Unitarity bounds on dark matter effective interactions at LHC

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Endo, Motoi ^a   Yamamoto, Yasuhiro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Hadron Hadron Scattering; Jet physics; Particle and resonance production

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904329886     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2014)126     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Search for New Phenomena in Monojet plus Missing Transverse Momentum Final States using 10fb-1 of pp Collisions at sqrts = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-147.
2. CMS Collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048.
3. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP 09 (2010) 037 [ arXiv:1002.4137 ].
4. Y. Bai, P.J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the Frontier of Dark Matter Direct Detection, JHEP 12 (2010) 048 [ arXiv:1005.3797 ].
5. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait et al., Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [ arXiv:1008.1783 ].
6. I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Unitarity and Monojet Bounds on Models for DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015023 [ arXiv:1112.5457 ].
7. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 412 [ arXiv:1307.2253 ].
8. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Part II: Complete Analysis for the s-channel, arXiv:1402.1275.
9. O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Beyond Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2014) 025 [ arXiv:1308.6799 ].
10. M. Jacob and G.C. Wick, On the general theory of collisions for particles with spin, Annals Phys. 7 (1959) 404.
11. A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [ arXiv:1310.1921 ].
12. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [ arXiv:1106.0522 ].
13. J. Pumplin, D.R. Stump, J. Huston, H.L. Lai, P.M. Nadolsky et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis, JHEP 07 (2002) 012 [ hep-ph/0201195 ].
14. DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [ arXiv:1307.6346 ].
15. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [ hep-ph/0603175 ].
16. H.E. Haber, Spin formalism and applications to new physics searches, hep-ph/9405376.