Eye- and feature-based modulation of onset rivalry caused by the preceding stimulus

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 13, 2011, Pages

  Abe, Satoru ^a,b   Kimura, Eiji ^a   Kyoto, Ken Goryo ^c  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c KYOTO WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Binocular rivalry; Flash suppression; Onset rivalry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ATTENTION; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 81555214656     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.13.6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abe, S., Kimura, E., & Goryo, K. (2007). Perceptual misbinding of pattern and color revealed by visibility modulation of rivalrous stimuli. Perception, 36, 67.
2. Alais, D., Cass, J., O'Shea, R. P., & Blake, R. (2010). Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness. Current Biology, 20, 1362-1367.
3. Alais, D., & Melcher, D. (2007). Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research, 47, 269-279.
4. Baker, D. H., & Graf, E. W. (2009). On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 49, 451-459.
5. Bartels, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2010). Binocular rivalry: A time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. Journal of Vision, 10(12):3, 1-14, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/12/3, doi:10.1167/10.12.3.
6. Blake, R. (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain and Mind, 2, 5-38.
7. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 1-11.
8. Blake, R., Westendorf, D., & Fox, R. (1990). Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 593-602.
9. Blake, R., Yang, Y., & Westendorf, D. (1991). Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 32, 2821-2825.
10. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
11. Brascamp, J. W., Knapen, T. H. J., Kanai, R., van Ee, R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2007). Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 7(12):12, 1-12, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/12/12, doi:10.1167/7.12.12.
12. Carlson, T. A., & He, S. (2004). Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron, 43, 907-914.
13. Carter, O., & Cavanagh, P. (2007). Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE, 2, e343.
14. Chong, S. C., & Blake, R. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 1794-1803.
15. Derrington, A. M., Krauskopf, J., & Lennie, P. (1984). Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. Journal of Physiology, 357, 241-265.
16. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412-4420.
17. He, S., Carlson, T., & Chen, X. (2005). Parallel pathways and temporal dynamics in binocular rivalry. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry (pp. 81-100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Holmes, D. J., Hancock, S., & Andrews, T. J. (2006). Independent binocular integration for form and colour. Vision Research, 46, 665-677.
19. Hong, S. W., & Shevell, S. K. (2006). Resolution of binocular rivalry: Perceptual misbinding of color. Visual Neuroscience, 23, 561-566.
20. Ikeda, K., & Morotomi, T. (2000). Feature-specific priming effects upon short duration binocular rivalry. 123-134.
21. Ikeda, K., & Morotomi, T. (2002). Color-specific filtering of rival binocular inputs induced by priming. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 57-65.
22. Kamphuisen, A. P., van Wezel, R. J. A., & van Ee, R. (2007). Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 1142-1144.
23. Kang, M. S., & Blake, R. (2010). What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 179-186.
24. Keliris, G. A., Logothetis, N. K., & Tolias, A. S. (2010). The role of the primary visual cortex in perceptual suppression of salient visual stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12353-12365.
25. Kreiman, G., Fried, I., & Koch, C. (2005). Responses of single neurons in the human brain during flash suppression. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry (pp. 213-230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Laing, C. R., & Chow, C. C. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 12, 39-53.
27. Lehky, S. R. (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception, 17, 215-228.
28. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
29. Leopold, D. A., Maier, A., Wilke, M., & Logothetis, N. (2005). Binocular rivalry and the illusion of monocular vision. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry (pp. 231-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Levelt, W. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
31. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 353, 1801-1818.
32. Macknik, S. L., & Livingstone, M. S. (1998). Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 144-149.
33. Macknik, S. L., & Martinez-Conde, S. (2004). Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: Implications for binocular vision and visual awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1049-1059.
34. Macknik, S. L., & Martinez-Conde, S. (2007). The role of feedback in visual masking and visual processing. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 125-152.
35. Macknik, S. L., Martinez-Conde, S., & Haglund, M. M. (2000). The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 7556-7560.
36. Mitchell, J. F., Stoner, G. R., & Reynolds, J. H. (2004). Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature, 429, 410-413.
37. Ooi, T. L., & Loop, M. S. (1994). Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity. Vision Research, 34, 2997-3003.
38. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
39. Sheth, B. R., & Pham, T. (2008). How emotional arousal and valence influence access to awareness. Vision Research, 48, 2415-2424.
40. Song, C., & Yao, H. (2009). Duality in binocular rivalry: Distinct sensitivity of percept sequence and percept duration to imbalance between monocular stimuli. PLoS ONE, 4, e6912.
41. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
42. Tsuchiya, N., Koch, C., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2006). Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(10):6, 1068-1078, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/10/6, doi:10.1167/6.10.6.
43. van Boxtel, J. J. A., van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (2007). Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. Journal of Vision, 7(14):3, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/14/3, doi:10.1167/7.14.3.
44. Walker, P., & Powell, D. J. (1979). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. Vision Research, 19, 247-249.
45. Watson, T. L., Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2004). Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 14, 1670-1674.
46. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499-14503.
47. Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception, 12, 447-456.
48. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478.