Binocular onset rivalry at the time of saccades and stimulus jumps

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Kalisvaart, Joke P ^a   Rampersad, Sumientra M ^a   Goossens, Jeroen ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; RETINA IMAGE; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SACCADES; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 79958809221     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020017     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Blake R, (2001) A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. Brain and Mind 2: 5-38 Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017925416289.
2. Blake R, (2005) Landmarks in the History of Binocular Rivalry. In: Alais D, Blake R, editors. Binocular Rivalry and Perceptual Ambiguity Cambridge, MA MIT Press pp. 1-28.
3. Blake R, Logothetis NK, (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 13-21 Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1701.
4. Tong F, Meng M, Blake R, (2006) Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 502-511 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16997612.
5. Leopold DA, Wilke M, Maier A, Logothetis NK, (2002) Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 5: 605-609 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11992115.
6. Chen X, He S, (2004) Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Current Biology: CB 14: 1013-1017 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15182676.
7. Kanai R, Knapen THJ, van Ee R, Verstraten FAJ, (2007) Disruption of implicit perceptual memory by intervening neutral stimuli. Vision Research 47: 2675-2683 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697690.
8. Maier A, Wilke M, Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, (2003) Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Current Biology: CB 13: 1076-1085 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12842006.
9. Pearson J, Clifford CGW, (2004) Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. Journal of Vision 4: 196-202 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15086309.
10. Noest AJ, van Ee R, Nijs MM, van Wezel RJA, (2007) Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. Journal of Vision 7: 10 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17685817.
11. Mamassian P, Goutcher R, (2005) Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5: 361-375 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15929658.
12. Chong SC, Blake R, (2006) Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46: 1794-1803 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16368126.
13. Carter O, Cavanagh P, (2007) Onset rivalry: brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE 2: e343 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17406667.
14. Klink PC, van Ee R, Nijs MM, Brouwer GJ, Noest AJ, et al. (2008) Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. Journal of Vision 8: 16.11-18 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842087.
15. Blake R, Sobel KV, Gilroy LA, (2003) Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron 39: 869-878 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12948452.
16. Melcher D, (2005) Spatiotopic transfer of visual-form adaptation across saccadic eye movements. Current Biology: CB 15: 1745-1748 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16213821.
17. van Boxtel JJ, Alais D, van Ee R, (2008) Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. J Vis 8: 17 11-10.
18. Nishida S, Motoyoshi I, Andersen RA, Shimojo S, (2003) Gaze modulation of visual aftereffects. Vision Res 43: 639-649.
19. Ross J, Ma-Wyatt A, (2004) Saccades actively maintain perceptual continuity. Nature Neuroscience 7: 65-69 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14661023.
20. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
21. Pelli DG, (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442.
22. Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N, (1998) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21: 753-759.
23. Collewijn H, van der Mark F, Jansen TC, (1975) Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Res 15: 447-450.
24. Long GM, Toppino TC, (2004) Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin 130: 748-768 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367079.
25. Robboy MW, Cox IG, Erickson P, (1990) Effects of sighting and sensory dominance on monovision high and low contrast visual acuity. Clao J 16: 299-301.
26. Ooi TL, He ZJ, (2001) Sensory eye dominance. Optometry 72: 168-178.
27. Chen X, He S, (2003) Temporal characteristics of binocular rivalry: visual field asymmetries. Vision Research 43: 2207-2212 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12885375.
28. Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, Niida T, Shoji N, et al. (2004) Effects of dominant and nondominant eyes in binocular rivalry. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry 81: 377-383 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15181364.
29. Fahle M, (1987) Naso-temporal asymmetry of binocular inhibition. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 28: 1016-1017 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3583626.
30. Fahle M, Schmid M, (1988) Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex. Vision Research 28: 293-300 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3414016.
31. Curcio CA, Sloan KR Jr, Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Kalina RE, (1987) Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236: 579-582.
32. Rovamo J, Virsu V, (1979) An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp Brain Res 37: 495-510.
33. Ooi TL, He ZJ, (2006) Binocular rivalry and surface-boundary processing. Perception 35: 581-603 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16836052.
34. Scotto MA, Oliva GA, Tuccio MT, (1990) Eye movements and reversal rates of ambiguous patterns. Percept Mot Skills 70: 1059-1073.
35. Toppino TC, (2003) Reversible-figure perception: mechanisms of intentional control. Perception & Psychophysics 65: 1285-1295 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14710962.
36. van Dam LCJ, van Ee R, (2006) The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46: 787-799 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309727.
37. van Dam LCJ, van Ee R, (2006) Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 6: 1172-1179 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17209727.
38. Kanai R, Moradi F, Shimojo S, Verstraten FAJ, (2005) Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception 34: 803-822 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16124267.
39. Burr DC, Morrone MC, Ross J, (1994) Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature 371: 511-513 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7935763.
40. Deubel H, Schneider WX, (1996) Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 36: 1827-1837 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8759451.
41. Kowler E, Anderson E, Dosher B, Blaser E, (1995) The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research 35: 1897-1916 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7660596.
42. Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME, (1992) The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science (New York, NY) 255: 90-92 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1553535.
43. Umeno MM, Goldberg ME, (1997) Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses. Journal of Neurophysiology 78: 1373-1383 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9310428.
44. Nakamura K, Colby CL, (2002) Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 4026-4031 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11904446.
45. Ross J, Morrone MC, Goldberg ME, Burr DC, (2001) Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends in Neurosciences 24: 113-121 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11164942.
46. Davis ET, Palmer J, (2004) Visual search and attention: an overview. Spatial Vision 17: 249-255 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15559104.
47. Viviani P, (1990) Eye movements in visual search: cognitive, perceptual and motor control aspects. Reviews of Oculomotor Research 4: 353-393 Available:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7492533.