Making sense of knowledge integration maps

Digital Knowledge Maps in Education: Technology-Enhanced Support for Teachers and Learners

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 17-40

  Schwendimann, Beat A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Concept mapping; Evaluation; Knowledge integration maps; Network analysis; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927143574     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/9781461431787_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (90)

1. Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J., & Goldsmith, T. E. (1994). Structural knowledge assessment— comparison of referent structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 303-311.
2. Ainsworth, S. E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2/3), 131-152.
3. Ainsworth, S. (2006). Deft: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learningandinstruction, 16(3), 183-198.
4. Anderson, R. C. (1984). Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 13(9), 5-10.
5. Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr’s ‘ultimate/proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy, 18(4), 553-565.
6. Austin, L. B., & Shore, B. M. (1995). Using concept mapping for assessment in physics. Physics Education, 30, 41.
7. Ausubel, D. R (1963). Thepsychology ofmeaningful verbal learning: An introduction to school learning. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
8. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology—a cognitive view. London: Holt, Rienhart and Winston.
9. Bjork, R. A., & Linn, M. C. (2006). The science of learning and the learning of science— introducing desirable difficulties. The APS Observer, 19(3), 29, 39.
10. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Crocking, R. R. (2000A). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed., pp. X, 374 p). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Crocking, R. R. (2000B). How experts differ from novices. In How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed., Chap. 2). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Bruner, J. S. (1960). Theprocess ofeducation. New York, NY: Vantage.
13. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1986). A study of thinking. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
14. Canas, A. J. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. Http://www.ihmc.us/users/acanas/Publications/ConceptMapLitReview/
15. Canas, A. J. (2004). Cmap tools—knowledge modeling kit [Computer Software]. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC).
16. Cathcart, L., Stieff, M., Marbach-Ad, G., Smith, A., & Frauwirth, K. (2010). Using knowledge structure maps as a foundation for knowledge management. Icls.
17. Chang, K. E., Chiao, B. C., Chen, S. W., & Hsiao, R. S. (2000). A programming learning system for beginners—a completion strategy approach. Ieee Transactions on Education, 43(2), 211-220.
18. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 21-33.
19. Chartrand, G., & Zhang, P. (2004). Introduction to graph theory. Boston, MA: McGraw-HiU Higher Education.
20. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-151.
21. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. S. Sternberg (Ed.). Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 1-75). Hiusdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Cline, B. E., Brewster, C. C., & FeU, R. D. (2009). A rule-based system for automatically evaluating student concept maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2282-2291.
23. Coleman, E. B. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3), 387-427.
24. Czerniak, C. M., & Haney, J. J. (1998). The effect of collaborative concept mapping on elementary preservice teachers’ anxiety, efficacy, and achievement in physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(4), 303-320.
25. Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 448-465.
26. Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2005). Designing for complex system understanding in the high school biology classroom. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
27. Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959.
28. Edmondson, K. M. (2000). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view. Educational psychology press (pp. 15-40). Elsevier Academic Press.
29. Fisher, K. M. (2000). Semnet software as an assessment tool. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 197-221). Elsevier Academic Press.
30. Fisher, K. M., Wandersee, J. H. M., & Moody, D. E. (2000). Mapping biology knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Gentner, D. (1978). On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988.
32. Glaser, R., Chi, M. T. H., & Farr, M. J. (1985). The nature of expertise (National Center for Research in Vocational Education). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
33. Goel, A., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989). Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence—Volume 2 (pp. 1388-1394).
34. Goel, A. K., Rugaber, S., & Vattam, S. (2008). Structure, behavior, and function of complex systems: The structure, behavior, and function modeling language. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 23, 23.
35. Grundspenkis, J., & Strautmane, M. (2009). Usage of graph patterns for knowledge assessment based on concept maps. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University. Computer Sciences, 38(38), 60-71.
36. Herl, H. E. (1999). Reliability and validity of a computer-based knowledge mapping system to measure content understanding. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3-4), 315-333.
37. Herl, H. E., O’Neil, H. F. J., Chung, G. K., Dennis, R. A., & Lee, J. J. (1997, March). Feasibility of an on-line concept mapping construction and scoring system. Report: ED424233. 27Pp.
38. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28, 127-138.
39. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307-331.
40. Hoffman, R. R. (1998). How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology. In R. Williams, W. Faulkner, & J. Fleck (Eds.), Exploring expertise (pp. 81-100). Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh Press.
41. Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., & Harold, F. O. N. (1984). Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues. New York, NY: Academic.
42. Hoppe, H. U., Engler, J., & Weinbrenner, S. (2012). The impact of structural characteristics of concept maps on automatic quality measurement. In J. Van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS). Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
43. Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 81-97. Http://dx. Doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9087-4. Doi: 10.1007/s11423-008-9087-4
44. Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772-775.
45. Kinchin, I. M. (2000A). Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 61-68.
46. Kinchin, I. M. (2000B). From ‘ecologist’ to ‘conceptual ecologist’: The utility of the conceptual ecology for teachers of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 178-183.
47. Kinchin, I. M. (2001). If concept mapping is so helpful to learning biology, why aren’t we all doing it? International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1257-1269.
48. Kinchin, I. M., De-Leij, F. A. A. M., & Hay, D. B. (2005). The evolution of a collaborative concept mapping activity for undergraduate microbiology students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(1), 1-14.
49. Kommers, P., & Lanzing, J. (1997). Students’ concept mapping for hypermedia design: Navigation through world wide web (WWW) space and self-assessment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, S(3-4), 421-455.
50. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., Cross, D. R., & Reynolds, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semi-natic maps. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 331-367.
51. Linn, M. C., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J., Zhang, H., & McElhaney, K. (2010). Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations? In A. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork. London, UK: Psychology Press.
52. Liu, L., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1023-1040.
53. Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1993, August 1-4). The structure and use of biological knowledge about mammals in novice and experienced students. Paper Presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
54. Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.
55. Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475-492.
57. Michael, R. S. (1995). The validity of concept maps for assessing cognitive structure. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 55(10-A), 3141.
58. Mintzes, J. J., Wanderersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2001). Assessing understanding in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 118-124.
59. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (1997). Meaningful learning in science: The human constructivist perspective. In Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge. The educational psychology series (pp. 405-447). (1)U North Carolina, Dept of Biological Science, Wilmington, NC, US, San Diego: Academic Press.
60. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413-448.
61. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Pensacola, FL: IHMC.
62. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86.
64. Osmundson, E., Chung, G., Herl, H., & Klein, D. (1999). Knowledge mapping in the classroom: A tool for examining the development of students’ conceptual understandings. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles.
65. Pallant, A., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Reasoning with atomic-scale molecular dynamic models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 51-66.
66. Pearsall, N., Skipper, J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81(2), 193-215.
67. Pemmaraju, S. V., & Skiena, S. S. (2003). Computational discrete mathematics: Combinatorics and graph theory with mathematica. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
68. Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Automated knowledge visualization and assessment. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 77-115). New York, NY: Springer.
69. Plotnick, E. (1997). Concept mapping: A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts: An ERIC digest. Syracuse, NY: Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
70. Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1103-1127.
71. Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1999). Concept mapping as a tool for learning: Broadening the framework for student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 47(2), 74-79.
72. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2000). On the use of concept maps as an assessment tool in science: What we have learned so far. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 2(1), 30.
73. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Iverson, H., & Yin, Y. (2009). Towards the use of concept maps in large-scale assessments: Exploring the efficiency of two scoring methods. Narst conference.
74. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, S. E., Li, M., & Shavelson, R. J. (2001). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 260-278.
75. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, S. E., & Shavelson, R. J. (1997). Concept map-based assessment in science: Two exploratory studies. Cse Report, 436.
76. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 569-600.
77. Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (2002). Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships. School Science and Mathematics, 102(1), 33-44.
78. Safayeni, F., Derbentseva, N., & Canas, A. J. (2005). A theoretical note on concepts and the need for cyclic concept maps. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 741-766. Doi:10.1002/tea.20074.
79. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45(2), 185-213.
80. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Durso, F. T., Goldsmith, T. E., Breen, T. J., Cooke, N. M., Tucker, R. G., et al. (1985). Measuring the structure of expertise. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 25, 699-728.
82. Schwendimann, B. A. (2007). Integrating interactive genetics visualizations into high school biology. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association 2007. Chicago, IL.
83. Schwendimann, B. A. (2011A). Integrating genotypic and phenotypic ideas of evolution through critique-focused concept mapping. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association 2011. New Orleans, LA.
84. Schwendimann, B. A. (2011B). Linking genotypic and phenotypic ideas of evolution through collaborative critique-focused concept mapping. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Hong Kong, China: CSCL Conference.
85. Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Wiley, E. W. (2005). Windows into the mind. Higher Education, 49(4), 413-430.
86. Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., & Canaday, D. (2000). Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning—a report of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1221-1246. Retrieved from Google Scholar.
87. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
88. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (p. 825). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). The teaching of learning strategies. Innovation Abstracts, 5(32).
90. Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 166-184.