Linking genotypic and phenotypic ideas of evolution through collaborative critique-focused concept mapping

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conf. Proc. - Short Papers and Posters, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conf.

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 954-955

  Schwendimann, Beat A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CONCEPT MAPPING; CONCEPT MAPS; TREATMENT GROUP; UNOBSERVABLE;

CURRICULA; TIMING CIRCUITS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84858426598     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891-1901. (Pubitemid 35302001)
2. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
3. diSessa, A. A. (2008). A bird's eye view of the "pieces" vs. "Coherence" controversy. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Herron, J. C. (2003). Allele A1 population genetics software [Audiovisual Material].
5. Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Eylon, B.-S. (2004). The scaffolded knowledge integration framework for instruction. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education. (pp. 47-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Linn, M. C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313(5790), 1049-1050. (Pubitemid 44300215)
8. Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Schwendimann, B. (2007). Integrating interactive genetics visualizations into high school biology. Annual meeting of american educational research association (AERA).
10. Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychol, 52(2), 170-194. doi:10.1016/j. cogpsych.2005.10.001 (Pubitemid 43160193)
11. Southerland, S. A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C. L., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Science Education, 85(4), 328-348.