Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 10, Issue 88, 2013, Pages

  Desai, Ravi A ^a,b,c,d   Gopal, Smitha B ^a   Chen, Sophia ^a   Chen, Christopher S ^a,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Boston University   (United States)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cell migration; Cell polarization; Cell cell adhesion; Contact inhibition of locomotion; Micropatterning

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CYTOLOGY; DIGITAL STORAGE; MACHINERY; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY;

AGENT-BASED MODEL; CELL MIGRATION; CELL POLARIZATION; CELL-CELL ADHESION; COLLECTIVE CELL MIGRATIONS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; MICRO PATTERNING; TWO-STATE TRANSITIONS;

CELLS;

ARTICLE; CELL MIGRATION; CONTACT INHIBITION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; LOCOMOTION; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; ANIMAL; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL LINE; CELL MOTION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL LINE; CELL MOVEMENT; CONTACT INHIBITION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS;

EID: 84896588244     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0717     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abercrombie M. 1979 Contact inhibition and malignancy. Nature 281, 259-262. (doi:10.1038/281259a0)
2. Abercrombie M. 1970 Contact inhibition in tissue culture. In Vitro 6, 128-142. (doi:10.1007/BF02616114)
3. Abercrombie M, Heaysman JE 1953 Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp. Cell Res. 5, 111-131. (doi:10.1016/0014-4827(53)90098-6)
4. Paddock SW, Dunn GA 1986 Analysing collisions between fibroblasts and fibrosarcoma cells: fibrosarcoma cells show an active invasionary response. J. Cell Sci. 81, 163-187.
5. Carmona-Fontaine C., Matthews HK, Kuriyama S, Moreno M., Dunn GA, Parsons M, Stern CD, Mayor R. 2008 Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 456, 957-961. (doi:10.1038/ nature07441)
6. Astin JW, Batson J, Kadir S., Charlet J, Persad RA, Gillatt D, Oxley J.D., Nobes CD 2010 Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1194-1204. (doi:10.1038/ncb2122)
7. Theveneau E, Marchant L, Kuriyama S., Gull M, Moepps B, Parsons M., Mayor R. 2010 Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity. Dev. Cell 19, 39-53. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.012)
8. Middleton CA. 1977 The effects of cell-cell contact on the spreading of pigmented retina epithelial cells in culture. Exp. Cell Res. 109, 349-359. (doi:10.1016/0014-4827(77)90014-3)
9. Kadir S, Astin JW, Tahtamouni L, Martin P., Nobes CD 2011 Microtubule remodelling is required for the front-rear polarity switch during contact inhibition of locomotion. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2642-2653. (doi:10.1242/jcs.087965)
10. Desai RA, Gao L, Raghavan S., Liu WF, Chen CS 2009 Cell polarity triggered by cell-cell adhesion via E-cadherin. J. Cell Sci. 122, 905-911. (doi:10.1242/jcs.028183)
11. Middleton CA. 1972 Contact inhibition of locomotion in cultures of pigmented retina epithelium. Exp. Cell Res. 70, 91-96. (doi:10.1016/0014- 4827(72)90185-1)
12. Vaughan RB, Trinkaus JP 1966 Movements of epithelial cell sheets in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 1, 407-413.
13. Huttenlocher A, Lakonishok M, Kinder M., Wu S, Truong T, Knudsen K.A., Horwitz AF 1998 Integrin and cadherin synergy regulates contact inhibition of migration and motile activity. J. Cell Biol. 141, 515-526. (doi:10.1083/jcb.141. 2.515)
14. Vesely P, Weiss RA 1973 Cell locomotion and contact inhibition of normal and neoplastic rat cells. Int. J. Cancer 11, 64-76. (doi:10.1002/ijc.2910110108)
15. Tanaka M, Kuriyama S, Aiba N. 2012 Nm23-H1 regulates contact inhibition of locomotion, which is affected by ephrin-B1. J. Cell Sci. 125, 4343-4353. (doi:10.1242/jcs.104083)
16. Stramer B et al. 2010 Clasp-mediated microtubule bundling regulates persistent motility and contact repulsion in Drosophila macrophages in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 189, 681-689. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200912134)
17. Davis JR, Huang CY, Zanet J, Harrison S., Rosten E, Cox S, Soong D.Y., Dunn GA, Stramer BM 2012 Emergence of embryonic pattern through contact inhibition of locomotion. Development 139, 4555-4560. (doi:10.1242/dev.082248)
18. Theveneau E, Steventon B, Scarpa E., Garcia S, Trepat X, Streit A., Mayor R. 2013 Chase-and-run between adjacent cell populations promotes directional collective migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 763-772. (doi:10.1038/ncb2772)
19. Abercrombie M, Ambrose EJ 1958 Interference microscope studies of cell contacts in tissue culture. Exp. Cell Res. 15, 332-345. (doi:10.1016/0014- 4827(58)90034-X)
20. Anear E, Parish RW 2012 The effects of modifying RhoA and Rac1 activities on heterotypic contact inhibition of locomotion. FEBS Lett. 586, 1330-1335. (doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.044)
21. Friedl P, Gilmour D. 2009 Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 445-457. (doi:10.1038/nrm2720)
22. Rorth P. 2007 Collective guidance of collective cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 575-579. (doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2007.09.007)
23. McCann CP, Kriebel PW, Parent C.A., Losert W. 2010 Cell speed, persistence and information transmission during signal relay and collective migration. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1724-1731. (doi:10.1242/jcs.060137)
24. Bronner-Fraser M., Fraser SE 1988 Cell lineage analysis reveals multipotency of some avian neural crest cells. Nature 335, 161-164. (doi:10.1038/335161a0)
25. Richardson BE, Lehmann R. 2010 Mechanisms guiding primordial germ cell migration: strategies from different organisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 37-49. (doi:10.1038/nrm2815)
26. Tarbashevich K, Raz E. 2010 The nuts and bolts of germ-cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 715-721. (doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2010.09.005)
27. Liu WF, Nelson CM, Pirone D.M., Chen CS 2006 E-cadherin engagement stimulates proliferation via Rac1. J. Cell Biol. 173, 431-441. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200510087)
28. Tan JL, Liu W, Nelson C.M., Raghavan S., Chen CS 2004 Simple approach to micropattern cells on common culture substrates by tuning substrate wettability. Tissue Eng. 10, 865-872. (doi:10.1089/1076327041348365)
29. Fraley SI, Feng Y, Giri A., Longmore GD, Wirtz D. 2012 Dimensional and temporal controls of three-dimensional cell migration by zyxin and binding partners. Nat. Commun. 3, 719. (doi:10.1038/ncomms1711)
30. Pouthas F, Girard P, Lecaudey V., Ly TB, Gilmour D, Boulin C, Pepperkok R., Reynaud EG 2008 In migrating cells, the Golgi complex and the position of the centrosome depend on geometrical constraints of the substratum. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2406-2414. (doi:10.1242/jcs.026849)
31. Carmona-Fontaine C., Theveneau E, Tzekou A., Tada M, Woods M, Page K.M., Parsons M., Lambris JD, Mayor R. 2011 Complement fragment C3a controls mutual cell attraction during collective cell migration. Dev. Cell 21, 1026-1037. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.012)
32. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics P.J., Murphy CJ, Nealey PF 2003 Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1881-1892. (doi:10.1242/jcs.00383)
33. Curtis AS, Varde M. 1964 Control of cell behavior: topological factors. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 33, 15-26.
34. Rosenberg MD. 1963 Cell guidance by alterations in monomolecular films. Science 139, 411-412. (doi:10.1126/science.139.3553.411)
35. Kovacs EM, Goodwin M, Ali R.G., Paterson AD, Yap AS 2002 Cadherin-directed actin assembly: E-cadherin physically associates with the Arp2/3 complex to direct actin assembly in nascent adhesive contacts. Curr. Biol. 12, 379-382. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00661-9)
36. Smutny M et al. 2010 Myosin II isoforms identify distinct functional modules that support integrity of the epithelial zonula adherens. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 696-702. (doi:10.1038/ncb2072)
37. Cavey M, Rauzi M, Lenne P.F., Lecuit T. 2008 A two-tiered mechanism for stabilization and immobilization of E-cadherin. Nature 453, 751-756. (doi:10.1038/nature06953)
38. Dupin I, Camand E, Etienne-Manneville S. 2009 Classical cadherins control nucleus and centrosome position and cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 185, 779-786. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200812034)
39. Weber GF, Bjerke MA, DeSimone DW 2012 A mechanoresponsive cadherin-keratin complex directs polarized protrusive behavior and collective cell migration. Dev. Cell 22, 104-115. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.013)
40. Smith A, Robinson V, Patel K., Wilkinson DG 1997 The EphA4 and EphB1 receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin-B2 ligand regulate targeted migration of branchial neural crest cells. Curr. Biol. 7, 561-570. (doi:10.1016/S0960- 9822(06)00255-7)
41. Thery M, Pepin A, Dressaire E., Chen Y, Bornens M. 2006 Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 63, 341-355. (doi:10.1002/cm.20126)
42. Thery M, Racine V, Pepin A., Piel M, Chen Y, Sibarita J.B., Bornens M. 2005 The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 947-953. (doi:10.1038/ncb1307)
43. Thery M, Racine V, Piel M., Pepin A, Dimitrov A, Chen Y., Sibarita J-B, Bornens M. 2006 Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19771-19776. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0609267103)
44. Chen CS, Alonso JL, Ostuni E, Whitesides G.M., Ingber DE 2003 Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 307, 355-361. (doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01165-3)
45. Desai RA, Khan MK, Gopal S.B., Chen CS 2011 Subcellular spatial segregation of integrin subtypes by patterned multicomponent surfaces. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 3, 560-567. (doi:10.1039/c0ib00129e)
46. Etienne-Manneville S., Hall A. 2001 Integrin-mediated activation of Cdc42 controls cell polarity in migrating astrocytes through PKCzeta. Cell 106, 489-498. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00471-8)
47. Gomes ER, Jani S, Gundersen GG 2005 Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121, 451-463. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.022)
48. Watanabe T et al. 2004 Interaction with IQGAP1 links APC to Rac1, Cdc42, and actin filaments during cell polarization and migration. Dev. Cell 7, 871-883. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.017)
49. Chu YS, Thomas WA, Eder O, Pincet F., Perez E, Thiery JP, Dufour S. 2004 Force measurements in E-cadherin-mediated cell doublets reveal rapid adhesion strengthened by actin cytoskeleton remodeling through Rac and Cdc42. J. Cell Biol. 167, 1183-1194. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200403043)
50. Yonemura S, Wada Y, Watanabe T., Nagafuchi A, Shibata M. 2010 a-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 533-542. (doi:10.1038/ncb2055)
51. Liu Z, Tan JL, Cohen D.M., Yang MT, Sniadecki NJ, Ruiz SA, Nelson C.M., Chen CS 2010 Mechanical tugging force regulates the size of cell-cell junctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9944-9949. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0914547107)
52. Ehrlich JS, Hansen MD, Nelson WJ 2002 Spatiotemporal regulation of Rac1 localization and lamellipodia dynamics during epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Dev. Cell 3, 259-270. (doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00216-2)
53. le Duc Q., Shi Q, Blonk I., Sonnenberg A, Wang N, Leckband D., de Rooij J. 2010 Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II-dependent manner. J. Cell Biol. 189, 1107-1115. (doi:10.1083/jcb.201001149)
54. Leerberg JM, Yap AS 2012 Vinculin, cadherin mechanotransduction and homeostasis of cell-cell junctions. Protoplasma 250, 817-829. (doi:10.1007/s00709-012-0475-6)
55. Weber GF, Bjerke MA, Desimone DW 2011 Integrins and cadherins join forces to form adhesive networks. J. Cell Sci. 124, 1183-1193. (doi:10.1242/jcs. 064618)
56. Dike LE, Chen CS, Mrksich M, Tien J., Whitesides GM, Ingber DE 1999 Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 35, 441-448. (doi:10.1007/s11626-999-0050-4)
57. Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, Yamada KM 2009 One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 184, 481-490. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200810041)
58. Maiuri P et al. 2012 The first world cell race. Curr. Biol. 22, R673-R675. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.052)
59. Devreotes P. 1989 Dictyostelium discoideum: a model system for cell-cell interactions in development. Science 245, 1054-1058. (doi:10.1126/science. 2672337)
60. Couzin ID, Krause J. 2003 Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv. Stud. Behav. 32, 1-75. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01001-5)
61. Parrish JK, Edelstein-Keshet L. 1999 Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. Science 284, 99-101. (doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.99)
62. Vitorino P, Meyer T. 2008 Modular control of endothelial sheet migration. Genes Dev. 22, 3268-3281. (doi:10.1101/gad.1725808)
63. Vedula SR, Leong MC, Lai T.L., Hersen P., Kabla AJ, Lim CT, Ladoux B. 2012 Emerging modes of collective cell migration induced by geometrical constraints. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12974-12979. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1119313109)
64. Trepat X, Wasserman MR, Angelini T.E., Millet E., Weitz DA, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ 2009 Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat. Phys. 5, 426-430. (doi:10.1038/nphys1269)