Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 434-440

  Hamzaoui, Olfa ^a   Monnet, Xavier ^a   Richard, Christian ^a   Osman, David ^a   Chemla, Denis ^a   Teboul, Jean Louis ^a  

^a BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Pulse contour algorithm; Pulse contour analysis; Real time cardiac output monitoring; Transpulmonary thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL TONE; CALIBRATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FEMALE; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE WAVE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; THERMODILUTION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 38549151697     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.OB013E318161FEC4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, et al: Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13:437-440
2. Rodig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, et al: Continuous cardiac output measurement: Pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:525-530
3. Godje O, Thiel C, Lamm P, et al: Less invasive, continuous hemodynamic monitoring during minimally invasive coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1532-1536
4. Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, et al: Comparison of pulmonary arterial thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis: Evaluation of a new algorithm. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14:296-301
5. Bein B, Worthmann F, Tonner PH, et al: Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac out put. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004; 18:185-189
6. Sander M, Von Heymann C, Foer A, et al: Pulse contour analysis after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2005; 9:R729-R734
7. Godje O, Höke K, Goetz AE, et al: Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:52-58
8. Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, et al: Cardiac index measurements during rapid preload changes: A comparison of pulmonary artery thermodilution with arterial pulse contour analysis. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17:241-248
9. Wesseling KH, Dewitt B, Weber AP, et al: A simple device for the continuous measurement of cardiac output. Adv Cardiovasc Phys 1983; 5:1-52
10. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310
11. Critchley LA, Critchley JAJH: A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit 1999; 15:85-91
12. Laird NM, Ware JH: Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38:963-974
13. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, et al: Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: Pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:350-356
14. Cecconi M, Grounds M, Rhodes A: Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: Are we as good as we think we are? Curr Opin Crit Care 2007; 13:294-296
15. Michard F: Pulse contour cardiac analysis: Fairy tale or new reality. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1791-1792
16. Rauch H, Muller M, Fleisher F, et al: Pulse contour analysis versus thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46:424-429
17. Fakler U, Pauli Ch, Balling G, et al: Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133:224-228
18. Mielck F, Buhre W, Hanekop G, et al: Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17:211-216
19. Halvorsen PS, Espinoza A, Lundblad R, et al: Agreement between PiCCO pulse-contour analysis, pulmonal artery thermodilution and transthoracic thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:1050-1057
20. De Waal EE, Kalkman CJ, Rex S, et al: Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1904-1909
21. Ostergaard M, Nielsen J, Rasmussen JP, et al: Cardiac output-pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:1044-1049
22. Mahajan A, Shabanie A, Turner J, et al: Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output monitoring in cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1283-1288
23. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al: Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:329-336
24. Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, et al: Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care 2006; 10:R164
25. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schollhorn T, et al: Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:176-182
26. Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R: A pilot assessment of the FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:344-349
27. Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR: Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: Clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21:3-7
28. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, et al: Measurement of cardiac output: A comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:337-342
29. Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, et al: Comparison of FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24:832-839
30. Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S, et al: Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:591-597
31. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al: Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402-1407
32. Zollner C, Haller M, Weis M, et al: Beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac output by intravascular pulse contour analysis: A prospective criterion standard study in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14:125-129
33. Godje O, Seebauer T, Peyerl M, et al: Hemo-dynamic monitoring by double indicator dilution technique in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. Chest 2000; 118:775-781
34. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A: Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac out put in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:843-846
35. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, et al: Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 2003; 124:1900-1908
36. Combes A, Berneau JB, Luyt CE, et al: Estimation of left ventricular systolic function by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1377-1383
37. Katzenelson R, Perel A, Berkenstadt H, et al: Accuracy of transpulmonary thermodilution versus gravimetric measurement of extravascular lung water. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1550-1554
38. Monnet X, Anguel N, Osman D, et al: Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:448-453