The effect of motional averaging on the calculation of NMR-derived structural properties

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 542-555

  Daura, Xavier ^a   Antes, Iris ^a,b   Van Gunsteren, Wilfred F ^a   Thiel, Walter ^b   Mark, Alan E ^a,c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3J coupling constant; Chemical shift; Computer simulation; Molecular dynamics; NMR; NOE distance; Peptides

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; METHANOL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; PROTONS; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0032800402     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990901)36:4<542::AID-PROT17>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Tropp J. Dipolar relaxation and nuclear Overhauser effects in nonrigid molecules: The effect of fluctuating internuclear distances. J Chem Phys 1980;72:6035-6043.
2. Hoch JC, Dobson CM, Karplus M. Fluctuations and averaging of proton chemical shifts in the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Biochemistry 1982;21:1118-1125.
3. Olejniczak ET, Dobson CM, Karplus M, Levy RM. Motional averaging of proton nuclear Overhauser effects in proteins. Predictions from a molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106:1923-1930.
4. Hoch JC, Dobson CM, Karplus M. Vicinal coupling constants and protein dynamics. Biochemistry 1985;24:3831-3841.
5. Kessler H, Griesinger C, Lautz J, Müller A, van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC. Conformational dynamics detected by nuclear magnetic resonance NOE values and J coupling constants. J Am Chem Soc 1988;110:3393-3396.
6. Van Gunsteren WF, Brunne RM, Gros P, van Schaik RC, Schiffer CA, Torda AE. Accounting for molecular mobility in structure determination based on nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction data. In: James TL, Oppenheimer NJ, editors. Methods in enzymology: nuclear magnetic resonance, Vol 239. New York: Academic Press; 1994. p 619-654.
7. Philippopoulos M, Lim C. Internal motions in the molecular tumbling regime. Effect on NMR dipolar cross-relaxation and interproton distance determination. J Phys Chem 1994;98:8264-8273.
8. Brüschweiler R, Case DA. Characterization of biomolecular structure and dynamics by NMR cross relaxation. Prog NMR Spectroscopy 1994;26:27-58.
9. Abseher R, Lüdemann S, Schreiber H, Steinhauser O. NMR cross-relaxation investigation by molecular dynamics simulation: a case study of ubiquitin in solution. J Mol Biol 1995;249:604-624.
10. Schneider TR, Brünger AT, Nilges M. Influence of internal dynamics on accuracy of protein NMR structures: derivation of realistic model distance data from a long molecular dynamics trajectory. J Mol Biol 1999;285:727-740.
11. Wüthrich K. NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. New York: JohnWiley & Sons; 1986. 292 p.
12. Torda AE, van Gunsteren WF. Molecular modeling using nuclear magnetic resonance data. In: Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB, editors. Reviews in computational chemistry, Vol III. New York: VCH Publishers; 1992. p 143-172.
13. Scott WRP, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF. On using time-averaging restraints in molecular dynamics simulation. J Biomol NMR 1998;12:501-508.
14. Karplus M. Contact electron-spin interactions of nuclear magnetic moments. J Chem Phys 1959;30:11-15.
15. Bax A, Tjandra N. Are proteins even floppier than we thought? Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:254-256.
16. de Groot BL, Amadei A, Scheek RM, van Nuland NAJ, Berendsen HJC. An extended sampling of the configurational space of HPR from E. coli. Proteins 1996;26:314-322.
17. Daura X, Jaun B, Seebach D, van Gunsteren WF, Mark AE. Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Biol 1998;280:925-932.
18. van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA, et al. Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual and user guide. Zürich: Vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich; 1996. p 1-1024.
19. Daura X, van Gunsteren WF, Rigo D, Jaun B, Seebach D. Studying the stability of a helical β-heptapeptide by molecular dynamics simulations. Chem Eur J 1997;3:1410-1417.
20. 3JHNα for identification of helical secondary structure. J Mol Biol 1984;180:741-751.
21. 1H NMR spectra of ferrichrome peptides I: The non-amide protons. Biopolymers 1978;17:617-636.
22. Daura X, van Gunsteren WF, Mark AE. Folding-unfolding thermodynamics of a β-heptapeptide from equilibrium simulations. Proteins 1999;34:269-280.
23. Patchkovskii S, Thiel W. NMR chemical shifts in MNDO approximation: Parameters and results for C, H, N, and O. J Comput Chem 1999; in press.
24. Patchkovskii S. Analytical computation of first-order response properties in MNDO methods (dissertation). Zürich: University of Zürich. 1997.
25. Dewar MJS, Thiel W. Ground states of molecules. 38. The MNDO method. Approximations and parameters. J Am Chem Soc 1977;99: 4899-4907.
26. Wüthrich, K. NMR in biological research: peptides and proteins. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1976. 379 p.
27. Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer PvR, Pople JA. Ab initio molecular orbital theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986. 548 p.
28. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, et al. GAUSSIAN94, Revision E.2. Pittsburgh, PA: Gaussian Inc.; 1995.
29. Cheeseman JR, Trucks GW, Keith TA, Frisch MJ. A comparison of models for calculating nuclear magnetic resonance shielding tensors. J Chem Phys 1996;104:5497-5509.
30. Thiel W. Program MNDO97, Version 5.0, Zürich. 1998.
31. Seebach D, Ciceri PE, Overhand M, et al. Probing the helical secondary structure of short-chain β-peptides. Helv Chim Acta 1996;79:2043-2066.
32. Gademann K, Jaun B, Seebach D, Perozzo R, Scapozza L, Folkers G. Temperature-dependent NMR and CD spectra of β-peptides: On the thermal stability of β-peptide helices-Is the folding process of β-peptides non-cooperative? Helv Chim Acta 1999;82: 1-11.