Determining and visualizing flexibility in protein structures

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 820-826

  Scott, Walter R P ^a   Straus, Suzana K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Geometric algebra; Protein dynamics; Protein mobility; Protein structure; Protein structure comparison

Indexed keywords

4,7 DIBENZYL 2,3,4,5,6,7 HEXAHYDRO 5,6 DIHYDROXY 1,3 BIS[4 (HYDROXYMETHYL)BENZYL] 2H 1,3 DIAZEPIN 2 ONE; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS PROTEINASE; PRION PROTEIN; SENSORY RHODOPSIN; PROTEIN; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; CONFORMATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY DIFFRACTION; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 84927689304     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24776     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Mészáros B, Simon I, Dosztányi Z. The expanding view of protein-protein interactions: complexes involving intrinsically disordered proteins. Phys Biol 2011;8:035003.
2. Dunker AK, Silman I, Uversky VN, Sussman JL. Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008;18:756-764.
3. Tsai CJ, Ma B, Sham YY, Kumar S, Nussinov R. Structured disorder and conformational selection. Proteins 2001;44:418-427.
4. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr Sect A 1976;32:922-923.
5. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;235:625-634.
6. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Size-independent comparison of protein three-dimensional structures. Proteins 1995;22:273-283.
7. Betancourt MR, Skolnick J. Universal similarity measure for comparing protein structures. Biopolymers 2001;59:305-309.
8. Yang AS, Honig B. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. i. protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance. J Mol Biol 2000;301:665-678.
9. Ye Y, Godzik A. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2003;19 Suppl 2:ii246-255.
10. Salem S, Zaki MJ, Bystroff C. FlexSnap: flexible non-sequential protein structure alignment. Algorithms Mol Biol 2010;5:12.
11. Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FlexProt: alignment of flexible protein structures without a predefinition of hinge regions. J Comput Biol 2004;11:83-106.
12. Mosca R, Schneider TR. RAPIDO: a web server for the alignment of protein structures in the presence of conformational changes. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:W42-46.
13. Snyder DA, Montelione GT. Clustering algorithms for identifying core atom sets and for assessing the precision of protein structure ensembles. Proteins 2005;59:673-686.
14. Coutsias EA, Seok C, Dill KA. Using quaternions to calculate RMSD. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1849-1857.
15. Hestenes D. Oersted medal lecture 2002: Reforming the mathematical language of physics. Am J Phys 2003;71:104-121.
16. Doran C, Lasenby A. Geometric Algebra for Physicists, 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2007with corr edition.
17. Chisolm E. Geometric algebra. arXiv:1205.5935; 2012 [math-ph].
18. Dorst L, Fontijne D, Mann S. Geometric Algebra for Computer Science, 1st ed. Amsterdam, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann; 2007.
19. Crippen GM, Havel TF. Stable calculation of coordinates from distance information. Acta Crystallogr Sect A 1978;34:282-284.
20. Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, Wu Z, Song G, Yang L, Kolinski A, Pokarowski P. Distance matrix-based approach to protein structure prediction. J Struct Funct Genomics 2009;10:67-81.
21. Wells SA, Dove MT, Tucker MG. Finding best-fit polyhedral rotations with geometric algebra. J Phys: Condens Matter 2002;14:4567.
22. Daura X, Antes I, van Gunsteren WF, Thiel W, Mark AE. The effect of motional averaging on the calculation of NMR-derived structural properties. Proteins 1999;36:542-555.
23. Kelley LA, Gardner SP, Sutcliffe MJ. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. Protein Eng 1996;9:1063-1065.
24. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-1612.
25. Yamazaki T, Hinck AP, Wang YX, Nicholson LK, Torchia DA, Wingfield P, Stahl SJ, Kaufman JD, Chang CH, Domaille PJ, Lam PY. Three-dimensional solution structure of the HIV-1 protease complexed with DMP323, a novel cyclic urea-type inhibitor, determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Protein Sci 1996;5:495-506.
26. Calzolai L, Lysek DA, Guntert P, von Schroetter C, Riek R, Zahn R, Wüthrich K. NMR structures of three single-residue variants of the human prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:8340-8345.
27. Wang S, Munro RA, Shi L, Kawamura I, Okitsu T, Wada A, Kim S-Y, Jung K-H, Brown LS, Ladizhansky V. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy structure determination of a lipid-embedded heptahelical membrane protein. Nat Methods 2013;10:1007-1012.
28. Freedberg DI, Ishima R, Jacob J, Wang Y-X, Kustanovich I, Louis JM, Torchia DA. Rapid structural fluctuations of the free HIV protease flaps in solution: relationship to crystal structures and comparison with predictions of dynamics calculations. Protein Sci 2002;11:221-232.
29. Kurt N, Scott WRP, Schiffer CA, Haliloglu T. Cooperative fluctuations of unliganded and substrate-bound HIV-1 protease: a structure-based analysis on a variety of conformations from crystallography and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2003;51:409-422.
30. Good DB, Wang S, Ward ME, Struppe J, Brown LS, Lewandowski JR, Ladizhansky V. Conformational dynamics of a seven transmembrane helical protein anabaena sensory rhodopsin probed by solid-state NMR. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:2833-2842.
31. Stewart M, Kent HM, McCoy AJ. The structure of the q69l mutant of GDP-ran shows a major conformational change in the switch II loop that accounts for its failure to bind nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2). J Mol Biol 1998;284:1517-1527.
32. Vetter IR, Nowak C, Nishimoto T, Kuhlmann J, Wittinghofer A. Structure of a ran-binding domain complexed with ran bound to a GTP analogue: implications for nuclear transport. Nature 1999;398:39-46.