Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, second edition

Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-396

  Byrne, Barbara M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917197208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203805534     Document Type: Book

References (310)

1. Aikin, L. S., Stein, J. A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Structural equation analyses of clinical sub-population differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 488-499.
2. Aish, A. M., & Joreskog, K. G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 19, 716-723.
3. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
4. Allison, P. D. (1987). Estimation of linear models with incomplete data. In C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1987 (pp. 71-103). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. American Psychologist. (1995). [Replies to Cohen (1994)]. American Psychologist, 50, 1098-1103.
6. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
7. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
8. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). AmosTM 16 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.
10. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: Smallwaters.
11. Atkinson, L. (1988). The measurement-statistics controversy: Factor analysis and subinterval data. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 361-364.
12. Austin, J. T., & Calderon, R. F. (1996). Theoretical and technical contributions to structural equation modeling: An updated bibliography. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 105-175.
13. Babakus, E., Ferguson, C. E., Jr., & Joreskog, K. G. (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 222-228.
14. Bacharach, S. B., Bauer, S. C., & Conley, S. (1986). Organizational analysis of stress: The case of elementary and secondary schools. Work and Occupations, 13, 7-32.
15. Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49-87.
16. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 547-560.
17. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1993). Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research: Critique and new developments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 143-170.
18. Bandalos, D. L. (1993). Factors influencing cross-validation of confirmatory factor analysis models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 351-374.
19. Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling Journal, 9, 78-102.
20. Bandalos, D. L., & Finney S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75.
22. Beck, A., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Association.
23. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.
24. Benson, J., & Bandalos, D.L. (1992). Second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the Reactions to Tests Scale with cross-validation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 459-487.
25. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
26. Bentler, P. M. (1988). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 317-335). New York: Plenum.
27. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
28. Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
29. Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
30. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
31. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1987). This week's citation classic. Current Contents, 19, 16.
32. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78-117.
33. Bentler, P. M., & Dijkstra, T. (1985). Efficient estimation via linearization in structural model. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate analysis VI (pp. 9-42). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181-197.
35. Biddle, B. J., & Marlin, M.M. (1987). Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling. Child Development, 58, 4-17.
36. Bloxis, S. A., & Cho, Y. I. (2008). Coding and centering of time in latent curve models in the presence of interindividual time heterogeneity. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 413-433.
37. Bodner, T. E. (2008). What improves with increasing missing data imputations? Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 651-675.
38. Bollen, K. A. (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375-377.
39. Bollen, K. A. (1989a). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
40. Bollen, K. A. (1989b). A new incremental fit index for general structural models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 303-316.
41. Bollen, K. A., & Barb, K. H. (1981). Pearson's r and coursely categorized measures. American Sociological Review, 46, 232-239.
42. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1988, August). Bootstrapping structural equation models: Variability of indirect effects and goodness-of-fit measures. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual meeting, Atlanta, GA.
44. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 111-135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Bolstad, W. M. (2004). Introduction to Bayesian statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
46. Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In H. Wold & K. Joreskog (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation (pp. 149-173). New York: Elsevier-North-Holland.
47. Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229-242.
48. Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisted. In R. Cudeck, S. DuToit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
49. Bovaird, J. A. (2007). Multilevel structural equation models for contextual factors. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 149-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criteria (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
51. Breckler, S. J. (1990). Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern? Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260-271.
52. Brookover, W. B. (1962). Self-Concept of Ability Scale. East Lansing, MI: Educational Publication Services.
53. Brown, R. L. (1994). Efficacy of the indirect approach for estimating structural equation models with missing data: A comparison of five methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 287-316.
54. Browne, M. W. (1984a). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
55. Browne, M. W. (1984b). The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1-21.
56. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.
57. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Applications of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.
59. Byrne, B. M. (1988a). The Self Description Questionnaire III: Testing for equivalent factorial validity across ability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 397-406.
60. Byrne, B. M. (1988b). Adolescent self-concept, ability grouping, and social comparison: Reexamining academic track differences in high school. Youth and Society, 20, 46-67.
61. Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic model. New York: Springer-Verlag.
62. Byrne, B. M. (1991). The Maslach Inventory: Validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 583-605.
63. Byrne, B. M. (1993). The Maslach Inventory: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 197-212.
64. Byrne, B. M. (1994a). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 645-673.
65. Byrne, B. M. (1994b). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Byrne, B. M. (1994c). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289-311.
67. Byrne, B. M. (1995). Strategies in testing for an invariant second-order factor structure: A comparison of EQS and LISREL. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 53-72.
68. Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the lifespan: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
69. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Byrne, B. M. (1999). The nomological network of teacher burnout: A literature review and empirically validated model. In M. Huberman & R. Vandenberghe (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 15-37). London: Cambridge University Press.
71. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Byrne, B. M. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 399-402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS Graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272-300.
74. Byrne, B. M. (2005a). Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 17-30.
75. Byrne, B. M. (2005b). Factor analysis: Confirmatory. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioural science (pp. 599-606). London: Wiley.
76. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for time-invariant and time-varying predictors of selfperceived ability in math, language, and science: A look at the gender factor. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 145-169). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78. Byrne, B. M., & Baron P. (1993). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing and cross-validating an hierarchical factor structure for nonclinical adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26, 164-178.
79. Byrne, B. M., & Baron, P. (1994). Measuring adolescent depression: Tests of equivalent factorial structure for English and French versions of the Beck Depression Inventory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 33-47.
80. Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Balev, J. (1996). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing for its factorial validity and invariance across gender for Bulgarian adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 641-651.
81. Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Balev, J. (1998). The Beck Depression Inventory: A crossvalidated test of second-order structure for Bulgarian adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 241-251.
82. Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Campbell, T. L. (1993). Measuring adolescent depression: Factorial validity and invariance of the Beck Depression Inventory across gender. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 127-143.
83. Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Campbell, T. L. (1994). The Beck Depression Inventory (French version): Testing for gender-invariant factorial structure for nonclinical adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9, 166-179.
84. Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., Larsson, B., & Melin, L. (1995). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing and cross-validating a second-order factorial structure for Swedish nonclinical adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 345-356.
85. Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., Larsson, B., & Melin, L. (1996). Measuring depression for Swedish nonclinical adolescents: Factorial validity and equivalence of the Beck Depression Inventory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 37-45.
86. Byrne, B. M., & Bazana, P. G. (1996). Investigating the measurement of social and academic competencies for early/late preadolescents and adolescents: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 113-132.
87. Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 557-576.
88. Byrne, B. M., & Crombie, G. (2003). Modeling and testing change over time: An introduction to the latent growth curve model. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 2, 177-203.
89. Byrne, B. M., & Goffin, R. D. (1993). Modeling MTMM data from additive and multiplicative covariance structures: An audit of construct validity concordance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 67-96.
90. Byrne, B. M., Lam, W. W. T., & Fielding, R. (2008). Measuring patterns of change in personality assessments: An annotated application of latent growth curve modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 1-11.
91. Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474-481.
92. Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599-613.
93. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
94. Byrne, B. M., Stewart, S. M., & Lee, P. W. H. (2004). Validating the Beck Depression Inventory-II for Hong Kong community adolescents. International Journal of Testing, 4, 199-216.
95. Byrne, B. M., & Worth Gavin, D. A. (1996). The Shavelson model revisited: Testing for the structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 215-228.
96. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
97. Carlson, M., & Mulaik, S.A. (1993). Trait ratings from descriptions of behavior as mediated by components of meaning. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 111-159.
98. Cheong, J. W., MacKinnon, D. P., & Khoo, S. T. (2003). Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 238-262.
99. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.
100. Chinese Behavioral Sciences Society. (2000). The Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed., licensed Chinese translation, The Psychological Corporation). New York: Harcourt Brace.
101. Chou, C-P., Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347-357.
102. Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115-126.
103. Coenders, G., & Saris, W. E. (2000). Testing nested additive, multiplicative, and general multitrait-multimethod models. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 219-250.
104. Coenders, G., Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1997). Alternative approaches to structural modeling of ordinal data: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 261-282.
105. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
106. Comrey, A. L. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Conway, J. M., Scullen, S. E., Lievens, F., & Lance, C. E. (2004). Bias in the correlated uniqueness model for MTMM data. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 535-559.
108. Cooke, D. J., Kosson, D. S., & Michie, C. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants. Psychological Assessment, 13, 531-542.
109. Corten, I. W., Saris, W. E., Coenders, G., van der Veld, W., Aalberts, C. E., & Kornelis, C. (2002). Fit of different models for multitrait-multimethod experiments. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 213-232.
110. Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-327.
111. Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
112. Cudeck, R., du Toit, S., & Sorbom, D. (2001). Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
113. Cudeck, R., & Henly, S. J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512-519.
114. Curran, P. J., Bauer, D. J., & Willoughby, M. T. (2004). Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 220-237.
115. Curran, P. J., Edwards, M. C., Wirth, R. J., Hussong, A. M., & Chassin, L. (2007). The incorporation of categorical measurement models in the analysis of individual growth. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
116. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.
117. Davey, A., Savla, J., & Luo, Z. (2005). Issues in evaluating model fit with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 578-597.
118. DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
119. Diaconis, P., & Efron, B. (1983). Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Scientific American, 248, 116-130.
120. DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327-346.
121. Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1994). Modeling incomplete longitudinal substance use data using latent variable growth curve methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 313-338.
122. Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1995). Modeling the processes of development via latent growth curve methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 187-205.
123. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Okut, H., Stryker, L. A., & Li, F. (2002). An extension of the general latent variable growth modeling framework to four levels of the hierarchy. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 303-326.
124. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Stryker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Stryker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
126. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
127. Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia: SIAM.
128. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
129. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., & Trierweiler, L. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.
130. Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Geiser, C., Cole, D. A., Gollwitzer, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2008). Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods. Psychological Methods, 13, 230-253.
131. Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128-141.
132. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
133. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343-367.
134. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
135. Finch, J. F., West, S. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 87-107.
136. Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., & Rourke, B.P. (1988). Discriminant validity of lateral sensorimotor tests in children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 779-799.
137. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
138. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572-580.
139. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodnessof- fit indices for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
140. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
141. Green, S. B., Akey, T. M., Fleming, K. K., Hershberger, S. L., & Marquis, J. G. (1997). Effect of the number of scale points on chi-square fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 108-120.
142. Hagtvet, K. A., & Nasser, F. M. (2004). How well do item parcels represent conceptually defined latent constructs? A two-facet approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 168-193.
143. Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W-L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 470-489.
144. Hancock, G. R., & Nevitt, J. (1999). Bootstrapping and the identification of exogenous latent variables within structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 394-399.
145. Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth; A lifespan perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67-97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
147. Hayashi, K., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). Examining identification issues in factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 631-645.
148. Hernandez, A., & Gonzalez-Roma, V. (2002). Analysis of multitrait-multioccasion data: Additive versus multiplicative models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 59-87.
149. Hershberger, S. L., & Fisher, D. G. (2003). A note on determining the number of imputations for missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 648-650.
150. Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 325-344.
151. Hofer, S. M., & Hoffman, L. (2007). Statistical analysis with incomplete data: A developmental perspective. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 13-32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
152. Hox, J. J., & Kleiboer, A. M. (2007). Retrospective questions or a diary method? A two-level multitrait-multimethod analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 311-325.
153. Hoyle, R. H. (1995a). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
154. Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1995b). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
155. Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
156. Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
157. Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
158. Hu, L-T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351-362.
159. Ichikawa, M., & Konishi, S. (1995). Application of the bootstrap methods in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 60, 77-93.
160. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
161. Jamshidian, M., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). ML estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data using complete data routines. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 21-41.
162. Joreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
163. Joreskog, K. G. (1971a). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
164. Joreskog, K. G. (1971b). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-426.
165. Joreskog, K. G. (1990). New developments in LISREL: Analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 24, 387-404.
166. Joreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
167. Joreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 59, 381-389.
168. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
169. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
170. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996a). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
171. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
172. Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 285-305.
173. Kenny, D. A. (1976). An empirical application of confirmatory factor analysis to the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 247-252.
174. Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
175. Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
176. Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
177. Kim, S., & Hagtvet, K. A. (2003). The impact of misspecified item parceling on representing latent variables in covariance structure modeling: A simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 101-127.
178. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
179. Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parcelling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765.
180. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
181. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
182. Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. I. (1992). Breakthrough in statistics (Vols. 1 and 2). New York: Springer-Verlag.
183. La Du, T. J., & Tanaka, J. S. (1989). Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 625-636.
184. LaGrange, B., & Cole, D. A. (2008). An expansion of the trait-state-occasion model: Accounting for shared method variance. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 241-271.
185. Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., & Scullen, S. E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitraitmultimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228-244.
186. Lei, M., & Lomax, R. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 1-17.
187. Leiter, M. P. (1991). Coping patterns as predictors of burnout: The function of control and escapist coping patterns. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 123-144.
188. Li, F., Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., McAuley, E., Chaumeton, N. R., & Harmer, P. (2001). Enhancing the psychological well-being of elderly individuals through tai chi exercise: A latent growth curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 493-530.
189. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
190. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 292-326.
191. Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of crosscultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
192. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
193. Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192-211.
194. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, & structural analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
195. Long, J. S. (1983a). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
196. Long, J. S. (1983b). Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
197. MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-120.
198. MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
199. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
200. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
201. MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1-32.
202. MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
203. MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.
204. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
205. Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.). (1996). Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
206. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
207. Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya, B36, 115-128.
208. Marsh, H. W. (1988). Multitrait-multimethod analyses. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology, measurement, and evaluation: An international handbook (pp. 570-578). Oxford: Pergamon.
209. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47-70.
210. Marsh, H. W. (1992a). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, NSW, Australia: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.
211. Marsh, H. W. (1992b). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, NSW, Australia: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.
212. Marsh, H. W. (1998). Pairwise deletion for missing data in structural equation models: Nonpositive definite matrices, parameter estimates, goodness of fit, and adjusted sample sizes. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 22-36.
213. Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1991). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitraitmultimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47-70.
214. Marsh, H. W., & Balla, J. R. (1994). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size and model complexity. Quality and Quantity, 28, 185-217.
215. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
216. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Craven, R. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor analyses of MTMM data: The correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 489-507.
217. Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1994). Longitudinal stability of means and individual differences: A unified approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 317-359.
218. Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitraitmultimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
219. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181-220.
220. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
221. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
222. McArdle, J. J. (1994). Structural factor analysis experiments with incomplete data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 409-454.
223. McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110-133.
224. McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
225. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
226. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122.
227. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
228. Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial equivalence on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9, 93-115.
229. Moustaki, I. (2001). A review of exploratory factor analysis for ordinal categorical data. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 461-480). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
230. Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
231. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Altine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
232. Muthen, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115-132.
233. Muthen, B. O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In A. E. Raftery (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1997 (pp. 453-481). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
234. Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189.
235. Muthen, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462.
236. Muthen, B.O., & Muthen, L.K. (2004). Mplus user's guide. Muthen & Muthen.
237. Noreen, E. W. (1989). Computer-intensive methods for testing hypotheses. New York: Wiley.
238. O'Brien, R. M. (1985). The relationship between ordinal measures and their underlying values: Why all the disagreement? Quality and Quantity, 19, 265-277.
239. Pettegrew, L. S., & Wolf, G. E. (1982). Validating measures of teacher stress. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 373-396.
240. Pomplun, M., & Omar, M.H. (2003). Do minority representative reading passages provide factorially invariant scores for all students? Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 276-288.
241. Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43.
242. Raaijmakers, Q. A. (1999). Effectiveness of different missing data treatments in surveys with Likert-type data: Introducing the relative mean substitution approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 725-748.
243. Raftery, A. E. (1993). Baysian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163-180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
244. Raykov, T. (2005). Analysis of longitudinal studies with missing data using covariance structure modeling with full-information maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 493-505.
245. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
246. Raykov, T., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Issues in structural equation modeling research. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 289-318.
247. Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, P. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
248. Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51-67.
249. Rogers, W. M., & Schmitt, N. (2004). Parameter recovery and model fit using multidimensional composites: A comparison of four empirical parcelling algorithms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 379-412.
250. Rogosa, D. R., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 726-748.
251. Rogosa, D. R., & Willett, J. B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika, 50, 203-228.
252. Rosen, M. (1998). Gender differences in hierarchically ordered ability dimensions: The impact of missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 37-62.
253. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
254. Rovine, M. J., & Delaney, M. (1990). Missing data estimation in developmental research. In A. Von Eye (Ed.), Statistical methods in longitudinal research: Vol. I. Principles and structuring change (pp. 35-79). New York: Academic Press.
255. Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
256. Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
257. Saris, W. E., & Aalberts, C. (2003). Different explanations for correlated disturbance terms in MTMM studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 193-213.
258. Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Sorbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. In C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1987 (pp. 105-130). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
259. Saris, W., & Stronkhorst, H. (1984). Causal modeling: Nonexperimental research: An introduction to the LISREL approach. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
260. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In American Statistical Association 1988 proceedings of the business and economics section (pp. 308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
261. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
262. Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1985). Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 83-90.
263. Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2005). A statistically justified pairwise ML method for incomplete nonnormal data: A comparison with direct ML and pairwise ADF. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 183-214.
264. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman Hall.
265. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
266. Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missingdata problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545-571.
267. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
268. Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitraitmultimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1-22.
269. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
270. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
271. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
272. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. D. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford.
273. Soares, A. T., & Soares, L. M. (1979). The Affective Perception Inventory: Advanced level. Trumbell, CT: ALSO.
274. Sobel, M. F., & Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1985). Use of null models in evaluating the fit of covariance structure models. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1985 (pp. 152-178). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
275. Sorbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.
276. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
277. Steiger, J. H. (1998). A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMSEA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 411-419.
278. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society annual meeting, Iowa City, IA.
279. Stine, R. A. (1990). An introduction to bootstrap methods: Examples and ideas. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 243-291.
280. Stoel, R. D., Garre, F. G., Dolan, C., & van den Wittenboer, W. W. (2006). On the Likelihood Ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints. Psychological Methods, 11, 439-455.
281. Sugawara, H. M., & MacCallum, R. C. (1993). Effect of estimation method on incremental fit indexes for covariance structure models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 365-377.
282. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In J. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
283. Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1984). Confirmatory hierarchical factor analyses of psychological distress measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621-635.
284. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26-30.
285. Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 2.1-2.35.
286. Tomas, J. M., Hontangas, P. M., & Oliver, A. (2000). Linear confirmatory factor models to evaluate multitrait-multimethod matrices: The effects of number of indicators and correlation among methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 469-499.
287. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
288. Vogt, W. P. (1993). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
289. Wang, S., Wang, N., & Hoadley, D. (2007). Construct equivalence of a national certification examination that uses dual languages and audio assistance. International Journal of Testing, 7, 255-268.
290. Weng, L-J., & Cheng, C-P (1997). Why might relative fit indices differ between estimators? Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 121-128.
291. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
292. Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 118-154.
293. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1977 (pp. 84-136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
294. Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically tested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
295. Whittaker, T.A., & Stapleton, L.M. (2006). The performance of cross-validation indices used to select among competing covariance structure models under multivariate nonnormality conditions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 295-335.
296. Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement equivalence of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
297. Willett, J. B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 15, pp. 345-422). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
298. Willett, J. B. (1989). Some results on reliability for the longitudinal measurement of change: Implications for the design of studies of individual growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 587-602.
299. Willett, J. B., & Keiley, M. K. (2000). Using covariance structure analysis to model change over time. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 665-694). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
300. Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363-381.
301. Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1996). Cross-domain analyses of change over time: Combining growth modeling and covariance structure analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 125-157). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
302. Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994). Parsimony-based fit indices for multipleindicator models: Do they work? Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 161-189.
303. Wood, J. M., Tataryn, D. J., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under- and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354-365.
304. Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256-293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
305. Wothke, W. (1996). Models for multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 7-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
306. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In Sociological methodology (pp. 165-200). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
307. Yuan, K.-H., Lambert, P. L., & Fouladi, R.T. (2004). Mardia's multivariate kurtosis with missing data. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 39, 413-437.
308. Yung, Y-F., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Bootstrap-corrected ADF test statistics in covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 63-84.
309. Yung, Y-F., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 195-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
310. Zhu, W. (1997). Making bootstrap statistical inferences: A tutorial. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 44-55.