Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter: A comprehensive analysis in effective field theory

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1-32

  Matsumoto, Shigeki ^a   Mukhopadhyay, Satyanarayan ^a   Tsai, Yue Lin Sming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919796789     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2014)155     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. V. Trimble, Existence and nature of dark matter in the universe, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.25 (1987) 425 [INSPIRE].
2. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept.267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
3. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
4. H. Georgi, Effective field theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.43 (1993) 209 [INSPIRE].
5. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb and Z.C. Krusberg, Deducing the nature of dark matter from direct and indirect detection experiments in the absence of collider signatures of new physics, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 043509 [arXiv:0808.3384] [INSPIRE].
6. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
7. S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and N. Okada, Can WIMP dark matter overcome the nightmare scenario?, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 055026 [arXiv:1005.5651] [INSPIRE].
8. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on dark matter from colliders, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
9. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders, Phys. Lett.B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
10. C.A. de S. Pires, F.S. Queiroz and P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter, DAMA, CoGeNT and CDMS-II, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 105014 [arXiv:1002.4601] [INSPIRE].
11. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, LEP shines light on dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 014028 [arXiv:1103.0240] [INSPIRE].
12. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C.S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective dark matter model: relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC, JHEP08 (2011) 018 [arXiv:0912.4511] [INSPIRE].
13. I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Unitarity and monojet bounds on models for DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 015023 [arXiv:1112.5457] [INSPIRE].
14. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.-C. Yuan, Global constraints on effective dark matter interactions: relic density, direct detection, indirect detection and collider, JCAP05 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1201.3402] [INSPIRE].
15. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [INSPIRE].
16. B. Bhattacherjee, D. Choudhury, K. Harigaya, S. Matsumoto and M.M. Nojiri, Model independent analysis of interactions between dark matter and various quarks, JHEP04 (2013) 031 [arXiv:1212.5013] [INSPIRE].
17. T. Lin, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, Probing dark matter couplings to top and bottom quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 063510 [arXiv:1303.6638] [INSPIRE].
18. J.-Y. Chen, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, Dark matter coupling to electroweak gauge and Higgs bosons: an effective field theory approach, Phys. Dark Univ.2 (2013) 200 [arXiv:1305.0021] [INSPIRE].
19. S. Esch, M. Klasen and C.E. Yaguna, Detection prospects of singlet fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075017 [arXiv:1308.0951] [INSPIRE].
20. L. Vecchi, WIMPs and un-naturalness, arXiv:1312.5695 [INSPIRE].
21. M.A. Fedderke, J.-Y. Chen, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, The fermionic dark matter Higgs portal: an effective field theory approach, JHEP08 (2014) 122 [arXiv:1404.2283] [INSPIRE].
22. S. Davidson, Including the Z in an effective field theory for dark matter at the LHC, arXiv:1403.5161 [INSPIRE].
23. C.M. Ho and R.J. Scherrer, Anapole dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 722 (2013) 341 [arXiv:1211.0503] [INSPIRE].
24. Y. Gao, C.M. Ho and R.J. Scherrer, Anapole dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 045006 [arXiv:1311.5630] [INSPIRE].
25. O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Beyond effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP01 (2014) 025 [arXiv:1308.6799] [INSPIRE].
26. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 728 (2014) 412 [arXiv:1307.2253] [INSPIRE].
27. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. Part II: Complete analysis for the s-channel, JCAP06 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1402.1275] [INSPIRE].
28. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, T. Jacques, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. Part III: Analysis for the t-channel, arXiv:1405.3101 [INSPIRE].
29. C. Balázs, T. Li and J.L. Newstead, Thermal dark matter implies new physics not far above the weak scale, JHEP08 (2014) 061 [arXiv:1403.5829] [INSPIRE].
30. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076 [INSPIRE].
31. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
32. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 021301 [arXiv:1301.6620] [INSPIRE].
33. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Dark matter constraints from observations of 25 Milky Way satellite galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 042001 [arXiv:1310.0828] [INSPIRE].
34. IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Search for dark matter annihilations in the sun with the 79-string IceCube detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 131302 [arXiv:1212.4097] [INSPIRE].
35. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group and SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaborations, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
36. DELPHI collaboration, J. Abdallah et al., Photon events with missing energy in e+e−collisions ats=130$$ \sqrt(s)=130 $$GeV to 209 GeV, Eur. Phys. J.C 38 (2005) 395 [hep-ex/0406019] [INSPIRE].
37. DELPHI collaboration, J. Abdallah et al., Search for one large extra dimension with the DELPHI detector at LEP, Eur. Phys. J.C 60 (2009) 17 [arXiv:0901.4486] [INSPIRE].
38. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt(s)=8 $$TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048 (2013).
39. W.A. Rolke, A.M. Lopez and J. Conrad, Limits and confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 551 (2005) 493 [physics/0403059] [INSPIRE].
40. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun.176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059] [INSPIRE].
41. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].
42. G. Bélanger et al., Indirect search for dark matter with MicrOMEGAs 2.4, Comput. Phys. Commun.182 (2011) 842 [arXiv:1004.1092] [INSPIRE].
43. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 3: a program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].
44. A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 1729 [arXiv:1207.6082] [INSPIRE].
45. N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
46. A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — a complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
47. R. Catena and P. Ullio, The local dark matter phase-space density and impact on WIMP direct detection, JCAP05 (2012) 005 [arXiv:1111.3556] [INSPIRE].
48. J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic dynamics, second edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (2008).
49. L. Álvarez-Ruso, T. Ledwig, J. Martin Camalich and M.J. Vicente-Vacas, Nucleon mass and pion-nucleon sigma term from a chiral analysis of lattice QCD data, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 054507 [arXiv:1304.0483] [INSPIRE].
50. P. Junnarkar and A. Walker-Loud, Scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 114510 [arXiv:1301.1114] [INSPIRE].
51. QCDSF collaboration, G.S. Bali et al., Strangeness contribution to the proton spin from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 222001 [arXiv:1112.3354] [INSPIRE].
52. D. Hooper, C. Kelso and F.S. Queiroz, Stringent and robust constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section from the region of the galactic center, Astropart. Phys.46 (2013) 55 [arXiv:1209.3015] [INSPIRE].
53. F. Nesti and P. Salucci, The dark matter halo of the Milky Way, AD 2013, JCAP07 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1304.5127] [INSPIRE].
54. G.D. Martinez, J.S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, L.E. Strigari and R. Trotta, Indirect dark matter detection from dwarf satellites: joint expectations from astrophysics and supersymmetry, JCAP06 (2009) 014 [arXiv:0902.4715] [INSPIRE].
55. Y.-L.S. Tsai, Q. Yuan and X. Huang, A generic method to constrain the dark matter model parameters from Fermi observations of dwarf spheroids, JCAP03 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1212.3990] [INSPIRE].
56. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
57. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
58. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
59. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, I. Masina, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, The universal Higgs fit, JHEP05 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1303.3570] [INSPIRE].
60. H. Baer et al., The International Linear Collider technical design report. Volume 2: Physics, arXiv:1306.6352 [INSPIRE].
61. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile, The XENON1T dark matter search experiment, Springer Proc. Phys.148 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1206.6288] [INSPIRE].
62. D.C. Malling et al., After LUX: the LZ program, arXiv:1110.0103 [INSPIRE].
63. P. Cushman et al., Working group report: WIMP dark matter direct detection, arXiv:1310.8327 [INSPIRE].
64. L.E. Strigari, Neutrino coherent scattering rates at direct dark matter detectors, New J. Phys.11 (2009) 105011 [arXiv:0903.3630] [INSPIRE].
65. M.E. Peskin, Comparison of LHC and ILC capabilities for Higgs boson coupling measurements, arXiv:1207.2516 [INSPIRE].
66. M. Klute, R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch and D. Zerwas, Measuring Higgs couplings at a linear collider, Europhys. Lett.101 (2013) 51001 [arXiv:1301.1322] [INSPIRE].
67. A. Ishikawa, Search for invisible Higgs decays at the ILC, talk given at the European Linear Collider Workshop ECFA LC2013, DESY, Hamburg Germany, 27-31 May 2013.
68. A. Ishikawa, private communication.
69. A.M. Galper et al., Status of the GAMMA-400 project, Adv. Space Res.51 (2013) 297 [arXiv:1201.2490] [INSPIRE].
70. B. Bhattacherjee, M. Ibe, K. Ichikawa, S. Matsumoto and K. Nishiyama, Wino dark matter and future dSph observations, JHEP07 (2014) 080 [arXiv:1405.4914] [INSPIRE].
71. R.H. Helm, Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187 MeV electrons from selected even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev.104 (1956) 1466 [INSPIRE].
72. J. Engel, Nuclear form-factors for the scattering of weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Lett.B 264 (1991) 114 [INSPIRE].
73. K. Cheung, Y.-L.S. Tsai, P.-Y. Tseng, T.-C. Yuan and A. Zee, Global study of the simplest scalar phantom dark matter model, JCAP10 (2012) 042 [arXiv:1207.4930] [INSPIRE].
74. BayesFITS Group collaboration, A. Fowlie, K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Dark matter and collider signatures of the MSSM, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055012 [arXiv:1306.1567] [INSPIRE].
75. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
76. S. Ovyn, X. Rouby and V. Lemaitre, DELPHES, a framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, arXiv:0903.2225 [INSPIRE].
77. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-ktjet clustering algorithm, JHEP04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
78. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
79. M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N3myth for the ktjet-finder, Phys. Lett.B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [INSPIRE].
80. J. Pumplin et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis, JHEP07 (2002) 012 [hep-ph/0201195] [INSPIRE].
81. M.R. Whalley, D. Bourilkov and R.C. Group, The Les Houches accord PDFs (LHAPDF) and LHAGLUE, hep-ph/0508110 [INSPIRE].