Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014)

Writing Systems Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 17-31

  Share, David L ^a   Daniels, Peter T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Abugida; Akshara; Alphabet; Alphasyllabary; Orthographic depth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927549572     PISSN: 17586801     EISSN: 1758681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. S. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among readingdisabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 16, 423-442. doi:10.1023/A:1024237415143
2. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
3. Agbemadon, A., & Boethius, H. (1989). Syllabaire 5. Atakpamé: SIL Togo.
4. Allen, W. S. (1953). Phonetics in ancient India. London Oriental Series 1. London: Oxford University Press.
5. Asfaha, Y. M., Kurvers, J., & Kroon, S. (2009). Grain size in script and teaching: Literacy acquisition in Ge'ez and Latin. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 709-724. doi:10.1017/S0142716409990087
6. Barry, W. J. (2006). Phoneme. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed.). (Vol. 9, pp. 345-50). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Bhide, A., Gadgil, S., Zelinsky, C. M., & Perfetti, C. (2014). Does reading in an alphasyllabary affect phonemic awareness? Inherent schwa effects in Marathi-English bilinguals. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 73-93. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.855619
8. Bialystok, E., Luk, G., & Kwan, E. (2005). Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(1), 43-61. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0901-4
9. Bright, W. (Ed.). (1992). International encyclopedia of linguistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. Bright, W. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana), 30, 63-71.
11. (Also in Written Language and Literacy, 2 [1999], 45-61.)
12. Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why Jaydon can't read: The triumph of ideology over evidence. Policy, 29, 21-32.
13. Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.
14. Daniels, P. T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 110, 727-731.
15. Daniels, P. T. (1991). Is a structural graphemics possible? 18th LACUS Forum, 528-537.
16. Daniels, P. T. (1992a). Contacts between Semitic and Indic scripts. In A. Harrak (Ed.), Contacts between cultures: Selected papers from the 33rd International Congress of Asian and North African Studies, Toronto, August 15-25, 1990, West Asia and North Africa (Vol. 1, pp. 146-152). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
17. Daniels, P. T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 83-110). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
18. Daniels, P. T. (2000). Syllables, consonants, and vowels in West Semitic writing. Lingua Posnaniensis, 42, 43-55.
19. Daniels, P. T. (2002). The study of writing in the twentieth century: Semitic studies interacting with non-Semitic. Israel Oriental Studies, 20, 85-117.
20. Daniels, P. T. (2007). Littera ex occidente: Toward a functional history of writing. In C. L. Miller (Ed.), Studies in Semitic and Afroasiatic linguistics presented to Gene B. Gragg (pp. 53-68). Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
21. Daniels, P. T. (2008). Writing systems of major and minor languages. In B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & S. N. Sridhar (Eds.), Language in South Asia (pp. 285-308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Daniels, P. T. (2012). Introduction to Graphonomy. Workshop on Writing Systems. Haifa University.
23. Daniels, P. T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In M. Mumin & K. Versteegh, (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa (pp. 17-31). Leiden: Brill.
24. Daniels, P. T. (in preparation). Writing systems: A slim guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. (in preparation). Is the concept of orthographic depth too shallow?
26. Das, T., Kumar, U., Bapi, R. S., Padakannaya, P., & Singh, N. C. (2009). Neural representation of an alphasyllabary - The story of Devanagari. Current Science, 97, 1033-1038.
27. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447. doi:10.3102/00346543071003393
28. Eviatar, Z., & Share, D. L. (2013). Processing Semitic writing systems: Introduction to a special issue of. Writing Systems Research, 5, 131-133.
29. Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325-340.
30. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2014). An introduction to language (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
31. Frost, R. (1992). Orthography and phonology: The psychological reality of orthographic depth. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 255-274). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
32. Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic systems and skilled word recognition processes in reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 272-295). Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263-279. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X11001841
34. Gaur, A. (1995). Scripts and writing systems: A historical perspective. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 19-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
35. Gelb, I. J. (1952/1963). A study of writing (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Geva, E. (2008). Facets of metalinguistic awareness related to reading development in Hebrew: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual children. In K. Koda & M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Crosslinguistic relationships in first- and second language and literacy development (pp. 154-187). New York, NY: Routledge.
37. Gleason, A. (1996). Christian missionary activities. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 777-780). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38. Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. (1973). Teaching reading by use of a syllabary. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 447-483. doi:10.2307/747169
39. Goodman, K. S. (1989). Whole-language research: Foundations and development. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 207-220. doi:10.1086/461613
40. Havelock, E. A. (1982). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 332-326.
42. Jeffery, L. (1961). The local scripts of Archaic Greece. Oxford: Clarendon. Addenda to 2nd ed. by A. W. Johnston, 1990.
43. Kandhadai, P., & Sproat, R. (2010). Impact of spatial ordering of graphemes in alphasyllabic scripts on phonemic awareness in Indic languages. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 105-116. doi:10.1093/wsr/wsq009
44. Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 85-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 157-66.
46. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam: North Holland.
47. Koda, K. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy experience on second language learning to read. In K. Koda & M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second language and literacy development (pp. 68-96). New York, NY: Routledge.
48. Lonigan, C. J., & Shanahan, T. (2009). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel, executive summary: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
49. McCarthy, S. (1995). The Cree syllabary and the writing system riddle: A paradigm in crisis. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
50. Mishra, R., & Stainthorp, R. (2007). The relationship between phonological awareness and word reading accuracy in Oriya and English: A study of Oriya-speaking fifth-graders. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 23-37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00326.x
51. Morrison, H. (1945). A letter on spelling reform. American Speech, 20, 208-211. doi:10.2307/486730
52. Myhill, J. (2009). Towards an understanding of the relationship between diglossia and literacy, a survey commissioned by the Israel Language and Literacy Committee. Retrieved from http://education.academy.ac.il
53. Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 7-22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00329.x
54. Nag, S. (2014a). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 105-119. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.855621
55. Nag, S. (2014b). Alphabetism and the science of reading: From the perspective of the akshara languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 866. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00866
56. Nag, S., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Cognitive profiles of poor readers of Kannada. Reading and Writing, 24, 657-676. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9258-7
57. Nag, S., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). Reading in an alphasyllabary: Implications for a language-universal theory of learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 404-423. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.576352
58. Nag, S., Snowling, M., Quinlan, P., & Hulme, C. (2014). Child and symbol factors in learning to read a visually complex writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 309-324. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.892489
59. Nakamura, P. R., Koda, K., & Joshi, R. M. (2014). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132-147. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.855620
60. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
61. Oberlies, T. (2007). Aśokan Prakrit and Pali. In G. Cardona & D. Jain (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages (pp. 161-203). London: Routledge.
62. Padakannaya, P. (2009). Language and communication. In G. Misra (Ed.), Psychology in India: Basic psychological processes and human development (Vol. I, pp. 111-151). Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.
63. Pandey, Pramod. (2007). Phonology-orthography interface in Devanagari for Hindi. Written Language and Literacy, 10, 145-162. doi:10.1075/wll.10.2.06pan
64. Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3-24. doi:10.1207/ S1532799XSSR0701-02
65. Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning & Development, 9, 296-316. doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.813828
66. Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43-59. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
67. Prakash, P., Rekha, D., Nigam, R., & Karanth, P. (1993). Phonological awareness, orthography and literacy. In R. J. Scholes (Ed.), Literacy and language analysis (pp. 55-70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Ravid, D. (2006). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339-364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69. Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. New York, NY: Springer.
70. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
71. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
72. Reddy, P. P., & Koda, K. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110-130. doi:10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
73. Rickard, L. S. J., & Lee, L. C. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children's spelling errors in Malay. Reading and Writing, 17(1/2), 7-26. doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000013833.79570.de
74. Rimzhim, A., Katz, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2014). Brahmi-derived orthographies are typologically aksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41-53. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013. 855618
75. Roberts, D. (2008). Thirty years of tone orthography testing in West African languages (1977-2007). Journal of West African Languages, 35, 199-242.
76. Roberts, D. (2013). Testing tone orthographies in African languages: A summary of previous research. Unpublished manuscript.
77. Rogers, H. (1995). Optimal orthographies. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 31-43). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
78. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh- Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy and orthography (pp. 3-28). New York, NY: Springer.
79. Salomon, R. G. (2006). Kharos·t·hi syllables used as location markers in Gandharan stupa architecture. In P. Callieri (Ed.), Architetti, capomastri, artigiani: L'organizzazione dei cantieri e della produzione artistica nell'Asia ellenistica, Studi offerti a Domenico Faccenna nel suo ottantesimo compleano (pp. 181-224.) Rome: Istituto Italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente.
80. Salomon, R. G. (2007). Writing systems of the Indo-Aryan languages. In G. Cardona & D. Jain (Eds.), The Indo- Aryan languages (pp. 67-103.). London: Routledge.
81. Salomon, R. G. (2012). Some principles and patterns of script change. In S. D. Houston (Ed.), The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (pp. 119-133.). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
82. Schwartz, M., Leikin, M., & Share, D. L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children. Written Language and Literacy, 8, 179-207.
83. Scragg, D. G. (1974). A history of English spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
84. Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). The science of reading and its educational implications. Language Learning and Development, 9, 331-360. doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.812017
85. Share, D. L. (1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
86. Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of over-reliance on an "outlier" orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584-615. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
87. Share, D. L. (2012). Frost and fogs, or sunny skies? Orthography, reading, and misplaced optimalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 307-308. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000271
88. Share, D. L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 752. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
89. Share, D. L. (in press). Learning to read Hebrew. In L. Verhoeven & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Reading acquisition: Crosslinguistic and cross-script perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Shimron, J. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
91. Shimron, J., & Navon, D. (1981). The distribution of information within letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 483-491. doi:10.3758/BF03204845
92. Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2005). The science of reading: A handbook. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
93. Sproat, R. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Strauss, S. L., & Altwerger, B. (2007). The logographic nature of English alphabetics and the fallacy of direct intensive phonics instruction. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7, 299-319. doi:10.1177/1468798407083664
95. Swiggers, P. (1984). On the nature of West-Semitic writing systems. Aula Orientalis, 2, 149-151.
96. Taylor, I. (1883/1899). The alphabet: An account of the origin and development of letters (2nd ed.). London: Kegan Paul, Trench.
97. Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. (1995). Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
98. Tunmer, W. E., Nicolson, T., Greaney, K. T., Prochnow, J. E., Chapman, J. E., & Arrow, A. W. (2013). PIRLS before swine. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 43, 105-119.
99. Vaid, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). Exploring word recognition in a semi-alphabetic script: The case of Devanagari. Brain and Language, 81, 679-690. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2556
100. Valle-Arroyo, F. (1990). Spelling errors in Spanish. Reading and Writing, 2(1), 83-98. doi:10.1007/BF00383375
101. van der Kuijp, L. W. J. (1996). The Tibetan script and derivatives. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 431-441). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
102. Venezky, R. L. (1976). Notes on the history of English spelling. Visible Language, 10, 351-365.
103. Venezky, R. L. (1995). How English is read: Grapheme-phoneme regularity and orthographic structure in word recognition. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 111-129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
104. Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York, NY: Guilford.
105. Whitney, W. D. (1877). On the comparative frequency of occurrence of the alphabetic elements in Sanskrit. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 10, cl-clii.
106. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3-29. doi:10.1037/0033- 2909.131.1.3