Majorana dark matter with a coloured mediator: Collider vs direct and indirect searches

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Garny, Mathias ^a   Ibarra, Alejandro ^b   Rydbeck, Sara ^c   Vogl, Stefan ^b  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c DESY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904299675     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2014)169     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [ hep-ph/0404175 ]. (Pubitemid 40076471)
2. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076.
3. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [ arXiv:1207.5988 ].
4. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [ arXiv:1310.8214 ].
5. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Search for Gamma-ray Spectral Lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and Dark Matter Implications, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 082002 [ arXiv:1305.5597 ].
6. AMS collaboration, M. Aguilar et al., First Result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: Precision Measurement of the Positron Fraction in Primary Cosmic Rays of 0.5-350 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 141102.
7. H.E.S.S. collaboration, A. Abramowski et al., Search for photon line-like signatures from Dark Matter annihilations with H.E.S.S, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 041301 [ arXiv:1301.1173 ].
8. J. Aleksic et al., Optimized dark matter searches in deep observations of Segue 1 with MAGIC, JCAP 02 (2014) 008 [ arXiv:1312.1535 ].
9. IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Search for dark matter annihilations in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 131302 [ arXiv:1212.4097 ].
10. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in final states with missing transverse energy and 0, 1, 2, 3, or at least 4 b-quark jets in 8 TeV pp collisions using the variable AlphaT, CMS-PAS-SUS-12-028.
11. -1 of √s = 8 TeV proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-047 [ATLAS-COM-CONF-2013-049].
12. CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter and large extra dimensions in monojet events in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, JHEP 09 (2012) 094 [ arXiv:1206.5663 ].
13. -1 of pp Collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-147 [ATLAS-COM-CONF-2012-190].
14. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile, The XENON1T Dark Matter Search Experiment, arXiv:1206.6288.
15. D.C. Malling et al., After LUX: The LZ Program, arXiv:1110.0103.
16. K. Bernlöhr et al., Monte Carlo design studies for the Cherenkov Telescope Array, Astropart. Phys. 43 (2013) 171 [ arXiv:1210.3503 ].
17. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Direct Detection of Dark Matter Degenerate with Colored Particles in Mass, Phys. Lett. B 706 (2011) 208 [ arXiv:1110.3719 ].
18. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, M. Pato and S. Vogl, Closing in on mass-degenerate dark matter scenarios with antiprotons and direct detection, JCAP 11 (2012) 017 [ arXiv:1207.1431 ].
19. K. Hamaguchi, S.P. Liew, T. Moroi and Y. Yamamoto, Isospin-Violating Dark Matter with Colored Mediators, JHEP 05 (2014) 086 [ arXiv:1403.0324 ].
20. M. Garny, A. Ibarra and S. Vogl, Dark matter annihilations into two light fermions and one gauge boson: General analysis and antiproton constraints, JCAP 04 (2012) 033 [ arXiv:1112.5155 ].
21. M. Asano, T. Bringmann and C. Weniger, Indirect dark matter searches as a probe of degenerate particle spectra, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 128 [ arXiv:1112.5158 ].
22. T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl and C. Weniger, Fermi LAT Search for Internal Bremsstrahlung Signatures from Dark Matter Annihilation, JCAP 07 (2012) 054 [ arXiv:1203.1312 ].
23. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, M. Pato and S. Vogl, Internal bremsstrahlung signatures in light of direct dark matter searches, JCAP 12 (2013) 046 [ arXiv:1306.6342 ].
24. A. Ibarra, M. Totzauer and S. Wild, High-energy neutrino signals from the Sun in dark matter scenarios with internal bremsstrahlung, JCAP 12 (2013) 043 [ arXiv:1311.1418 ].
25. A. Ibarra, M. Totzauer and S. Wild, Higher order dark matter annihilations in the Sun and implications for IceCube, JCAP 04 (2014) 012 [ arXiv:1402.4375 ].
26. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015011 [ arXiv:1307.8120 ].
27. H. An, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang, Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction, arXiv:1308.0592.
28. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion Portal Dark Matter, JHEP 11 (2013) 171 [ arXiv:1308.0612 ].
29. A. DiFranzo, K.I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman and T.M.P. Tait, Simplified Models for Dark Matter Interacting with Quarks, JHEP 11 (2013) 014 [ arXiv:1308.2679 ].
30. J.N. Ng and A. de la Puente, Top Quark as a Dark Portal and Neutrino Mass Generation, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 204 [ arXiv:1307.2606 ].
31. L. Bergstrom, Radiative Processes in Dark Matter Photino Annihilation, Phys. Lett. B 225 (1989) 372.
32. T. Bringmann, L. Bergstrom and J. Edsjo, New Gamma-Ray Contributions to Supersymmetric Dark Matter Annihilation, JHEP 01 (2008) 049 [ arXiv:0710.3169 ].
33. T. Bringmann, F. Calore, G. Vertongen and C. Weniger, On the Relevance of Sharp Gamma-Ray Features for Indirect Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 103525 [ arXiv:1106.1874 ].
34. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb and Z.C. Krusberg, Deducing the nature of dark matter from direct and indirect detection experiments in the absence of collider signatures of new physics, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 043509 [ arXiv:0808.3384 ].
35. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP 09 (2010) 037 [ arXiv:1002.4137 ].
36. A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC Bounds on Interactions of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095013 [ arXiv:1108.1196 ].
37. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing Energy Signatures of Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 056011 [ arXiv:1109.4398 ].
38. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 412 [ arXiv:1307.2253 ].
39. O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Beyond Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2014) 025 [ arXiv:1308.6799 ].
40. P. Ciafaloni et al., On the Importance of Electroweak Corrections for Majorana Dark Matter Indirect Detection, JCAP 06 (2011) 018 [ arXiv:1104.2996 ].
41. N.F. Bell et al., W/Z Bremsstrahlung as the Dominant Annihilation Channel for Dark Matter, Revisited, Phys. Lett. B 706 (2011) 6 [ arXiv:1104.3823 ].
42. M. Garny, A. Ibarra and S. Vogl, Antiproton constraints on dark matter annihilations from internal electroweak bremsstrahlung, JCAP 07 (2011) 028 [ arXiv:1105.5367 ].
43. J. Kopp, L. Michaels and J. Smirnov, Loopy Constraints on Leptophilic Dark Matter and Internal Bremsstrahlung, JCAP 04 (2014) 022 [ arXiv:1401.6457 ].
44. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Leptophilic Effective WIMPs, arXiv:1402.7358.
45. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Lepton Portal Dark Matter, arXiv:1402.6696.
46. T and b-quark multiplicity in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2568 [ arXiv:1303.2985 ].
47. CMS collaboration, Search for New Physics in the Multijets and Missing Momentum Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-SUS-13-012 [ arXiv:1402.4770 ].
48. M. Papucci, A. Vichi and K.M. Zurek, Monojet versus rest of the world I: t-channel Models, arXiv:1402.2285.
49. Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Should squarks be degenerate?, Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 337 [ hep-ph/9304307 ].
50. G. D'Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [ hep-ph/0207036 ].
51. 0 mixing to constrain the flavor structure of new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 211802 [ arXiv:0903.2118 ].
52. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191.
53. G. Bélanger et al., Indirect search for dark matter with MicrOMEGAs2.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 842 [ arXiv:1004.1092 ].
54. A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, arXiv:1402.6287.
55. J.R. Ellis, T. Falk and K.A. Olive, Neutralino-stau coannihilation and the cosmological upper limit on the mass of the lightest supersymmetric particle, Phys. Lett. B 444 (1998) 367 [ hep-ph/9810360 ].
56. L. Bergstrom and P. Ullio, Full one loop calculation of neutralino annihilation into two photons, Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 27 [ hep-ph/9706232 ].
57. Z. Bern, P. Gondolo and M. Perelstein, Neutralino annihilation into two photons, Phys. Lett. B 411 (1997) 86 [ hep-ph/9706538 ].
58. P. Ullio and L. Bergstrom, Neutralino annihilation into a photon and a Z boson, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 1962 [ hep-ph/9707333 ].
59. L. Bergstrom, T. Bringmann, M. Eriksson and M. Gustafsson, Gamma rays from Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 131301 [ astro-ph/0410359 ]. (Pubitemid 40620466)
60. L. Bergstrom, T. Bringmann, M. Eriksson and M. Gustafsson, Gamma rays from heavy neutralino dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 241301 [ hep-ph/0507229 ]. (Pubitemid 43272899)
61. R. Flores, K.A. Olive and S. Rudaz, Radiative Processes in Lsp Annihilation, Phys. Lett. B 232 (1989) 377.
62. M. Drees, G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and M.M. Nojiri, Neutralino annihilation into gluons, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 636 [ hep-ph/9306325 ].
63. N.F. Bell, J.B. Dent, T.D. Jacques and T.J. Weiler, Dark Matter Annihilation Signatures from Electroweak Bremsstrahlung, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 103517 [ arXiv:1101.3357 ].
64. N.F. Bell, A.J. Brennan and T.D. Jacques, Neutrino signals from electroweak bremsstrahlung in solar WIMP annihilation, JCAP 10 (2012) 045 [ arXiv:1206.2977 ].
65. P. Ciafaloni et al., Initial State Radiation in Majorana Dark Matter Annihilations, JCAP 10 (2011) 034 [ arXiv:1107.4453 ].
66. P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli, A. De Simone, A. Riotto and A. Urbano, Electroweak Bremsstrahlung for Wino-Like Dark Matter Annihilations, JCAP 06 (2012) 016 [ arXiv:1202.0692 ].
67. A. De Simone, A. Monin, A. Thamm and A. Urbano, On the effective operators for Dark Matter annihilations, JCAP 02 (2013) 039 [ arXiv:1301.1486 ].
68. K. Fukushima, Y. Gao, J. Kumar and D. Marfatia, Bremsstrahlung signatures of dark matter annihilation in the Sun, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 076014 [ arXiv:1208.1010 ].
69. F. Luo and T. You, Enhancement of Majorana Dark Matter Annihilation Through Higgs Bremsstrahlung, JCAP 12 (2013) 024 [ arXiv:1310.5129 ].
70. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [ hep-ph/9506380 ].
71. M. Drees and M. Nojiri, Neutralino-nucleon scattering revisited, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3483 [ hep-ph/9307208 ].
72. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, M. Pato and S. Vogl, On the spin-dependent sensitivity of XENON100, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 056002 [ arXiv:1211.4573 ].
73. P. Gondolo and S. Scopel, On the sbottom resonance in dark matter scattering, JCAP 10 (2013) 032 [ arXiv:1307.4481 ].
74. M. Felizardo et al., Final Analysis and Results of the Phase II SIMPLE Dark Matter Search, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 201302 [ arXiv:1106.3014 ].
75. 3 I Bubble Chamber Operated in a Deep Underground Site, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 052001 [ arXiv:1204.3094 ].
76. R. Mahbubani, M. Papucci, G. Perez, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Light Nondegenerate Squarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 151804 [ arXiv:1212.3328 ].
77. M. Krämer et al., Supersymmetry production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, arXiv:1206.2892.
78. LHC SUSY Cross section Working Group, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/ view/LHCPhysics/SUSYCrosssections.
79. W. Hollik, J.M. Lindert and D. Pagani, NLO corrections to squark-squark production and decay at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2013) 139 [ arXiv:1207.1071 ].
80. A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 2.3: MSSM, structure functions, event generation, batchs and generation of matrix elements for other packages, hep-ph/0412191.
81. J. Pumplin et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis, JHEP 07 (2002) 012 [ hep-ph/0201195 ].
82. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [ arXiv:1106.0522 ].
83. DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [ arXiv:1307.6346 ].
84. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 [ arXiv:0710.3820 ].
85. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 021301 [ arXiv:1301.6620 ].
86. H.K. Dreiner, M. Krämer and J. Tattersall, How low can SUSY go? Matching, monojets and compressed spectra, Europhys. Lett. 99 (2012) 61001 [ arXiv:1207.1613 ].
87. 0 Mixing, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 055024 [ arXiv:0906.1879 ].
88. 2 in the Standard Six Quark Model, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2899.
89. V.D. Barger, M.S. Berger and P. Ohmann, Universal evolution of CKM matrix elements, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 2038 [ hep-ph/9210260 ].