Multifunctional forest management in Northern Portugal: Moving from scenarios to governance for sustainable development

Land Use Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1111-1122

  Carvalho Ribeiro, S M ^a   Lovett, A ^a   O'Riordan, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Forest management in Portugal; Integrated landscape planning; Multifunctional forests; Rural diversity; Sustainable forest management (SFM)

Indexed keywords

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GRAZING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; NATIONAL PARK; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

PORTUGAL;

EID: 77952888193     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. 3DNature World Construction Set, Visual Nature Studio 2009, (September 2009). http://www.3dnature.com/.
2. Adger, W.N., Brown, K., Jorban, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S., Seyfang, G., 2004. Governance for sustainabilty: towards a thick understanding of environmental decision making, CSERGE Working Paper EDM 02-04 ( (March 2009)). http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/by_year.htm.
3. Adobe Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended 2009, (September 2009). http://www.adobe.com/.
4. Andresen M.T., Castelbranco C. Heading for a postmodern landscape-Portuguese trends in the reconciliation of environmental-quality and landscape planning with economic-development. Landscape and Urban Planning 1993, 23(3-4):183-194.
5. Appleton K., Lovett A. GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision-making. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 65(3):117-131.
6. Brandt J., Tress B., Tress G. Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management 2000, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, Denmark, 18-20 October. J. Brandt, B. Tress, G. Tress (Eds.).
7. Carlman I. The rule of sustainability and planning adaptativity. Ambio 2005, 34(2):163-168.
8. Carvalho-Ribeiro, S.M., 2009. The role of multifunctional forests in sustainable landscapes: a case study from Portugal. PhD Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
9. Carvalho-Ribeiro S.M., Lovett A. Associations between forest characteristics and socio-economic development: a case study from Portugal. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:2873-2881.
10. CEMAT Spatial development glossary. Territory and Landscape n. 2 2007, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
11. de Blust G., Olmen M.V. Monitoring multifunctional terrestrial landscapes: some comments. Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management 2000, Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, Denmark. J. Brandt, B. Tress, G. Tress (Eds.).
12. DEFRA Valuing our natural environment. Final Report NR0103 2006, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
13. DGRF Matriz estruturante para as florestas 2007, Direccao Geral dos Recursos Florestais, Lisbon, (September 2008). http://www.dgrf.min-agricultura.pt/portal, DGRF (Ed.).
14. Dolman P.M., Lovett A., O'Riordan T., Cobb D. Designing whole landscapes. Landscape Research 2001, 26(4):305-335.
15. Dwyer J. The state of the rural environment in Europe: what challenges and opportunities for future policies. Future Policies for Rural Europe 2013 and Beyond-Delivering Sustainable Rural Land Management in a Changing Europe 2007, Brussels. L. u. P. Group (Ed.).
16. Eastman J.R. IDRISI Andes Manual 2006, Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.
17. Elands B.H.M., O'Leary T.N., Boerwinkel H.W.J., Wiersum K.F. Forest as a mirror of rural conditions: local views on the role of forests across Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 2004, 6:469-482.
18. Elands B.H.M., Praestholm S. Landowners' perspectives on the rural future and the role of forests across Europe. Journal of Rural Studies 2008, 24(1):72-85.
19. Elands B.H.M., Wiersum K.F. Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses. Forest Policy and Economics 2001, 3(1-2):5-16.
20. ELC The European Landscape Convention 2000, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
21. Fidelis T., Sumares D. Nature conservation and urban development control in the Portuguese planning system: a new impetus against old praxis?. European Environment 2008, 18:298-311.
22. Firmino A. Agriculture and landscape in Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning 1999, 46(1-3):83-91.
23. Folke C., Carpenter S., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S., Walker B. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 2002, 31(5):437-440.
24. Folke C., Hahan T., Olsson P., Norberg J. Adaptative governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review Environmental Resources 2005, 30. 8.1-8.33.
25. Fry G. Multifunctional landscapes-towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 159:159-168.
26. Grimble R., Chan M.K. Stakeholder analysis for natural resources management in developing countries. Natural Resource Forum 1995, 19(2):113-124.
27. Hagedorn K. Towards an institutional theory of multifunctionality. Multifunctional Land Use. Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, 105-124. Springer, Berlin. U. Mander, H. Wiggering, K. Helming (Eds.).
28. Johnson N., White A., Perrot-Maite D. Developing Markets for Water Services from Forests: Issues and Lessons for Innovators 2002, USA. F. trends, W. R. Institute, T. K. group (Eds.).
29. Knickel K., Renting H. Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 2000, 40(4):512-528.
30. Kok K., Rothmanc D.S., Patel M. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective. Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 2006, 38:261-284.
31. Lee N.K. Deliberately seeking sustainability in the Columbia river basin. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions 1995, 214-238. Columbia University Press, New York. C.S. Holling, S.S. Light (Eds.).
32. Leskinen L.A., Leskinen P., Kurttila M., Kangas J., Kajanus M. Adapting modem strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process-a case study of a forest research station. Forest Policy and Economics 2006, 8(3):267-278.
33. Malczewski J. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in Planning 2004, 62:3-65.
34. Mander U., Helming K., Wiggering H. Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, Springer, Berlin. U. Mander, H. Wiggering, K. Helming (Eds.).
35. Marey-Pérez M.F., Rodríguez-Vicente V. Forest transition in Northern Spain: Local responses on large-scale programmes of field-afforestation. Land Use Policy 2008, 26:139-156.
36. Martins H., Borges J.G. Addressing collaborative planning methods and tools in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 2007, 248:107-118.
37. Mather A.S. The forest transition. Area 1992, 24(4):367-379.
38. Mather A.S. Forest transition theory and the reforesting of Scotland. Scottish Geographical Journal 2004, 120(1-2):83-98.
39. Mather A.S., Fairbairn J., Needle C.L. The course and drivers of the forest transition: the case of France. Journal of Rural Studies 1999, 15(1):65-90.
40. Mather A.S., Needle C.L. The forest transition: a theoretical basis. Area 1998, 30(2):117-124.
41. Mather A.S., Needle C.L., Coull J.R. From resource crisis to sustainability: the forest transition in Denmark. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 1998, 5(3):182-193.
42. MCPFE Ministerial Conference for Protection of Forests in Europe 2007, http://www.mcpfe.org/.
43. MEA The multiscale approach. Chapter 4. Millenium Ecosystems Assessment 2003, (9 March 2009) pp. 61-83. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx.
44. Meitner M.J., Gandy R., Sheppard S.R.J. The role of visualisation in communicating and understanding forest complexity. Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning 2005, CALP University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 1-9.
45. Milligan J., O'Riordan T. Governance for sustainable coastal futures. Coastal Management 2007, 35:499-509.
46. Milligan J., O'Riordan T., Nicholson-Cole S.A., Watkinson A.R. Nature conservation for future sustainable shorelines: lessons from seeking to involve the public. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:206-213.
47. Moreira F., Ferreira P.G., Rego F.C., Bunting S. Landscape changes and breeding bird assemblages in northwestern Portugal: the role of fire. Landscape Ecology 2001, 16(2):175-187.
48. Moreira F., Rego F.C., Ferreira P.G. Temporal (1958-1995) pattern of change in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal: implications for fire occurrence. Landscape Ecology 2001, 16(6):557-567.
49. Nabuurs G.J., Paivinen R., Schanz H. Sustainable management regimes for Europe's forests-a projection with EFISCEN until 2050. Forest Policy and Economics 2001, 3:155-173.
50. Nicholson-Cole S.A., O'Riordan T. Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future. Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. W.N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, K. O'Brien (Eds.).
51. Niskanen A., Lin C. Regional similarities of forest resources and socio-economic structures in EU member states. Forest Policy and Economics 2001, 3:55-67.
52. O'Riordan T., Stoll-Kleemann Biodiversity, sustainability and human communities. Protecting Beyond the Protected 2002, 317. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. T. O'Riordan, Stoll-Kleemann (Eds.).
53. O'Riordan T., Voisey H. Agenda 21. The Transition to Sustainability. The Politics of Agenda 21 in Europe 1998, 320. Earthscan Publication Ltd., London. T. O'Riordan, H. Voisey (Eds.).
54. OECD Governance for sustainable development. Five OECD case studies. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2002, 384. OECD. O. f. e. c. a. OECD (Ed.).
55. OECD The new rural paradigm. Policies and governance. OECD Rural Policy Reviews 2006, OECD, Paris. OECD (Ed.).
56. Okkonen L. From exogenous to endogenous development in Scottish forestry: the feasibility of small-scale wood energy enterprise. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2008, 51(2):221-232.
57. Pereira E., Queiroz C., Pereira H.M., Vicente L. Ecosystem services and human well-being: a participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology & Society 2005, 10(2):14.
58. Pereira P.M., Fonseca M.P. Nature vs nurture: the making of montado ecosystem. Conservation Ecology 2003, 7(3):7.
59. Pinto-Correia T., Breman B. New roles for farming in a differentiated countryside: the Portuguese example. Regional Environmental Change 2008.
60. Selman P. Multi-function landscape plans: a missing link in sustainability planning?. Local Environment 2002, 7(3):283-294.
61. Selman P. Planning at the Landscape Scale 2006, Routledge, London/New York, p. 213.
62. Shearer A.W. Approaching scenario based studies: three perceptions about the future and considerations for landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32:67-87.
63. Slee B. The socio-economic evaluation of the impact of forestry on rural development: a regional level analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 2006, 8(5):542-554.
64. Slee B. Social indicators of multifunctional rural land use: the case of forestry in the UK. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 2007, 120(1):31-40.
65. Slee B., Roberts D., Evans R. Forestry in the rural economy: a new approach to assessing the impact of forestry on rural development. Forestry 2004, 77(5):441-453.
66. Stengera A., Haroub P., Navrudc S. Valuing environmental goods and services derived from the forests. Journal of Forest Economics 2009, 15(1-2):1-14.
67. Tovey H. Introduction: rural sustainable development in the knowledge society era. Sociologia Ruralis 2008, 48(3):185-199.
68. Tress B., Tress G. Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning-a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 64(3):161-178.
69. Vejre H., Abildtrup J., Andersen E., Anerden P., Brandt J., Busck A., Dalgaard T., Hasler B., Huusom H., Kristensen L., Kristensen S., Praestholm S. Multifunctional agriculture and multifunctional landscapes-land use as an interface. Multifunctional Land Use. Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, 93-104. Springer, Berlin. U. Mander, H. Wiggering, K. Helming (Eds.).