Interplay between chemotaxis and contact inhibition of locomotion determines exploratory cell migration

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Lin, Benjamin ^a,b,c   Yin, Taofei ^d   Wu, Yi I ^d   Inoue, Takanari ^a,b,e   Levchenko, Andre ^a,c  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^e JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPHRIN B1; EPHRIN RECEPTOR B1; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; EPHRIN RECEPTOR; EPHRIN RECEPTOR B3;

CANCER; CHEMOTAXIS; INHIBITION; LOCOMOTION; MOBILITY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; WOMENS HEALTH;

ARTICLE; BREAST METASTASIS; CANCER CELL; CELL CONTACT; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL SPREADING; CHEMOTAXIS; CONTACT INHIBITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ANIMAL; CELL MOTION; EXPERIMENTAL MAMMARY NEOPLASM; FEMALE; GENE SILENCING; GENETICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TUMOR CELL LINE; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ANIMALS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MOVEMENT; CHEMOTAXIS; CONTACT INHIBITION; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; FEMALE; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAMMARY NEOPLASMS, ANIMAL; RATS; RECEPTOR, EPHB3; RECEPTORS, EPH FAMILY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 84926642278     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7619     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Schmitt, A. M. et al. Wnt-Ryk signalling mediates medial-lateral retinotectal topographic mapping. Nature 439, 31-37 (2006).
2. Carmona-Fontaine, C. et al. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 456, 957-961 (2008).
3. Theveneau, E. et al. Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity. Dev. Cell 19, 39-53 (2010).
4. Condeelis, J., Singer, R. H. & Segall, J. E. The Great Escape: When cancer cells hijack the genes for chemotaxis and motility. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 695-718 (2005).
5. Sidani, M. et al. Cofilin determines the migration behavior and turning frequency of metastatic cancer cells. J. Cell Biol. 179, 777-791 (2007).
6. Kamai, T. et al. Overexpression of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 GTPases is associated with progression in testicular cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 4799-4805 (2004).
7. Xue, C. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression results in increased tumor cell motility in vivo coordinately with enhanced intravasation and metastasis. Cancer Res. 66, 192-197 (2006).
8. Roussos, E. T., Condeelis, J. S. & Patsialou, A. Chemotaxis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 573-587 (2011).
9. Wang, W. et al. Single cell behavior in metastatic primary mammary tumors correlated with gene expression patterns revealed by molecular profiling. Cancer Res. 62, 6278-6288 (2002).
10. Wyckoff, J. B., Jones, J. G., Condeelis, J. S. & Segall, J. E. A critical step in metastasis: in vivo analysis of intravasation at the primary tumor. Cancer Res. 60, 2504-2511 (2000).
11. Wyckoff, J. B., Segall, J. E. & Condeelis, J. S. The collection of the motile population of cells from a living tumor. Cancer Res. 60, 5401-5404 (2000).
12. Goswami, S. et al. Macrophages promote the invasion of breast carcinoma cells via a colony-stimulating factor-1/epidermal growth factor paracrine loop. Cancer Res. 65, 5278-5283 (2005).
13. Bailly, M., Yan, L., Whitesides, G. M., Condeelis, J. S. & Segall, J. E. Regulation of protrusion shape and adhesion to the substratum during chemotactic responses of mammalian carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 241, 285-299 (1998).
14. Abercrombie, M. & Heaysman, J. E. M. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture: I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp. Cell Res. 5, 111-131 (1953).
15. Mayor, R. & Carmona-Fontaine, C. Keeping in touch with contact inhibition of locomotion. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 319-328 (2010).
16. Abercrombie, M. Contact inhibition and malignancy. Nature 281, 259-262 (1979).
17. Astin, J. W. et al. Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1194-1204 (2010).
18. Paddock, S. W. & Dunn, G. A. Analysing collisions between fibroblasts and fibrosarcoma cells: fibrosarcoma cells show an active invasionary response. J. Cell Sci. 81, 163-187 (1986).
19. Sharma, V. P. et al. Reconstitution of in vivo macrophage-tumor cell pairing and streaming motility on one-dimensional micro-patterned substrates. IntraVital. 1, 77-85 (2012).
20. Paliwal, S. et al. MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast. Nature 446, 46-51 (2007).
21. Lin, B. et al. Synthetic spatially graded Rac activation drives cell polarization and movement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, E3668-E3677 (2012).
22. Scarpa, E. et al. A novel method to study contact inhibition of locomotion using micropatterned substrates. Biol. Open 2, 901-906 (2013).
23. Desai, R. A., Gopal, S. B., Chen, S. & Chen, C. S. Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130717 (2013).
24. Condeelis, J. & Segall, J. E. Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 921-930 (2003).
25. Gaggioli, C. et al. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 1392-1400 (2007).
26. Parent, C. A., Blacklock, B. J., Froehlich, W. M., Murphy, D. B. & Devreotes, P. N. G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells. Cell 95, 81-91 (1998).
27. Park, K. C. et al. Rac regulation of chemotaxis and morphogenesis in Dictyostelium. EMBO J 23, 4177-4189 (2004).
28. Servant, G. et al. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 287, 1037-1040 (2000).
29. Gardiner, E. M. et al. Spatial and temporal analysis of Rac activation during live neutrophil chemotaxis. Curr. Biol. 12, 2029-2034 (2002).
30. Haugh, J. M., Codazzi, F., Teruel, M. & Meyer, T. Spatial sensing in fibroblasts mediated by 3′ phosphoinositides. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1269-1280 (2000).
31. Kraynov, V. S. et al. Localized Rac activation dynamics visualized in living cells. Science 290, 333-337 (2000).
32. Yip, S.-C. et al. The distinct roles of Ras and Rac in PI 3-kinase-dependent protrusion during EGF-stimulated cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 120, 3138-3146 (2007).
33. Yoo, S. K. et al. Differential regulation of protrusion and polarity by PI(3)K during neutrophil motility in live Zebrafish. Dev. Cell 18, 226-236 (2010).
34. Komatsu, N. et al. Development of an optimized backbone of FRET biosensors for kinases and GTPases. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4647-4656 (2011).
35. Riedl, J. et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat. Method 5, 605-607 (2008).
36. Huttenlocher, A. et al. Integrin and cadherin synergy regulates contact inhibition of migration and motile activity. J. Cell Biol. 141, 515-526 (1998).
37. Orioli, D. & Klein, R. The eph receptor family:axonal guidance by contact repulsion. Trends Genet. 13, 354-359 (1997).
38. Oike, Y. et al. Regulation of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis by EphB/ephrin-B2 signaling between endothelial cells and surrounding mesenchymal cells. Blood 100, 1326-1333 (2002).
39. Pasquale, E. B. Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer: bidirectional signalling and beyond. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 165-180 (2010).
40. Pasquale, E. B. Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 462-475 (2005).
41. Dail, M., Richter, M., Godement, P. & Pasquale, E. B. Eph receptors inactivate R-Ras through different mechanisms to achieve cell repulsion. J. Cell Sci. 119, 1244-1254 (2006).
42. Davis, S. et al. Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 266, 816-819 (1994).
43. Villar-Cerviño, V. et al. Contact repulsion controls the dispersion and final distribution of Cajal-Retzius cells. Neuron 77, 457-471 (2013).
44. Wong, K., Pertz, O., Hahn, K. & Bourne, H. Neutrophil polarization: Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity support a self-organizing mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3639-3644 (2006).
45. Wu, K. Y. et al. Local translation of RhoA regulates growth cone collapse. Nature 436, 1020-1024 (2005).
46. El-Sibai, M. et al. RhoA/ROCK-mediated switching between Cdc42- and Rac1-dependent protrusion in MTLn3 carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 314, 1540-1552 (2008).
47. DeRose, R., Miyamoto, T. & Inoue, T. Manipulating signaling at will: chemically-inducible dimerization (CID) techniques resolve problems in cell biology. Pflügers Archiv. - Eur. J. Physiol. 465, 409-417 (2013).
48. Li, G. et al. EphB3 suppresses non-small-cell lung cancer metastasis via a PP2A/RACK1/Akt signalling complex. Nat. Commun. 3, 667 (2012).
49. Abercrombie, M. The Croonian Lecture, 1978: The crawling movement of metazoan cells. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series B, Biol. Sci. 207, 129-147 (1980).
50. Davis, J. R. et al. Emergence of embryonic pattern through contact inhibition of locomotion. Development 139, 4555-4560 (2012).
51. Pertz, O., Hodgson, L., Klemke, R. L. & Hahn, K. M. Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity in migrating cells. Nature 440, 1069-1072 (2006).
52. Itoh, R. E. et al. Activation of Rac and Cdc42 video imaged by fluorescent resonance energy transfer-based single-molecule probes in the membrane of living cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 6582-6591 (2002).
53. Unger, M. A., Chou, H.-P., Thorsen, T., Scherer, A. & Quake, S. R. Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288, 113-116 (2000).
54. McDonald, J. C. et al. Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 21, 27-40 (2000).
55. Inoue, T. & Meyer, T. Synthetic activation of endogenous PI3K and Rac identifies an AND-Gate switch for cell polarization and migration. PLoS ONE 3, e3068 (2008).
56. Hodgson, L., Shen, F. & Hahn, K. in Current Protocols in Cell Biology (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001).