Social and economic aspects of peatland management in Northern Europe, with particular reference to the English case

Geoderma

Volumn 154, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 242-251

  Rawlins, A ^a   Morris, J ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Economics; Ecosystems; Peatland; Soils; Stakeholder analysis

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL USE; CURRENT DRIVERS; ECONOMIC ASPECTS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FOOD PRICES; HUMAN INTERVENTION; LAND DRAINAGE; MANAGEMENT DECISIONS; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; NATURE CONSERVATION; NON-USE VALUES; PEAT SOILS; PEATLAND; POLICY FRAMEWORK; PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTOR; STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER INTEREST; SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT;

AGRICULTURE; CONSERVATION; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE; PEAT; SOILS;

WETLANDS;

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS; INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE; LAND DEGRADATION; NATURE CONSERVATION; PEAT SOIL; PEATLAND; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EUROPE;

EID: 72249110681     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bräuer I. Money as an indicator: to make use of economic evaluation for biodiversity conservation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 98 1-3 (2003) 483-491
2. Brouwer R., Langford I.H., Bateman I.J., and Turner R.K. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Regional Environmental Change 1 1 (1999) 47-57
3. Brunning R. Archaeology and Peat Wastage on the Somerset Moors (2001), Somerset County Council, Taunton, Somerset
4. Brunning, R., 2003. Personal communication.
5. Clarke D., and Joosten H. Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands: Background and Principles Including A Framework for Decision-making (2002), International Mire Conservation Group and International Peat Society, Helsinki. http://www.peatsociety.fi/ http://www.peatsociety.fi/
6. Costanza R., Farber S.C., and Maxwell J. Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics 1 4 (1989) 335-361
7. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., and van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics 25 1 (1997) 3-15
8. Daly H.E. Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 2 1 (1990) 1-6
9. Defra. England Rural Development Programme (2004), Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London. http://www.defra.gov.uk http://www.defra.gov.uk. 2004
10. De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., and Boumans R.M.J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41 3 (2002) 393-408
11. Farber S.C., Costanza R., and Wilson M.A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 41 3 (2002) 375-392
12. Garrod G., and Willis K.G. Economic Valuation of the Environment, Methods and Case Studies (1999), Edward Elgar, London
13. Great Fen Project, 2006. The Great Fen Project. www.greatfen.org.uk.
14. Gregory J., and Miller S. Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility (1998), Plenum, New York
15. Hamel J., Dufour S., and Fortin D. Case Study Methods (1993), Sage Publications, California
16. Hanley N., Shogren J., and White B. Introduction to Environmental Economics (2001), Oxford UP, Oxford
17. Hinterberger F., Luks F., and Schmidt-Bleele F. Material flows vs 'natural capital' what makes an economy sustainable?. Ecological Economics 23 1 (1997) 1-14
18. Miles M.B., and Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis (1994), Sage Publications, California
19. Morris J., Gowing D.J.G., Mills J., and Dunderdale J.A.L. Reconciling agricultural economic and environmental objectives: the case of recreating wetlands in the Fenland area of eastern England. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 79 (2000) 245-257
20. Mushove P., and Vogel C. Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management. Global Environment Change 15 (2004) 184-198
21. National Trust, 2004. Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, UK. http://www.wicken.org.uk.
22. Neuman W.L. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (2003), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
23. Oates R. Restoring the Fens. The Fens Floodplain Project (2002), EU LIFE Environment Project. http://www.floodplains.org/ http://www.floodplains.org/
24. OECD. Using the pressure-state-impact-response model to develop indicators of sustainability. OECD Framework for Environmental Indicators (2001), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
25. OECD. Environmental Indicators for Sustainability. Executive Summary (2001), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
26. Saaty T.L. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 32 7 (1986) 841-855
27. Schilstra A.J. How sustainable is the use of peat for commercial energy production?. Ecological Economics 39 2 (2001) 285-293
28. Tietenberg T. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 6th edition (2003), Addison-Wesley, New York
29. Turner K., Brouwer R., and Georgiou S. Ecosystem functions and the implications for economic evaluation. English Nature Research Report vol. 441 (2001), English Nature, Peterborough (now Natural England)
30. Turner R.K., Paavola J., Cooper P., Farber S., Jessamy V., and Georgiou S. Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics 46 3 (2003) 493-510
31. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2003), Sage Publications, California