finkbeiner, M. Su and C. Weniger, Is the 130 GeV Line Real? A Search for Systematics in the Fermi-LAT Data, JCAP 01 (2013) 029 [ arXiv:1209.4562 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. M. Su and D.P. Finkbeiner, Strong Evidence for Gamma-ray Line Emission from the Inner Galaxy, arXiv:1206.1616 [ INSPIRE ].
36. D. Whiteson, Searching for Spurious Solar and Sky Lines in the Fermi-LAT Spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 023530 [ arXiv:1302.0427 [ INSPIRE ].
37. D.P. Finkbeiner, M. Su and C. Weniger, Is the 130 GeV Line Real? A Search for Systematics in the Fermi-LAT Data, JCAP 01 (2013) 029 [ arXiv:1209.4562 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. E. Carlson, T. Linden, S. Profumo and C. Weniger, Clustering analysis of the morphology of the 130 GeV gamma-ray feature, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 043006 [ arXiv:1304.5524 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. S. Profumo and T. Linden, Gamma-ray Lines in the Fermi Data: is it a Bubble?, JCAP 07 (2012) 011 [ arXiv:1204.6047 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. ATLAS collaboration, Search for dark matter candidates and large extra dimensions in events with a jet and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 04 (2013) 075 [ arXiv:1210.4491 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter and large extra dimensions in monojet events in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, JHEP 09 (2012) 094 [ arXiv:1206.5663 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC Bounds on Interactions of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095013 [ arXiv:1108.1196 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [ arXiv:1008.1783 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Search for new particles decaying into dijets in proton-antiproton collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 112002 [ arXiv:0812.4036 ] [ INSPIRE ].
45. -1 of pp Collision Data at √s = 7 TeV collected by the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 37 [ arXiv:1108.6311 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. -1 of pp Collisions at √s = 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-059 (2013).
47. P.J. Fox, J. Liu, D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, An Effective Z', Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 115006 [ arXiv:1104.4127 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. B. Bhattacherjee, D. Choudhury, K. Harigaya, S. Matsumoto and M.M. Nojiri, Model Independent Analysis of Interactions between Dark Matter and Various Quarks, JHEP 04 (2013) 031 [ arXiv:1212.5013 ] [ INSPIRE ].
49. E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, Y. Mambrini and B. Zaldivar, Extra U(1), effective operators, anomalies and dark matter, JHEP 11 (2013) 083 [ arXiv:1307.0005 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. H. An, X. Ji and L.-T. Wang, Light Dark Matter and Z Dark Force at Colliders, JHEP 07 (2012) 182 [ arXiv:1202.2894 ] [ INSPIRE ].
51. S. Profumo, W. Shepherd and T. Tait, The Pitfalls of Dark Crossings, arXiv:1307.6277 [ INSPIRE ].
52. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on Light Majorana dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 185 [ arXiv:1005.1286 ] [ INSPIRE ].
53. S. Godfrey and T. Martin, Z' Discovery Reach at Future Hadron Colliders: A Snowmass White Paper, arXiv:1309.1688 [ INSPIRE ].
54. P. Langacker, The Physics of Heavy Z Gauge Bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199 [ arXiv:0801.1345 ] [ INSPIRE ].
55. J. Erler, P. Langacker, S. Munir and E. Rojas, Improved Constraints on Z-prime Bosons from Electroweak Precision Data, JHEP 08 (2009) 017 [ arXiv:0906.2435 ] [ INSPIRE ].
56. M. Pato et al., Complementarity of Dark Matter Direct Detection Targets, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083505 [ arXiv:1012.3458 ] [ INSPIRE ].
57. P.J. Fox, J. Liu, D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, An Effective Z', Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 115006 [ arXiv:1104.4127 ] [ INSPIRE ].
58. V. Barger, D. Marfatia and A. Peterson, LHC and Dark Matter Signals of Z' Bosons, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015026 [ arXiv:1206.6649 ] [ INSPIRE ].
59. sMixing in Leptophobic Z Model, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 183 [ hep-ph/0607113 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 44404229)
60. 6 and SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 59 (1998) 015020 [ hep-ph/9806397 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. X model, Phys. Lett. B 411 (1997) 313 [ hep-ph/9709245 ] [ INSPIRE ].
62. J.L. Lopez, String unification and leptophobic Z in flipped SU(5), Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 52A (1997) 284 [ hep-ph/9607231 ] [ INSPIRE ].
63. S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, Constraining the Z Mass in 331 Models using Direct Dark Matter Detection, arXiv:1307.7802 [ INSPIRE ].
64. A. Solaguren-Beascoa and M. Gonzalez-Garcia, Dark Radiation Confronting LHC in Z Models, Phys. Lett. B 719 (2013) 121 [ arXiv:1210.6350 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. P. Gondolo, P. Ko and Y. Omura, Light dark matter in leptophobic Z' models, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035022 [ arXiv:1106.0885 ] [ INSPIRE ].
66. M.R. Buckley, D. Hooper and J.L. Rosner, A Leptophobic Z And Dark Matter From Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 343 [ arXiv:1106.3583 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. P. Dong, H. Hung and T. Tham, 3-3-1-1 model for dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115003 [ arXiv:1305.0369 ] [ INSPIRE ].
68. J. Mizukoshi, C. de S. Pires, F. Queiroz and P. Rodrigues da Silva, WIMPs in a 3-3-1 model with heavy Sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 065024 [ arXiv:1010.4097 ] [ INSPIRE ].
69. C. Kelso, C.A. de S. Pires, S. Profumo, F.S. Queiroz and P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, A 331 WIMPy Dark Radiation Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2797 [ arXiv:1308.6630 ] [ INSPIRE ].
70. P. Dong, T.P. Nguyen and D. Soa, The 3-3-1 model with inert scalar triplet, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095014 [ arXiv:1308.4097 ] [ INSPIRE ].
71. J. Ruiz-Alvarez, C. de S. Pires, F.S. Queiroz, D. Restrepo and P. Rodrigues da Silva, On the Connection of Gamma-Rays, Dark Matter and Higgs Searches at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075011 [ arXiv:1206.5779 ] [ INSPIRE ].
72. B. Kyae and J.-C. Park, Light dark matter for Fermi-LAT and CDMS observations, arXiv:1310.2284 [ INSPIRE ].
73. G. Bélanger, A. Goudelis, J.-C. Park and A. Pukhov, Isospin-violating dark matter from a double portal, JCAP 02 (2014) 020 [ arXiv:1311.0022 ] [ INSPIRE ].
74. E. Del Nobile, C. Kouvaris, F. Sannino and J. Virkajarvi, Dark Matter Interference, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012) 1250108 [ arXiv:1111.1902 ] [ INSPIRE ].
75. C.-K. Chua and R.-C. Hsieh, Study of Dirac fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 036011 [ arXiv:1305.7008 ] [ INSPIRE ].
76. H. Davoudiasl and I.M. Lewis, Dark Matter from Hidden Forces, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 055026 [ arXiv:1309.6640 ] [ INSPIRE ].
77. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, I. Lewis and W.J. Marciano, Higgs Decays as a Window into the Dark Sector, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015022 [ arXiv:1304.4935 ] [ INSPIRE ].
78. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Béringer et al., The Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001, http://pdg.lbl.gov.
79. J. Preskill, Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory, Annals Phys. 210 (1991) 323 [ INSPIRE ].
80. CMS collaboration, Search for leptonic decays of W' bosons in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-060 (2012).
81. CMS collaboration, Search for narrow resonances in dilepton mass spectra in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 714 (2012) 158 [ arXiv:1206.1849 ] [ INSPIRE ].
82. 3: A program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 960 [ arXiv:1305.0237 ] [ INSPIRE ].
83. G. Bélanger et al., Indirect search for dark matter with MicrOMEGAs2.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 842 [ arXiv:1004.1092 ] [ INSPIRE ].
84. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [ arXiv:0803.2360 ] [ INSPIRE ].
85. B. Allgood et al., The shape of dark matter halos: dependence on mass, redshift, radius and formation, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 367 (2006) 1781 [ astro-ph/0508497 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 43539371)
86. A.V. Kravtsov, A.A. Klypin, J.S. Bullock and J.R. Primack, The Cores of dark matter dominated galaxies: Theory versus observations, Astrophys. J. 502 (1998) 48 [ astro-ph/9708176 ] [ INSPIRE ].
87. J.S. Bullock et al., Profiles of dark haloes. Evolution, scatter and environment, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 321 (2001) 559 [ astro-ph/9908159 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 33631563)
88. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [ arXiv:1106.0522 ] [ INSPIRE ].
89. A. Alloul, J. D'Hondt, K. De Causmaecker, B. Fuks and M. Rausch de Traubenberg, Automated mass spectrum generation for new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2325 [ arXiv:1301.5932 ] [ INSPIRE ].
90. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [ hep-ph/0603175 ] [ INSPIRE ].
91. For general information about PGS follow the links: http://www.physics. ucdavis.edu/conway/research/software/pgs/pgs4-general.htm.
92. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and M. Treccani, Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions, JHEP 01 (2007) 013 [ hep-ph/0611129 ] [ INSPIRE ].
93. A. Abdesselam et al., Boosted objects: A Probe of beyond the Standard Model physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1661 [ arXiv:1012.5412 ] [ INSPIRE ].
94. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048 (2012).
95. J. Va'vra, A New Possible Way to Explain DAMA Results, arXiv:1401.0698 [ INSPIRE ].
96. S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, A 1 GeV WIMP is Not a Good Way to Explain the DAMA Result, arXiv:1401.4253 [ INSPIRE ].
97. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Search for Gamma-ray Spectral Lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and Dark Matter Implications, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 082002 [ arXiv:1305.5597 ] [ INSPIRE ].
98. collaboration for the Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Gustafsson, Fermi-LAT and the Gamma-Ray Line Search, arXiv:1310.2953 [ INSPIRE ].
99. H.M. Lee, M. Park and V. Sanz, Interplay between Fermi gamma-ray lines and collider searches, JHEP 03 (2013) 052 [ arXiv:1212.5647 ] [ INSPIRE ].