Types of feedback in a computer-based collaborative problem-solving group task

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 699-715

  Hsieh, I Lin Gloria ^a   O'Neil Jr , Harold F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b National Center for Research on Evaluation Standards and Student Testing (CRESST)   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative problem solving; Computer; Feedback; Group task

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS; WEBSITES;

GROUP TASKS; RESPONSE FEEDBACKS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 0036836490     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00025-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alibali M.W. (1999). How children change their minds. strategy change can be gradual or abrupt Developmental Psychology. 35:1999;127-145.
2. Barron, B. (2000). Problem solving in video-based microworlds. collaborative and individual outcomes of high-achieving sixth-grade students Journal of Educational Psychology. 92:2000;391-398.
3. Baxter G.P., Elder A.D., & Glaser R. (1996). Assessment and instruction in the science classroom (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 418). 1996;University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles.
4. Chung G., O'Neil H.F. Jr., & Herl H.E. (1999). The use of computer-based collaborative knowledge mapping to measure team processes and team outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior. 15:1999;463-493.
5. Clark K., & Dwyer F.M. (1998). Effects of different types of computer-assisted feedback strategies on achievement and response confidence. International Journal of Instructional Media. 25(1):1998;55-63.
6. Cohen E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
7. Cohen, B.P., & Arechevala-Vargas (1987). Interdependence, interaction, and productivity (Working Paper No. 87-3). Stanford, CA: Center for Sociology Research.
8. Dempsey, J.V., Driscoll, M.P., & Swindell, L.K. Text-based feedback. In J. V. Dempsey, & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 21-54). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
9. Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1996). Assessment of domain-specific and domain-transcending prior knowledge: entry assessment and the use of profile analysis. In M. Birenbaum, & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning process and prior knowledge (pp. 93-129.
10. Foote, C. (1999). Attribution feedback in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13, 155-166.
11. Glaser, R., Raghavan, K., & Baxter, G. (1992). Design characteristics of science performance assessments (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 349). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
12. Herl, H.E., Baker, E.L., & Niemi, D. (1996). Construct validation of an approach to modeling cognitive structure of U.S. history knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 206-218.
13. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126-136.
14. Mayer, R.E., & Wittrock, M.C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47-62). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA, Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
15. Morgan, B.B., Salas, E., & Glickman A.S. (1993). An analysis of team evolution and maturation. Journal of General Psychology, 120, 277-291.
16. Oliver, R., & Omari A. (2001). Student responses to collaborating and Learning in a Web-based environment. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 17(1), 34-47.
17. O'Neil H.F. Jr. (1999). Perspectives on computer-based performance assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 225-268.
18. O'Neil, H. F. Jr., Chung, G. K. W. K., & Brown, R. S. (1997). Use of networked simulations as a context to measure team competencies. In H. F. O'Neil Jr. (Ed.), Workforce readiness: competencies and assessment (pp. 411-452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. O'Neil, H. F., Jr., Herl, H. E. (1998, April). Reliability and validity of a trait measure of self-regulation. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
20. Rubba, P. A., Rye, J. A., Di Base, W. J., Crawford, B. A. (2001). Proceedings of the annual international conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (Costa Mesa, California). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED453083).
21. Sales G.C. (1993). Adapted and adaptive feedback in technology-based instruction. In J. V. Dempsey, & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 159-176). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
22. Schacter, J., Herl, H. E., Chung, G., Dennis, R. A., & O'Neil, H. F. Jr. (1999). Computer-based performance assessments: a solution to the narrow measurement and reporting of problem-solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 403-418.
23. Sugrue, B. (1995). A theory-based framework for assessing domain-specific problem-solving ability. Educational Measurement: issues and Practice, 14(3), 29-36.
24. Tileston, D. W. (2000). 10 Best teaching practices: how brain research, learning styles, and standards define teaching competencies (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447085).
25. Warden, C. A. (2000). EFL business writing behaviors in different feedback environments. Language Learning, 50, 573-616.
26. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
27. Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 239-261.
28. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Chizhik, A. W. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: group composition and performance American Educational Research Journal, 35, 607-651.
29. Webb N. M., & Palincsar A. S. (1996). Group process in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner, R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA, Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
30. Webb N. M., Welner M., Zuniga S. (2001). Short circuits or superconductors? Examining factors that encourage or undermine group learning and collaboration among high-ability students (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 541). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
31. Zhang J. (A distributed representation approach to group problem solving. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49:1998;801-809.