Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context

British Accounting Review

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 207-222

  Beck, A Cornelia ^a   Campbell, David ^b   Shrives, Philip J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Country comparison; Environmental reporting; Voluntary disclosure

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955843169     PISSN: 08908389     EISSN: 10958347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Adams C.A., Coutts A., Harte G. Corporate equal opportunities (non-) disclosure. British Accounting Review 1995, 27(2):87-108.
2. Adams C.A., Hill W., Roberts C.B. Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour?. British Accounting Review 1998, 30(1):1-21.
3. Adams C., Frost G. Accessibility and functionality of the corporate web site: implications for sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment 2006, 15(4):275-287.
4. Adams C., Kuasirikun N. A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on the ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies. European Accounting Review 2000, 9(1):53-79.
5. Aerts W. On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1994, 19(4-5):337-353.
6. Aerts W. Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2005, 30:493-517.
7. Aerts W., Cormier D., Magnan M. Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: an international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2006, 25(3):299-331.
8. Ahmad N.S., Gao S.S. Corporate environmental reporting in Libya: a study of absence. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal 2005, 25(1):11-14.
9. Beattie V., McInnes B., Fearnley S. A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum 2004, 28(3):205-239.
10. Beattie V., Thomson S.J. Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosure. Accounting Forum 2007, 31:129-163.
11. Beets S.D., Souther C.C. Corporate environmental reports: the need for standards and an environmental assurance service. Accounting Horizons 1999, 13(2):129-145.
12. Beiersdorf Annual report. At home all over the world 2002, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg.
13. Benckiser R. Annual report & accounts 2000. Over 9 millions products sold every day 2000, Reckitt Benckiser Plc, Slough.
14. Beretta S., Bozzolan S. A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting 2004, 39(3):265-288.
15. Bernard H.R., Ryan G.W. Text analysis. Qualitative and quantitative methods. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology 1998, Alta Mira Press, California. H.R.Bernard (Ed.).
16. Botosan C. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 1997, 72(3):323-349.
17. British Airways Annual report & accounts http://britishairways.com.
18. BT Annual report and form 20-F 2001 2001, BT Group Plc, London.
19. BT Delivering today. Investing for tomorrow 2004, Annual Report and Form 20-F 2004, BT Group plc, London.
20. Buhr N. Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case of acid rain and Falconbridge. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1998, 11(2):163-190.
21. Buhr N., Freedman M. Culture, institutional factors and differences in environmental disclosure between Canada and the United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2001, 21:293-322.
22. Buhr N., Reiter S. Ideology, the environment and one worldview: a discourse analysis of Noranda's environmental and sustainable development reports. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management 2006, 3:1-48.
23. Bundesumweltamt Environmental data for Germany 2007, Federal Environment Agency, Dessau-Roßlau. 2007 ed.
24. Campbell D.J. Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction. Corporate social disclosure in marks and spencer corporate reports, 1969-1997. Accounting Forum 2000, 24(1):80-100.
25. Campbell D.J. Intra- and intersectoral effects in environmental disclosures: evidence for legitimacy theory?. Business Strategy and the Environment 2003, 12(6):357-371.
26. Campbell D.J. A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies-a research note. British Accounting Review 2004, 36(1):107-117.
27. Campbell D.J., Beck A.C., Shrives P.J. A note on comparative language interrogation for content analysis: the example of English vs. German. British Accounting Review 2005, 37(4):339-350.
28. Campbell D.J., Rahman M.R.A. A longitudinal examination of intellectual capital reporting in marks & spencer annual reports, 1978-2008. British Accounting Review 2010, 42(1):56-70.
29. Cerf A.R. Corporate reporting and investment decisions 1961, University of California Press, Berkley, USA.
30. Chapman R., Milne M.J. The triple bottom line: how New Zealand companies measure up, corporate environmental strategy. International Journal for Sustainable Business 2004, 11(2):2-37.
31. Chau G.K., Gray S.J. Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting 2002, 37:247-265.
32. Clatworthy M., Jones M.J. Financial reporting of good and bad news: evidence from accounting narratives. Accounting and Business Research 2003, 33(3):171-183.
33. Clausen J. Environmental reporting and the EMAS statement in Germany. Eco-Management and Auditing 1996, 3(1):37-41.
34. Cormier D., Gordon I.M. An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2001, 14(5):587-616.
35. Cormier D., Magnan M., van Velthoven B. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: economic incentives, public pressure or institutional conditions?. European Accounting Review 2005, 14(1):3-39.
36. Coupland C. Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: currency in the banking sector?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2006, 17(7):865-881.
37. Cowen S.S., Ferreri L.B., Parker L.D. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1987, 12(2):111-122.
38. Cross T.A., Djajadikerta G.H. An examination of the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures in New Zealand and Australia: A research framework 2004, paper presented at the 3rd Australasian CSEAR conference, Macquarie University, Sydney.
39. Deegan C., Rankin M. Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1996, 9(2):50-67.
40. Deegan C., Rankin M., Tobin J. An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983 to 1997. A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):313-343.
41. Defra e-Digest. Municipal waste index, waste management statistics Available online, Accessed September 2008. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/statistics/wastats/bulletin07.htm.
42. Deutsche Post Company report 2002. Solutions tailored to our customers' needs 2002, Deutsche Post AG, Bonn.
43. Eder K. The social construction of nature 1996, Sage Publications, London.
44. E.ON Annual report 2002. Switched on 2002, E.ON AG, Düsseldorf.
45. Ernst, Ernst Social responsibility disclosure: Survey of fortune 500 annual reports 1972-1978, (later Ernst and Whinney), Ernst and Ernst, Cleveland, OH.
46. Eurostat Europe in figures. Eurostat yearbook 2005 2005, European Commission, Eurostat.
47. Freedman M., Jaggi B.B. Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting 2005, 40:215-232.
48. Frondel M., Horbach J., Rennings K. End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries 2004, Discussion Paper No. 04-82, ZEW, Mannheim.
49. Gamble G.O., Hsu K., Devaun K., Radtke R.R. Environmental disclosures in annual reports and 10Ks: an examination. Accounting Horizons 1995, 9(3):34-54.
50. Gamble G.O., Hsu K., Jackson C., Tollerson C.D. Environmental disclosures in annual reports: an international perspective. The International Journal of Accounting 1996, 31(3):293-331.
51. García-Meca E., Martínez I. Assessing the quality of disclosure on intangibles in the Spanish capital market. European Business Review 2005, 17(4):305-313.
52. GKN GKN plc annual report 2002, Engineering Superior Performance.
53. Gray R., Javad M., Power D.M., Sinclair C.D. Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 2001, 28(3&4):327-356.
54. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting - a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):47-77.
55. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Methodological themes: constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):78-101.
56. Gray S.J., Skogsvik K. Voluntary disclosures of quoted pharmaceutical companies in Sweden and the UK: the development over the period 1984-1998. European Accounting Review 2004, 23(4):787-805.
57. Gray R., Walters D., Bebbington J., Thomson I. The greening of enterprise: an exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organizational change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1995, 6:211-239.
58. GRI Sustainable reporting guidelines 2002, Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, MA.
59. Groeben N., Rustemeyer R. On the integration of qualitative and qualitative methodological paradigms (based on the example of content analysis). Trends and perspectives in empirical social research 1994, 308-326. Walter De Gruyter, Berlin/New York. I. Borg, P.P. Mohler (Eds.).
60. Guthrie J.E., Parker L.D. Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1990, 3:159-176.
61. Hackston D., Milne M.J. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosure in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1996, 9(1):77-108.
62. Halme M., Huse M. The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1997, 13(2):137-157.
63. Hammond K., Miles S. Assessing quality assessment of corporate social reporting: UK perspective. Accounting Forum 2004, 28:61-79.
64. Harte G., Owen D. Environmental disclosure in the annual reports of British companies: a research note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1991, 4(3):51-61.
65. Hasseldine J., Salama A.I., Toms J.S. Quantity versus quality: the impact of environmental disclosures on the reputations of UK Plcs. British Accounting Review 2005, 37(2):231-248.
66. Herbst T. Environmental disclosure: corporate use of the world wide web. Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business 2000, 5(2):81-90.
67. Hogner R.H. Corporate social reporting: eight decades of development at U.S. Steel. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 1982, 4:243-250.
68. Holsti O. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities 1969, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts.
69. Hossain M., Tan L.M., Adams M. Voluntary disclosure in an emerging capital market: some empirical evidence from companies listed on the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange. International Journal of Accounting 1994, 29:334-351.
70. Houldin M. External relations. Accounting for the environment 2 2001, 197-200. Sage Publications, London. R. Gray, J. Bebbington (Eds.).
71. ICAEW Financial reporting of risk - Proposals for a statement of business risk 1998, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.
72. ICAEW No surprises: The case for better risk reporting 1999, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.
73. ICAEW No surprises: Working for better risk reporting 2002, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.
74. Idowu S.O., Towler B.A. A comparative study of the contents of social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 2004, 15(4):420-437.
75. Inchausti B.G. The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. European Accounting Review 1997, 6(1):45-68.
76. Jaggi B., Zhao R. Environmental performance and reporting: perceptions of managers and accounting professionals in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Accounting 1996, 31(3):333-346.
77. James P., Prehn M., Steger U. Corporate environmental management in Britain and Germany 1997, Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society, London.
78. Jones M.J., Shoemaker P.A. Accounting narratives: a review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature 1994, 13:142-184.
79. Jordan A., Lenschow A. 'Greening' the European union: what can be learned from the 'leaders' of EU environmental policy?. European Environment 2000, 10(3):109-120.
80. KarstadtQuelle Annual report 2000 2000, KarstadtQuelle AG, Hamburg.
81. Kolk A. Evaluating corporate environmental reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment 1999, 8(4):225-237.
82. Kolk A., Walhain S., Wateringen S.v.d Environmental reporting by the fortune global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector. Business Strategy and the Environment 2001, 10(1):15-28.
83. KPMG KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005 2005, KPMG, Amsterdam. K.G.S. Services (Ed.).
84. Krippendorff K. Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology 2004, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. 2nd ed.
85. Krut R., Moretz A. The state of global environmental reporting: lessons from the Global 100. Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business 2000, 7(1):85-91.
86. Kuasirikun N., Sherer M. Corporate social accounting disclosure in Thailand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2004, 17(4):629-660.
87. Laan Smith J.v.d., Adhikari A., Tondkar R.H. Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: a stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2005, 24:123-151.
88. Laine M. Meanings of the term 'sustainable development' in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum 2005, 29(4):395-413.
89. Lang M., Lundholm R. Cross-sectional determinants of analysts ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 1993, 31(2):246-271.
90. Livesey S.M., Kearins K. Transparent and caring corporations?. Organizations & Environment 2002, 15(3):233-258.
91. Lober D.J., Bynum D., Campbell E., Jacques M. The 100 plus corporate environmental report study: a survey of an evolving environmental management tool. Business Strategy and the Environment 1997, 6:57-73.
92. Loew T., Ankele K., Braun S., Clausen J. Bedeutung der internationalen CSR-Diskussion für Nachhaltigkeits und die sich daraus ergebenden Anforderungen an Unternehmen mit Fokus Berichterstattung 2004, Future e.V. And Institut Für Ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung IÖW, Berlin/Münster.
93. Lufthansa Annual report 2002, Lufthansa AG, Frankfurt/Main.
94. Marston C.L., Shrives P.J. The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: a review article. British Accounting Review 1991, 23(3):195-210.
95. McNally G., Eng L.H., Hasseldine C.R. Corporate financial reporting in New Zealand: an analysis of user preferences, corporate characteristics and disclosure practices for discretionary information. Accounting and Business Research 1982, 11-20. Winter.
96. Merkl-Davies D., Brennan N. Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: incremental information or impression management?. Journal of Accounting Literature 2007, 26:116-194.
97. Milne M.J., Adler R.W. Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1999, 12(2):237-265.
98. Milne M.J., Tregidga H., Walton S. The triple bottom line: benchmarking New Zealand's early reporters. University of Auckland Business Review 2003, 5(2):1-14.
99. Moneva J.M., Llena F. Environmental disclosures in the annual reports of large companies in Spain. European Accounting Review 2000, 9(1):7-29.
100. National Grid Transco Annual report and accounts 2003/4. There is an art to delivering energy 2004, National Grid Transco Plc, London.
101. Ness K.E., Mirza A.M. Corporate social disclosure: a note on a test of agency theory. British Accounting Review 1991, 23(3):211-218.
102. Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell L. Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1998, 23(3):265-282.
103. Nobes C., Parker R.H. Comparative international accounting 2008, vol. 10. Prentice Hall, London.
104. O'Donovan G. Environmental disclosures in the annual report. Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):344-371.
105. O'Dwyer B., Gray R. Corporate social reporting in the republic of Ireland: a longitudinal study. Irish Accounting Review 1998, 5(2):1-34.
106. Owen D., Shaw K., Cooper S. The operating and financial review: A catalyst for improved corporate social and environmental disclosure? 2005, ACCA, London.
107. Parker L.D. Social and environmental accounting research. A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2005, 18(6):824-860.
108. Patten D.M. Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1991, 10:297-308.
109. Patten D.M., Crampton W. Legitimacy and the internet: an examination of corporate webpage environmental disclosure. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management 2004, 2:31-57.
110. Perrini F. Building a European portrait of corporate social responsibility reporting. European Management Journal 2005, 23(6):611-627.
111. Raar J. Environmental initiatives: towards triple-bottom line reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 2002, 7(3):169-183.
112. Roberts C.B. Environmental disclosures: a note on reporting practices in mainland Europe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1991, 4(3):62-71.
113. Schering Annual report 2003 2004, Schering AG, Berlin.
114. Slack N., Chambers S., Johnston R., Betts A. Operation and process management 2009, Prentice Hall, London. 2nd ed.
115. Smith M., Taffler R.J. The chairman's statement: a content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 2000, 13(5):624-646.
116. Solomon A., Lewis L. Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment 2002, 11:154-169.
117. van Staden C.J., Hooks J. A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. British Accounting Review 2007, 39(3):197-210.
118. Stanwick S.D., Stanwick P.A. A descriptive analysis of environmental disclosures: a study of the US chemical industry. Eco-Management and Auditing 1998, 5(1):22-37.
119. Steenkamp N., Northcott D. Content analysis in accounting research: the practical challenges. Australian Accounting Review 2007, 17(3):12-25.
120. SustainAbility/UNEP Tomorrow's value: The global reporters 2006 survey of corporate sustainability reporting 2006, SustainAbility Ltd, London.
121. Tilt C. The content and disclosure of Australian corporate environmental policies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2001, 14(2):190-212.
122. Titscher S., Meyer M., Wodak R., Vetter E. Methods of text and discourse analysis 2000, Sage Publications, London.
123. Toms J.S. Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: some UK evidence. British Accounting Review 2002, 34(3):257-282.
124. Tregidga H., Milne M.J. From sustainable management to sustainable development: a longitudinal analysis of leading New Zealand environmental reporters. Business Strategy and the Environment 2006, 15(4):219-241.
125. UNEP/SustainAbility Engaging stakeholders: The Benchmark survey 1996, UNEP/SustainAbility, London.
126. de Villiers C., van Staden C.J. Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2006, 31(8):763-781.
127. Unerman J. Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2000, 13(5):667-681.
128. Warsame H., Neu D., Simmons C.V. Responding to 'discrediting' events: annual report disclosure responses to environmental fines. Accounting and the Public Interest 2002, 2:22-40.
129. Wilmshurst T.D., Frost G.R. Corporate environmental reporting. A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2000, 13(1):10-26.
130. Wiseman J.W. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1982, 7(1):53-63.
131. Wurzel R. Flying to unexpected turbulence: the German EU presidency in the environmental field. German Politics 2000, 9(3):23-42.
132. Zéghal D., Ahmed S.A. Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1990, 3(1):38-53.