Assessing Science Understanding Through Concept Maps

Assessing Science Understanding

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 15-40

  Edmondson, Katherine M ^a  

^a Animal Health Diagnostic Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882463299     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012498365-6/50004-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Austin L.B., Shore B.M. Using concept mapping for assessment in physics. Physics Education 1995, 30(1):41-45.
2. Ausubel D., Novak J.D., Hanesian H. Educational psychology: A cognitive view 1978, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York. 2nd ed.
3. Baxter G.P., Elder A.D., Glaser R. Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educational Psychologist 1996, 31(2):133-140.
4. Bezzi A. Use of repertory grids in facilitating knowledge construction and reconstruc-tion in geology. journal of Research in Science Teaching 1996, 33(2):179-204.
5. Biggs J.B. Institutional learning and the integration of knowledge. Learning in medical school 1989, 21-38. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong. J. I. Balla, M. Gibson, A. M. Chang (Eds.).
6. Botton C. Collaborative concept mapping and formative assessment key stage 3: Understandings of acids and bases. School Science Review 1995, 77(279):124-130.
7. Chi M.T.H., Feltovich P.J., Glaser R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 1981, 5(2):121-152.
8. Cliburn J.W. Concept maps to promote meaningful learning. journal of College Science Teaching 1990, 19(4):212-217.
9. Coles C.R. Helping students with learning difficulties in medical and health-care edu-cation. Medical Education 1990, 24:300-312.
10. Coppola B.P., Ege S.N., Lawton R.G. The University of Michigan undergraduate chemistry curriculum: 2. Instructional strategies and assessment. journal of Chemical Educa-tion 1997, 74(1):84-94.
11. Edmondson K.M. College students' conceptions of their responsibilities for learning. Master's thesis 1985, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
12. Edmondson K.M. Concept mapping for the development of medical curricula. journal of Research in Science Teaching 1995, 32(7):777-793.
13. Edmondson K.ML, Novak J.D. The interplay between epistemological views, learn-ing strategies, and attitudes of college students. journal of Research in Science Teaching 1993, 32(6):547-559.
14. Edmondson K.M., Smith D.F. Concept mapping to facilitate veterinary students' understanding of fluid and electrolyte disorders. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1998, 10(1):21-33.
15. Edmondson K.M., Wandersee J.H., Novak J.D., Coppola B.C. Using metacognitive tools to facilitate faculty development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teachin 1995.
16. Entwistle N., Ramsden P. Understanding student learning 1983, Croom Helm, London.
17. Entwistle N.J. Styles of learning and teaching 1988, David Fulton, London.
18. Toward a general theory of expertise 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. K.A. Ericsson, J. Smith, (Eds.).
19. Esiobu G.O., Soyibo K. Effects of concept and Vee mappings under three learning modes on students' cognitive achievement in ecology and genetics. journal of Research in Sci-ence Teaching 1995, 32(9):971-995.
20. The content of science 1994, The Falmer Press, London. P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, R. White, (Eds.).
21. Glaser R. Learning theory and theories of knowledge. Learning & instruction 1987, 397-414. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK. E. DeCorte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, P. Span (Eds.).
22. Gowin D.B. Educating 1981, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
23. Hegarty-Hazel E., Prosser M. Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies, Part 2: Student learning in biology. International journal of Science Educa-tion 1991, 13(4):421-429.
24. Heinze-Fry J.A., Novak J.D. Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education 1990, 74:461-472.
25. Hetlund L., Hammerness K., Unger C, Wilson D.G. How do students demonstrate understanding?. Teaching for understanding 1998, 197-232. lossey-Bass, San Francisco. M. S. Wiske (Ed.).
26. Hoz R., Tomer Y, Tamir P. The relations between disciplinary and pedagogical knowl-edge and the length of teaching experience of biology and geography teachers. journal of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27(10):973-985.
27. Johnson P.J., Goldsmith T.E., Teague K.W. Similarity, structure, and knowledge: A representational approach to assessment. Cognitively diagnostic assessment 1995, 221-249. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale, NJ. P. D. Nichols, S. F. Chapman, R. L. Brennan (Eds.).
28. Johnson S.D., Satchwell R.E. The effect of functional flow diagrams on apprentice aircraft mechanics' technical system understanding. Performance Improvement Quarterly 1993, 6(4):73-91.
29. Jones M.H., Rua M.J., Carter G. Science teachers' conceptual growth within Vygot-sky's zone of proximal development. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1998, 35(9):967-985.
30. Kulhavy R.W., Schwartz N.H. Working memory: The encoding process. Cognitive classroom learning 1986, Academic Press, San Diego. G. D. Phye, T. Andre (Eds.).
31. Liu X., Hinchey M. Validity and reliability of concept mapping as an alternative science assessment. Published. Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics 1993, Cornell University, Department of Education, Ithaca, NY.
32. Markham K.M., Mintzes.J.J., Jones M.G. The concept map as a research and evalu-ation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1994, 31(1):91-101.
33. Markow P.G., Lonning R.A. Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry labo-ratories: Students' perceptions and effects on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teach-ing 1998, 35(9):1015-1029.
34. McKeachie W.J., Pintrich P.R., Lin Y.-G., Sharma R. Teaching and learning in the college classroom (No. 90-B-003.1). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning 1990, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
35. Teaching science for understanding 1997, Academic Press, San Diego. J.J. Mintzes, J.H. Wandersee, J.D. Novak (Eds.).
36. Nakhleh M.B. Chemical education research in the laboratory environment. Journal. of Chemical Education 1994, 71(3):201-205.
37. Nakhleh M.B., Krajcik.J.S. Influence of levels of information as presented by differ-ent technologies on students' understanding of acid, base and pH concepts. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1994, 31(10):1077-1096.
38. Novak.J.D. A theory of education 1977, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
39. Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics 1987, Department of Education, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. J.D. Novak (Ed.).
40. Novak.J.D. Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27(10):937-949.
41. Novak.J.D. How do we learn our lesson? Taking students through the process. The Sei-enceTeacher 1993, 60(3):50-55.
42. Novak.J.D. Learning, creating, and using knowledge 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
43. Novak.J.D., Gowin D.B. Learning how to learn 1984, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. Novak.J.D., Musonda D. A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learn-ing. American Educational Research journal 1991, 28(1):117-153.
45. Novak.J.D., Gowin D.B., Johansen G.T. The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education 1983, 67:625-645.
46. Okebukola P.A. Attaining meaningful learning of concepts in genetics and ecology: An examination of the potency of the concept-mapping technique. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27(5):493-504.
47. Olson.J.R., Biolsi K.J. Techniques for representing expert knowledge. Toward a general theory of expertise 1991, 240-285. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. K. A. Ericsson, J. Smith (Eds.).
48. Pankratius W.J. Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achieve-ment in secondary school physics. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27(4):315-333.
49. Pearsall N.R., Skipper.J.E.J., Mintzes.J.J. Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education 1997, 81(2):193-215.
50. Pendley B.D., Bretz R.L., Novak.J.D. Concept maps as a tool to assess learning in chemistry. Journal. of Chemical Education 1994, 71(1):9-15.
51. Posner G., Strike K., Hewson P., Gertzog W. Accommodation of a scientific concep-tion: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 1982, 66:211-227.
52. Prawat R.S. Constructivisms, modern and postmodern. Educational Psychologist 1996, 31(3/4):215-225.
53. Prosser M. The effects of cognitive structure and learning strategy on student achievement. Student learning 1987, 29-38. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK. J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, D. W. piper (Eds.).
54. Regis A., Albertazzi P.G., Roletto E. Concept maps in chemistry education. Journal. of Chemical Education 1996, 73(11):1084-1088.
55. Rice D.C, Ryan.J.M., Samson S.M. Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete?. Journal of Research in Science Teach-ing 1998, 35(10):1103-1127.
56. Roth W.-M. Authentic school science 1995, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
57. Roth W.-M., Roychoudhury A. The concept map as a tool for the collaborative con-struction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1993, 30(5):503-534.
58. Ruiz-Primo M.A., Shavelson R.J. Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1996, 33(6):569-600.
59. Schmidt H.G., Norman G.R., Boshuizen H.P.A. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implications. Academic Medicine 1990, 65(10):611-621.
60. Shymansky I.A., Woodworth G., Norman O., Dunkhase.J., Matthews C, Liu C.-T. A study of changes in middle school teachers' understanding of selected ideas in science as a function of an in-service program focusing on student preconcept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1993, 30(7):737-755.
61. Starr M.L, Krajcik J.S. Concept maps as a heuristic for science curriculum develop-ment: Toward improvement in process and product. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27(10):987-1000.
62. The practice of constructivism in science education 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. K. Tobin, (Ed.).
63. Trowbridge.J.E., Wandersee.J.H. How do graphics presented during college biology lessons affect students' learning?. Journal of College Science Teaching 1996, 26(1):54-57.
64. Trowbridge.J.E., Wandersee.J.H. Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1994, 31(5):459-473.
65. Trowbridge.J.E., Wandersee.J.H. Theory-driven graphic organizers. Teaching science for understanding 1998, 95-131. Academic Press, San Diego. J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, J. D. Novak (Eds.).
66. von Glasersfeld E. Radical constructivism-. A way of knowing and learning 1995, The Falmer Press, London.
67. Wallace.J.D., Mintzes.J.J. The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27(10):1033-1052.
68. Wandersee.J.H., Mintzes.J.J., Novak.J.D. Research on alternative conceptions in science. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning 1994, 177-210. MacMillan, New York. D. L. Gabel (Ed.).
69. Welch W.W. Student assessment and curriculum evaluation. Improving science education 1995, 90-116. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. B. Fraser. J., H. J. Walberg (Eds.).
70. West L. Implications of recent research for improving secondary school science learning. Jmproving learning: New perspectives 1988, 51-68. Kogan Page, London. P. Ramsden (Ed.).
71. Cognitive structure and conceptual change 1985, Academic Press, Orlando, FL. L.H.T. West, A.L. Pines (Eds.).
72. White R., Gunstone R. Probing understanding 1992, The Falmer Press, London.
73. Willerman M., MacHarg R.A. The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1991, 28(8):705-711.
74. Wilson.J. The predictive validity of concept mapping: Relationships to measures of achievement. Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics 1993, Cornell University, Department of Education, Ithaca, NY.
75. Wilson I.M. Network representations of knowledge about chemical equilibrium: Varia-tions with achievement. Journal. of Research in Science Teaching 1994, 31(10):1133-1147.
76. Teaching for understanding 1998, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. M.S. Wiske (Ed.).
77. Zajchowski R., Martin I. Differences in the problem solving of stronger and weaker novices in physics: Knowledge, strategies, or knowledge structure?. Journal of Research in Sci-ence Teaching 1993, 30(5):459-470.