Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change

Ecological Economics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 690-699

  Spash, Clive L ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citizens' juries; Environmental values; Social costs and benefits; Stated preferences; Value articulating institutions

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CURRENCY DEVALUATION; ECONOMIC CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; POLITICAL ECONOMY;

DASHEEN MOSAIC VIRUS;

EID: 34447107116     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aldred J. Consumer valuation and citizen deliberation: towards a comparison. In: Getzner M., Spash L., and Stagl S. (Eds). Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (2005), Routledge, London 187-208
2. Aldred J. Incommensurability and monetary valuation. Land Economics 82 2 (2006) 141-161
3. Anderson E. Value in Ethics and Economics (1993), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
4. Arnstein A. A ladder of citizenship participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 26 4 (1969) 216-233
5. Arzt K. The challenges of stakeholder participation: agri-environmental policy. In: Getzner M., Spash C.L., and Stagl S. (Eds). Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (2005), Routledge, London 244-262
6. Beierle T.C., and Konisky D.M. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning. C, Government and Policy 19 4 (2001) 515-527
7. Blamey R.K. Citizens, consumers and contingent valuation: clarification and the expression of citizen values and issue-opinions. In: Adamowicz W.L., Boxall P., Luckert M.K., Phillips W.E., and White W.A. (Eds). Forestry, Economics and the Environment (1996), CAB International, Wallingford 103-133
8. Blamey R.K., and James R. Citizens' juries: an alternative or an input to environmental cost-benefit analysis. Australian and New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics (1999), Griffith University, Brisbane
9. Bobrow D.B., and Dryzek J.S. Policy Analysis and Design (1987), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
10. Brown T.C., Peterson G.L., and Tonn B.E. The values jury to aid natural resource decisions. Land Economics 71 2 (1995) 250-260
11. Burgess J., Limb M., and Harrison C.M. Exploring environmental values through the medium of small-groups. 1. Theory and practice. Environment and Planning A 20 3 (1988) 309-326
12. Burgess J., Limb M., and Harrison C.M. Exploring environmental values through the medium of small-groups. 2. Illustrations of a group at work. Environment and Planning A 20 4 (1988) 457-476
13. Crosby N. Citizens juries: one solution for difficult environmental questions. In: Renn O., Webler T., and Wiedemann P. (Eds). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse vol. 8 (1995), Kluwer, Dordecht 157-174
14. Funtowicz S.O., and Ravetz J.R. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
15. Funtowicz S.O., and Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 7 (1993) 739-755
16. Gintis H. Game Theory Evolving (2000), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
17. Gowdy J.M. The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation and policy. Land Economics 80 2 (2004) 239-257
18. Gregory R., and Wellman K. Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study. Ecological Economics 39 1 (2001) 37-52
19. In: Hausman J.A. (Ed). Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment (1993), North-Holland, Amsterdam
20. Holland A. The foundations of environmental decision-making. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 7 4 (1997) 483-496
21. Howarth R.B., and Wilson M.A. A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: aggregation by mutual consent. Land Economics 82 1 (2006) 1-16
22. Jacobs M. Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions. In: Foster J. (Ed). Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment (1997), Routledge, London 211-231
23. James R.F., and Blamey R.K. Deliberation and economic valuation: National Park Management. In: Getzner M., Stagl S., and Spash C. (Eds). Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (2005), Routledge, London 225-243
24. Joss S. Danish consensus conferences as a model of participatory technology assessment. Science and Public Policy 25 1 (1998) 2-22
25. In: Kagel J.H., and Roth A.E. (Eds). Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
26. Kahneman D., and Sugden R. Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental & Resource Economics 32 1 (2005) 161-181
27. Kahneman D., Ritov I., Jacowitz K.E., and Grant P. Stated willingness to pay for public goods: a psychological perspective. Psychological Science 4 5 (1993) 310-315
28. Kahneman D., Ritov I., and Schkade D. Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: an analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19 1-3 (1999) 203-235
29. Kallis G., Videira N., Antunes P., Guimarães Pereira Â., Spash C.L., Coccossis H., Corral Quintana S., del Moral L., Hatzilacou D., Lobo G., Mexa A., Paneque P., Pedregal B., and Santos R. Participatory methods for water resource planning. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy 24 2 (2006) 215-234
30. Knetsch J.L. Environmental valuation: some problems of wrong questions and misleading answers. Environmental Values 3 4 (1994) 351-368
31. Knetsch J.L. Gains, losses, and the US EPA economic analyses guidelines: a hazardous product?. Environmental & Resource Economics 32 1 (2005) 91-112
32. Lienhoop N., and MacMillan D.C. Valuing a complex environmental change: assessing participant performance in deliberative group-based approaches and in-person interviews for contingent valuation. Environmental Values 16 2 (2007) (May)
33. Macmillan D.C., Philip L., Hanley N., and Alvarez-Farizo B. Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches. Ecological Economics 43 1 (2002) 49-59
34. Macmillan D.C., Hanley N., and Lienhoop N. Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preference engine?. Ecological Economics 60 1 (2006) 299-307
35. Martinez-Alier J., Munda G., and O'Neill J. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 26 3 (1998) 277-286
36. Niemeyer S. Deliberation in the wilderness: displacing symbolic politics. Environmental Politics 13 2 (2004) 347-372
37. Niemeyer S. Preference transformation through deliberation: protecting world heritage. In: Getzner M., Spash C.L., and Stagl S. (Eds). Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (2005), Routledge, London 263-289
38. Niemeyer S., and Spash C.L. Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation and their pragmatic syntheses: a critical appraisal. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy 19 4 (2001) 567-586
39. O'Connor M., Funtowicz S., Aguiler-Klink F., Spash C.L., and Holland A. Valuation for Sustainable Environments: The VALSE Project Full Final Report vol. 395 (1998), European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra
40. O'Neill J. Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-being and the Natural World (1993), Routledge, London
41. O'Neill J. The Market: ethics, knowledge & politics (1998), Routledge, London
42. O'Neill J. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy 9 4 (2001) 483-500
43. O'Neill J., and Spash C.L. Comparing institutional processes for environmental valuation: citizen's juries and contingent valuation. ESRC/Foresight Programme Workshop Strengthening Decision-Making for Sustainable Development (1998), Oxfordshire, Eynsham Hall
44. Pelletier D., Kraak V., McCullum C., Uusitalo U., and Rich R. The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: an empirical study from New York's North Country. Policy Sciences 32 2 (1999) 103-131
45. In: Renn O., Webler T., and Wiedemann P. (Eds). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Technology, Risk, and Society: An International Series in Risk Analysis (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
46. Rockloff S.F., and Lockie S. Democratization of coastal zone decision making for indigenous Australians: insights from stakeholder analysis. Coastal Management 34 3 (2006) 251-266
47. Sagoff M. The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
48. Sagoff M. Some problems with environmental economics. Environmental Ethics 10 (1988) 55-74 (Spring)
49. Sagoff M. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecological Economics 24 2-3 (1998) 213-230
50. Sen A.K. On Ethics and Economics (1987), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England
51. Smith V.L. Papers in Experimental Economics (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
52. Soma K. Natura economica in environmental valuation. Environmental Values 15 1 (2006) 31-50
53. Spash C.L. Ethical motives and charitable contributions in contingent valuation: empirical evidence from social psychology and economics. Environmental Values 9 4 (2000) 453-479
54. Spash C.L. Multiple value expression in contingent valuation: economics and ethics. Environmental Science & Technology 34 8 (2000) 1433-1438
55. Spash C.L. Broadening democracy in environmental policy processes. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy 19 4 (2001) 475-482
56. Spash C.L. Deliberative monetary valuation. 5th Nordic Environmental Research Conference (2001), Denmark, University of Aarhus
57. Spash C.L. Greenhouse Economics: value and ethics (2002), Routledge, London
58. Spash C.L. Non-economic motivation for contingent values: rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Economics 82 4 (2006) 602-622
59. Spash C.L. Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV) in Practice. Socio-Economics and Environment in Discussion (SEED). Working Paper Series No. 4 (2007), CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
60. Spash C.L., and Vatn A. Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60 (2006) 379-388
61. Spash C.L., Stagl S., and Getzner M. Exploring alternatives for environmental valuation. In: Getzner M., Spash C.L., and Stagl S. (Eds). Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (2005), Routledge, London
62. Stagl S. Emerging methods for sustainability valuation and appraisal (2007), Sustainable Development Research Network, London 66
63. Stewart D.W., and Shamdasani P.N. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice (1990), Sage, Thousand Oaks, London
64. Trainor S.F. Realms of value: conflicting natural resource values and incommensurability. Environmental Values 15 1 (2006) 3-29
65. Vatn A. The environment as commodity. Environmental Values 9 4 (2000) 493-509
66. Vatn A. Environmental valuation and rationality. Land Economics 80 1 (2004) 1-18
67. Vatn A. Institutions and the Environment (2005), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
68. Ward H. Citizens' juries and valuing the environment: a proposal. Environmental Politics 8 2 (1999) 75-96
69. Wilson M.A., and Howarth R.B. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics 41 3 (2002) 431-443