Cross-country review of smart grid adoption in residential buildings

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 48, Issue , 2015, Pages 192-213

  Chou, Jui Sheng ^a   Kim, Changwan ^b   Ung, Thanh Khiet ^a   Yutami, I Gusti Ayu Novi ^a   Lin, Guo Tai ^a   Son, Hyojoo ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Consumer adoption; Cross country study; Energy efficiency; Residential building; Smart grid; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; HOUSING; INVESTMENTS; SMART METERS; SMART POWER GRIDS;

CONSUMER ADOPTIONS; CONSUMER PERCEPTION; CROSS-COUNTRY STUDIES; ENERGY; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; METERING DEVICES; POLICY MAKERS; RESIDENTIAL BUILDING; SMART GRID; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84926687849     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.055     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. SSSR Depuru, L. Wang, and V. Devabhaktuni Smart meters for power grid: challenges, issues, advantages and status Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15 2011 2736 2742
2. M. Fadaeenejad, A.M. Saberian, M. Fadaee, M.A.M. Radzi, H. Hizam, and M.Z.A. AbKadir The present and future of smart power grid in developing countries Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29 2014 828 834
3. Stromback J, Dromacque C, Yassin MH. The potential of smart meter enabled programs to increase energy and systems efficiency: a mass pilot comparison: VaasaETT, Global Energy Think Tank; 2011. Available from http://esmig.eu/sites/default/files/2011.10.12-empower-demand-report-final.pdf.
4. J.-S. Chou, and IGAN Yutami Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia Appl Energy 128 2014 336 349
5. Global Smart Grid Federation. The Global Smart Grid Federation 2012 Report: Global Smart Grid Federation; 2012. Available from https://www.smartgrid.gov/sites/default/files/doc/files/Global-Smart-Grid-Federation-Report.pdf.
6. Giordano V, Meletiou A, Covrig CF, Mengolini A, Ardelean M, Fulli G, et al. Smart grid projects in Europe: lessons learned and current developments 2012 update. Publications Office of the European Union; 2013. Available from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/28191.
7. The U.S. Energy Information Administration. Smart meter deployments continue to rise. Available from http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=8590; 2013 [retrieved 08.11.13].
8. S. Luthra, S. Kumar, R. Kharb, M.F. Ansari, and S.L. Shimmi Adoption of smart grid technologies: an analysis of interactions among barriers Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33 2014 554 565
9. E. McKenna, I. Richardson, and M. Thomson Smart meter data: balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications Energy Policy 41 2012 807 814
10. J. Park, F. Gunn, and S.-L. Han Multidimensional trust building in e-retailing: cross-cultural in trust formation and implications for perceived risk J Retail Consum Serv 19 2012 304 312
11. S. Yeniyurt, and J.D. Townsend Does culture explain acceptance of new products in a country?: an empirical investigation Int Mark Rev 20 2003 377 396
12. H.R. Markus, and S. Kitayama Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation Psychol Rev 98 1991 224 253
13. Y. Truong A cross-country study of consumer innovativeness and technological service innovation J Retail Consum Serv 20 2013 130 137
14. I. Im, S. Hong, and M.S. Kang An international comparison of technology adoption: testing the UTAUT model Inf Manag 48 2011 1 8
15. J. Mandese, S. Dweyer, H. Mesak, and M. Hsu An exploratory examination of the influence of national culture on cross-national product diffusion J Int Mark 13 2005 1 27
16. K. Yang, and L.D. Jolly The effects of consumer perceived value and subjective norm on mobile data service adoption between American and Korean consumers J Retail Consum Serv 16 2009 502 508
17. DN-y Mah, J.M. van der Vleuten, I.p. JC-m, and P.R. Hills Governing the transition of socio-technical systems: a case study of the development of smart grids in Korea Energy Policy 45 2012 133 141
18. Mokhoff N. Smart meter deployment on the rise globally. Available from http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc-id=1264362; 2012 [retrieved 08.11.13].
19. Institute for Electric Innovation. Utility-scale smart meter deployments: a foundation for expanded grid benefits: Institute for Electric Innovation - The Edison Foundation; 2013. Available from http://www.edisonfoundation.net/iei/Documents/IEE-SmartMeterUpdate-0813.pdf.
20. Ryberg T. Smart Metering in Europe - 9th edition. Berg Insight; 2012. Available from http://www.berginsight.com/ShowReport.aspx?m-m=3&id=149.
21. The World Factbook - CIA. Country comparison: Electricity - consumption; 2012. Available from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2233rank.html.
22. The U.S. Energy Information Administration. Country analysis brief overview, Korea. Available from http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=ks; 2013 [retrieved 08.11.13].
23. Burea of Energy - Ministry of Economic Affair of Taiwan. How is the natural gas transported in Taiwan? Why can't Taiwan import pipeline natural gas?; 2012. Available from http://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/english/content/Content.aspx?menu-id=1694.
24. Burea of Energy - Ministry of Economic Affair of Taiwan. Taiwan Launched Smart Grid Deployment; 2012. Available from http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/english/news/News.aspx?kind=6&menu-id=176&news-id=28433.
25. Taiwan Power Company. Taiwan power company sustainability report 2013. Taipower Company - Taiwan; 2013. Available from http://www.taipower.com.tw/e-content/content/report/.%5C.%5C.%5CUpFile%5CCompanyENFile%5C2013Taipower-English-EBook.pdf.
26. The China Post. Taipower plans to install smart meters for customers by 2012. Available from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan-business/2010/06/17/261100/Taipower-plans.htm; 2010 [retrieved 08.11.13].
27. Taipower Company - Taiwan. Power Grid Construction; 2013. Available from http://www.taipower.com.tw/e-content/content/construction/construction01-1.aspx?sid=1#.
28. Korea Smart Grid Institute. Korea's Jeju smart grid test-bed overview. Available from http://www.smartgrid.or.kr/10eng3-1.php; 2011 [retrieved 08.11.13].
29. Energy Korea. By 2016, installing smart meter in one out of every two households. Available from http://energy.korea.com/archives/26734?cat=25; 2012 [retrieved 08.11.13].
30. Meet-Bis Vietnam Project. Smart grid development in Vietnam. Available from http://meet-bis.vn/news/social-news/smart-grid-development-in-vietnam-3087.html; 2013 [retrieved 08.11.13].
31. T. Krishnamurti, D. Schwartz, A. Davis, B. Fischhoff, W.B. de Bruin, and L. Lave Preparing for smart grid technologies: a behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters Energy Policy 41 2012 790 797
32. DN-y Mah, J.M. van der Vleuten, P. Hills, and J. Tao Consumer perceptions of smart grid development: results of a Hong Kong survey and policy implications Energy Policy 49 2012 204 216
33. Gerpott T.J., Paukert M. Determinants of willingness to pay for smart meters: an empirical analysis of household customers in Germany. Energy Policy 2013.
34. Wunderlich P, Veit D, Sarker S. Examination of the determinants of smart meter adoption: an user perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012, December 16, 2012-December 19, 2012: Orlando, FL, United states; 2012.
35. Al-Abdulkarim L, Lukszo Z, Fens T. Acceptance of privacy-sensitive technologies: smart metering case in The Netherlands. Paper presented at the Third International Engineering Systems Symposium, CESUN 2012: Delft University of Technology, 18-20 June 2012; 2012.
36. Kranz J, Gallenkamp J., Picot AO. Exploring the role of control - smart meter acceptance of residential consumers. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2010; 2010.
37. Y. Malhotra, D. Galletta, and L. Kirsch How endogenous motivations influence user intentions: beyond the dichotomy of extrinsic and intrinsic user motivations J Manag Inf Syst 25 2008 267 300
38. Davis FD A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; 1986.
39. F.D. Davis Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Q 13 1989 319 340
40. G. Hofstede Culture's Consequences: international differences in work-related values 1984 SAGE Publications Thousand Oaks, CA, US
41. A.A. Erumban, and S.B. de Jong Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: a consequence of culture? J World Bus 41 2006 302 314
42. I. Lee, B. Choi, J. Kim, and S.-J. Hong Culture-technology fit: effects of cultural characteristics on the post-adoption beliefs of mobile internet users Int J Electron Commer 11 2007 11 51
43. C.-C. Lin, C.-H. Yang, and J.Z. Shyua A comparison of innovation policy in the smart grid industry across the pacific: China and the USA Energy Policy 57 2013 119 132
44. E. Ten Heuvelhof, and M. Weijnen Investing in smart grids within the market paradigm: the case of the Netherlands and its relevance for China Policy Soc 32 2013 163 174
45. M.G. Jennings A smarter plan? A policy comparison between Great Britain and Ireland's deployment strategies for rolling out new metering technologies Energy Policy 57 2013 462 468
46. J.R. Rossiter, and B. Braithwaite C-OAR-SE-based single-item measures for the two-stage technology acceptance model Aust Mark J 21 2013 30 35
47. H.-d. Yang, and Y. Yoo It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model Decis Support Syst 38 2004 19 31
48. D.Y. Lee, and M.R. Lehto User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model Comput Educ 61 2013 193 208
49. V. Venkatesh, and F.D. Davis A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies Manag Sci 46 2000 184 204
50. C.M. Jackson, S. Chow, and R.A. bitch Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system Decis Sci 28 1997 357 389
51. R. Hartway, S. Price, and C.K. Woo Smart meter, customer choice and profitable time-of-use rate option Energy 24 1999 895 903
52. Johnson AM. The technology acceptance model and the decision to invest in information security. Paper presented at the 2005 Southern Association of Information Systems Conference: North Carolina; 2005.
53. G.J. Udo, K.K. Bagchi, and P.J. Kirs An assessment of customers' e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention Int J Inf Manag 30 2010 481 492
54. H. Son, Y. Park, C. Kim, and J.-S. Chou Toward an understanding of construction professionals' acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: an extension of the technology acceptance model Autom Constr 28 2012 82 90
55. J.J. Cronin Jr, M.K. Brady, and G.T.M. Hult Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments J Retail 76 2000 193 218
56. F. Lin, S.S. Fofanah, and D. Liang Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: a validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success Gov Inf Q 28 2011 271 279
57. S.-Y. Hung, C.-M. Chang, and S.-R. Kuo User acceptance of mobile e-government services: an empirical study Gov Inf Q 30 2013 33 44
58. W. Liu, C. Wang, and A.P.J. Mol Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: the case of Shandong in China Appl Energy 102 2013 1187 1196
59. H.-J. Kim, M. Mannino, and R.J. Nieschwietz Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: impact of technology features and complexity Int J Account Inf Syst 10 2009 214 228
60. R. Shibl, M. Lawley, and J. Debuse Factors influencing decision support system acceptance Decis Support Syst 54 2013 953 961
61. G. DeSanctis, and M.S. Poole Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structural theory Organ Sci 5 1994 121 147
62. Vagias WM. Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson University: Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management; 2006.
63. B.M. Byrne Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming 2013 Taylor & Francis UK
64. K. Cho, T. Hong, and C. Hyun Effect of project characteristics on project performance in construction projects based on structural equation model Expert Syst Appl 36 2009 10461 10470
65. J.-S. Chou, and C. Kim A structural equation analysis of the QSL relationship with passenger riding experience on high speed rail: an empirical study of Taiwan and Korea Expert Syst Appl 36 2009 6945 6955
66. K. Molenaar, S. Washington, and J. Diekmann Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential J Constr Eng Manag 126 2000 268 276
67. J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, and B.J. Babin Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective 2010 Pearson Education, Limited Upper Saddle River, NJ, US
68. K.A. Bollen A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models Sociol Methods Res 17 1989 303 316
69. L.A. Hayduk Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advances 1988 Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD, US
70. R.B. Kline Principles and practice of structural equation modeling third ed. 2011 The Guilford Press New York City, NY, US
71. C. Fornell, and D.F. Larcker Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error J Mark Res 18 1981 39 50
72. C. Fornell, M. Johnson, E. Anderson, J. Cha, and B. Bryant The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings J Mark 60 1996 7 18
73. Z. Xingang, K. Jiaoli, and L. Bei Focus on the development of shale gas in China - based on SWOT analysis Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21 2013 603 613
74. W. Wang, Y. Xu, and M. Khanna A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid Comput Netw 55 2011 3604 3629
75. Hongfei L, Dongping F, Mahatma S, Hampapur A. Usage analysis for smart meter management. Paper presented at the Emerging Technologies for a Smarter World (CEWIT), 2011 8th International Conference & Expo on 2-3 November 2011; 2011.
76. Quinn EL. Smart metering & privacy: existing law and competing policies: Colorado public utilities commission; 2009. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1462285.
77. T. Hargreaves, M. Nye, and J. Burgess Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term Energy Policy 52 2013 126 134