Predictive context influences perceptual selection during binocular rivalry

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue NOVEMBER, 2011, Pages

  Denison, Rachel N ^a   Piazza, Elise A ^b   Silver, Michael A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambiguous stimuli; Expectation; Multistable perception; Prediction; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION SELECTION; PREDICTION; RESPONSE TIME; RETINA RIVALRY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 84933672557     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00166     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alink, A., Schwiedrzik, C.M., Kohler, A., Singer, W., and Muckli, L. (2010). Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 2960-2966.
2. Baker, D., and Graf, E. (2009). Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
3. Blake, R., and Logothetis, N.K. (2002). Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 13-21.
4. Blake, R., and Overton, R. (1979). The site of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception 8, 143-152.
5. Blakemore, C., and Nachmias, J. (1971). The orientation specificity of two visual after-effects. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 213, 157-174.
6. Brainard, D.H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433-436.
7. Brascamp, J.W., Knapen, T.H.J., Kanai, R., Van Ee, R., and Van Den Berg, A.V. (2007). Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. J. Vis. 7(12):12, 1-12.
8. Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Res. 51, 1484-1525.
9. Chong, S.C., and Blake, R. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 46, 1794-1803.
10. Dayan, P. (1998). A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Comput. 10, 1119-1135.
11. Doherty, J.R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M.M., and Nobre, A.C. (2005). Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. J. Neurosci. 25, 8259-8266.
12. Dolan, R.J., Fink, G.R., Rolls, E., Booth, M., Holmes, A., Frackowiak, R.S., and Friston, K.J. (1997). How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature 389, 596-599.
13. Eger, E., Henson, R.N., Driver, J., and Dolan, R.J. (2007). Mechanisms of top-down facilitation in perception of visual objects studied by fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 17, 2123-2133.
14. Engel, E. (1956). The role content in binocular resolution. Am. J. Psychol. 69, 87-91.
15. Esterman, M., and Yantis, S. (2010). Perceptual expectation evokes category-selective cortical activity. Cereb. Cortex 20, 1245-1253.
16. Freyd, J.J., and Finke, R.A. (1984). Facilitation of length discrimination using real and imaged context frames. Am. J. Psychol. 97, 323-341.
17. Freyd, J.J., and Johnson, J.Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 13, 259-268.
18. Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 815-836.
19. Friston, K., and Kiebel, S. (2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1211-1221.
20. Garrido, M.I., Kilner, J.M., Stephan, K.E., and Friston, K.J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 453-463.
21. Gershman, S., Vul, E., and Tenenbaum, J. (2009). Perceptual multistability as Markov chain Monte Carlo inference. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 22, 611-619.
22. Gregory, R.L. (1997). Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 352, 1121-1127.
23. Haijiang, Q., Saunders, J.A., Stone, R.W., and Backus, B.T. (2006). Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 483-488.
24. Hancock, S., and Andrews, T.J. (2007). The role of voluntary and involuntary attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception 36, 288-298.
25. Haynes, J.-D., Deichmann, R., and Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438, 496-499.
26. Helmholtz, H. von (1866). Treatise on Physiological Optics, Vol. 3. (J.P. Southall, Ed.) New York: Dover. (English translation, 1924)
27. Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A., and Friston, K. (2008). Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: an epistemological review. Cognition 108, 687-701.
28. Hubbard, T.L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 822-851.
29. James, T.W., Humphrey, G.K., Gati, J.S., Menon, R.S., and Goodale, M.A. (2000). The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition. Curr. Biol. 10, 1017-1024.
30. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., and Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 271-304.
31. Knill, D.C., and Pouget, A. (2004). The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci. 27, 712-719.
32. Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A.S., and Bar, M. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain Cogn. 65, 145-168.
33. Lee, S.H., and Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 39, 1447-1454.
34. Lee, S.H., and Blake, R. (2002). V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry. J. Vis. 2, 618-626.
35. Lee, S.H., Blake, R., and Heeger, D.J. (2005). Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 22-23.
36. Lehky, S.R., and Maunsell, J.H. (1996). No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Res. 36, 1225-1234.
37. Leopold, D.A., and Logothetis, N.K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379, 549-553.
38. Leopold, D.A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., and Logothetis, N.K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 605-609.
39. Liebert, R.M., and Burk, B. (1985). Voluntary control of reversible figures. Percept. Motor Skills 61, 1307-1310.
40. Logothetis, N.K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453, 869-878.
41. Logothetis, N.K., Leopold, D.A., and Sheinberg, D.L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621-624.
42. Logothetis, N.K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., and Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412, 150-157.
43. Logothetis, N.K., and Schall, J.D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245, 761-763.
44. Maloney, L.T., Dal Martello, M.F., Sahm, C., and Spillmann, L. (2005). Past trials influence perception of ambiguous motion quartets through pattern completion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3164-3169.
45. Melloni, L., Schwiedrzik, C.M., Müller, N., Rodriguez, E., and Singer, W. (2011). Expectations change the signatures and timing of electrophysiological correlates of perceptual awareness. J. Neurosci. 31, 1386-1396.
46. Meng, M., and Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. J. Vis. 4, 539-551.
47. Mitchell, J.F., Stoner, G.R., and Reynolds, J.H. (2004). Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 429, 410-413.
48. Moreno-Bote, R., Knill, D.C., and Pouget, A. (2011). Bayesian sampling in visual perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12491-12496.
49. Mumford, D. (1992). On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biol. Cybern. 66, 241-251.
50. Murray, S.O., Kersten, D., Olshausen, B.A., Schrater, P., and Woods, D.L. (2002). Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15164-15169.
51. Ooi, T.L., and He, Z.J. (1999). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention. Perception 28, 551-574.
52. Ozkan, K., and Braunstein, M.L. (2009). Predominance of ground over ceiling surfaces in binocular rivalry. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 1305-1312.
53. Pearson, J., and Brascamp, J. (2008). Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 334-341.
54. Pearson, J., Clifford, C.W., and Tong, F. (2008). The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Curr. Biol. 18, 982-986.
55. Pelli, D.G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437-442.
56. Perrett, D.I., Xiao, D., Barraclough, N.E., Keysers, C., and Oram, M.W. (2009). Seeing the future: Natural image sequences produce "anticipatory" neuronal activity and bias perceptual report. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 2081-2104.
57. Peterson, M.A. (1986). Illusory concomitant motion in ambiguous stereograms: evidence for nonstimulus contributions to perceptual organization. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 12, 50-60.
58. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., and Heeger, D.J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1153-1159.
59. Rao, R.P., and Ballard, D.H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 79-87.
60. Roach, N.W., Mcgraw, P.V., and Johnston, A. (2011). Visual motion induces a forward prediction of spatial pattern. Curr. Biol. 21, 740-745.
61. Schrater, P.R., and Sundareswara, R. (2007). Theory and dynamics of perceptual bistability. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 19, 1217-1224.
62. Sekuler, R., and Ball, K. (1977). Mental set alters visibility of moving targets. Science 198, 60-62.
63. Sheinberg, D.L., and Logothetis, N.K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3408-3413.
64. Shimono, M., Kitajo, K., and Takeda, T. (2011). Neural processes for intentional control of perceptual switching: a magnetoencephalography study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32, 397-412.
65. Spratling, M.W. (2008). Predictive coding as a model of biased competition in visual attention. Vision Res. 48, 1391-1408.
66. Spratling, M.W. (2010). Predictive coding as a model of response properties in cortical area V1. J. Neurosci. 30, 3531-3543.
67. Sterzer, P., Frith, C., and Petrovic, P. (2008). Believing is seeing: expectations alter visual awareness. Curr. Biol. 18, R697-698.
68. Summerfield, C., and Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 403-409.
69. Summerfield, C., Egner, T., Greene, M., Koechlin, E., Mangels, J., and Hirsch, J. (2006). Predictive codes for forthcoming perception in the frontal cortex. Science 314, 1311-1314.
70. Summerfield, C., and Koechlin, E. (2008). A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. Neuron 59, 336-347.
71. Sundareswara, R., and Schrater, P.R. (2008). Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions. J. Vis. 8(5):12, 1-19.
72. Tong, F., and Engel, S.A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411, 195-199.
73. Tong, F., Meng, M., and Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 502-511.
74. Toppino, T.C. (2003). Reversible-figure perception: mechanisms of intentional control. Percept. Psychophys. 65, 1285-1295.
75. Watamaniuk, S.N., and Mckee, S.P. (1995). Seeing motion behind occluders. Nature 377, 729-730.
76. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E.P., and Adelson, E.H. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 598-604.
77. Wilke, M., Logothetis, N.K., and Leopold, D.A. (2006). Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17507-17512.
78. Wilke, M., Mueller, K.-M., and Leopold, D.A. (2009). Neural activity in the visual thalamus reflects perceptual suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9465-9470.
79. Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K.A., and Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1595-1602.
80. Zhou, G., Zhang, L., Liu, J., Yang, J., and Qu, Z. (2010). Specificity of face processing without awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 408-412.