Calibrated versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monitoring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: An observational study

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 5-12

  Slagt, Cornelis ^a   Helmi, Mochamat ^b   Malagon, Ignacio ^c   Groeneveld, A B Johan ^b  

^a ZAANS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD VESSEL TONE; CALIBRATED ARTERIAL PRESSURE WAVEFORM ANALYSIS; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; THERMODILUTION; UNCALIBRATED ARTERIAL PRESSURE WAVEFORM ANALYSIS; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SHOCK, SEPTIC; STANDARDS;

AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEPSIS; SHOCK, SEPTIC; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84927750200     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000173     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N, et al. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: Validation in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 573-579.
2. Slagt C, de Leeuw MA, Beute J, et al. Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27: 171-177.
3. Slagt C, Malagon I, Groeneveld AB. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 626-637.
4. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies: With specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13: 201.
5. Kiefer N, Hofer CK, Marx G, et al. Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters. Crit Care 2012; 16: R98.
6. Pratt B, Roteliuk L, Hatib F, et al. Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output using a novel measurement and analysis method. Biomed Instrum Technol 2007; 41: 403-411.
7. Hatib F, Jansen JR, Pinsky MR. Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock. J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 853-860.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
9. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91.
10. Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25: 536-546.
11. Monnet X, Anguel N, Naudin B, et al. Arterial pressure based cardiac output in septic patients: Different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices. Crit Care 2010; 14: R109.
12. Bendjelid K, Giraud R, Sigenthaler N, Michard F. Validation of a new transpulmonary thermodilution system to assess global end-diastolic volume and extravascular lung water. Crit Care 2010; 14: R209.
13. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, et al. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-h calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 434-440.
14. Jellema WT, Wesseling KH, Groeneveld AB, et al. Continuous cardiac output in septic shock by simulating a model of the aortic input impedance: A comparison with bolus injection thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1317-1328.
15. Gö dje O, Hö ke K, Goetz AE, et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 52-58.
16. Holm C, Mayr M, Hö rbrand F, et al. Reproducibility of transpulmonary thermodilution measurements in patients with burn shock and hypothermia. J Burn Care Rehabil 2005; 26: 260-265.
17. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: A meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1220-1235.
18. Columb MO. Clinical measurement and assessing agreement. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 2008; 19: 328-329.
19. Jo YY, Song JW, Yoo YC, et al. The uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output during off-pump coronary bypass surgery: Performance in patients with a low cardiac output status and a reduced left ventricular function. Kor J Anesthesiol 2011; 60: 237-243.
20. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, et al. A comparison of third-generation semi-invasive arterial waveform analysis with thermodilution in patients undergoing coronary surgery. Sci World J 2012; 2012: 45108119.
21. Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Kobayashi S, et al. Performance of third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system during hyperdynamic therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3: 99.
22. Vasdev S, Chauhan S, Choudhury M, et al. Arterial pressure waveform derived cardiac output FloTrac/Vigileo system (third generation software): Comparison of two monitoring sites with the thermodilution cardiac output. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26: 115-120.
23. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: A comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 337-342.
24. Slagt C, Beute J, Hoeksema M, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis without calibration versus thermodilution in septic shock: Evolving accuracy of software versions. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 7: 550-554.
25. Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, et al. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 615-622.
26. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1480-1486.
27. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Chiarandini P, et al. Arterial pulse cardiac output agreement with thermodilution in patients in hyperdynamic circulation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 681-687.
28. Krejci V, Vannucci A, Abbas A, et al. Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors during orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2010; 16: 773-782.
29. Akiyoshi K, Kandabashi T, Kaji J, et al. Accuracy of arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output measurement in comparison with thermodilution methods in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation. J Anesth 2011; 25: 178-183.
30. Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo (version 3.02) and a comparison with previous data in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 515-522.
31. Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Validity of a third-generation device. Transplant Proc 2012; 4: 424-428.
32. Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 2566-2573.
33. Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee SR, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Continuous cardiac output measurement: Arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 979-983.
34. Eleftheriadis S, Galatoudis Z, Didilis V, et al. Variations in arterial blood pressure are associated with parallel changes in FloTrac/Vigileo-derived cardiac output measurements: A prospective comparison study. Crit Care 2009; 13: R179.
35. Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS, et al. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal Doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 751-757.
36. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, et al. Tracking changes in cardiac output: Methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1801-1808.
37. Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, et al. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care 2006; 10: R164.
38. Sander M, Soies CD, Foer A, Von Heymann C. Cardiac output measurement by arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery: A comparison of measurements derived from waveforms of the radial artery versus the ascending aorta. J Int Med Res 2008; 36: 414-419.
39. Hamm J-B, Nguyen B-V, Kiss G, et al. Assessment of a cardiac output device using arterial pulse waveform analysis, Vigileo, in cardiac surgery compared to pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 295-301.
40. Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, et al. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: An evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 257-264.