The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 959-972

  Gobster, Paul H ^a   Nassauer, Joan I ^b   Daniel, Terry C ^c   Fry, Gary ^d  

^a NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Context; Ecological aesthetics; Landscape change; Landscape perception; Scenic beauty

Indexed keywords

ESTHETICS; LAND MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; PERCEPTION;

EID: 34547153722     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Daniel TC (2001a) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plann 54:267-281
2. Daniel TC (2001b) Aesthetic preferences and ecological sustainability. In: Sheppard SRJ, Harshaw HW (eds) Forests and landscapes: linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics. CABI Publishing, Oxon, pp 15-30
3. Fry G, Sarlov-Herlin I (1997) The ecological and amenity functions of woodland edges in the agricultural landscape; a basis for design and management. Landsc Urban Plann 37:45-55
4. Gobster PH (1995) Aldo Leopold's ecological esthetic: integrating esthetic and biodiversity values. J For 93:6-10
5. Gobster PH (1999) An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landsc J 18:54-64
6. Gobster PH (2001a) Foreword. In: Sheppard SRJ, Harshaw HW (eds) Forests and landscapes: linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics. CABI Publishing, Oxon, pp 21-28
7. Gobster PH (2001b) Visions of nature: conflict and compatibility in urban park restoration. Landscape Urban Plann 56:35-51
8. Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC (2005) Landscape aesthetics: what's ecology got to do with it? In: Lange E, Miller D (eds) Proceedings of our shared landscape: integrating ecological, socio-economic and aesthetic aspects in landscape planning and management. Ascona, Switzerland, May 2-May 6, 2005. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, pp 42-44
9. Hill, D., Daniel, TC (in press) Foundations for an ecological aesthetic: can information alter landscape preferences? Soc Nat Res
10. Nassauer JI (1992) The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landsc Ecol 6:239-250
11. Nassauer JI (1993) Ecological function and the perception of suburban residential landscapes. In: Gobster PH (ed) Managing urban and high use recreation settings, Gen Tech Rep NC-163, USDA Forest Service North Central For Exp Stn, St. Paul, pp 55-60
12. Nassauer JI (1995a) Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landsc J 14:161-170
13. Nassauer JI (1995b) Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 10:229-237
14. Nassauer JI (1997) Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. In: Nassauer JI (ed) Placing nature: culture and landscape ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 65-83
15. Ode ÅK, Fry G (2002) Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban For Urban Greening 1:15-24
16. Palang H, Fry G (eds) (2003) Landscape interfaces: cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Landscape Series, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
17. Parsons R, Daniel TC (2002) Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landsc Urban Plann 60:43-56
18. Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc Res 31:229-255