Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 271-279

  Lin, Fengyi ^a   Fofanah, Seedy S ^a   Liang, Deron ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Accountability; Electronic government (e Government); Information systems success; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955046290     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision Sciences 1999, 30:361-391.
2. Aggelidid V.P., Chatzoglou P.D. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Journal of Medical Informatics 2008, 78:115-126.
3. Agrifoglio R., Black S., Metallo C. Twitter acceptance: The role of intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of ALPIS, Sprouts: Working papers on information systems 2010, 10(9):1-7. Retrieved May 28, 2010, from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-9 2010.
4. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Attitude and normative beliefs as factors influencing intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972, 21(1):1-9.
5. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. Akman I., Ali Y., Mishra A., Arifoglu A. E-Government: A global view an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(2):239-257.
7. Bertot J. The multiple dimensions of the digital divide: More than the technology 'haves' and 'have nots'. Government Information Quarterly 2003, 20(2):185-191.
8. Bwalya K.J. Factors affecting adoption of e-Government in Zambia. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 2009, 38(4):1-13.
9. Campeau D.R., Higgins C.A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of measure and initial test. MIS quarterly 1995, 19(2):182-211.
10. Carter L., Bélanger F. The utilization of e-Government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal 2005, 15(1):5-25.
11. Chau P.Y.K., Hu P.J.H. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences 2001, 32(4):699-719.
12. Chen L.D., Gillenson M.L., Sherrell D.L. Entering online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Information Management 2002, 39:705-719.
13. Cronbach L. Essentials of psychological testing 1970, Harper International editions, New York.
14. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13(3):319-339.
15. Day M., Demiris G., Oliver D.P., Courtney K., Hensel B. Exploring underutilization of videophones in hospice settings. Telemed J E Health 2007, 13(1):25-31.
16. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. Information system success: The quest for dependent variable. Information Systems Research 1992, 3(1):60-95.
17. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 2003, 19(4):9-30.
18. Dishaw M.T., Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology-fit constructs. Information Management 1999, 36(1):9-22.
19. ECA/Government of the Gambia National e-Government program for the Gambia 2004, Report available at. http://www.uneca.org/aisi/docs/Gambiae-Gov-report.pdf.
20. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18(1):39-50.
21. Gallagher B.J. An empirical analysis of attitude differences between three kin-related generations. Youth and Society 1974, 5:327-349. Retrieved August 18, 2010, from http://yas.sagepub.com/content/5/3.toc.
22. Gefen D., Straud D., Elena K. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27(1):51-90.
23. Gupta M.P., Jana D. E-Government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly 2003, 20(4):365-387.
24. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate data analysis 1998, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. 5th Ed.
25. Heeks R. Implementing and managing e-Government: An international text 2006, Sage, London.
26. Heo J., Han I. Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: An empirical investigation. Information Management 2003, 40(4):243-256.
27. Hiller, J. S., & Belanger, F. (2001). Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government (pp. 162-198). North America: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
28. Hu P.J., Chau P.Y.K., Liu Sheng O.R., Tam K.Y. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999, 16(2):91-112.
29. Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Gragg P., Cavaye A. Personal computing acceptance factors on small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 1997, 21(3):279-302.
30. Islam B., Okuda A. E-government - The case of the Gambia. Presentation made at the World summit on Information Society, Geneva 2003-Tunis, 2005 2005, Retrieved October 6, 2009, from. http://www.uneca.org/codi/codi4/codi_iv_report.pdf.
31. Jaeger P.T. The endless wire: E-Government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly 2003, 20(4):323-331.
32. Jobe E.D. Electronic/mobile government in Africa: Progress made and challenges ahead 2009, Retrieved April 20, 2010 from. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan033668.pdf.
33. Karahanna E., Straub D.W., Chervany N.L. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 1999, 23(2):182-213.
34. Kettinger W.J., Lee C.C. Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decision Sciences 1994, 25(5):737-766.
35. Kim S., Kim H.J., Lee H. An institutional analysis of an e-Government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):42-50.
36. Kim S., Kim H.J., Lee H. An institutional analysis of an e-Government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):42-50.
37. Larsen, E., & Rainie, L. (2002). The rise of the e-citizen: How people use government agencies' Web sites. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
38. Lederer A., Maupin D.J., Sena M.P., Zhuang Y. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 2000, 29(3):269-282.
39. Lin J.C.C., Lu H. Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a website. International Journal of Information Management 2000, 20(3):197-208.
40. Lucas H.C., Spitler V.K. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences 1999, 30(2):291-311.
41. Moon J.W., Kim Y.G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information Management 2001, 38(4):217-230.
42. Park Y., Chen J.V. Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2007, 107(9):1349.
43. Rabaiah A., Vandijck E., Musa F. Abstraction of e-Government, Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference E-Commerce, Barcelona, Spain 2006, 27-34.
44. Seddon, P., & Kiew, M. (1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. In J. I. DeGross, S. L. Huff, M. C. Munro, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 99-110). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
45. Shin D.H. User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computers 2007, 19(4):472-483.
46. Taylor S., Todd P.A. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 1995, 19(4):561-570.
47. Torres L., Pina V., Acerete B. E-Government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(2):217-238.
48. Venkatesh V. Determinant of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 2000, 11(4):342-365.
49. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis D.F. User acceptance of information technology. Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27(3):425-478.
50. Wang Y.S. The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly 2003, 20(4):333-352.
51. Wang Y.S., Liao Y.W. Assessing e-Government systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information system success. Government Information Quarterly 2008, 25:717-733.
52. Wu J., Wang S., Lin L. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007, 76(1):66-77.
53. Yayehyirad K. E-government in Africa, prospects, challenges and practices 2006, Retrieved October 12, 2009, from. http://people.itu.int/~kitaw/egov/paper/E-Government_in_Africa.pdf.