Onset rivalry: factors that succeed and fail to bias selection

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 520-535

  Attarha, Mouna ^a   Moore, Cathleen M ^a  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

Initial dominance; Motion; Onset binocular rivalry; Prediction; Rivalry entrainment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SEMANTICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925491874     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0793-1     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Abe, S., Kimura, E., & Goryo, K. (2011). Eye- and feature-based modulation of onset rivalry caused by the preceding stimulus. Journal of Vision, 11(13), 1–18. doi:10.1167/11.13.6
2. Alink, A., Schwiedrzik, C. M., Kohler, A., Singer, W., & Muckli, L. (2010). Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(8), 2960–2966. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 3730-10.2010
3. Anderson, E., Siegel, E. H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). The visual impact of gossip. Science (New York, N.Y.), 332(6036), 1446–1448. doi:10.1126/science.1201574
4. Blake, R., Brascamp, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2014). Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 369(1641), 20130211–20130211. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038
5. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(1), 13–21. doi:10.1038/nrn701
6. Blake, R., Yang, Y., & Westendorf, D. (1991). Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 32(10), 2821–2825.
7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
8. Breese, B. B. (1909). Binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 16(6), 410.
9. Carter, O., & Cavanagh, P. (2007). Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE, 2(4), e343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000343
10. Chong, S. C., & Blake, R. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46(11), 1794–1803. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.031
11. Chopin, A., & Mamassian, P. (2010). Task usefulness affects perception of Rivalrous images. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1886–1893. doi:10.1177/0956797610389190
12. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 119–126. doi:10.1038/nn0203-119
13. Crovitz, H. F., & Lipscomb, D. B. (1963). Dominance of the temporal visual fields at a short duration of stimulation. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 631–637.
14. de Jong, M. C., Kourtzi, Z., & van Ee, R. (2012a). Perceptual experience modulates cortical circuits involved in visual awareness. European Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 3718–3731. doi:10.1111/ejn.12005
15. de Jong, M. C., Knapen, T., & van Ee, R. (2012b). Opposite influence of perceptual memory on initial and prolonged perception of sensory ambiguity. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e30595. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030595.g006
16. Denison, R. N., Piazza, E. A., & Silver, M. A. (2011). Predictive context influences perceptual selection during binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 166. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00166
17. Denison, R. N., & Silver, M. A. (2012). Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 246–259. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00121
18. den Ouden, H. E. M., Kok, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2012). How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00548
19. Dolan, R. J., Fink, G. R., Rolls, E., Booth, M., Holmes, A., Frackowiak, R. S., & Friston, K. J. (1997). How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature, 389(6651), 596–599. doi:10.1038/39309
20. Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(293), 52–64. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090
21. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162–169. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002
22. Esterman, M., & Yantis, S. (2010). Perceptual expectation evokes category-selective cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 20(5), 1245–1253. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp188
23. Fahle, M. (1982). Cooperation between different spatial frequencies in binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 44, 27–29.
24. Fox, R., & Herrmann, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 432–436.
25. Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
26. Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 453–463. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029
27. Georgeson, M. A., & Meese, T. S. (1997). Perception of stationary plaids: The role of spatial filters in edge analysis. Vision Research, 37(23), 3255–3271.
28. Gray, K. L. H., Adams, W. J., & Garner, M. (2009). The influence of anxiety on the initial selection of emotional faces presented in binocular rivalry. Cognition, 113, 105–110.
29. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438(7067), 496–499. doi:10.1038/nature04169
30. Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A., & Friston, K. (2008). Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition, 108(3), 687–701. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010
31. Joassin, F., Maurage, P., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., & Campanella, S. (2004). When audition alters vision: An event-related potential study of the cross-modal interactions between faces and voices. Neuroscience Letters, 369(2), 132–137. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.067
32. Kalisvaart, J. P., Rampersad, S. M., & Goossens, J. (2011). Binocular onset rivalry at the time of saccades and stimulus jumps. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020017.t002
33. Kaplan, I. T., & Metlay, W. (1964). Light intensity and binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 22–26.
34. Kim, Y.-J., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2006). Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46(3), 392–406. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.009
35. Kovács, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Fehér, A. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(26), 15508–15511.
36. Leat, S. J., & Woodhouse, J. M. (1984). Rivalry with continuous and flashed stimuli as a measure of ocular dominance across the visual field. Perception, 13, 351–357.
37. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39(8), 1447–1454.
38. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2005). Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 8(1), 22–23. doi:10.1038/nn1365
39. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys’ percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379(6565), 549–553. doi:10.1038/379549a0
40. Lee, T. S., & Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 20(7), 1434–1448.
41. Levelt, W. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
42. Levelt, W. J. (1967). Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 143–145.
43. Lin, Z., & He, S. (2009). Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Progress in Neurobiology, 87(4), 195–211. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.002
44. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1801–1818. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0333
45. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science (New York, N.Y.), 245(4919), 761–763.
46. LoSciuto, L. A., & Hartley, E. L. (1963). Religious affiliation and open-mindedness in binocular resolution. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 427–430.
47. Lumer, E. D., Friston, K., & Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science, 280, 1930–1934.
48. Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., & Tsuchiya, N. (2012). Introduction to research topic - binocular rivalry: A gateway to studying consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–3. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263/full
49. Melloni, L., Schwiedrzik, C. M., Müller, N., Rodriguez, E., & Singer, W. (2011). Expectations change the signatures and timing of electrophysiological correlates of perceptual awareness. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(4), 1386–1396. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 4570-10.2011
50. Mitchell, J. F., Stoner, G. R., & Reynolds, J. H. (2004). Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature, 429(6990), 410–413. doi:10.1038/nature02554
51. Mudrik, L., Deouell, L. Y., & Lamy, D. (2011). Scene congruency biases Binocular Rivalry. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 756–767. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.001
52. Mueller, T. J., & Blake, R. (1989). A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 61(3), 223–232.
53. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1999). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. Perception, 28(5), 551–574. doi:10.1068/p2923
55. O'Shea, R. P., Kornmeier, J., & Roeber, U. (2013). Predicting visual consciousness electrophysiologically from intermittent binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e76134. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076134.s005
56. O’Shea, R. P., Parker, A., La Rooy, D., & Alais, D. (2009). Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: Evidence for common processes. Vision Research, 49(7), 671–681. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.020
57. Paffen, C. L. E., & Alais, D. (2011). Attentional modulation of binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 105. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00105
58. Pastukhov, A., & Braun, J. (2011). Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception. Journal of Vision, 11(10), 1–10. doi:10.1167/11.10.12
59. Pearson, J., & Brascamp, J. (2008). Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 334–341. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.006
60. Pelekanos, V., Roumani, D., & Moutoussis, K. (2011). The effects of categorical and linguistic adaptation on binocular rivalry initial dominance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 187. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00187
61. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
62. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., & Heeger, D. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153–1159.
63. Rao, R. P., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79–87. doi:10.1038/4580
64. Roumani, D., & Moutoussis, K. (2012). Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 35. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00035
65. Sheth, B. R., & Pham, T. (2008). Vision research. Vision Research, 48(23–24), 2415–2424. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.013
66. Šidák, Z. K. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 626–633. doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935
67. Sillito, A. M., Jones, H. E., Gerstein, G. L., & West, D. C. (1994). Feature-linked synchronization of thalamic relay cell firing induced by feedback from the visual cortex. Nature, 369(6480), 479–482. doi:10.1038/369479a0
68. Song, C., & Yao, H. (2009). Duality in binocular rivalry: Distinct sensitivity of percept sequence and percept duration to imbalance between monocular stimuli. PLoS ONE, 4(9), e6912. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006912
69. Stanley, J., Forte, J. D., Cavanagh, P., & Carter, O. (2011). Onset rivalry: The initial dominance phase is independent of ongoing perceptual alternations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00140/abstract
70. Stefanics, G., & Czigler, I. (2012). Automatic prediction error responses to hands with unexpected laterality: An electrophysiological study. NeuroImage, 63(1), 253–261. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.068
71. Stefanics, G., Kremlacek, J., & Czigler, I. (2014). Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, B, 1-19. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00666/abstract
72. Summerfield, C., & Koechlin, E. (2008). A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. Neuron, 59(2), 336–347. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.021
73. Thesen, T., Vibell, J. F., Calvert, G. A., & Sterbauer, R. A. (2004). Neuroimaging of multisensory processing in vision, audition, touch, and olfaction. Cognitive Processing, 5(2), 84–93. doi:10.1007/s10339-004-0012-4
74. Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411(6834), 195–199. doi:10.1038/35075583
75. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 502–511. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003
76. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753–759.
77. Tononi, G., Srinivvasan, R., Russell, D. P., & Edelman, G. M. (1998). Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(3198), 3203.
78. van Ee, R. (2009). Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: Evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 26, 2612–2622.
79. Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houdé, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1414–1432. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002
80. Wacongne, C., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(11), 3665–3678. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 5003-11.2012
81. Walker, P. (1978). Binocular rivalry: Central or peripheral selective processes? Psychological Bulletin, 85, 376–389.
82. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision—part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 128, 371–394.
83. Wilson, H. R., Blake, R., & Lee, S. H. (2001). Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature, 412(6850), 907–910. doi:10.1038/35091066
84. Wolf, M., & Hochstein, S. (2011). High-level binocular rivalry effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00129/abstract
85. Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception, 12(4), 447–456.
86. Yu, K., & Blake, R. (1992). Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1158–1173.